website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Winter Olympic Games Beijing 2022 Olympic Sports Programme


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, vinipereira said:

 

I'm not 100% behind IOC changes either (those mixed events are mostly unnecessary and will only be good for the top nations anyway), but at least they're trying to add new things (and nothing extremely radical like what happens on YOG). For some opinions here, it looks like 3 or 4 more women's events will completely ruin the Winter Olympics :p

 

 

The problem is that every mixed event any random person throws at them as suggestion seems to be added, while actual new sports (telemark skiing, natural track luge) don't make it. They are doing rather radical stuff for the Summer Olympics by the way, with 100% judge sports like surfing or skateboarding, or a non-existing climbing event as the only climbing event.

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/11/#findComment-151924
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Nate River said:

New events:

Women’s Monobob

Mixed Short Track Speed Skating Relay

Mixed Ski Jumping Team Event

Men’s and women’s Ski Big Air

Mixed Team Aerials

Mixed Team Snowboardcross

 

Quota changes:

Biathlon: -20

Bobsleigh: -12 men, +12 women

Curling: +4 (2 added mixed doubles teams)

Ice Hockey: +46 (2 added women’s teams)

Skating: -26

Skiing: -41

I excited to see the monobob, not sure how I feel about the Short Track Mixed Relay, Definitely think the Mixed Team Ski Jumping belongs, Ski Big Air was inevitable, no need or reason to add Aerials Team and Snowboard Team (dumb, dumb, dumb, dumbest)

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/11/#findComment-151925
Share on other sites

Just now, vinipereira said:

 

LOL no. The same nations will win other things as usual :p

 

 

But that's the point, B nations will miss out on qualifications so more and more nations will only enter alpine/cross-country skiing. :(

#banbestmen

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/11/#findComment-151926
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Gianlu33 said:

So.. no chance for natural luge? :(

 

I know, I’m sad to see they weren’t added

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/11/#findComment-151927
Share on other sites

3 minuti fa, dcro ha scritto:

So apparently alpine combined is not out? So much for @heywoodu's statement about Gisin being Olympic champion for all times. :p

It isn't official yet, as you can read on the official document "Technical review still in process by FIS"

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/11/#findComment-151928
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, vinipereira said:

 

LOL no. The same nations will win other things as usual :p

 

It's not about who wins, it's about having competitive events. Removing competitive men's events or reducing fields there, solely to have more equality, doesn't seem fair at all if they are replaced by events that are not even half as competitive. One example would be bobsleigh: there are quite a large number of men who can win it, while there are realistically speaking maybe 2-3 women's drivers who could do so. Bigger men's field seems fair. On the other hand in skeleton, the women's field is generally more competitive at the moment, so increasing women's quote seems fair there.

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/11/#findComment-151929
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

 

The problem is that every mixed event any random person throws at them as suggestion seems to be added, while actual new sports (telemark skiing, natural track luge) don't make it. They are doing rather radical stuff for the Summer Olympics by the way, with 100% judge sports like surfing or skateboarding, or a non-existing climbing event as the only climbing event.

 

Well, yes, but I was referring more to the women's "problem". The new sports are a whole new conversation.

 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/11/#findComment-151930
Share on other sites

I am pretty sure Totallympics collectively could create a better sports program. 

 

 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/11/#findComment-151931
Share on other sites

Just now, Gianlu33 said:

It isn't official yet, as you can read on the official document "Technical review still in process by FIS"

The IOC Charter says events need to be finalized at a min 3 years before the Olympics... so yes.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/11/#findComment-151932
Share on other sites

Adesso, intoronto ha scritto:

The IOC Charter says events need to be finalized at a min 3 years before the Olympics... so yes.

Well, IOC rules became flexible under the Bach's governament. Milan will host the IOC session and Italy will be candidate for 2026 Olympics (it wasn't allow), 2024 and 2028 Olympics was decided during the same IOC Session. IOC became a big joke, thank Bach :) 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/11/#findComment-151933
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • China Media Group (CMG) will broadcast all 116 gold medal events of the Milan Winter Olympics live on CCTV-1, CCTV-5, CCTV-5+ and CCTV-16. It will also use technologies such as 4K/8K ultra-high definition to enhance the viewing experience. Live broadcasts of all events will be carried out from 16:00 Beijing time to 06:00 the next day.
    • The strength of the UK is that they are 100% focused on the track, while Italy must to navigate between the track and the road: the line-up is different for practically every event, etc. Paternoster should focus 100% on the track; she won't win anything big on the road anymore. As it is, she's weak both there and there. The situation is different with Balsamo, as she's also having significant success on the road and likely earns the most money there.
    • Discovery+ in the UK have also got their schedule up now.     I notice that only thing listed as being in UHD is the Opening Ceremony though....     
    • The problem over the last few years was that no-one was able to keep pace with the big Katie Archibald turns. Looks to be sorted now.  
    • The women's top 50 is so crammed with athletes from the same five nations that it is not inconceivable they are unable to fill the full quota from the top 50, in which case a third double spot would open up between USA/BEL/GBR
    • That women's pursuit team looks brutally fast. Batter you over the head into submission brutal, perhaps not seen since the early Trott-Rowsell days The 4 minute barrier could be on borrowed time.   The two British women sprinters Finucane and Caldwell also look pretty ominous, indeed the whole women's sprint team looks in some shape and with some depth to get that result without Finucane   Work to do for the British men's teams, but they won't be unhappy either, not to mention Joe Truman's unexpected Kilo win.
    • I prefer to do mine like this guy (https://app.podiumsport.it/) does his "Projected Medals" as probability based rather than straight medal picking... all things being equal, conversion rates should be about the same and the outliers come out in the wash. Unfortunately most people just like medal picking, and think any other approach is weird  
    • So probably: Men Oceania: Americas: Africa: Asia: One of  Europe: One of Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (probably not)  and whichever countries don’t qualify from Asian Games.  Universality: ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of the above in World Rankings    and one of  (most likely) or  seem safe with two quotas. The other will be favourites if a third team gets allocated two.    Women Oceania: Europe: One of Americas:  /  if US is ineligible due to their host quota, if the host quota gets reallocated then Canada will be in contention in the rankings Africa:   Asia: One of   Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (x1?)  (x1/2)  (x1/2), whichever doesn’t qualify out of  / ,  and  ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of above.  Universality: ?    is safe with two quotas between  it’ll be tough for whoever misses out of those three.   nevermind , 
    • The rankings look likely to give two spots each in the men's side to Egypt (2nd athlete at 3) and GB (second athlete at 9). the nearest contender after that is France and both Egypt and GB have plenty of contenders after their respective number 2 but before France's umber 2   Women's side looks a bit more of a battle, with Egypt again likely to provide 2, and then a fight between USA, GBR and BEL for the other lucky double spot. That said, so dominant are the Egyptians, Americans and Brits, that failing to find all the contenders in the top 50 is entirely plausible, possibly opening a third 'double' spot.
    • I'd done my final revisions on my prediction spreadsheets.. and I'm sticking with 26 for Canada.    Take it to the bank! (But don't sign anything)
×
×
  • Create New...