I personally think: I would love to see Tokyo 2021 happen.
But if Tokyo 2021 cannot happen it should be moved to 2032 without farther biding, if only JPN would be interested, and I am not sure they would.
So if there is Tokyo 2021 happening
or if Tokyo 2021 is cancelled, but JPN doesn;t want to have Tokyo 2032, or IOC (which is very likely) and NBC (which is not that likely) doesn;t share my opinion on Tokyo 2032 without bid,
who should get 2032 - I wonder what you think on that matter.
According to EN wikipedia, parties interested in hosting 2032 are:
Mumbai IND
Jakarta INA
Doha QAT
Rhine-Ruhr GER
Madrid ESP
Southeast Queensland AUS
And according to EN wikipedia, other potential bids are:
Seoul-Pyongyang KOR/PRK
Istanbul TUR
Chengdu-Chongqing or Shanghai CHN
Tokyo JPN
North-Central Italy ITA
Rotterdam-Amsterdam NED
London GBR
Budapest HUN
My early thoughts:
If i could choose among interested parties only:
(euro-vision style points haha):
1. Southeast Queensland AUS 6pts
2. Rhine-Ruhr GER 5pts
3. Madrid ESP 4pts
4. Doha QAT 3 pts
5. Mumbai IND 2 pts
6. Jakarta INA 1 pt
If I could choose among interested parties and potential bids combined: (tokyo 2032 excluded from the list due to what I wrote earlier):
1. Southeast Queensland AUS 13 pts
2. Rotterdam-Amsterdam NED 12 pts
3. Rhine-Ruhr GER 11 pts
4. Budapest HUN 10 pts
5. North-Central Italy ITA 9 pts
6. Madrid ESP 8pts
7. Shanghai CHN 7 pts
8. London GBR 6 pts
9. Doha QAT 5 pts
10. Mumbai IND 4 pts
11. Istanbul TUR 3 pts
12. Jakarta INA 2 pts
13. Seoul-Pyongyang KOR 1 pt
I know it is not how euro-vision points system work, but that is not important, the order is important, and the difference between the points, (if I can chooose among interested parties and potential bids combined - I want NED to host the 32 olympics twice as much as I want GBR to host it)
what are your thoughts on that, ladies and gents?