website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Shooting Qualification to Tokyo 2020 Summer Olympic Games


Recommended Posts

Just now, dcro said:

I am not sure... These probably aren't final (NED will likely decline), but I still wouldn't know if the ISSF would allow nations to choose their reallocation.

Our Male Trap Shooter is 52 and has competed at 4 previous Olympiad. Our Female Trap shooter is ranked in Top 20 and was 7th at Recent European Championship. Would be very silly for us to accept this.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/969-shooting-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/26/#findComment-383995
Share on other sites

Just now, Oldira said:

Our Male Trap Shooter is 52 and has competed at 4 previous Olympiad. Our Female Trap shooter is ranked in Top 20 and was 7th at Recent European Championship. Would be very silly for us to accept this.

Unless it's the only spot we could get. Shooting has some very, very weird reallocations...

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/969-shooting-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/26/#findComment-383996
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dodge said:

Unless it's the only spot we could get. Shooting has some very, very weird reallocations...

Yeah. Very tough luck though for Aoife Gormally if that's the case.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/969-shooting-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/26/#findComment-383998
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, intoronto said:

@dcroAny idea who is in line for reallocation for women's trap?

No idea. There are no more eligible athletes in women's trap (between unqualified nations), so we are in a scenario which was not foreseen in the qualification system (lol).

 

If they reallocate it to the next two highest ranked athletes (from any nation) - :FIN:TUR

If they reallocate it to the next two highest ranked athletes (not already qualified in W trap specifically) - :TUR:CYP

If they reallocate it to the next two highest MQS athletes (from any nation) - :GER:GER

If they reallocate it to the next two highest MQS athletes (not already qualified in W trap specifically) - :GER:KUW

 

...

#banbestmen

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/969-shooting-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/26/#findComment-384000
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, dcro said:

By the way, there should be further reallocations, once China / Russia decline female quotas.


Unless they plan to send mixed team-only athletes, which is highly improbable.

Why China would decline females quota?

 

China finished trials and announced current version list with 24 people. But we have 25 quotas. So China plans to return (not decline) one unused men's 10m air rifle quota to exchange one men's trap or men's skeet quota. It's permitted by the rule but China didn't find a NOC available to exchange quota yet. We are asking help for ISSF and waiting for confirmation.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/969-shooting-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/26/#findComment-384006
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Vic Liu said:

Why China would decline females quota?

 

China finished trials and announced current version list with 24 people. But we have 25 quotas. So China plans to return (not decline) one unused men's 10m air rifle quota to exchange one men's trap or men's skeet quota. It's permitted by the rule but China didn't find a NOC available to exchange quota yet. We are asking help for ISSF and waiting for confirmation.

Wait, China is really sending 14 (!) women, with zero double starters (individually), and two athletes entered only for the mixed team events? :yikes:

#banbestmen

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/969-shooting-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/26/#findComment-384010
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dcro said:

Wait, China is really sending 14 (!) women, with zero double starters (individually), and two athletes entered only for the mixed team events? :yikes:

Yes. We have 14 women, but with double starters. For both rifle and pistol, one individual event only, one attending individual and mixed, one mixed only.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/969-shooting-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/26/#findComment-384013
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Oldira said:

Yeah. Very tough luck though for Aoife Gormally if that's the case.

It’s also a national quota, not an individual one so Ireland may send former world junior champion Ian O’Sullivan instead

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/969-shooting-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/26/#findComment-384068
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dcro said:

 

If they reallocate it to the next two highest MQS athletes (from any nation) - :GER:GER

 

 

...

From a totally objective point of view, I think this one sound fair. :)

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/969-shooting-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/26/#findComment-384075
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • China Media Group (CMG) will broadcast all 116 gold medal events of the Milan Winter Olympics live on CCTV-1, CCTV-5, CCTV-5+ and CCTV-16. It will also use technologies such as 4K/8K ultra-high definition to enhance the viewing experience. Live broadcasts of all events will be carried out from 16:00 Beijing time to 06:00 the next day.
    • The strength of the UK is that they are 100% focused on the track, while Italy must to navigate between the track and the road: the line-up is different for practically every event, etc. Paternoster should focus 100% on the track; she won't win anything big on the road anymore. As it is, she's weak both there and there. The situation is different with Balsamo, as she's also having significant success on the road and likely earns the most money there.
    • Discovery+ in the UK have also got their schedule up now.     I notice that only thing listed as being in UHD is the Opening Ceremony though....     
    • The problem over the last few years was that no-one was able to keep pace with the big Katie Archibald turns. Looks to be sorted now.  
    • The women's top 50 is so crammed with athletes from the same five nations that it is not inconceivable they are unable to fill the full quota from the top 50, in which case a third double spot would open up between USA/BEL/GBR
    • That women's pursuit team looks brutally fast. Batter you over the head into submission brutal, perhaps not seen since the early Trott-Rowsell days The 4 minute barrier could be on borrowed time.   The two British women sprinters Finucane and Caldwell also look pretty ominous, indeed the whole women's sprint team looks in some shape and with some depth to get that result without Finucane   Work to do for the British men's teams, but they won't be unhappy either, not to mention Joe Truman's unexpected Kilo win.
    • I prefer to do mine like this guy (https://app.podiumsport.it/) does his "Projected Medals" as probability based rather than straight medal picking... all things being equal, conversion rates should be about the same and the outliers come out in the wash. Unfortunately most people just like medal picking, and think any other approach is weird  
    • So probably: Men Oceania: Americas: Africa: Asia: One of  Europe: One of Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (probably not)  and whichever countries don’t qualify from Asian Games.  Universality: ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of the above in World Rankings    and one of  (most likely) or  seem safe with two quotas. The other will be favourites if a third team gets allocated two.    Women Oceania: Europe: One of Americas:  /  if US is ineligible due to their host quota, if the host quota gets reallocated then Canada will be in contention in the rankings Africa:   Asia: One of   Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (x1?)  (x1/2)  (x1/2), whichever doesn’t qualify out of  / ,  and  ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of above.  Universality: ?    is safe with two quotas between  it’ll be tough for whoever misses out of those three.   nevermind , 
    • The rankings look likely to give two spots each in the men's side to Egypt (2nd athlete at 3) and GB (second athlete at 9). the nearest contender after that is France and both Egypt and GB have plenty of contenders after their respective number 2 but before France's umber 2   Women's side looks a bit more of a battle, with Egypt again likely to provide 2, and then a fight between USA, GBR and BEL for the other lucky double spot. That said, so dominant are the Egyptians, Americans and Brits, that failing to find all the contenders in the top 50 is entirely plausible, possibly opening a third 'double' spot.
    • I'd done my final revisions on my prediction spreadsheets.. and I'm sticking with 26 for Canada.    Take it to the bank! (But don't sign anything)
×
×
  • Create New...