website statistics
Jump to content

International Olympic Committee News


George_D
 Share

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, dcro said:

Chinese Taipei is named "Chinese" because of politics, so I don't see your point.

My point is that Taiwan should be allowed to call their nation what ever they want, without being threatened by IOC to be excluded from an international sport competition, because of a name. 

I'm sorry my point wasn't formulated clearly. 

Edited by wumo26
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wumo26 said:

POLITICS ALERT!!! ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Taiwan is due to vote on Saturday, November 24, on whether the island should compete as "Taiwan" and not "Chinese Taipei".

IOC warns Taiwan name-change could cost country right to compete at Tokyo 2020.

https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/1072419/ioc-warns-taiwan-name-change-could-cost-country-right-to-compete-at-tokyo-2020

 

Politics and sports is like a dirty martini. Olives and olive juice should not be mixed with alcohol, but it still exist anyway. :stop:

They said "The IOC is hoping that the interest of the Olympic Movement in Chinese Taipei will prevail over political considerations"

So basically the term and concept of Chinese Taipei team isn't a "political consideration" for IOC :mumble:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Griff88 said:

They said "The IOC is hoping that the interest of the Olympic Movement in Chinese Taipei will prevail over political considerations"

So basically the term and concept of Chinese Taipei team isn't a "political consideration" for IOC :mumble:

 

Well, yes. Just like a concept of systematic doping isn't a "fair-play consideration" for IOC. :p

#banbestmen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 ore fa, wumo26 ha scritto:

POLITICS ALERT!!! ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Taiwan is due to vote on Saturday, November 24, on whether the island should compete as "Taiwan" and not "Chinese Taipei".

IOC warns Taiwan name-change could cost country right to compete at Tokyo 2020.

https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/1072419/ioc-warns-taiwan-name-change-could-cost-country-right-to-compete-at-tokyo-2020

 

Politics and sports is like a dirty martini. Olives and olive juice should not be mixed with alcohol, but it still exist anyway. :stop:

 

Maybe I don't know about what Taiwan means in Chinese language or whichever is used there, but it seems quite strange to me that IOC is complaining that Taiwan doesn't want to use the "Chinese" word in its name. It sounds to me like a way to solve the political problem of the area. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, AlFHg said:

 

Maybe I don't know about what Taiwan means in Chinese language or whichever is used there, but it seems quite strange to me that IOC is complaining that Taiwan doesn't want to use the "Chinese" word in its name. It sounds to me like a way to solve the political problem of the area. 

Taiwan is named Chinese Taipei in international sport, not Taiwan, and there lies the conflict. For China, Taiwan is a province of the Republic of China. For Taiwan, It is a sovereign state. "Chinese Taipei" was then chosen as an ambigious name for athletes living on/from the island of Taiwan back in 1979/81 to solve the political conflict. 

 

I'm sorry if I misunderstood your point.

 

Edited by wumo26
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minuti fa, wumo26 ha scritto:

Taiwan is named Chinese Taipei in international sport, not Taiwan, and there lies the conflict. For China, Taiwan is a province of the Republic of China. For Taiwan, It is a sovereign state. "Chinese Taipei" was then chosen as an ambigious name for athletes living on/from the island of Taiwan back in 1979/81 to solve the political conflict. 

 

I'm sorry if I misunderstood your point.

 

Nono, you got the point and I knew about the story and the political situation of the country. It wasn’t clear to me that “Chinese” was a :CHN request, I always thought it was due to the fact that :TPE claimed Chinese lands. I thought that once the word Chinese was eliminated by the country name, it was accepted by everybody as a sort of “status quo istituzionalization”. Kind of naive, evidently...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well as far as I’m concerned the legitimate Chinese government has rested in Taiwan since the 1950s. If it were up to me, I would allow them to call themselves the Republic of China.

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Olympian1010 said:

Well as far as I’m concerned the legitimate Chinese government has rested in Taiwan since the 1950s. If it were up to me, I would allow them to call themselves the Republic of China.

gettyimages-489585536.jpg

Edited by Dolby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, AlFHg said:

 

Maybe I don't know about what Taiwan means in Chinese language or whichever is used there, but it seems quite strange to me that IOC is complaining that Taiwan doesn't want to use the "Chinese" word in its name. It sounds to me like a way to solve the political problem of the area. 

Yeah basically it's weird.. All these times they refused to use "Taiwan" and/or "Formosa" (remember the 'under protest' sign from Rome 1960?) since that implies the ROC is only controlling the Taiwan Island instead of the whole China. Now they sort of willing to back off, and IOC is making a fuss about it.

 

The reason why Chinese Taipei was accepted by ROC is the word 'Chinese' is somewhat ambiguous and have no clear sign of which area of control, as they say. Basically it's just saying "Hey we are the other China that based on Taipei!" So the Chinese Taipei is already having that 'status quo' thing as you mentioned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 horas atrás, Griff88 disse:

So the Chinese Taipei is already having that 'status quo' thing as you mentioned.

 

This is why I believe the IOC needs to discuss their position and demand that affiliated sports federation follow their rules if they want to be part of the Olympics.

Either the IOC accepts Macau, Faroe Islands, Tahiti, Gibraltar, New Caledonia and other few territories, or they end support altogether for dependent territories such as Aruba, Puerto Rico, Hong Kong, American Samoa, Guam and a few others. It bothers me to see swimmers from the Faroe Islands competing at the World Championships, or Tahiti at FIFA events, but when it comes to the Olympics the international federations suddenly pretend these territories do not exist. 

Great Britain's situation also bothers me a little. I don't care what sort of political scheme they got themselves into: if you are going to send four, five football teams to compete at the FIFA World Cup -- an event nearly as important as the Olympics -- have the balls to compete independently at the Olympics as well.

Then there's the case of Taiwan, Palestine and Kosovo. Palestine is an UN observer, so they should not be bothered. If we use the limited recognition bullshit, then we should reconsider allowing other states with limited recognition as well, including Israel, since the state is not recognized by other 31 UN members. The Kosovo situation is still a mess, and the IOC has jumped the gun by allowing them to compete, in my opinion. Taiwan is, well, a mess that was more or less sorted out, but now they want to open the can of worms again. It makes a lot more sense, historically, for them to ask for recognition than, say, Hong Kong, but it's still weird. I would leave things as they are, but if Taiwan is gone (for good) from the Olympics, I would not be sad and, in this case, I would still call for other territories to get the chop as well.

 

Edited by thiago_simoes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Anyone wants to add their vote? Deadline is Dec 1st
    • day 9 events   60. SPEED SKATING - W 500m 61. FREESTYLE SKIING - M Dual Moguls 62. SNOWBOARD - Mixed Team Snowboard Cross 63. ALPINE SKIING - W Giant Slalom 64. SKELETON - Mixed Team 65. BIATHLON - M 12.5km Pursuit 66. BIATHLON - W 10km Pursuit 67. SKI JUMPING - W Large Hill Individual 68. CROSS-COUNTRY SKIING - M 4x7.5km Relay
    • day 8   8-9-7---24 8-6-4---18 6-4-6---15 5-4-2---11 5-3-3---11 4-10-8---22 4-5-5---14 4-4-1---9 3-2-11---16 3-1-3---7 2-4-1---7 2-1-1---4 2-1-0---3 1-1-1---3 1-1-1---3 1-0-0---1 0-1-2---3 0-1-1---2 0-1-1---2 0-0-1---1
    • day 8 events   52. SPEED SKATING - M 500m   1. Jordan Stolz USA 2. Laurent Dubreuil CAN 3. Tatsuya Shinhama JPN   53. SHORT TRACK - M 1500m   1. William Dandjinou CAN 2. Park Ji-won KOR 3. Pietro Sighel ITA   54. FREESTYLE SKIING - W Dual Moguls   1. Jakara Anthony AUS 2. Jaelin Kauf USA 3. Olivia Giaccio USA   55. ALPINE SKIING - M Giant Slalom   1. Henrik Kristoffersen NOR 2. Marco Odermatt SUI 3. Atle Lie McGrath NOR   56. SKELETON - W Skeleton   1. Kimberly Bos NED 2. Tina Hermann GER 3. Valentina Margaglio ITA   57. BIATHLON - W 7.5km Sprint   1. Elvira Oeberg SWE 2. Justine Braisaz-Buchet FRA 3. Lisa Vittozzi ITA   58. SKI JUMPING - M Large Hill Individual   1. Stefan Kraft AUT 2. Timi Zajc SLO 3. Daniel Tschofenig AUT   59. CROSS-COUNTRY SKIING - W 4x7.5km Relay   1. Sweden 2. Norway 3. United States
    • As a Montreal Canadien fan, I am in agreement. However, he is struggling recently and is demoted to the 4th line this week. Hoping he can turn it around. 
    • I read now that Valentina Rodini will be in the new team of Tizzano + Galtarossa and Martini. I was probably in such an information bubble on Instagram that I thought that only Abbagnale was running a campaign and had a team of people around him. That's why I was surprised by his defeat + the fact that, for example, Rodini supports his rival. But as I wrote, for me the change in the general coach position is a plus. We need a new opening and a new impulse: Cattaneo had his best results in Tokyo and then he only explained that his rowers were running away abroad to the USA to study and that's why he had worse results. Ok, except that it's the same in Romania and Greece but they results are comparable or better. It's obvious that no one here will make the UK or the Netherlands, because we don't have such resources and money but I think we can repeat the Romanian results (2 gold - 3 silver in Paris) and that will be a much better result than the 2 silver in this year.
    • Abbagnale boasted that he had 80 per cent a few days before the vote (I still have the screen) and ran again as a result of a power deal. Not a great loss.   I have doubts about the new technical director though, you can't announce him during the congress, brandishing the scalp of the Abbagnale era technical staff (who then, were Crispi's men). Let's hope there are no rifts between the new staff and the athletes, it had to be handled better.
    • I was surprised by Abbagnale's defeat. I thought he was a sure of victory, since he decided to run - I read some source that he didn't know if he would start before Paris 2024. What do you think about it?
    • Rugby Sevens WR SVNS 2024 - 2025   Multi-Stage Event - 30 November 2024 - 4 May 2025     Official Website Programme Results System Facebook Page Discussion Thread
×
×
  • Create New...