thepharoah

Southgate is punishing Kane and Bellingham for scoring and taking them off 

Our journalist yesterday in gelsenkirchen met 4 ENG fans and asked them if they know any Slovak player. One of them answered : "Sure, Jan Oblak, he is really good" https://sportnet.sme.sk/spravy/futbal-slovensko-anglicko-reportaz-den-pred-fanusikovia-euro-2024/

1-0 Havertz , Denmark is too unlucky playing hosts in KO stages in Euro again 

Goal Musiala , Germany to quarters 

Goal Musiala , Germany to quarters 

1-0 Havertz , Denmark is too unlucky playing hosts in KO stages in Euro again 

If even an englishmen referee says it is raining, then it really must rain I assume

Finally Brazilian machine worked and Vini scored a brace 

2-0  

Germany lost 3 times at this day in 3 major tournaments , will it end the curse today or Denmark will win , wouldn't be anyhow surprised if Germany lose today . for me 2 matches of today are best in R16 beside France vs Belgium 

2-0  

The only thing special or interesting about it is that it’s harder to fuck up for the organizers and the athletes than riding was :P
 
This really feels like a bad / cheap American Ninja Warriors set.

147 till the moment with still 4 athletes or more to qualify in Athletics and Swimming , biggest delegation ever 

No Sanction Against Tobi Amusan (Nigeria)

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) rejects the appeals filed by World Athletics & WADA and confirms the decision taken by the World Athletics disciplinary tribunal finding that Tobi Amusan did not commit any anti-doping rule violation.

The statement by the CAS in Lausanne on 28 June 2024 reads:

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has dismissed the appeals filed by World Athletics (WA) and by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) against the decision issued on 17 August 2023 (the Challenged Decision) by the World Athletics Disciplinary Tribunal (WADT) in relation to the hurdler Oluwatobiloba (Tobi) Amusan (Nigeria).

Accordingly, the Challenged Decision in which the WADT considered that Tobi Amusan did not violate Rule 2.4 of the WA Anti-Doping Rules (WA ADR) and that no period of ineligibility should be imposed on the Athlete is confirmed.

The Athlete was initially charged with committing an Anti-Doping Rule Violation (ADRV) under Rule 2.4 WA ADR following three alleged Whereabouts Failures within a 12-month period.

In their respective appeal to CAS, WA and WADA had sought the imposition of a two-year period of ineligibility. The CAS Panel held a hearing on 19 January 2024. Having deliberated, the CAS Panel has issued its decision today dismissing both appeals.

The CAS Panel unanimously acknowledged that the Athlete committed two filing failures but did not confirm the existence of a missed test, alleged by WA and WADA, which would have been the third Whereabouts Failure committed within a 12-month period.

Accordingly, the CAS Panel concluded that the Athlete did not commit an ADRV and that the Challenged Decision should be confirmed.

The reasoned award will be published by CAS unless the parties request confidentiality.

147 till the moment with still 4 athletes or more to qualify in Athletics and Swimming , biggest delegation ever