website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Swimming Qualification to Summer Olympic Games Paris 2024


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Topicmaster1010 said:

@Josh @dullard

 

https://dlhd.so/stream/stream-53(dot)php

 

This link works apparently. You just have to replace the dot with .

Had it on for a bit already. The quality seems good. Fingers crossed it keeps working.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/10367-swimming-qualification-to-summer-olympic-games-paris-2024/page/99/#findComment-636937
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Josh said:

Everyone else is toast at Paris. 

Only way they have a chance is if she peaks at trials again and can't get back up for Paris.

Edited by dullard
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/10367-swimming-qualification-to-summer-olympic-games-paris-2024/page/99/#findComment-636951
Share on other sites

:USA US Olympic Trials: Day 1

 

Finals:

 

Men's 400m Freestyle:

1. Aaron Shackell - 3:45.46 Q

2. Kieran Smith - 3:45.76 Q?

3. David Johnston - 3:46.19

4. Bobby Finke - 3:46.27

5. Luke Whitlock - 3:46.55

6. Jake Magahey - 3:46.89

7. Daniel Matheson - 3:48.63

8. Jake Mitchell - 3:50.76

 

3 years ago, only one person in the final hit the A standard and there was a time trial to who else would get the 2nd spot. That wasn't an issue this year as the top 5 went under that time. Aaron Shackell is officially the first qualifier on the US team. As a reminder, the 2nd place finisher isn't yet guaranteed a spot on the Olympic team due to the athlete limit so Kieran Smith will have to wait.

 

Women's 400m Freestyle:

1. Katie Ledecky - 3:58.35 Q

2. Paige Madden - 4:02.08 Q?

3. Jillian Cox - 4:06.89

4. Kayla Han - 4:08.21

5. Aurora Roghair - 4:08.66

6. Anna Peplowski - 4:09.20

7. Leah Smith - 4:09.34

8. Madi Mintenko

 

Easy win for Ledecky and good time for her. Moves her ahead of McIntosh's time at Canadian Trials and only trails Titmus. Paige Madden has been in great form all year and was my pick to take the 2nd spot here and I'm glad she got that spot. Another thing worth mentioning is that Bella Sims and Claire Weinstein both bombed out in prelims and failing to make the final.

 

Semi-finals:

 

Advancing to Women's 100m Butterfly Final:

1. Gretchen Walsh - 55.18 (WR) :hyper:

2. Torri Huske - 55.79

3. Regan Smith - 55.92

4. Alex Shackell - 56.78

5. Claire Curzan - 57.24

6. Emma Sticklen - 57.77

7. Beata Nelson - 57.80

8. Kelly Pash

 

Should be an easy qualification for Walsh and Huske.

 

Advancing to Men's 100m Breaststroke Final:

1. Charlie Swanson - 59.34

2. Josh Matheny - 59.42

3. Nic Fink - 59.46

4. Liam Bell - 59.57

5. Jake Foster - 59.63

6. Michael Andrew - 59.65

7. Noah Nichols - 59.76

8. Luke Rodarte - 59.78

 

Don't think anyone expected Charlie Swanson to contend for a spot in this event. Will be interesting to see if he can keep it up in the final tomorrow. Nic Fink has his hands full.

 

Qualifiers after Day 1 (4 athletes):

 

Priority 1: 1st place winners

  • Katie Ledecky - W 400m Freestyle
  • Aaron Shackell - M 400m Freestyle

 

Priority 2: Top 4 in 100m Freestyle and 200m Freestyle

 

Priority 3: Other 2nd place finishers (Not guaranteed selection)

  • Paige Madden - W 400m Freestyle
  • Kieran Smith - M 400m Freestyle

 

Priority 4: 5th place finishers in 100m Freestyle and 200m Freestyle (Not guaranteed selection)

 

Priority 5: 6th place finishers in 100m Freestyle and 200m Freestyle (Not guaranteed selection)

Edited by Topicmaster1010

_

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/10367-swimming-qualification-to-summer-olympic-games-paris-2024/page/99/#findComment-636953
Share on other sites

So :CAN:ITA:USA Santo Condorelli has been ruled ineligible to compete in the US Olympic Trials because his last time competing for Italy is too recent, and his appeal on the matter has been rejected.

 

Can’t say I feel bad for him.

 

https://swimswam.com/santo-condorelli-eligibility-appeal-rejected-no-entry-at-u-s-olympic-trials/

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/10367-swimming-qualification-to-summer-olympic-games-paris-2024/page/99/#findComment-637004
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Josh said:

@dullard if you find any illegal streams please send them to me :p

guys, if you have an amazon firestick (or an android TV), check out the app sports fire...you get the whole world of sports there (ps always use a vpn with that, for your safety)

 

https://apkpure.com/sportsfire/com.leed.sportsfire

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/10367-swimming-qualification-to-summer-olympic-games-paris-2024/page/99/#findComment-637006
Share on other sites

So, in athletics we know there are super shoes which greatly contribute to the breaking of world records (Kelvin Kiptum, for example, was surely a great athlete, but there is no doubt the shoes played a big part in his marathon WR, like with most recent WR's). What's the thing in swimming that has made world records been broken again and again, year after year?

 

Are they just on an overall low level, or are there certain equipment developments, or faster pools, or, I don't know, wetter water that makes WR's be broken so often in swimming? :p 

 

Surely it's not just 'athletes get better', because athletes get better in every sport.

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/10367-swimming-qualification-to-summer-olympic-games-paris-2024/page/99/#findComment-637009
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Loubineaud raised his voice before the Olympics, but I don't think it was heard much... There is also something to consider, the french federation seemed to have deal with the dutch federation some training privileges for the french athletes.
    • If anything France should be considering hosting the speed skating at an exhibition hall, like Milan did.Never been a fan of hosting events in other countries if a solution can be found in the host country.
    • I think, that FIS should be trying to limit Norway's advantage, not further help them... Klaebo is strong enough to wins without their help. It's fortunate that Norway no longer dominates the women's competition, as much as it did during the Johaug and Bjoergen era, because that would be truly boring... I'm also not a huge fan of Russia's return, but the fact is that without Bolsuhnov, Klaebo hasn't lost to anyone in last 4 years and is, in that`s sense, a very lucky man (apart from his immense class). Paradoxically, without Putin and the war in Ukraine, Klaebo would have a much harder time makes the kind of string of victories, when he does here.
    • if it's about your gain, better 50% of San Siro stadium than 100% of the Bormio ski stadium, but if it's about how it looks, if it's about "perception", always better a full arena (big or small doesn't really matter, that's why they use the filled seats percentage to measure the impact)
    • Finnish ski association released a statement. Translated using DeepL. You can find it here in finnish: https://hiihtoliitto.fi/hiihtoliitto-pyytaa-fisn-eettista-toimielinta-selvittamaan-olympiasprintin-tapahtumat/ The Ski Association lodged a protest against the competition because, after the competition, it emerged that FIS had granted the Norwegian service team permission to bring a waxing table into the service area during the sprint skiing stage, even though this was not permitted under the advance instructions given by FIS to the teams and not even brought into the supervised service area. FIS did not inform other national teams about the possibility of using waxing pads. In addition, after the competition, it became apparent that the US national team had brought prohibited liquids into the service area. According to the rules, bringing any kind of liquid into the supervised service area was strictly prohibited, but no action was taken. Norwegian and US skiers won all the medals in the competition. The FIS later apologized for its actions and admitted that mistakes had been made in both cases.   According to Marleena Valtasola, Executive Director of the Finnish Ski Association, the FIS has not yet given the Ski Association a decision on Finland's protest.   "Despite several requests, we have not received a decision on our protest or answers to related questions. According to Norwegian media reports, FIS has rejected our complaint, but we have not been given any official decision. We interpret this to mean that the FIS has not even agreed to consider the matter. We find this very strange, considering that the FIS has publicly admitted that a mistake was made in the competition," says Valtasola. There has been public discussion about the protest deadline having been exceeded. However, the deadline for protests is one month after the end of the competition when a rule violation only becomes apparent after the competition. Our protest should therefore have been considered.   As a follow-up, we will ask the FIS's independent ethics body to investigate the matter and its handling. This body does not take a position on the results of the competition or the competition rules, so we are not demanding that the performances of the Norwegian or American skiers be invalidated. Rather, our demand is to investigate the events of the competition from the perspective of fairness, says Valtasola. It cannot be the case that some competitors are subject to different rules than others. In our opinion, it is also unacceptable for the protest to be simply swept under the carpet. Actions must be based on fair rules.   Through its actions, the Ski Association wants to promote fair competition and ensure that all athletes and teams have equal opportunities to compete for victory in the future.   We chose this course of action because it is the best solution from a sporting perspective and we believe that it offers the greatest opportunity to influence the future. Above all, it is a question of reviewing the integrity of the FIS's operations. This will no longer affect the results of the Olympic competition, but this must not happen again in the future; things must be handled better," says Valtasola.   The Finnish Olympic Committee supports the actions of the Ski Association.   "A clear mistake was made in the Olympic competition, which placed athletes in an unequal position. Such a significant error should be followed by more than just an apology, so we think it is good that the Ski Association is thoroughly investigating the matter with the FIS, says Janne Hänninen, Director of Elite Sports at the Olympic Committee.  
    • Triathlon WT Mixed Relay World Championships 2026   Hamburg (GER) - 12 July 2026     Official Website Programme Results System Facebook Page Discussion Thread
    • Probably there is one somewhere (not in Nice though). To be honest, French Alps have been a weak project from the start. Born out of wasted regional politicians that wanted a piece of olympic glory while Paris 2024 was still to happen. It would be fair to say that very few people cared until not so long ago. Mood is beginning to shift I think with the end of Milan (in a "shit, it's getting real" way). I beline at the end, Alpes 2030 will be okay, but with some shortcomings (like speed skating in foreign land)
    • Volleyball CEV European League added to the 2026 calendar (assigns FIVB ranking points).   Archery ranking events added to the 2026 calendar (assigns ranking points for Mixed Team Compound).
×
×
  • Create New...