website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Swimming Qualification to Summer Olympic Games Paris 2024


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Topicmaster1010 said:

@Josh @dullard

 

https://dlhd.so/stream/stream-53(dot)php

 

This link works apparently. You just have to replace the dot with .

Had it on for a bit already. The quality seems good. Fingers crossed it keeps working.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/10367-swimming-qualification-to-summer-olympic-games-paris-2024/page/99/#findComment-636937
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Josh said:

Everyone else is toast at Paris. 

Only way they have a chance is if she peaks at trials again and can't get back up for Paris.

Edited by dullard
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/10367-swimming-qualification-to-summer-olympic-games-paris-2024/page/99/#findComment-636951
Share on other sites

:USA US Olympic Trials: Day 1

 

Finals:

 

Men's 400m Freestyle:

1. Aaron Shackell - 3:45.46 Q

2. Kieran Smith - 3:45.76 Q?

3. David Johnston - 3:46.19

4. Bobby Finke - 3:46.27

5. Luke Whitlock - 3:46.55

6. Jake Magahey - 3:46.89

7. Daniel Matheson - 3:48.63

8. Jake Mitchell - 3:50.76

 

3 years ago, only one person in the final hit the A standard and there was a time trial to who else would get the 2nd spot. That wasn't an issue this year as the top 5 went under that time. Aaron Shackell is officially the first qualifier on the US team. As a reminder, the 2nd place finisher isn't yet guaranteed a spot on the Olympic team due to the athlete limit so Kieran Smith will have to wait.

 

Women's 400m Freestyle:

1. Katie Ledecky - 3:58.35 Q

2. Paige Madden - 4:02.08 Q?

3. Jillian Cox - 4:06.89

4. Kayla Han - 4:08.21

5. Aurora Roghair - 4:08.66

6. Anna Peplowski - 4:09.20

7. Leah Smith - 4:09.34

8. Madi Mintenko

 

Easy win for Ledecky and good time for her. Moves her ahead of McIntosh's time at Canadian Trials and only trails Titmus. Paige Madden has been in great form all year and was my pick to take the 2nd spot here and I'm glad she got that spot. Another thing worth mentioning is that Bella Sims and Claire Weinstein both bombed out in prelims and failing to make the final.

 

Semi-finals:

 

Advancing to Women's 100m Butterfly Final:

1. Gretchen Walsh - 55.18 (WR) :hyper:

2. Torri Huske - 55.79

3. Regan Smith - 55.92

4. Alex Shackell - 56.78

5. Claire Curzan - 57.24

6. Emma Sticklen - 57.77

7. Beata Nelson - 57.80

8. Kelly Pash

 

Should be an easy qualification for Walsh and Huske.

 

Advancing to Men's 100m Breaststroke Final:

1. Charlie Swanson - 59.34

2. Josh Matheny - 59.42

3. Nic Fink - 59.46

4. Liam Bell - 59.57

5. Jake Foster - 59.63

6. Michael Andrew - 59.65

7. Noah Nichols - 59.76

8. Luke Rodarte - 59.78

 

Don't think anyone expected Charlie Swanson to contend for a spot in this event. Will be interesting to see if he can keep it up in the final tomorrow. Nic Fink has his hands full.

 

Qualifiers after Day 1 (4 athletes):

 

Priority 1: 1st place winners

  • Katie Ledecky - W 400m Freestyle
  • Aaron Shackell - M 400m Freestyle

 

Priority 2: Top 4 in 100m Freestyle and 200m Freestyle

 

Priority 3: Other 2nd place finishers (Not guaranteed selection)

  • Paige Madden - W 400m Freestyle
  • Kieran Smith - M 400m Freestyle

 

Priority 4: 5th place finishers in 100m Freestyle and 200m Freestyle (Not guaranteed selection)

 

Priority 5: 6th place finishers in 100m Freestyle and 200m Freestyle (Not guaranteed selection)

Edited by Topicmaster1010

_

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/10367-swimming-qualification-to-summer-olympic-games-paris-2024/page/99/#findComment-636953
Share on other sites

So :CAN:ITA:USA Santo Condorelli has been ruled ineligible to compete in the US Olympic Trials because his last time competing for Italy is too recent, and his appeal on the matter has been rejected.

 

Can’t say I feel bad for him.

 

https://swimswam.com/santo-condorelli-eligibility-appeal-rejected-no-entry-at-u-s-olympic-trials/

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/10367-swimming-qualification-to-summer-olympic-games-paris-2024/page/99/#findComment-637004
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Josh said:

@dullard if you find any illegal streams please send them to me :p

guys, if you have an amazon firestick (or an android TV), check out the app sports fire...you get the whole world of sports there (ps always use a vpn with that, for your safety)

 

https://apkpure.com/sportsfire/com.leed.sportsfire

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/10367-swimming-qualification-to-summer-olympic-games-paris-2024/page/99/#findComment-637006
Share on other sites

So, in athletics we know there are super shoes which greatly contribute to the breaking of world records (Kelvin Kiptum, for example, was surely a great athlete, but there is no doubt the shoes played a big part in his marathon WR, like with most recent WR's). What's the thing in swimming that has made world records been broken again and again, year after year?

 

Are they just on an overall low level, or are there certain equipment developments, or faster pools, or, I don't know, wetter water that makes WR's be broken so often in swimming? :p 

 

Surely it's not just 'athletes get better', because athletes get better in every sport.

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/10367-swimming-qualification-to-summer-olympic-games-paris-2024/page/99/#findComment-637009
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • China Media Group (CMG) will broadcast all 116 gold medal events of the Milan Winter Olympics live on CCTV-1, CCTV-5, CCTV-5+ and CCTV-16. It will also use technologies such as 4K/8K ultra-high definition to enhance the viewing experience. Live broadcasts of all events will be carried out from 16:00 Beijing time to 06:00 the next day.
    • The strength of the UK is that they are 100% focused on the track, while Italy must to navigate between the track and the road: the line-up is different for practically every event, etc. Paternoster should focus 100% on the track; she won't win anything big on the road anymore. As it is, she's weak both there and there. The situation is different with Balsamo, as she's also having significant success on the road and likely earns the most money there.
    • Discovery+ in the UK have also got their schedule up now.     I notice that only thing listed as being in UHD is the Opening Ceremony though....     
    • The problem over the last few years was that no-one was able to keep pace with the big Katie Archibald turns. Looks to be sorted now.  
    • The women's top 50 is so crammed with athletes from the same five nations that it is not inconceivable they are unable to fill the full quota from the top 50, in which case a third double spot would open up between USA/BEL/GBR
    • That women's pursuit team looks brutally fast. Batter you over the head into submission brutal, perhaps not seen since the early Trott-Rowsell days The 4 minute barrier could be on borrowed time.   The two British women sprinters Finucane and Caldwell also look pretty ominous, indeed the whole women's sprint team looks in some shape and with some depth to get that result without Finucane   Work to do for the British men's teams, but they won't be unhappy either, not to mention Joe Truman's unexpected Kilo win.
    • I prefer to do mine like this guy (https://app.podiumsport.it/) does his "Projected Medals" as probability based rather than straight medal picking... all things being equal, conversion rates should be about the same and the outliers come out in the wash. Unfortunately most people just like medal picking, and think any other approach is weird  
    • So probably: Men Oceania: Americas: Africa: Asia: One of  Europe: One of Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (probably not)  and whichever countries don’t qualify from Asian Games.  Universality: ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of the above in World Rankings    and one of  (most likely) or  seem safe with two quotas. The other will be favourites if a third team gets allocated two.    Women Oceania: Europe: One of Americas:  /  if US is ineligible due to their host quota, if the host quota gets reallocated then Canada will be in contention in the rankings Africa:   Asia: One of   Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (x1?)  (x1/2)  (x1/2), whichever doesn’t qualify out of  / ,  and  ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of above.  Universality: ?    is safe with two quotas between  it’ll be tough for whoever misses out of those three.   nevermind , 
    • The rankings look likely to give two spots each in the men's side to Egypt (2nd athlete at 3) and GB (second athlete at 9). the nearest contender after that is France and both Egypt and GB have plenty of contenders after their respective number 2 but before France's umber 2   Women's side looks a bit more of a battle, with Egypt again likely to provide 2, and then a fight between USA, GBR and BEL for the other lucky double spot. That said, so dominant are the Egyptians, Americans and Brits, that failing to find all the contenders in the top 50 is entirely plausible, possibly opening a third 'double' spot.
    • I'd done my final revisions on my prediction spreadsheets.. and I'm sticking with 26 for Canada.    Take it to the bank! (But don't sign anything)
×
×
  • Create New...