tbh, I've seen more than 1 goal like this given also in the NHL...and not only this year.
I don't agree at all, but I understand the ratio: the Latvian forward is pushed into the net by the Kazakh defender (therefore, no goalie interference) and the puck was already directed toward the net (therefore, the goal stands even if the cage is being dislodged in the same action).
imho, in a case like this the goal shouldn't be given because the goalie is denied the chance to stop the puck not because of his own fault.
still, the defender pushing the forward into the net should automatically get a 2-min minor.
unfortunately, the rule is different and its current interpretation is even worse (according to both the NHL and IIHF rulebooks).