website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

International Olympic Committee News


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

Oh I agree. I mean, I do strangely enough like them at swimming world championships as a fun intermezzo, some massive testosterone bombing in the pool for a bit :d

 

Thing is, there they are not in anythings way: world championships in sport X can have all the events they want, it's not in the way of other sports after all. At the Olympics that would be different. Same as why I don't mind the biathlon pursuit being in the biathlon world championships, but it is horrendous that it's a separate Olympic event.

 

Through with Biathlon everyone in the pursuit is there anyway. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1980-international-olympic-committee-news/page/113/#findComment-669176
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Orangehair43 said:

Through with Biathlon everyone in the pursuit is there anyway. 

That's not the point. The point there is that it's an inherently unfair medal event, where athletes have an actual (and in many cases nearly impossible to overcome) disadvantage based on another medal event. That is just nonsense.

 

First of all one's participation in one medal event should not even depend on another medal event, but one should definitely not start with a time disadvantage in a medal event and have the qualifier for that be a medal event in itself.

 

It's kind of like if in modern pentathlon we'd give out medals after the first three events and then also separate medals for whoever finishes the laser run first (using the standings to decide the start orders and time gaps).

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1980-international-olympic-committee-news/page/113/#findComment-669178
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NearPup said:

This might be a hot take but I actually think the 50s are the most boring swimming events.

 

Let's be honest, most of the swimming distances are redundant :d There isn't something that unique of doing 100 or 200 meters. But because the sport is as popular as it is and has a big branding of creating superstars, who can win "countless medals", it gets a pass on the program.

 

If we were looking objectively, compared with the other sports, the swimming schedule should be only:

 

- 100 m for the 4 styles

- 400 and 1500 m freestyle 

- 400 m individual medley

- 4x100 freestyle and 4x100 medley relays 

- Mayyyyyybe a mixed relay 

 

 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1980-international-olympic-committee-news/page/113/#findComment-669181
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, intoronto said:

Not sure of the format but it will be one male and one female. And it would not be their results from the individual event added together.

If that is the case they ran an event like this at The European Championships in Glasgow 2018 and it went down very good

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1980-international-olympic-committee-news/page/113/#findComment-669182
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

Since the next Olympics are in 2028, and of course by now the program is entirely finalized I assume (since athletes start their new Olympic cycle immediately): is there a clear list of events that were in Paris and won't be in LA, and events that weren't in Paris and will be in LA?

We'll know the new events in summer 2025.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1980-international-olympic-committee-news/page/113/#findComment-669183
Share on other sites

On 8/10/2024 at 7:47 PM, intoronto said:

 

 

About this. You would think this a good news.

 

But i have seen in the past years, that anytime i say "After X and X are gone it will be better" it's the complete opposite. I thought Bach will be much better than Rogge at that time and it backfired spectacularly. Now you think anyone after Bach can't do a worse job, but i'm not holding my breath.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1980-international-olympic-committee-news/page/113/#findComment-669188
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, NearPup said:

And we also know this should be three event: men’s single scull, women’s single scull and a mixed double scull.

 

Ah yes, beach rowing, one more of the stupid, stupid things, that will be happening for 2028. Who needs actual rowing, when you can have a knock off version to appease whoever..

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1980-international-olympic-committee-news/page/113/#findComment-669190
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Federer91 said:

 

Ah yes, beach rowing, one more of the stupid, stupid things, that will be happening for 2028. Who needs actual rowing, when you can have a knock off version to appease whoever..

Ya, if I had my way the quotas / events freed up from eliminating lightweight rowing would have gone to canoeing.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1980-international-olympic-committee-news/page/113/#findComment-669194
Share on other sites

This entire conversation is just proving that those constant changes in every edition is more troubling than helping I mean there are young athletes out there training to get to the Olympics only to learn after each edition that there sport might be out, I hope the next president will care enough to make a program for the long run

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1980-international-olympic-committee-news/page/113/#findComment-669245
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dnl said:

This entire conversation is just proving that those constant changes in every edition is more troubling than helping I mean there are young athletes out there training to get to the Olympics only to learn after each edition that there sport might be out, I hope the next president will care enough to make a program for the long run

I think there needs to be a balance between having stability in the program and also evolving.

 

I think adding sports like climbing, skateboarding and cricket were all overdue changes, I’m just not super keen in how it was done.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1980-international-olympic-committee-news/page/113/#findComment-669250
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • I have a time slot 16th of April, but my girlfriend doesn't . So you're not the only one ... Hopefully there are some tickets left when I enter the ticketshop.
    • Because of the continued uncertainty in the Gulf, the Doha Diamond League has been reorganised to the 19th June, in between Oslo and Paris.  Shanghai on 16 May will therefore be the first DL meet of the season.     WDL meeting in Doha postponed until June - Wanda Diamond League
    • Update after Matchdays 8 and 9.   Group A:  is almost a lock with 21p, and 7 games 7 wins. Almost impossible for them to not qualify. The battle is in the second place between  (16p) and  (13p).  with 8p is almost out.  and  eliminated.   Group B:  won both of the 2 games so is almost secured with 19p.  is second with 14p, with  (1 more game played) and  with 11p.  is eliminated and  practically too (6p)   Group C:  went 2 out of 2 so they are still first with 16p and one game less than the rest. The battle for second place will be between  14p,  11p and  9p.  eliminated and  (with one game less and 4p) probably too.   Group D: Only 3 for 2 places.  first with 19p has the advantage, but coming close is  with 16p. They played each other in the Matchday 11 of 12. Coming in third behind is  with 11p. ,  and  eliminated.   Group E: Both  and  won both matches so its still the same, Poland first with 24p and Italy second with 21p, which is the best runner-up and also qualifying directly, so is very likely that both teams end up qualifying no matter who finish first and second. , ,  and  eliminated.   Group F: A tie between  18p and  18p. Germany has the goal advantage (+21 to +20), and has to play the three weaker teams, so its more likely to qualify. Coming behind are  with 10p and  with 9p, which are practically eliminated with  and   Group G:  takes the advantage with 12p and one game less.  and  both have 7p, and coming behind are  5p (but one game less) and  with 5p.   Group H:  with the win against  moved to first place with 13p (and one game less), and Turkey stays in second with 11p.  is coming in third with 8p, while  is eliminated and  have 3p and one game less.   Group I: A triple tie between ,  and  with 10p. Belgium have the advantage because they have the best head to head points and one game less. Austria is second in the H2H difference and Denmark is third but with also one game less.  have 6p and  is eliminated.   The next 3 and last matchdays will define the 10 qualified teams and the 8 that will go to the playoffs. Matchdays will be 24-26 September, 28Sep-1Oct and 5-6 October, 2026.
    • Still no qualification system    ATHLETICS   BOXING   CRICKET   FOOTBALL   WATER POLO
    • That's how the organizing committee did it, stupid that its so early, before the world cup even but what can we do
    • I got my window starting on Sunday.  Need to see what is still available that might not be outrageously priced
    • Australian Open, best of Day #3   men's 50m Breast:  Sam Williamson, 27.14 women's 200m Fly:  Elizabeth Dekkers, 2.05.39 men's 100m Fly:  Matthew Temple, 51.70 women's 50m Back:  Alexandria Perkins, 27.79 men's 400m IM:  Lewis Clareburt, 4.10.10;  William Petric, 4.10.20 women's 200m Free:  Mollie O'Callaghan, 1.53.69;  Lani Pallister, 1.55.66;  Erika Fairweather, 1.55.72 men's 50m Free:  Jamie Jack, 21.71 women's 200m IM:  Kaylee McKeown, 2.09.22;  Ella Ramsay, 2.09.94 women's 50m Breast:  Sienna Toohey, 30.39;  Mia O'Leary, 30.75 men's 200m Back: Stuart Swinburn, 1.58.25  women's 1500m Free:  Lani Pallister, 15.44.07 men's 1500m Free: comin'up later
×
×
  • Create New...