website statistics
Jump to content

Doping Cases and Bans 2021 Thread


Wumo
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Monzanator said:

 

Those trials would end in out of court settlements anyway especially if an athlete who sues USTF would be suspended during a course of such trial (which makes sense since USTF would be treated as employer - isn't that what Jess Varnish argued vs British Cycling in the UK trial?).

 

Plus Nike (or any other sponsor) would probably pay enough money under the table for those #5 & #6 relay hopefuls so they don't file a case and block Richardson's place in the relay. Most things in USA usually come down to money in the end.

Not sure they would. In the UK Jess Varnish got direct funding from UK Cycling - in the USA athletes are not paid by the governing bodies ,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the BBC daily highlights show just now they ignored that Greenbank chirped up about doping, giving the impression only Murphy commented on the issue but then defended Rylov by saying he has been at the top of field since Rio and said that while it looked like Murphy was not directly accusing Rylov (that’s a stretch) he was still being unfair on him, 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Orangehair43 said:

On the BBC daily highlights show just now they ignored that Greenbank chirped up about doping, giving the impression only Murphy commented on the issue but then defended Rylov by saying he has been at the top of field since Rio and said that while Murphy was not directly accusing Rylov he was still being unfair on Rylov.

 

Sounds like damage control

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JoshMartini007 said:

Sounds like damage control

Probably just the pundit’s opinion. I can’t remember what he said about podium protests and the controversy  regarding Sun Yang in 2019 and Effimova and Herasimenia in 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...