website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Shooting Qualification to Tokyo 2020 Summer Olympic Games


Recommended Posts

The Slovaks could probably use this phrasing in the qualification system to challenge the ISSF’s decision:

Quote

Double Starters are athletes who have an Aa accreditation and, who are entered by their NOC in a specific event where their NOC has obtained a quota place and where the athlete has achieved the required MQS, and who are also entered in another event where the athlete also has the required MQS. Double Starters may be entered in other Shooting events provided they have achieved the required MQS and the NOC maximum quota per event is not exceeded.

However, the ISSF could likely defend their position using this clause:

Quote

…except that Mixed Team event quotas are obtained by the NOC and the athletes who are members of those teams are still eligible to obtain quota places in individual events.

“still eligible to obtain” being interpreted as athletes still need to qualify an individual for an individual event quota to participate in individual events.

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/969-shooting-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/32/#findComment-395486
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Olympian1010 said:

There’s nothing that upsets me more than “frivolous” or “dead” quota. People may not like how complicated the Canoe Sprint qualification system is, but at least the ICF makes the most of the quotas they award. Awarding quotas purely for a Mixed Team event that has other means of qualification and then not allowing the athletes qualified through the Mixed Team event to participate the individual events is an extraordinary waste of quota. 

Hard agree. I'm a great believer, broadly, in 'bang for your buck' (Shooting pun absolutely intended!) when it comes to the Games. There's huge pressure to reduce the total number of athletes, and you can't muck around wasting them - I think, in some ways archery gets it right - the ranked team places come first, and EVERY team member gets a shot in the individual. Then the remaining places go to the ranked individuals. This is one of the ways Archery managed to snag a fifth event without ANY quota alterations - and a fifth event which will give many more NOCs an opportunity at a 'team' event (as they only need a single male and single female).

 

FWIW the same principle means I believe every venue, especially expensive new ones, should find ways to cram in as many events as possible where that doesn't conflict, or can be made not to conflict, with quota numbers...So for example, I don't see why we can't have a mixed pair skeet, as it would require not a single new quota place, no new facility.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/969-shooting-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/32/#findComment-395607
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mpjmcevoy said:

Hard agree. I'm a great believer, broadly, in 'bang for your buck' (Shooting pun absolutely intended!) when it comes to the Games. There's huge pressure to reduce the total number of athletes, and you can't muck around wasting them - I think, in some ways archery gets it right - the ranked team places come first, and EVERY team member gets a shot in the individual. Then the remaining places go to the ranked individuals. This is one of the ways Archery managed to snag a fifth event without ANY quota alterations - and a fifth event which will give many more NOCs an opportunity at a 'team' event (as they only need a single male and single female).

 

FWIW the same principle means I believe every venue, especially expensive new ones, should find ways to cram in as many events as possible where that doesn't conflict, or can be made not to conflict, with quota numbers...So for example, I don't see why we can't have a mixed pair skeet, as it would require not a single new quota place, no new facility.

To be fair, Archery had an established Mixed Team legacy in World Cups and Championships. ISSF had no such event and had to create 3 Mixed Team events from scratch to retain 3 Gold medals. If you look at Mixed Team events in the present Olympic cycle, this thing is visible a lot. There has been a lot of changes in their format. And ISSF is already developing Mixed team events for other disciplines as well, so that for the next Olympic, they can try and add 3 more Gold medals without any increase in quota places. 

 

I agree that instead of giving out Mixed team quota and allowing the same athlete to win 2 quotas was simply wrong. They should have simply given the Mixed team quota winners a quota in each of the individual events (like Archery) but at that time, nobody knew how the Mixed team events would develop. So, in my opinion, the main problem was the hurried manner in which Mixed team events were rushed in Olympics. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/969-shooting-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/32/#findComment-395611
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Fly_like_a_don said:

So only 1 mixed team per nation unless mixed team quota obtained from World Championships? 

Thats what ISSF answered to our federation yesterday after our appeal. Not sure if it is for all 3 mixed events, since we were obviously solving the mixed trap issue, but I guess this will apply there as well, but not take it for granted.

 

The thing that really upset our federation and athletes, is not they changed the rule and will not allow them to compete in the individuals. It is the fact they did not announce it until past week ! Literally from 2018, when we won the quotas until July 2021, our athletes, federation, everyone was ready to start in the individuals. More than 2 years  they were all 4 preparing for the events. After 2 and half years, just one week before the start of the games ISSF suddenly announce the mixed trap quotas will be only for mixed trap. boom.

 

Not really serious and absolutely no fair from ISSF to change the rules after 2 and half years like that. Many people in Slovakia are already feeling like it was just because Slovakia is small and nobody cares, I already read comments that if it would be a major powerhouse like let say Italy winning in our situation ISSF would not release anything because of scare, now Slovakia, ok lets change it, nobody willl care...

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/969-shooting-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/32/#findComment-395623
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, hckošice said:

Thats what ISSF answered to our federation yesterday after our appeal. Not sure if it is for all 3 mixed events, since we were obviously solving the mixed trap issue, but I guess this will apply there as well, but not take it for granted.

 

The thing that really upset our federation and athletes, is not they changed the rule and will not allow them to compete in the individuals. It is the fact they did not announce it until past week ! Literally from 2018, when we won the quotas until July 2021, our athletes, federation, everyone was ready to start in the individuals. More than 2 years  they were all 4 preparing for the events. After 2 and half years, just one week before the start of the games ISSF suddenly announce the mixed trap quotas will be only for mixed trap. boom.

 

Not really serious and absolutely no fair from ISSF to change the rules after 2 and half years like that. Many people in Slovakia are already feeling like it was just because Slovakia is small and nobody cares, I already read comments that if it would be a major powerhouse like let say Italy winning in our situation ISSF would not release anything because of scare, now Slovakia, ok lets change it, nobody willl care...

It's of course not likely that Slovakia being Slovakia has any effect on the whole thing, but damn that sucks :( 

 

So typical for a sports federation to fuck things up like this. I know it's always possible perhaps a national federation did actually misread something, but way more likely ISSF just screwed up and the athletes are the victims. 

 

At least now I have a team to cheer for in the mixed event, go Slovakia!

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/969-shooting-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/32/#findComment-395625
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

It's of course not likely that Slovakia being Slovakia has any effect on the whole thing, but damn that sucks :( 

 

So typical for a sports federation to fuck things up like this. I know it's always possible perhaps a national federation did actually misread something, but way more likely ISSF just screwed up and the athletes are the victims. 

 

At least now I have a team to cheer for in the mixed event, go Slovakia!

we misread nothing. It was in the rules for more than 2 and half year. They just decided now to change the rule to afford only athletes who won quotas in idividual events to compete.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/969-shooting-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/32/#findComment-395628
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, dcro said:

Meanwhile, America is allowed to enter a time trial-only athlete, against all regulations and precedents.

you mean shooting or swimming?

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/969-shooting-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/32/#findComment-395630
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • 2026 LPGA Tour Aramco Championship - Las Vegas    Results (April 2-5, 2026)   (Ladies European Tour) (66.11 points)   Women's: 1. Lauren Couhglin 2. Leona Maguire 2. Nelly Korda 4. Miyu Yamashita 5. Akie Iwai 5. Karis Davidson   7. Yin Ruoning 7. Nanna Koertz Madsen 9. Nasa Hataoka 9. Carlota Ciganda   11. Lydia Ko 11. Allisen Corpuz   13. Kim Hyo-joo   13. Anna Huang 15. Angel Yin 15. Charley Hull 17. Jeeno Thitikul 17. Yoon I-na 17. Chiara Tamburlini 17. Jing Yan 17. Jenny Shin 17. Pajaree Anannarukarn 23. Choi Hye-jin   23. Andrea Lee   23. Brooke Henderson   23. Erika Hara     Results
    • 2026 LPGA Tour Ford Championship - Arizona    Results (March 26-29, 2026)   (61.43 points)   Women's: 1. Kim Hyo-joo 2. Nelly Korda 3. Minami Katsu 4. Lydia Ko 5. Chun In-gee 6. Yoon In-a   6. Mimi Rhodes   6. Frida Kinhult   9. Esther Henseleit 9. Chizzy Iwai 9. Rose Zhang   9. Dewi Weber   13. Cassie Porter   14. Nastasia Nadaud   15. Anna Nordqvist 15. Lindy Duncan   15. Manon de Roey   15. Lee Il-hee   15. Jing Yan 15. Sophia Schubert   15. Julia Lopez Ramirez   15. Lee So-mi   15. Chien Pei-yun 15. Yana Wilson     Results
    • 2026 LPGA Tour Fortinet Founders Cup - California   Results (March 19-22, 2026)   (59.28 points)   Women's: 1. Kim Hyo-joo 2. Nelly Korda 3. Im Jin-hee 3. Kim Sei-young 5. Carla Tejedo Mulet   5. Nasa Hataoka   5. Miyu Yamashita   5. Gaby Lopez 5. Lee Min-jee   5. Ryu Hae-ran   5. Cassie Porter 12. Robyn Choi 12. Kim A-lim   14. Aditi Ashok 14. Perrine Delacour 14. Choi Hye-jin 14. Lottie Woad 14. Jeeno Thitikul     Results
    • 2026 LPGA Tour Blue Bay LPGA - Hainan   Results (March 5-8, 2026)   (China LPGA Tour) (19.70 points)   Women's: 1. Lee Mi-hyang 2. Zhang Weiwei 3. Auston Kim 3. Aditi Ashok 5. Rio Takeda 5. Choi Hye-jin 5. Kim A-lim 5. Liu Yu 9. Jenny Bae 10. Lucy Li 10. Erika Hara 12. Esther Henseleit 12. Liu Yan 12. Liu Yujie 15. Lindy Duncan 15. Erica Shepherd 15. Ayaka Furue     Results
    • The women's weights are okay given the distribution of competitors. The men's weights are definitely underweight. Adding 2-3kg in each event would make it more balanced.
    • Australian Open, best of Day #2   men's 50m Fly:  Kyle Chalmers, 22.77 women's 400m Free:  Lani Pallister, 3.59.36;  Erika Fairweather, 4.02.09; Maria Costa, 4.03.41 men's 200m Free:  Lewis Clareburt, 1.45.57;  Edward Sommerville, 1.46.08;  Kai Taylor, 1.46.67; anybody else over the 1.47-sec mark women's 100m Fly:  Alexandria Perkins, 57.21 men's 100m Breast: all swimmers well beyond the 1-minute mark women's 100m Back:  Kaylee McKeown, 58.06;  Mollie O'Callaghan, 58.98 men's 100m Back:  Mark Nikolaev, 54.69 women's 50m Free:  (doping cheater) Shayna Jack, 24.60;  Olivia Wunsch, 24.84;  Mollie O'Callaghan, 24.89;  Alexandria Perkins, 24.92 men's 200m IM:  Lewis Clareburt, 1.58.42 women's 200m Breast:  Tara Kinder, 2.24.19 men's 800m Free:  Samuel Short, 7.41.04;  Elijah Winnington, 7.51.74
    • Stage #2 in  Granada is on!    mixed 10m Air Pistol   Gold:  India 1 (Palak & Mukesh Nelavalli) Silver:  China 1 (Yao Qianxun & Hu Kai) Bronze:  Hungary 1 (Veronika Major & Akos Karoly Nagy)   Full Results & Rankings https://www.issf-sports.org/competitions/3280/results
    • c'mon! stop those idiots! they're trying hard to ruin athletics in almost every aspect (road running, field events, the same cross country that has already been killed in practice)   please, someone shoot to death Coe and his accolades as soon as possible!!! 
    • That's only if they don't listen to Trump's 48 hour deadline. But that is permanently 48 hours away, since, well, TACO.
×
×
  • Create New...