website statistics
Jump to content

Swimming at the Summer Olympic Games Paris 2024


Totallympics
 Share

Recommended Posts

GB have to use Joe somewhere (in one of the relays) as he isn’t doing the individual but I think it’s fair to predict Jimmy swims the final. For GB to be a medal contender we not only need Peaty on supreme form but Jimmy to rediscover Tokyo magic on the fly leg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The open water races could still end up not being in the Seine, not because of the water conditions (that seems to have been cleaned up quite nicely), but because of the massively strong flow of water, more than twice as strong as the maximum that's allowed in the rules (1,2 m/s vs 0,5 m/s). Swimmers recently did a test in the Elbe river in Germany at 0,7 m/s and already barely managed to keep going, let alone if it's almost twice as strong.

 

Hopefully that changes very soon, the main challenge in a 10k race shouldn't be to avoid going backwards :p 

If you'd like to help our fellow Totallympics member Bruna Moura get to the 2026 Winter Olympics, after her car crash on the way to the 2022 Olympics, every tiny bit of help would be greatly appreciated! Full story and how to help can be found here!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/16/2024 at 9:11 AM, RussB said:

GB have to use Joe somewhere (in one of the relays) as he isn’t doing the individual but I think it’s fair to predict Jimmy swims the final. For GB to be a medal contender we not only need Peaty on supreme form but Jimmy to rediscover Tokyo magic on the fly leg.

If you look carefully at the relay schedules already up at World Aquatics, you can see some relays heats have already partially been filled in - no doubt to clear the rule about DQ if a relay only swimmer isn't used. In the men's 4 x 100 free, Lo and behold... Joe Litchfield and Jack Macmillen are down (notably down in the women's 4 x 1, Freya Anderon and Okara, no doubt for exactly the same reason). Given James being given the solo event, I think we can safely say they have no faith whatsoever in Litchfield, and if put him in the available relay that is most disposable. I assume GBR are emphasising Mens 4 x 2, Men's Medley, Mixed Medley, Men's 4 x 1, women's 4 x 2, Womens medley, women's 4 x 1 in that order - with high gold hopes in the first, firm medal intent in the next two, and somewhat less the next two, with hardly any hope in the last two.

 

Guy seems to have picked up a bit of Mojo after his move back this year, so the men's medley will be interesting, possibly more so than the mixed, where there is simply no decent female butterfly swimmer, so they are forced back to FMMF. I will bet my granny that Guy swims medley finals, they may try and rest him in freestyle relay heats, and let Dean do the donkey work there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't dispute your detective work but if they sacrifice the men's 4x1 like that, I might actually cry. :facepalm:

 

Picking both him and Jack in that seems a risk too far, especially with Cohoon, Dean and Whittle all being there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/16/2024 at 7:15 AM, Topicmaster1010 said:

Relay Power Rankings: Men's 4x100m Medley Relay

 

Other Power Rankings:

Women's 4x200m Freestyle Relay

 

Remember, for each country, I'm taking the top 4 eligible swimmers for each country and using their best times from 2024 to form a estimated relay time. 1.5 seconds will be subtracted from each cumulative time to account for reaction times.

 

*Please note that the order of swimmers is arranged from fastest to slowest times, NOT by predicted relay order.

 

16. :AUT Austria - 3:33.17

  • Backstroke: Bernhard Reitshammer - 54.54
  • Valentin Bayer - 1:00.49
  • Butterfly: Simon Bucher - 51.28
  • Freestyle: Heiko Gigler - 48.36

 

Not surprising to see Austria at the bottom of the rankings with Simon Bucher the only swimmer than had an OQT in the qualification period. Heiko Gigler is a decent option at freestyle but the other two legs drag this relay down.

 

15. :IRL Ireland - 3:32.57

  • Backstroke: Conor Ferguson - 53.87
  • Breaststroke: Darragh Greene - 59.91
  • Butterfly: Max Mc Cusker - 51.90
  • Freestyle: Shane Ryan - 48.39

 

Ireland actually doesn't have a single member of this relay that had an OQT in the stroke 100s during the qualification period. However, they were all just outside of their respective OQTs and that's enough to put them ahead of Austria here.

 

14. :SUI Switzerland - 3:32.44

  • Backstroke: Roman Mityukov - 53.58
  • Breaststroke: Jeremy Desplanches - 1:00.90
  • Butterfly: Noe Ponti - 50.16
  • Freestyle: Antonio Djakovic - 49.30

 

Noe Ponti is one of the best butterfliers in the world (currently ranked 2nd this year) and Roman Mityukov is a decent backstroker. However, the breaststroke and freestyle legs are too much of a weakness to prevent this relay on moving further up in the rankings.

 

13. :KOR South Korea - 3:32.01

  • Backstroke: Lee Juho - 53.81
  • Breaststroke: Choi Dongyeol - 59.74
  • Butterfly: Kim Jihun - 52.05
  • Freestyle: Hwang Sunwoo - 47.91

 

This relay definitely had the potential to be higher up in the rankings. Hwang Sunwoo is an elite freestyler. Lee Juho has been as quick as 53.32 in his career and Choi Dongyeol has been as quick as 59.28 but neither one has found their best form this year. It's a shame that Kim Youngbeom wasn't selected for the Olympic team. He recently broke the Korean 100m butterfly record in a time of 51.65 (a few months after the team selection).

 

12. :ESP Spain - 3:31.41

  • Backstroke: Hugo Gonzalez - 52.70
  • Breaststroke: Carles Coll - 1:00.39
  • Butterfly: Mario Molla - 51.48
  • Freestyle: Sergio de Celis - 48.34

 

Hugo Gonzalez has established himself as an elite backstroker and Mario Moll and Sergio Celis should provide decent legs. The breaststroke leg needs to be the difference maker if Spain wants a chance to make the final.

 

11. :JPN Japan - 3:31.16

  • Backstroke: Riku Matsuyama - 53.72
  • Breaststroke: Taku Taniguchi - 59.43
  • Butterfly: Katsuhiro Matsumoto - 51.23
  • Freestyle: Naoki Mizunuma - 48.28

 

Here, we have our first relay where all 4 swimmers were under their respective OQTs. However, there aren't any standout legs which is why they rank 11th here. Naoki Mizunuma has the highest world rank of the 4 swimmers at 19th in the 100m butterfly. Katsuhiro Matsumoto actually ranks 12th but the relay add up time is faster with him at freestyle.

 

10. :CAN Canada - 3:30.89

  • Backstroke: Blake Tierney - 53.48
  • Breaststroke: Finlay Knox - 1:00.66
  • Butterfly: Josh Liendo - 50.06
  • Freestyle: Yuri Kisil - 48.19

 

Josh Liendo is the big star here and will be expected to be the difference maker in this relay. Blake Tierney is greatly improving in the backstroke and Yuri Kisil is a decent option at freestyle. Like with most Canadian medley relays, breaststroke is the biggest weakness here. Finlay Knox will be expected to take the role and given his rapid improvement this year in the 200 IM, it's not out of the question for him to drop more time.

 

9. :POL Poland - 3:30.60

  • Backstroke: Ksawery Masiuk - 53.09
  • Breaststroke: Jan Kalusowski - 59.58
  • Butterfly: Jakub Majerski - 50.98
  • Freestyle: Mateusz Chowaniec - 48.45

 

Poland might have the most underrated medley relay of any team. Jakub Majerski has improved greatly this season and ranks 12th in the world in the 100m butterfly. Ksawery Masiuk also ranks in the top 20 in the 100m backstroke this year and is still a teenager. Kalusowski and Chowaniec have times just outside the OQT in their respective events.

 

8. :NED Netherlands - 3:30.21

  • Backstroke: Kai van Westering - 53.80
  • Breaststroke: Arno Kamminga - 58.87
  • Butterfly: Nyls Korstanje - 50.90
  • Freestyle: Sean Niewold - 48.14

 

With the addition of Kai van Westering and the emergence of Sean Niewold, the Netherlands will be a contender to make the final. They'll likely join Arno Kamminga (or Caspar Corbeau) and Nyls Korstanje on the relay who are both top 10 in the world in their respective events.

 

7. :GER Germany - 3:30.18

  • Backstroke: Ole Braunschweig - 53.48
  • Breaststroke: Melvin Imoudu - 58.84
  • Butterfly: Kaii Winkler - 51.51
  • Freestyle: Josha Salchow -47.85

 

Germany is a country that's made great improvements in the medley relay this year. Josha Salchow has dropped more than a second off his freestyle time in 2023 to improve his PB to 47.85. Melvin Imoudu has had a breakout year and his breaststroke PB stands at 58.84 now. Germany was also able to get one of the top American prospects Kaii Winkler to join their team which will be a big boost on the butterfly leg. Ole Braunschweig should also have a decent backstroke leg.

 

6. :ITA Italy - 3:29.55

  • Backstroke: Thomas Ceccon - 52.43
  • Breaststroke: Nicolo Martinenghi - 58.84
  • Butterfly: Alberto Razzetti - 52.06
  • Freestyle: Alessandro Miressi - 47.72

 

It was only two years ago that Italy won an unexpected gold at the 2022 World Championships in this relay. With Thomas Ceccon, Nicolo Martinenghi and Alessandro Miressi, they have 3 elite swimmers which all rank in the top 12 in the world this year in their respective events. Not a single Italian hit the 51.67 OQT during the qualification period. Alberto Razzetti will likely be asked to do the butterfly leg. He's an world class IMer and 200m butterflyer but his 100m butterfly best time this year is only 52.06 and that just won't cut it against the other top nations. If he can drop some time, Italy could factor into the medals.

 

5. :AUS Australia - 3:28.99

  • Backstroke: Isaac Cooper - 53.46
  • Breaststroke: Sam Williamson - 58.80
  • Butterfly: Matthew Temple - 50.60
  • Freestyle: Kyle Chalmers - 47.63

 

Despite Kyle Chalmers only having a season best of 47.63, we all know he's going to be much faster than that in Paris. Arguably no one has been more clutch on relays than him so if Australia is within striking distance of a medal heading into the freestyle leg, they'll get it. Sam Williamson has had a breakthrough year going under 59 seconds for the first time in his career at the Australian Trials. That's turned a longtime Australian weakness into a possible strength this year. Matthew Temple, at his best, is an elite butterflier but he failed to break the 51 second barrier at Australian Trials. He's been as quick as 50.25 in his career so the Australians will be hoping he can be at that form in Paris. The big question mark will be on the backstroke leg where Isaac Cooper has the fastest time this year at 53.46. He'll need to be faster if Australia wants to contend for the medals.

 

4. :FRA France - 3:28.93

  • Backstroke: Mewen Tomac - 52.88
  • Breaststroke: Leon Marchand - 59.06
  • Butterfly: Maxime Grousset - 50.59
  • Freestyle: Florent Manaudou - 47.90

 

Two impressive performances have helped vault France in the middle of medal contention. First, Leon Marchand set a monster PB in the 100m breaststroke going 59.06. Then at French Trials, Florent Manaudou set a PB in the 100m freestyle of 47.90. Add a top 12 backstroker + the reigning 100m butterfly world champion to the mix and you've got a really good relay. You can make an argument of putting Grousset on the freestyle leg and Clement Secchi on the butterfly leg but I did the math and based on their season bests, putting Grousset and Manadou in the relay makes the relay faster by 0.01 seconds.

 

3. :GBR Great Britain - 3:28.67

  • Backstroke: Ollie Morgan - 52.70
  • Breaststroke: Adam Peaty - 57.94
  • Butterfly: Joe Litchfield - 51.71
  • Freestyle: Matt Richards - 47.82

 

At British Trials, we got to see both the return to form of Adam Peaty and the emergence of Ollie Morgan as one of the best backstrokers in the world. It was after those swims that everyone thought the British medley relay could contend for gold. After all, Matt Richards had also just come off of a finals appearance in the 100m freestyle at the 2023 World Championships. But then the 100m butterfly leg happened. Surprisingly, Jacob Peters, the best British butterflyer over the past two years failed to make the Olympic Team and the race was won by Joe Litchfield in a pedestrian time of 51.71. Whether or not they will use Litchfield or clutch relay performer James Guy remains to be seen but either way, the butterfly leg will be the biggest difference maker for Great Britain.

 

2. :CHN China - 3:27.13

  • Backstroke: Xu Jiayu - 52.39
  • Breaststroke: Qin Haiyang - 58.24
  • Butterfly: Wang Changhao - 51.20
  • Freestyle: Pan Zhanle - 46.80

 

Speaking of a key butterfly leg, China will also need one. China currently boasts the 4th ranked 100m backstroker in the world, the 2nd ranked 100m breaststroker in the world, and the top ranked 100m freestyler in the world who just broke the world record at the 2024 World Championships. Wang Changhao will likely be relied on for the butterfly leg. He's just coming off setting a PB at Chinese Olympic Trials and ranks 18th in the world this year. If he can stay in touch with Caeleb Dressel, they'll have the World Record holder, Pan Zhanle, to bring them home.

 

1. :USA United States - 3:26.56

  • Backstroke: Ryan Murphy - 52.22
  • Breaststroke: Nic Fink - 58.57
  • Butterfly: Caeleb Dressel - 50.19
  • Freestyle: Jack Alexy - 47.08

 

Not surprisingly, the team that everybody will be chasing is the US, who has won every edition of this relay in Olympic history that they've competed in. There are no clear weaknesses on this team. So far this year, Ryan Murphy ranks 1st in the world in the 100m backstroke, Nic Fink ranks 3rd in the 100m breaststroke, Caeleb Dressel ranks 3rd in the 100m butterfly, and Jack Alexy ranks 3rd in the 100m freestyle.

Was already waiting for your countdown to continue.

 

Some notes about Germany:

a) Salchow already swam 48.3 last year, so it wasn’t a one second improvement for him this year.

b) Not sure how much of a boost Winkler will be (if he gets to compete), considering all the trouble and the fact that he is less than 0.2 seconds faster than Armbruster. I also think that Armbruster has to be used in some relay and I don’t think that he will be used in the mixed medley relay instead of Angelina Köhler.

 

Other than that:

I think it GB will use Scott on the free leg. 
I think it would be a big shock if neither the U.S. nor China would win gold. Behind them it could be a 4-way battle for bronze (Italy, GB, Australia, France). Personally I have the most question marks when it comes to France and Australia. My ranking would probably be:

USA

China

GB

Italy

France

Australia

Germany

Japan

 

Attachment is the great fabricator of illusions; reality can be obtained only by someone who is detached.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/12/2024 at 7:39 AM, Topicmaster1010 said:

Relay Power Rankings: Women's 4x200m Freestyle Relay

 

Thought it would be cool to start a series on this thread to preview all the relay events and seeing how each country compares to the rest. We begin with the women's 4x200m freestyle relay because I know all the entries already. For each country, I'm taking the top 4 eligible swimmers for each country and using their best times from 2024 to form a estimated relay time. 1.5 seconds will be subtracted from each cumulative time to account for reaction times.

 

*Please note that the order of swimmers is arranged from fastest to slowest times, NOT by predicted relay order.

 

16. :TUR Türkiye - 8:02.37

  • Givem Guvenç - 1:59.23
  • Ela Naz Özdemir - 2:00.52
  • Zehra Bilgin - 2:01.74
  • Ecem Dönmez - 2:02.38

 

15. :FRA France - 7:58.41

  • Lucile Tessariol - 1:59.22
  • Marina Jehl - 2:00.04
  • Assia Touati - 2:00.05
  • Oceane Carnez - 2:00.60

 

14. :NED Netherlands - 7:55.94

  • Marrit Steenbergen - 1:56.09
  • Imani de Jong - 1:59.25
  • Janna van Kooten - 1:59.35
  • Silke Holkenborg - 2:02.75

 

Was a little bit surprised to see the Netherlands this low. They should be higher but all 4 of their relays swimmers haven't been able to match their times from last year so far this year.

 

13. :ESP Spain - 7:54.66

  • María Daza - 1:58.81
  • Alba Herrero - 1:59.04
  • Paula Juste - 1:59.09
  • Ainhoa Campabadal - 1:59.22

 

12. :ITA Italy - 7:53.67

  • Sofia Morini - 1:57.81
  • Simona Quadarella - 1:58.82
  • Giulia D'Innocenzo - 1:59.23
  • Giulia Ramatelli - 1:59.31

 

11. :NZL New Zealand - 7:52.16

  • Erika Fairweather - 1:55.45
  • Laticia-Leigh Transom - 1:58.42
  • Eve Thomas - 1:59.07
  • Caitlin Deans - 2:00.72

 

10. :JPN Japan - 7:51.92

  • Waka Kobori - 1:58.22
  • Rio Shirai - 1:58.27
  • Hiroko Makino - 1:58.42
  • Nagisa Ikemoto - 1:58.51

 

9. :ISR Israel - 7:50.99

  • Anastasia Gorbenko - 1:56.74
  • Daria Golovaty - 1:57.87
  • Lea Polonsky - 1:58.89
  • Ayla Spitz - 1:58.99

 

8. :BRA Brazil - 7:50.20

  • Maria Costa - 1:56.37
  • Gabrielle Roncatto - 1:58.01
  • Stephanie Balduccini - 1:58.51
  • Maria Heitmann - 1:58.81

 

7. :HUN Hungary - 7:49.57

  • Nikolett Pádár - 1:56.83
  • Minna Ábráham - 1:57.22
  • Panna Ugrai - 1:58.07
  • Dóra Molnár - 1:58.95

 

6. :GER Germany - 7:48.32

  • Isabel Gose - 1:56.66
  • Julia Mrozinski - 1:57.22
  • Nicole Maier - 1:57.36
  • Nele Schulze - 1:58.58

 

5. :GBR Great Britain - 7:47.72

  • Freya Colbert - 1:56.22
  • Abbie Wood - 1:56.62
  • Medi Harris - 1:58.10
  • Freya Anderson - 1:58.28

 

Great Britain is the first country on these rankings that I'd say actually has a chance at a medal. Freya Anderson didn't race the individual 200m at British Trials this year due to illness. They'll need her back at her best if they want to contend for a medal along with drops from all the other swimmers.

 

4. :CAN Canada - 7:43.09

  • Summer McIntosh - 1:53.69
  • Mary-Sophie Harvey - 1:55.44
  • Julie Brousseau - 1:57.60
  • Emma O'Croinin - 1:57.86

 

This could very well be Canada's best shot at a relay medal. They have two dynamite legs with McIntosh and Harvey. Julie Brousseau is only 18 and has the potential to drop more time which will be a must for Canada if they want to challenge for the podium. If any of the swimmers look off in prelims, Ella Jansen (1:58.25) and Brooklyn Douthwright (1:58.49) will be looking for an opportunity to swim and who knows, maybe Penny Oleksiak will suddenly show signs of her old 200m freestyle form.

 

3. :CHN China - 7:42.57

  • Yang Junxuan - 1:54.37
  • Li Bingjie - 1:56.29
  • Liu Yaxin - 1:56.56
  • Tang Muhan - 1:56.85

 

Overall, this is a very well-rounded Chinese team. While the top two swimmers, on paper, are slower than Canada, everybody has shown that they are capable of going sub 1:57 on a flat start. Ge Chutong (1:57.04) and Kong Yaqi (1:57.04) are also relay options. They should still be the favourites to take the bronze medal and as shown at the 2020 Olympics, this Chinese relay is capable of surprising everybody.

 

2. :USA United States - 7:42.22

  • Katie Ledecky - 1:54.97
  • Claire Weinstein - 1:55.86
  • Paige Madden - 1:56.36
  • Erin Gemmell - 1:56.53

 

Slightly leading the charge for 2nd spot is the US. Their trials were much slower than people expected, but there's reason to believe they'll be much faster in Paris. While Ledecky has not been as fast as McIntosh or Yang this year, she's proven to be a game changer in this relay over her career. Claire Weinstein and Erin Gemmell are young and still improving and Paige Madden is having a career year at 25 years old. The US will also have Anna Peplowski (1:56.99) and Alex Shackell (1:57.05) waiting in reserve. The battle for silver should be an interesting one with likely 3 teams fighting for two medals. But...

 

1. :AUS Australia - 7:34.52

  • Ariarne Titmus - 1:52.23
  • Mollie O'Callaghan - 1:52.48
  • Lani Pallister - 1:55.57
  • Brianna Throssell - 1:55.74

 

then there's Australia. Good luck beating a relay team with the two fastest performers of all time. The Australian B-team could also have a chance of winning a medal. The next 4 fastest Aussies on the Olympic team this year are Kaylee McKeown (1:56.06), Jamie Perkins (1:56.22), Shayna Jack (1:56.22), and Meg Harris (1:56.93).

Still don’t see how GB could win a medal. I don’t see them beating Canada or China, not to mention both. My ranking would be:

Australia

USA

China

Canada

GB

Hungary

Germany

Japan/Brazil

Attachment is the great fabricator of illusions; reality can be obtained only by someone who is detached.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OlympicsFan said:

 

Other than that:

I think it GB will use Scott on the free leg. 
 

 

Obviously form will play a part but Richards has consistently been faster than Scott over 100m the last couple of years. Even with Duncan's relay prowess, it would be something of a shock if we made that change. Not completely unlikely, obviously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Had a massive headache, so decided to delay posting the results until now.    Hamburg Elite16 | Hamburg, Germany     Women’s Tournament Gold-  Tanja Hüberli/Nina Brunner  Silver-  Svenja Müller/Cinja Tillmann Bronze-  Thamela Cordello/Victoria Lopes   Men’s Tournament Gold-  Anders Mol/Christian Sørum  Silver-  Pablo Herrera/Adrian Gavira Bronze-  Stefan Boermans/Yorrick de Groot   Full Results
    • U20 World Championships will be live-streamed on the Beach Volleyball World Youtube Channel. 
    • 2024 Girls World Junior Rankings   20 countries are represented in these rankings. YOB = Year of Birth.   50m Freestyle Rank Nation YOB Swimmer Time Competition 1 2006 Olivia WUNSCH 24.45 Australian Olympic Trials 2 2006 Sara CURTIS 24.56 Italian Championships 3 2009 Rylee ERISMAN 24.62 US Olympic Trials 4 2007 Jana PAVALIC 24.67 European Championships 5 2006 Milla JANSEN 24.76 Junior Pan Pacs 6 2006 Eva OKARO 24.91 Sette Colli 7 2006 LYU Yue 25.04 World Championships 7 2006 Hannah CASEY 25.04 Junior Pan Pacs 9 2007 Julie MISHLER 25.06 USA Meet Indianapolis 10 2006 LIU Shuhan 25.11 Chinese Championships 10 2007 Annam OLASEWERE 25.11 TYR Pro Swim Series San Antonio 100m Freestyle Rank Nation YOB Swimmer Time Competition 1 2006 Olivia WUNSCH 53.17 Australian Olympic Trials 2 2009 Rylee ERISMAN 53.75 Junior Pan Pacs 3 2006 Milla JANSEN 53.81 Junior Pan Pacs 4 2006 Summer MCINTOSH 53.90 Canadian Open 5 2006 Nikolett PADAR 54.17 European Championships 5 2006 Sara CURTIS 54.22 European Juniors 7 2006 Minna ABRAHAM 54.28 European Juniors 8 2006 Alex SHACKELL 54.38 USA Meet Indianapolis 9 2006 Eva OKARO 54.46 British Championships 10 2007 Maria DAZA 54.50 Spanish Trials 200m Freestyle Rank Nation YOB Swimmer Time Competition 1 2006 Summer MCINTOSH 1:53.69 Canadian Trials 2 2007 Claire WEINSTEIN 1:54.88 Olympics 3 2006 Nikolett PADAR 1:56.14 Olympics 4 2008 KONG Yaqi 1:57.04 Chinese Championships 5 2006 Alex SHACKELL 1:57.05 US Olympic Trials 6 2006 Katie GRIMES 1:57.19 US Olympic Trials 7 2006 Minna ABRAHAM 1:57.22 European Championships 8 2007 YANG Peiqi 1:57.43 Chinese Championships 9 2006 Julie BROUSSEAU 1:57.60 Canadian Trials 10 2006 Inez MILLER 1:57.72 Junior Pan Pacs 400m Freestyle Rank Nation YOB Swimmer Time Competition 1 2006 Summer MCINTOSH 3:58.37 Olympics 2 2007 Claire WEINSTEIN 4:04.54 TYR Pro Swim Series Westmont 3 2008 Sofia DIAKOVA 4:05.16 Russian Swimming Cup 4 2007 YANG Peiqi 4:05.25 Chinese Championships 5 2006 MA Yonghui 4:06.59 Chinese Championships 6 2008 GAO Weizhong 4:06.60 Chinese Championships 7 2009 Kseniia MISHARINA 4:06.67 15th International Meet 8 2007 Madi MINTENKO 4:07.53 US Olympic Trials 9 2006 Julie BROUSSEAU 4:08.12 Canadian Trials 10 2008 Kayla HAN 4:08.21 US Olympic Trials 10 2006 Katie GRIMES 4:08.21 Grand Challenge 800m Freestyle Rank Nation YOB Swimmer Time Competition 1 2006 Summer MCINTOSH 8:11.39 USA Meet Orlando 2 2006 Katie GRIMES 8:21.51 Swim Meet of Champions 3 2007 Claire WEINSTEIN 8:23.73 TYR Pro Swim Series Westmont 4 2009 Kseniia MISHARINA 8:27.36 Russian Swimming Cup 5 2008 GAO Weizhong 8:27.97 Chinese Championships 6 2008 Agostina HEIN 8:29.19 World Championships 7 2006 MA Yonghui 8:29.24 Chinese Championships 8 2009 MAO Yihan 8:29.57 Chinese Championships 9 2009 Amelie BLOCKSIDGE 8:30.05 European Juniors 10 2008 Vivien JACKL 8:30.74 Hungarian Championships 1500m Freestyle Rank Nation YOB Swimmer Time Competition 1 2006 Katie GRIMES 15:57.31 Swim Meet of Champions 2 2009 Kseniia MISHARINA 16:06.09 Russian Championships 3 2008 GAO Weizhong 16:06.19 Chinese Championships 4 2008 Vivien JACKL 16:06.37 European Championships 5 2009 Amelie BLOCKSIDGE 16:10.04 British Meet Manchester 6 2007 YANG Peiqi 16:13.08 World Championships 7 2006 MA Yonghui 16:16.18 Chinese Championships 8 2007 Emma GIANNELLI 16:17.19 European Juniors 9 2009 MAO Yihan 16:17.95 Chinese Championships 10 2008 Agostina HEIN 16:21.68 World Championships 100m Backstroke Rank Nation YOB Swimmer Time Competition 1 2006 Leah SHACKLEY 59.05 US Olympic Trials 2 2006 Jaclyn BARCLAY 59.28 World Championships 3 2006 Summer MCINTOSH 59.64 USA Meet Orlando 4 2006 Teagan O'DELL 59.72 US Olympic Trials 5 2008 Charlotte CRUSH 59.86 US Olympic Trials 6 2006 Erika PELAEZ 59.95 US Olympic Trials 7 2009 Rylee ERISMAN 1:00.04 US Olympic Trials 8 2006 Delia LLOYD 1:00.43 Ontario Summer Nationals 9 2006 LEE Eunji 1:00.45 Korean Championships 10 2007 Zoe AMMUNDSEN 1:00.46 Australian Age Group Nationals 200m Backstroke Rank Nation YOB Swimmer Time Competition 1 2006 Jaclyn BARCLAY 2:07.03 World Championships 2 2006 Katie GRIMES 2:07.72 US Olympic Trials 3 2006 Teagan O'DELL 2:07.97 US Olympic Trials 4 2006 Leah SHACKLEY 2:08.19 Junior Pan Pacs 5 2006 Dora MOLNAR 2:09.02 European Championships 6 2006 Lilla BOGNAR 2:09.51 US Olympic Trials 7 2009 Audrey DERIVAUX 2:09.61 USA Futures Championships 8 2008 ZHANG Jingyan 2:09.70 Chinese Championships 9 2009 SUN Mingxia 2:09.75 Chinese Championships 10 2006 LEE Eunji 2:09.88 Olympics 100m Breaststroke Rank Nation YOB Swimmer Time Competition 1 2006 Eneli JEFIMOVA 1:06.08 European Juniors 2 2009 Sienna TOOHEY 1:07.01 Australian Olympic Trials 3 2006 Kotomi KATO 1:07.45 Junior Pan Pacs 4 2007 Monique WIERUSZOWSKI 1:07.67 Auckland Championships 5 2007 Smilte PLYTNYKAITE 1:07.91 European Juniors 6 2008 KO Haru 1:08.03 Korean Championships 7 2006 Piper ENGE 1:08.14 World Championships 8 2007 PARK Sieun 1:08.18 Korean Championships 9 2008 Nayara PINEDA 1:08.29 Spanish Winter Championships 10 2006 Irene MATI 1:08.32 Italian Championships 200m Breaststroke Rank Nation YOB Swimmer Time Competition 1 2006 Kotomi KATO 2:24.73 Junior Pan Pacs 2 2007 PARK Sieun 2:25.46 Korean Championships 3 2008 MOON Sua 2:26.69 Korean Championships 4 2006 Mina NAKAZAWA 2:27.00 Japan Olympic Trials 5 2006 Eneli JEFIMOVA 2:27.01 AP Race 6 2007 Kotomi SATO 2:27.02 Japan Olympic Trials 7 2006 Summer MCINTOSH 2:27.23 USA Meet Orlando 8 2010 LYU Qinyao 2:27.24 Chinese Championships 9 2007 Lena LUDWIG 2:27.45 German Championships 9 2008 Nayara PINEDA 2:27.45 World Championships 100m Butterfly Rank Nation YOB Swimmer Time Competition 1 2007 Mizuki HIRAI (WJR) 56.33 Kanagawa High School Meet 2 2006 Alex SHACKELL 56.78 US Olympic Trials 3 2006 Summer MCINTOSH 57.19 Canadian Open 4 2006 Lana PUDAR 57.97 Olympics 5 2009 Audrey DERIVAUX 57.99 Junior Pan Pacs 6 2007 Martine DAMBORG 58.09 Danish Open 7 2006 CHEN Luying 58.11 Chinese Championships 8 2008 Charlotte CRUSH 58.19 Junior Pan Pacs 9 2006 Olivia WUNSCH 58.30 Australian Olympic Trials 10 2006 Leah SHACKLEY 58.39 TYR Pro Swim Series Westmont 200m Butterfly Rank Nation YOB Swimmer Time Competition 1 2006 Summer MCINTOSH (WJR) 2:03.03 Olympics 2 2006 Alex SHACKELL 2:06.10 US Olympic Trials 3 2006 CHEN Luying 2:06.81 Chinese Championships 4 2009 GONG Zhenqi 2:07.28 Chinese Championships 5 2009 Audrey DERIVAUX 2:07.70 USA Futures Championships 6 2006 Lana PUDAR 2:07.92 World Championships 7 2006 MA Yonghui 2:08.73 World Championships 8 2006 Laura CABANES 2:09.03 Spanish Trials 9 2006 Katie GRIMES 2:09.22 Swim Meet of Champions 10 2007 Sarah DUMONT 2:09.64 European Juniors 200m Individual Medley Rank Nation YOB Swimmer Time Competition 1 2006 Summer MCINTOSH (WJR) 2:06.56 Olympics 2 2006 Mio NARITA 2:10.11 Konami Open 3 2006 Teagan O'DELL 2:11.57 Junior Pan Pacs 4 2007 ZHENG Huiyu 2:11.63 Chinese Championships 5 2006 Lilla BOGNAR 2:11.77 Junior Pan Pacs 6 2006 Laura CABANES 2:12.28 Spanish Trials 7 2008 Misuzu NAGAOKA 2:12.31 Junior Pan Pacs 8 2007 CHEN Xin 2:12.66 Chinese Championships 9 2009 Mana ISHIKAWA 2:13.19 Japan Olympic Trials 10 2008 Linda ROTH 2:13.19 German Juniors 400m Individual Medley Rank Nation YOB Swimmer Time Competition 1 2006 Summer MCINTOSH (WR) 4:24.38 Canadian Trials 2 2006 Katie GRIMES 4:32.45 Swim Meet of Champions 3 2008 Vivien JACKL 4:34.96 Hungarian Championships 4 2006 Mio NARITA 4:35.40 Japan Olympic Trials 5 2006 Lilla BOGNAR 4:37.86 US Olympic Trials 6 2006 Laura CABANES 4:39.99 Spanish Trials 7 2012 YU Zidi 4:40.97 Chinese Championships 8 2008 Misuzu NAGAOKA 4:41.57 Junior Pan Pacs 9 2007 Sarah DUMONT 4:42.44 European Juniors 10 2008 Kayla HAN 4:43.09 Speedo Summer Championships
    • Diamond League Silesia    Men’s Hammer Throw 1.  Ethan Katzberg (80.02m)  2. Mykhailo Kokhan (79.85m) 3.  Wojciech Nowicki (76.05m)   Women’s Hammer Throw 1.  Brooke Andersen (76.19m) 2.  Hanna Skydan (71.82m) 3.  Janee Kassanavoid (70.55m)   Men’s Shot Put 1.  Joe Kovacs (22.14m) 2.  Ryan Crouser (22.12m) 3.  Leonardo Fabbri (22.03m)   Men’s High Jump 1.  Gianmarco Tamberi (2.31m) 2.  Romaine Beckford (2.29m, PB) 3.  Oleh Doroshchuk (2.29m)   Men’s 110m Hurdles 1.  Grant Holloway (13.04) 2.  Rasheed Broadbell (13.05) 3.  Daniel Roberts (13.24)   Women’s 1000m 1.  Nelly Chepchirchir (2:31.24) 2.  Jemma Reekie (2:32.56) 3.  Mary Moraa (2:33.43)   Men’s Pole Vault 1.  Armand Duplantis (6.26m, WR!)  2.  Sam Kendricks (6.00m) 3.  Emmanouil Karalis (6.00m)   Men’s 100m 1.  Fred Kerley (9.87)  2.  Ferdinand Omanyala (9.88)  3.  Ackeem Blake (9.89)    Men’s 400m Hurdles 1.  Karsten Warholm (46.95)  2.  Clement Ducos (47.42, PB) 3.  Abderrahman Samba (47.69)   Women’s 400m Hurdles 1.  Femke Bol (52.13) 2.  Anna Cockrell (52.88) 3.  Rushell Clayton (53.13)   Men’s 3000m 1.  Jakob Ingebrigtsen (7:17.55, WR)  2.  Berihu Aregawi (7:21.28, PB & NR) 3.  Yomif Kejelcha (7:28.44)   Ingebrigtsen not only breaks Komen’s 28 year old WR, but smashes it! What a run from him.    Women’s Triple Jump 1.  Shanieka Ricketts (14.50m) 2.  Leyanis Perez Hernandez (14.42m) 3.  Dariya Derkach (14.02m)   Women’s 100m Hurdles 1.  Ackera Nugent (12.29)  2.  Grace Stark (12.37) 3.  Danielle Williams (12.38)   Women’s 400m 1.  Marileidy Paulino (48.66) 2.  Salwa Eid Naser (49.23) 3.  Natalia Kaczmarek (49.95)   Women’s Javelin Throw  1.  Adriana Vilagos (65.60m, PB & NR)  2.  Jo-an van Dyk (62.81m) 3.  Nikola Ogrodnikova (61.84m)   Men’s 3000m Steeplechase 1.  Soufiane El-Bakkali (8:04.29) 2.  Amos Serem (8:04.29) 3.  Samuel Firewu (8:04.34, PB)   Men’s 800m 1.  Marco Arop (1:41.86)  2.  Emmanuel Wanyonyi (1:43.23) 3.  Bryce Hoppel (1:43.32)   Men’s 200m 1.  Letsile Tebogo (19.83) 2.  Alexander Ogando (19.86)  3.  Kenny Bednarek (20.00)     Women’s 1500m 1.  Diribe Welteji (3:57.08) 2.  Freweyni Hailu (3:57.88) 3.  Georgia Bell (3:58.11)    Women’s 100m 1.  Tia Clayton (10.83)  2.  Marie-Josee Ta Lou (10.83)  3.  Tamari Davis (10.84)      Full Results
    • This is the TISC 2024 logo, it was the only way I could insert it as the file size was too big (hence the tackiness).
    • Charter and Official Rulebook         SECTION 1 - SONG CHOICE AND ELIGIBILITY:   1. (a) All songs must be released on or before December 31st, 2019, in keeping with TISC Open rules whereby songs released in the last 5 years are ineligible to compete.   1. (b) All songs must be ORIGINAL to the nation for which they are competing. In other words, if a song is a copy or cover of an original song by an artist from another nation, then it is ONLY permitted to participate for the nation of the artist who produced the original version. If the artist of the cover version is from the same nation as the original artist, then the cover version must fulfill rule 1(a) in order to be eligible to participate.   1. (c) Songs that competed at Eurovision shall be excluded from competing at TISC. However, songs which competed in a national final but were not put forward to represent their nation at Eurovision may be selected to compete at TISC.     SECTION 2 - ARTIST CHOICE AND ELIGIBILITY:   2. (a) Artists chosen to represent a nation must have been born in or be of the same nationality as the nation for which they are participating OR they must have more or equal association with that nation.   2. (b) In the case of bands, at least 50% of the band must be born in or be of the same nationality as the nation for which they are participating OR they should have more or equal association with that nation.   2. (c) For the purposes of the Totallympics International Song Contest, the same concept of nationality as that used by the IOC (International Olympic Committee) will be adopted. So, for example, artists from Scotland must represent Great Britain, artists from Faroe Islands must represent Denmark, etc.     SECTION 3 - NATIONAL JURY VOTING:   3. (a) National juries may consist of a single jury member OR a multi-member jury made up of two or more users from that nation.   3. (b) National juries must send their votes in SECRET (via private message) to the host organising member(s) of the song contest as requested during the designated voting window.   3. (c) National juries must submit their song entry on the official TISC thread for that edition within the designated song entry selection window as designated by the host organiser(s). National juries who fail to submit their song within the required time frame are at risk of disqualification from the contest.   3. (d) Each jury member in a multi-member jury shall send their individual preferences in SECRET (via private message) to the host organising member(s). The votes from each of the members of the multi-member jury will be combined to form a single set of votes which will represent the overall voting preference of that national jury. In this way, the votes from each of the participating national juries, whether single or multi-member juries, will hold equal value or weight.   3. (e) National juries will use the following voting format: (i) Jury members will award points to their 12 favourite songs in ascending manner from points 1 through 12 (inclusive) with the first preference receiving a maximum score of 12 points, second preference receiving 11 points, third preference receiving 10 points, and so forth until the song of 12th preference which will receive a single point. See below scoring table for reference:       1st Preference 12 pts  2nd Preference 11 pts  3rd Preference 10 pts  4th Preference 9 pts  5th Preference 8 pts  6th Preference 7 pts  7th Preference 6 pts  8th Preference 5 pts  9th Preference 4 pts  10th Preference 3 pts  11th Preference 2 pts  12th Preference 1 pt     (ii) In single member juries, these scores will subsequently represent the National Jury Vote of that nation. However, in multi-member juries, the votes of all the jury members from that nation will be combined to form a single set of points. The song which has received the most number of points from that national jury will be deemed to be the overall first preference choice of that jury and will receive the maximum score of 12 points; the song which has received the second highest number of points from that national jury will be deemed to be the overall second preference choice of that jury and will receive a score of 11 points, and so forth until the song which has received the 12th highest number of points which will receive a single point from that national jury. (iii) In the case of multi-member juries with 4 jury members or more, that jury can choose between the standard voting format (12-11-10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1) or the following alternative points format (18-15-12-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1). However, all jurors of that national jury must use the same format when submitting their votes. It is not permitted that some use the standard format and some others use the alternative format. As such, if a national jury wants to choose the alternative format over the standard format, that national jury must debate together in private message to come to a common consensus or majority vote on which to decide. The result of that discussion will then be posted on thread to inform all contestants and the organisers of their decision.All members of that jury will then submit their votes using the selected format. The host will then combine the votes of the jury members in the usual manner to form a single set of points as standard (12-11-10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1). (iv) National juries consisting of 2 members will be allowed the right to opt-in to an alternative voting process which guarantees that any song which received votes from both jury members will appear in the final top 12 combined list of that nation's final voting table. This will be achieved by removing the lowest ranked nation(s) in the combined top 12 which received points from just 1 jury member. The removed nation(s) will then become the highest ranking reserves. This opt-in method is available to national juries consisting of 2 members only. Any jury wishing to adopt this method shall inform the organisers of their decision to opt-in to the process by posting their intention to do so on the TISC thread prior to the opening of the voting window. The standard method of combining votes will still be the default method so if a 2-member national jury does not inform otherwise on thread, or if both jury members are in disagreement about which method to adopt, then the standard method will automatically be used to combine their votes.   3. (f) National juries must submit their votes by the official voting deadline as designated by the host organiser(s). National juries who fail to submit their votes within the required time frame will be disqualified from the contest.   3. (g) Any Nation which fails to participate in the voting process will be automatically disqualified from the contest.   3. (h) A random draw will take place in advance of the Grand Final to determine the order in which the National Juries will reveal their votes. This draw must be shown to be transparent and available to competing members should they wish to follow the result. The result of this draw must always be adhered to in order to preserve the random nature in which the voting will progress during the Grand Final. A National Jury may only request a "swap" in their designated voting position if, after the random draw, they have been assigned a voting slot outside of "reasonable hours". For the purpose of this contest, reasonable hours will be determined as anytime between 08:30-23:00 local time of that national jury. During the "swap" process, the host organiser will first look to make swaps between National Juries who are eligible for swaps after the random draw.     SECTION 4 - NATIONAL JURY TIE-BREAK PROCEDURES:   4. (a) In the event of a tie in the combined votes of multi-member juries, the following set of rules outlines how the tie-break will be resolved: (i) The song which has received points from the greatest number of jury members will be deemed the winner of the tie. For example, take the following scenario.... Songs A, B, and C each received a combined score of 10 points after the results of each national jury member were combined and calculated. Song A received a single score of 10 points from one jury member, Song B received scores of 7 points and 3 points from two separate jury members and Song C received scores of 5 points, 3 points and 2 points from 3 separate jury members. All three songs received a total of 10 points, however, Song C is deemed to be the winner of the tie because a greater number of jury members voted for that song (3 members in this case). (ii) If the songs remain deadlocked after 4 (a) (i), the song which received the highest value score from an individual jury member will be deemed the winner of the tie. For example, take the following scenario.... Song A and Song B each received a combined score of 14 points after the results of each national jury member were combined and calculated. Song A received scores of 8+6 points while Song B received scores of 7+7 points. Song A will be deemed the winner of that tie since that song received a score of higher value (8 points) from one of the national jury members. (iii) If the songs remain deadlocked after 4 (a) (i) and (ii), jury members from that national jury who did not award any votes to any of the songs involved in the tie-break will be asked to break the tie. This tie-break rule can only ever be used to break ties in juries of 3 members or more and ONLY if there is a jury member who did not vote for any of the songs involved in the tie-break. (iv) After the procedures 4 (a) (i), (ii) and (iii) have been carried out, all outstanding ties within the votes of a national jury shall be resolved by carrying out a single random draw. The nature of this random draw shall be as follows: The names of each national jury member will be entered into a draw. Each name will be drawn. The first jury member drawn will be awarded the right to break the unresolved tie of highest value. The second jury member drawn will be awarded the right to break the unresolved tie of the second highest value. For example, take the following scenario.... there are two members of National Jury X. After the votes of User A and User B are combined and calculated the following situation arises:         COUNTRY (Total points) -> Combined value Country A (24 points) -> 12 points Country B (21 points) -> 11 or 10 points Country C (21 points) -> 11 or 10 points Country D (18 points) -> 9 points Country E (16 points) -> 8 points Country F (13 points) -> 7 or 6 points Country G (13 points) -> 7 or 6 points Country H (10 points) -> 5 points Country I (7 points) -> 4 or 3 points County J (7 points) -> 4 or 3 points Country K (4 points) -> 2 points Country L (1 point) -> 1 or 0 points County M (1 point) -> 1 or 0 points   Those highlighted in red text are those ties which could not be resolved by 4 (a) (i), (ii) or (iii). As a result of the random draw, User A was drawn first, meaning that user will be given the right to break the unresolved tie of the highest value (the tie between Country B and C for 11 or 10 points). User B was drawn second meaning that user will be given the right to break the unresolved tie of the second highest value (the tie between Country F and G for 7 or 6 points). The order will then be reversed so that User B will be given the right to break the unresolved tie of the third highest value (the tie between Country I and J for 4 or 3 points). User A will finally be given the right to break the unresolved tie of the fourth highest value (the tie between Country L and M for 1 or 0 points). This procedure to break the unresolved ties will be used for national juries of any number with the first user drawn being given the right to break the unresolved tie of the highest value, the second user drawn being given the right to break the unresolved tie of the second highest value, third user the third highest tie, etc. reversing the order if need be when the order has completed one cycle. However, it should be noted that unresolved tie-breaks which require random draws will occur mostly in two-member juries since national juries with 3 or more members will likely resolve all ties through 4 (a) (i), (ii) or (iii).     SECTION 5 - OVERALL SCOREBOARD TIE-BREAK PROCEDURES:   5. (a) In the event of a tie in the overall scoreboard between two or more nations, the following set of rules outlines how the tie-break will be resolved: (i) The nation which has received points from the greatest number of National Juries will be deemed the winner of the tie. (ii) If there is still a tie after 5 (a) (i), the nation which has received the greatest number of 12 points will be deemed the winner of the tie. (iii) If there is still a tie after 5 (a) (i), (ii), the nation which has received the greatest number of 11 points will be deemed the winner of the tie. If the tie remains deadlocked, the process will continue by counting the number of 10 points each nation received, 9 points, 8 points, and so on until the tie-break can be resolved. 5. (b) If there is still a tie in the overall scoreboard between two or more nations after 5 (a) (i), (ii) and (iii) have been implemented, those nations shall be deemed to have tied for position in the overall scoreboard.     SECTION 6 - TEAM CHALLENGE FORMAT AND RULES:   6. (a) Each edition of the Totallympics International Song Contest will feature a Team Challenge competition. The main purpose of this team element is to further enhance the community spirit that is an integral feature of TISC events and to provide another means of encouraging users to interact with one another.   6. (b) The TISC Team Challenge event may vary in format from one contest to the next. The nature of the format will be dependent on the number of participating nations.   6. (c) Nations will be assigned to their team by random draw.   6. (d) The ideal format is that there will be a minimum of 8 teams, each made up of 4 nations. However, if that is not possible, the teams will be formed from one of the following formats (listed in order of preference): (i) teams of 3 nations (ii) teams of 5 nations (iii) if it's not possible for each team to have the same number of nations, a special provision will be introduced (for example: power plays).   6. (e) It is recommended that the teams shall be named after various cities/regions of the host country and combined with a nickname. For example, a contest in Brazil might feature teams called the Brasilia Capitals and Manaus Amazons.     SECTION 7 - ELIGIBILITY, CONDUCT AND RESPONSIBILITY OF PARTICIPANTS:   7. (a) Any first time participant must have been registered on the forum at least 2 months before they take part in the contest. The date used to calculate the 2 months rule will be 2 months prior to the National Selection deadline. A first time participant may be allowed special dispensation to participate in TISC, even if they do not fulfill the 2-month rule criteria. However, in such circumstances, that user must have shown a high level of activity in the forum in terms of posts and presence. This special dispensation will be awarded on the agreement of Totallympics admin, namely Sindo, who will conduct all necessary verification checks and will be given final approval by the TISC management team, namely OlympicIRL and the host of that TISC edition. These rules are not designed to exclude, only to ensure TISC retains a distinct character, built upon a unique community atmosphere created by users of the forum.   7. (b) Participating users shall be respectful of the song choice of all nations once they fulfill all of the necessary eligibility requirements.   7. (c) Participating users must not reveal or give any indication as to their preferences or voting choices at any stage before the official announcement of the votes during the Grand Final.   7. (d) Participating users must not discuss private voting procedures with other members so as to ensure fairness is always in play and to ensure any suspense during the Grand Final is kept intact.   7. (e) Participating users must be respectful when posting and discussing with other members on the Totallympics International Song Contest Thread.   7. (f) If foul play is detected with respect to 7 (a), (b), (c), (d) or (e) at any stage before, during or after the contest, the TISC organising committee reserves the right to place the participation or result of that nation under review.     SECTION 8 - HOSTING DUTIES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND ORGANISATIONAL TIMEFRAME:   8. (a) The host organisation should adhere to the follow basic schedule upon organising the contest:   When opening the thread, the registration window should be opened immediately, however, this window is only for user registration. The song entry window should not be opened in the first week to allow as many users as possible to take part in their national jury selection process. There shall be another 2 weeks allocated for registration and national song selection until the deadline to submit an entry. There shall be 2 weeks allocated for voting (of which a maximum of 4 days will be allocated to the host jury to submit their votes to a designated neutral third party). There shall be a maximum of 2 weeks allocated after the voting window closes to allow the hosts time to organise the Grand Final. This time-frame was agreed upon during a public vote but in special circumstances, exceptions will be considered.   8. (b) The host organiser(s) must submit their votes in advance of receiving votes from other National Juries by private message. The votes of the host(s) should be sent by private message to a neutral third party after the national selection window has passed and before the national jury voting phase begins.   8. (c) The host organiser(s) must abide by the same rules that govern the participation of users in the Totallympics International Song Contest as outlined in Section 6.     SECTION 9 - FUTURE HOSTING RIGHTS:   9. (a) Upon completion of the relevant song contest, the winning nation will automatically be awarded the rights to host the subsequent Totallympics International Song Contest 1 year later.   9. (b) If the winning nation wishes to decline the hosting duties, the runner-up of that edition will then be awarded the opportunity to accept or decline the hosting rights. If the runner-up also declines the hosting duties, the 3rd placed nation of that edition will have the opportunity to accept or decline the hosting rights.   9. (c) In the event that the hosting rights are declined by the top 3 ranked nations at the previous edition of the relevant TISC, an open bid process will be conducted in order to award the hosting rights. This process will be open to all candidates, first-time hosts as well as previous hosts. A random draw will take place with each candidate being awarded a number of tickets in the draw. The more tickets a candidate has entered, the better their chance of being selected as host. Here is the process for how the tickets will be distributed:   Each candidate automatically awarded 1 ticket each in the draw. However, additional tickets awarded as follows - did not host in the previous 5 editions (+1 additional ticket) - did not host in the previous 10 editions (+1 additional ticket) - did not host previously (+2 additional tickets) - took part in the previous bidding process (+1 additional ticket). For first-time hosts, they will add an additional ticket for each edition they are unsuccessful for in bidding, thus increasing their chance slightly with each unsuccessful bid. This increase will only be available for first-time hosts. Additionally, if a first-time host missed 2 consecutive bidding campaigns, then their tickets no longer carry forward and they lose those additional tickets.
    • Totallympics Open International Song Contest 2024    Totallympics Forum - TBD 2024 - TBD 2024        Official Schedule Until Saturday, October 26th: British Summer Time (UTC +1) From Sunday, October 27th: Greenwich Mean Time (UTC +0)   Sunday, August 25th 23:00 National Jury Registration Window Open   Sunday, September 1st 14:00 National Song Entry Selection Window Opened   Sunday, Septmber 22nd 21:00 National Jury Registration and National Song Entry Window Closed   Monday, September 23rd 22:00 Host Jury Voting Window Open   Friday, September 27th 21:00 Host Jury Voting Window Closed   Friday, September 27th 22:00 National Jury Voting Window Open   Friday, October 17th 21:00 National Jury Voting Window Closed   Sunday, October 19th 14:00 Voting Order Draw   Monday, October 20th 14:00 Festival of Music begins   Friday, 1st November* 19:00  Opening Ceremony    Saturday, 2nd November* 10:00 Totallympics Open International Song Contest 2024 Grand Final   Sunday, 3rd November* 19:00 Closing Ceremony     * Subject to change   Participating Nations     Nation Jury Members Artist - Song Video   Great Britain @Cinnamon Bun TBD   Ireland @OlympicIRL TBD   Total Jury Members 2   Total Nations 2        
×
×
  • Create New...