website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Summer Olympic Games 2032 Bid Process


Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Vektor said:

Germany should and will get 2036 if they want to host it. 

No thanks, they can have 2040 but leave '36 to someone else

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1978-summer-olympic-games-2032-bid-process/page/19/#findComment-397411
Share on other sites

On 05/04/2021 at 04:46, AustralianFan said:

 

 

Brisbane/SEQ - highly advanced bid and has full government support at all three levels of government,

- has the majority support of Queensland’s citizens.

- Brisbane/SEQ has exclusive Preferred Bidder status over all other bidders.

- now completing final paperwork before IOC votes them in as the Hosts at the 138th IOC Session this July in Tokyo.

- COVID circuit breaker choice for 2032

- they are so far in front and have been so for the last 3 years and no-one will catch them now before the Final Vote in 4 months time in July

 

South/North Korea - been asleep for 3 years.  just talking and have barely moved or done much at all. Not a chance for 2032 at least. There’s kess than 4 months to the expected 2032 Brisbane/SEQ hosting vote and so South/North Korea unfortunately is too little, too late for 2032.

 

Budapest, Hungary - been asleep, they have hardly gotteen out of bed and have just formed a committee to do a “feasability study”. Too little, too late for 2032

 

Rhine-Rhur, Germany - lots of infighting, does not have their own government support for the bid and the majority of their own citizens are against the bid. Now because they do not understand the new bidding rules and now they have started a fight with the IOC.  This bid is a real mess and no chance for 2032.  2036 is a priblem too as it is 100 years after the Nazi-run  Games of 1936 - something which will weigh against them for 2036.

 

Qatar - not a chance.  New IOC rules require the Summer Games must be held in July/August. That eliminates Qatar straight away way too hot for the many Olympic outdoor sports and spectators. 

 

 

I wish the other bidders well for next time and I am sure each of the rivals bidders will be better prepared next time.

 

 

India has recently started to harbour ambitions of hosting the Olympics probably 2036 hence. Is IOC too firm on Jul-Aug window, so will this go against India's bid as its the monsoon season. Sporting events in India are typically held in Nov-Dec or Feb-Mar

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1978-summer-olympic-games-2032-bid-process/page/19/#findComment-397488
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Siddhartha Talukdar said:

India has recently started to harbour ambitions of hosting the Olympics probably 2036 hence. Is IOC too firm on Jul-Aug window, so will this go against India's bid as its the monsoon season. Sporting events in India are typically held in Nov-Dec or Feb-Mar

Don't think anyone will want India to host after the shitshow the 2010 Commonwealth Games were. The Olympics are double the size.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1978-summer-olympic-games-2032-bid-process/page/19/#findComment-397519
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Orangehair43 said:

An hundred years on from 1936 would be something I am not sure the IOC will go for. 

On one hand, I could see it as a "Look how far we've come as a species!" sort of thing.  On the other hand, I doubt the IOC, and Germany specifically, want to focus so much on "Hey, we're not the Nazis anymore!"  

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1978-summer-olympic-games-2032-bid-process/page/19/#findComment-397531
Share on other sites

Sad the IOC is relegated on settling on cities like Brisbane. Good for then however for being proactive about it and getting the IOC to commit. 

 

 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1978-summer-olympic-games-2032-bid-process/page/19/#findComment-397557
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, intoronto said:

Sad the IOC is relegated on settling on cities like Brisbane. Good for then however for being proactive about it and getting the IOC to commit. 

 

 

Exactly.  A few years back they said they would not look at bids from second-string cities, they only wanted big global mega cities.  Well, how's that working out?

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1978-summer-olympic-games-2032-bid-process/page/19/#findComment-397562
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Grassmarket said:

Exactly.  A few years back they said they would not look at bids from second-string cities, they only wanted big global mega cities.  Well, how's that working out?

Certain large but provincial cities in major traditional 'markets' will look on the Brisbane decision with excitement - in GB, the obvious candidates Birmingham and Manchester, possibly the North East and Glasgow will suddenly feel it is possible. Likewise large cities in Germany that are not Munich or Berlin. Spain and Madrid might be less happy with a perceived opening up of the field.

 

Of course, the silly thing is Barcelona showed just how an Olympics can elevate a 'second' city - the IOC should never have been so silly in the first place. But then, that's on a loop, isn't it.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1978-summer-olympic-games-2032-bid-process/page/19/#findComment-397564
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Final Standing   Nation P W(OTW) L(OTL) GF GA +/- Pt. Romania 5 4(0) 1(0) 47 3 +44 12 Iceland 5 3(1) 2(1) 35 14 +21 9 Chinese Taipei 5 3(1) 2(1) 21 14 +7 9 Mexico 5 3(1) 2(1) 20 10 +10 9 Belgium 5 2(1) 3(1) 19 14 +5 6 South Africa 5 0(0) 5(0) 1 88 -87 0   The following Nations have qualified for the Women's Ice Hockey IIHF Under 18 Division II Group A World Championship 2027 Romania   The following Nations have qualified for the Women's Ice Hockey IIHF Under 18 Division II Group B World Championship 2027 Belgium Chinese Taipei Iceland Mexico  South Africa
    • Sunday February 1st, 2026 - Round-Robin Last Day Results (GMT +2)   13:00   Belgium  0 - 6  Romania 16:30   Chinese Taipei  4 - 5OT  Iceland 20:00   Mexico  14 - 1  South Africa
    • All Milano-Cortina Olympians are to be find in the first posts of the respective threads just like in this one.
    • Almost sadder than a university hall of residence
    • Big shock as  beat the all-conquering  Men's Team Sprint team in the Heats!
    • sure! in every Italian bedroom you normally have every kind of table, chairs, furniture, tv screen  to me, this really look an unfinished room, you normally don't see such a sad place even when you buy a new house 
    • Canoe Sprint There is a now a cap of 5 athletes per gender in the kayak events (down from 6 in 2024). The World Championships has been replaced by the Olympic Qualification Rankings.   K2 lost 2 boat quotas while K4 has gained 1 boat quota. Quota distribution is quite complicated as it usually is for canoe sprint. They also force nations to compete in a minimum number of events based on the number of athletes qualified; 2 and 3 athletes per boat class must compete in 2 events, 4 must compete in all 3 events and 5 must compete in all 3 events and have two entries in the K1 event.
    • Wrestling will have a completely new format, I do not like the changes. ranking isn't really a good idea in this sport, this will force wrestlers to compete in so many events to collect points. which is not good for their health. specially with the current UWW ranking points distribution system which is plain stupid   they are also gifting 18 quotas to very weak countries by that last qualification event. but I understand their point of view. can't wait to see lots of Russian wrestlers compete for weak countries for that 1 available quota.
    • Canoe Slalom Quotas from men's/women's K1 have been moved to men's/women's KX1. K1 will now have 14 quotas while KX1 will have 10 quotas. C1 remains at 17 quotas. Athletes may participate in other events up to a maximum of 2 athletes per NOC.   The World Championship qualifier has been dropped in favour of the Olympic Qualification Rankings (7 K1, 10 C1, 3 KX1), afterwards you have the Continental Qualifiers (1 per boat) and then a new Global Qualifier (2 per boat).   There were a few changes regarding ways to ensure an athlete can only obtain 1 quota. The biggest being at each stage the boat priority is K1 > KX1 > C1 for the rankings and KX1 > K1 > C1 for the continental/global qualifiers. This basically means if the same athlete qualifiers in multiple boats then the quota will be given to the kayak over canoe.    
    • I'll post significant changes periodically. I'll start with the recently added/updated documents.   Archery The addition of mixed compound (12M & 12W) forced a reduction on the recurve side. The mixed compound quotas are distributed as follows   Host - 1 World Championships - 3 Continental Games - 5 World Ranking List - 2 Final Qualifier - 1   To compensate the team events will now only have 8 nations. 2 quotas were removed from the World Ranking List and 2 were removed from the Final Qualifier.   Individual recurve and mixed recurve distribution is the same
×
×
  • Create New...