website statistics
Jump to content

Biathlon at the Winter Olympic Games Beijing 2022


Totallympics
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, SalamAkhi said:

:mumble:

They removed the quota for Latvia since it was earned by Rastorgujevs.

They added :KAZ.

They removed the 2nd quota for China since it was not in the top 12, to give it via "host country places" (+1 another one).
So that's only 11 quota via the IBUQP, why is :CRO not included ? 

 

2XCHN, 2XJPN, 2XKAZ, 2xMDA, POL, ROM, NZL and KOR =12 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also I don't understand the "host nation places".

 

Is 1+2 :

 

* 1 via IBUQP (Cheng) + 2 wild-cards = 3 athletes. In this case there's a mistake in the tally since Cheng would be counted twice. 

* 1 + 2 = 3 wild-cards + Cheng = 4 athletes = a relay. In this case why do they write 1+2 when it's actually simply 3 ? It was said that they could get 2 wild-cards if not in the top 10 of the IBUQP, so why 1+2 :mumble:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, prso1000 said:

2XCHN, 2XJPN, 2XKAZ, 2xMDA, POL, ROM, NZL and KOR =12 

https://assets.ctfassets.net/cz0vl36hcq0x/77wgSttsh6Bt8LffBRm6Mi/650abda9b96dc35e32281ce59b2ec98b/Annex4a_Quota_Allocation_List_MEN_150122.pdf

Look, only 11 quota via the IBUQP, and China does get further allocations via host-country (why and most of all how much ?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NearPup said:

Looks like they gave :CHN 3 host quotas.

It seems they „earned“ one plus 2 host quotas but then it is really totally unfair towards Croatia as @SalamAkhiwrote 

as there were 12 qualifying places incl host quota and now there are 13 

 

so either they give a quota to Croatia or take away one from KAZ, or it does not make sense! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, prso1000 said:

It seems they „earned“ one plus 2 host quotas but then it is really totally unfair towards Croatia as @SalamAkhiwrote 

as there were 12 qualifying places incl host quota and now there are 13 

 

so either they give a quota to Croatia or take away one from KAZ, or it does not make sense! 

No, it looks like they added two quotas beyond the limit of 105. There is precedent for this (Canada got 3 men's host quotas outside the normal qualification rules in 2010).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NearPup said:

No, it looks like they added two quotas beyond the limit of 105. There is precedent for this (Canada got 3 men's host quotas outside the normal qualification rules in 2010).

Yes seems to be the case. But to me that is unfair. The rules were clear and now China gets a present to qualify a relay. Why not saying from beginning the host has 4 quotas 🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NearPup said:

No, it looks like they added two quotas beyond the limit of 105. There is precedent for this (Canada got 3 men's host quotas outside the normal qualification rules in 2010).

Ok so they've got 2 extra-quota and can therefore field a relay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.biathlonworld.com/news/2022-olympic-games-qualifying/4Mg7ZORJkfP5zKX82xGBIp

 

IBU stated if China ended in top20, it's 105 total quotas. If China is out of top20, it's 107 total quotas to help China reach 4 quotas per gender and attend the relay. I also just surprisingly know it and searching the IBU document and news. It writes clearly in news but I don't find the lines in qualification document.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...