website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Athletics Qualification to Tokyo 2020 Summer Olympic Games


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, OlympicIRL said:

So I just got an email from World Athletics in response to my question if unqualified athletes impact the 56 athlete quota in the men’s 100m and it’s as I suspected, they don’t impact the quota for that event:

 

Not sure what the case is for the other events. 

so there will be 56 qualified via the ranking and the minimums + the tripartites?

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/922-athletics-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/127/#findComment-384446
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Benolympique said:

so there will be 56 qualified via the ranking and the minimums + the tripartites?

Yes according to World Athletics that is the case for the men’s 100m. I do not know if that is the case for any other event. 
 

I would imagine some of those qualified by ranking-only in the men’s 100m will be entered in the preliminary round with the universality qualified athletes before we move to Round 1 proper with 56 athletes.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/922-athletics-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/127/#findComment-384447
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OlympicIRL said:

So I just got an email from World Athletics in response to my question if unqualified athletes impact the 56 athlete quota in the men’s 100m and it’s as I suspected, they don’t impact the quota for that event:

 

Not sure what the case is for the other events. 

Well, that's pretty weird. Singling out one event like this.

 

I guess preliminary stages will then have some World Ranking athletes combined with universality athletes? Talk about no-contest.

#banbestmen

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/922-athletics-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/127/#findComment-384450
Share on other sites

Just now, dcro said:

Well, that's pretty weird. Singling out one event like this.

 

I guess preliminary stages will then have some World Ranking athletes combined with universality athletes? Talk about no-contest.

Yes that’s how it worked in the previous world championships I believe where B standard athletes were in the prelim round along with the universality athletes.

 

It would be interesting to know if it is only for the men’s 100m or if it is the case through all events that universality places don’t affect the quota. I am pretty sure it is only the men’s 100m this applies to as even the women’s 100m doesn’t have a prelim round and therefore probably has a fixed number of 56 quotas.

 

I will email them back after work to see if I can get more clarification :d 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/922-athletics-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/127/#findComment-384451
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, OlympicIRL said:

Yes that’s how it worked in the previous world championships I believe where B standard athletes were in the prelim round along with the universality athletes.

 

It would be interesting to know if it is only for the men’s 100m or if it is the case through all events that universality places don’t affect the quota. I am pretty sure it is only the men’s 100m this applies to as even the women’s 100m doesn’t have a prelim round and therefore probably has a fixed number of 56 quotas.

 

I will email them back after work to see if I can get more clarification :d 

But the again, those B standard athletes were always a minority and still some pure universality athletes progressed?

 

If 56 athletes are to advance to the first round, then universality athletes stand no chance barring any injuries or false starts. This mismatch will look pretty bad on screen. :facepalm:

#banbestmen

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/922-athletics-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/127/#findComment-384454
Share on other sites

Can anyone confirm this story to be true?

 

:ASA getting a universality place in the men's 100?

https://ksltv.com/464521/park-city-sprinters-dream-comes-true-after-making-olympics-in-second-sport/?

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/922-athletics-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/127/#findComment-384457
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • So qualification isn't done, and the last few spots are very close with essentially one more race to go.   On the 6th and 7th Canada entered 6 racers in the lower tier North American cup races in Lake Placid. On the 11th there was races again in Lake Placid, Canada only entered 2 (articles say withdrew 4, start list on the 10th says 2 registered, whatever).  If the total amount entered was above 20 then the ranking points for first start at 120 and go down incrementally, with only 2 Canadians entered there were 19 competitors so points for first only start at 90.    The USA only has a shot at qualifying 2 sleds at this point, and Uhlaender appears to have had a shot at catching up to 2nd best among the americans. She came 1st, those 30 points really cost her if that is how the USA nominates their team.   The best 17 countries get one sled, based on how their top competitor is ranked.  is in 13th with 498 points,  is in 14th with 480,  15th 475,  16th 468,  17th 457,  18th 456 and no one else has the ability to gain enough points.  could have received 27 more points,  19 more,  21 more. So a big deal for them, and not appearing in the stories.   The accusation is that Canada did it for their own gain, to protect Channell's chance of qualifying: the 6 countries with the highest ranked 2nd best slider get a 2nd quota.  Channell holds the last spot at 512,  Erlacher is next at 484. Both only race at the World Cup level. However, the next best after that is  Simmchen at 391, who did race in Lake Placid and misses out on 25 points. Both her and her teammate would have to pass both Channell and Erlacher in the rankings for them to achieve a 2nd quota. A miraculous outcome, but that is what Uhlaender is accusing the Canadians of being afraid of. Could be, I don't think so but who knows.  
    • I see, wasn't sure if they had internal trials like Canada had in the past. So Uhlaender will receive 84 points, more possibly if she races again, and Ro has one more race. So very understandable why she would be upset. 
    • The American selection criteria is IBSF ranking as of January 18th. Currently:   15  Kelly Curtis 710 16  Alessandra Fumagalli 704 17  Mystique Ro 694 18  Valentina Margaglio 668 19  Sujung Hong 662 20  Katie Uhlaender 660   So those 30 points could be important depending on next weekend.
    • Regarding  and  :   The FIL documents refer to Part C.2.2. of the Qualification rules regarding Athlete eligibility, it seems the Canadian women's double is missing the minimum of timed runs in Cortina (c.2.2.1), whereas the other are missing the requirement under C.2.2.2
    • I am so confused at the whole thing   Can someone give a short summary of what is the actual issue, and what would have happened (as in, who would have qualified) if those Canadians who withdrew did start?
    • Agree. That article is completely non-sensical. No one understands the qualification system apart from actually Cecchini. And the ones who technically could be upset (e.g. Austria) are not mentioned. :D   And the Israelis athlete is interestingly the woman who just drove down the halfpipe at the 2018 Olympics.   Plus, that race did get Johansen into the quota slot for 
    • Other than the Reuters article it is all pretty badly presented. What I find comical is, if true, the Israeli and Maltese federations were upset. LOL, so far out of contention but mad about five to ten points when they need hundreds.  and  are right on the edge and lose key points so I would understand them being upset, but Uhlaender? All three americans would have to overtake the 3rd best british slider, it would take divine intervention to accomplish. So she is upset, but it is not rational to blame the Canadian coach. It must be very frustrating to not be racing in the World Cup, climb into the top 20 in rankings, and it still not be enough. 
    • Slopestyle WC Snowmass    Women Gold-  Laurie Blouin (81.21) Silver-  Mari Fukada (77.26) Bronze-  Kokomo Murase (75.36)   Men Gold-  Jake Canter (85.16) Silver-  Su Yiming (84.18) Bronze-  Dane Menzies (83.68)    Full Results
×
×
  • Create New...