website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Badminton Qualification to Tokyo 2020 Summer Olympic Games


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Griff88 said:

Olympic Qualification Ranking as of 15 June 2021

So can we presume the ranking is final now and we can speculate the seeding (even with multiple players in top8/16 we can guess who will be chosen)?

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/923-badminton-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/6/#findComment-372470
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Vic Liu said:

So can we presume the ranking is final now and we can speculate the seeding (even with multiple players in top8/16 we can guess who will be chosen)?

Yes you're right! The seeding for singles and doubles are basically sealed at this point.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/923-badminton-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/6/#findComment-372473
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, intoronto said:

Rip :SRI missing out on a quota by one spot.

How is is possible, are not only 34 players qualified for the singles ?

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/923-badminton-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/6/#findComment-372485
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, intoronto said:

Rip :SRI missing out on a quota by one spot.

They may get it. Wouldn't be surprised if Sweden decline Burestedt's spot

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/923-badminton-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/6/#findComment-372487
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, hckošice said:

How is is possible, are not only 34 players qualified for the singles ?

Double starters are in the tournament software ranking. It has the top 40 scheduled to play.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/923-badminton-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/6/#findComment-372490
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Agger said:

They may get it. Wouldn't be surprised if Sweden decline Burestedt's spot

Why would they decline? Tough qualification standard?

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/923-badminton-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/6/#findComment-372491
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, hckošice said:

How is is possible, are not only 34 players qualified for the singles ?

5 male doubles players are also qualified in mixed doubles. + unused host quota. makes it 40 instead of 34

 

@intoronto he is the 3rd reserve, he is next after NZL but only because NZL is getting the Oceania quota. some players above him are also eligible to qualify. NGR and POL. but the Nigeria guy will qualify in men's doubles. so Sri Lanka is in fact the 2nd reserve.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/923-badminton-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/6/#findComment-372492
Share on other sites

Just now, MHSN said:

5 male doubles players are also qualified in mixed doubles. + unused host quota. makes it 40 instead of 34

 

@intoronto he is the 3rd reserve, he is next after NZL but only because NZL is getting the Oceania quota. some players above him are also eligible to qualify. NGR and POL. but the Nigeria guy will qualify in men's doubles. so Sri Lanka is in fact the 2nd reserve.

I am not sure... the tournament software ranking is different and labeled as of May 11 2021.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/923-badminton-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/6/#findComment-372494
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, intoronto said:

I am not sure... the tournament software ranking is different and labeled as of May 11 2021.

oh yes . I was looking at the wrong ranking. :facepalm: he is the 1st reserve

 

and based on previous experiences, we always have at least one or two withdrawals in badminton. even more sometimes. some countries have their own standards.

 

 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/923-badminton-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/6/#findComment-372496
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • I love that it is more straightforward in relation to the number of quotas and does not allow possible problems as it was in Tokyo and Paris.
    • I love the judo qualification system, for me is the best in all disciplines. It combines a strong circuit, and it allows 100 or so countries to participate in.   So, maybe, if UWW does its job properly, it will be a good thing.
    • China Media Group (CMG) will broadcast all 116 gold medal events of the Milan Winter Olympics live on CCTV-1, CCTV-5, CCTV-5+ and CCTV-16. It will also use technologies such as 4K/8K ultra-high definition to enhance the viewing experience. Live broadcasts of all events will be carried out from 16:00 Beijing time to 06:00 the next day.
    • The strength of the UK is that they are 100% focused on the track, while Italy must to navigate between the track and the road: the line-up is different for practically every event, etc. Paternoster should focus 100% on the track; she won't win anything big on the road anymore. As it is, she's weak both there and there. The situation is different with Balsamo, as she's also having significant success on the road and likely earns the most money there.
    • Discovery+ in the UK have also got their schedule up now.     I notice that only thing listed as being in UHD is the Opening Ceremony though....     
    • The problem over the last few years was that no-one was able to keep pace with the big Katie Archibald turns. Looks to be sorted now.  
    • The women's top 50 is so crammed with athletes from the same five nations that it is not inconceivable they are unable to fill the full quota from the top 50, in which case a third double spot would open up between USA/BEL/GBR
    • That women's pursuit team looks brutally fast. Batter you over the head into submission brutal, perhaps not seen since the early Trott-Rowsell days The 4 minute barrier could be on borrowed time.   The two British women sprinters Finucane and Caldwell also look pretty ominous, indeed the whole women's sprint team looks in some shape and with some depth to get that result without Finucane   Work to do for the British men's teams, but they won't be unhappy either, not to mention Joe Truman's unexpected Kilo win.
    • I prefer to do mine like this guy (https://app.podiumsport.it/) does his "Projected Medals" as probability based rather than straight medal picking... all things being equal, conversion rates should be about the same and the outliers come out in the wash. Unfortunately most people just like medal picking, and think any other approach is weird  
    • So probably: Men Oceania: Americas: Africa: Asia: One of  Europe: One of Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (probably not)  and whichever countries don’t qualify from Asian Games.  Universality: ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of the above in World Rankings    and one of  (most likely) or  seem safe with two quotas. The other will be favourites if a third team gets allocated two.    Women Oceania: Europe: One of Americas:  /  if US is ineligible due to their host quota, if the host quota gets reallocated then Canada will be in contention in the rankings Africa:   Asia: One of   Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (x1?)  (x1/2)  (x1/2), whichever doesn’t qualify out of  / ,  and  ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of above.  Universality: ?    is safe with two quotas between  it’ll be tough for whoever misses out of those three.   nevermind , 
×
×
  • Create New...