website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Summer Olympic Games 2032 Bid Process


Recommended Posts

The Indonesian NOC posted on Instagram to explain that 'targeted dialogue' means it is not over yet, I commented on the lack of openly accessible information and gave what information that Brisbane had shared to public. They later deleted the post for some reason...



 

Edit: They reposted it, let's hope it's not because of my negative comment :lol:

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1978-summer-olympic-games-2032-bid-process/page/17/#findComment-352748
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Griff88 said:

The Indonesian NOC posted on Instagram to explain that 'targeted dialogue' means it is not over yet, I commented on the lack of openly accessible information and gave what information that Brisbane had shared to public. They later deleted the post for some reason...



 

Edit: They reposted it, let's hope it's not because of my negative comment :lol:

Well I don't see information that Brisbane shared to public either, it just suddenly became the recommendation city. I understand that it's a developed city with relatively good facilities and friendly atmosphere for athletes. But I don't see the discussion about the budget and how to raise it. It may be a "debt trap" for Australia like Belt and Road initiative.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1978-summer-olympic-games-2032-bid-process/page/17/#findComment-352764
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Vic Liu said:

Well I don't see information that Brisbane shared to public either, it just suddenly became the recommendation city. I understand that it's a developed city with relatively good facilities and friendly atmosphere for athletes. But I don't see the discussion about the budget and how to raise it. It may be a "debt trap" for Australia like Belt and Road initiative.

I saw something like this, which probably is not that convincing - but it is better than just saying “we’re bidding” without having any concrete thing accessible to public while being optimistic af

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1978-summer-olympic-games-2032-bid-process/page/17/#findComment-352773
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
12 minutes ago, rybak said:

I really doubt that we will have another Games in Korea in near future :d 

This is kind of "politically correct World Peace" 1976 Gold Medalist, Men's fencing, Thomas Bach would love to promote in his quest for the Nobel Peace Prize.

 

Now Brisbane 2032 board members must at least farted twhen they heard this.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1978-summer-olympic-games-2032-bid-process/page/17/#findComment-360637
Share on other sites

The modern Olympic movement has undergone the biggest changes in Host City/Region selection in it’s history.

 

Its called Agenda 2020 (2014), New Norm (2018) and Agenda 2020+5 (2021).

 

Very big changes to the selection process and announced to the world.

 

No secret here.

 

Although yes I’m Australian, I am very glad that Brisbane/SEQ 2032 grasped these changes very quickly after they were announced and has been very busy ever since literally sprinting to the finish line, which I’m glad they have almost reached with the 138th IOC Session in Tokyo expected to vote on the 2032 host.

 

Yes, it’s all changed.  No more rigid 7 year bidding period, so many more changes.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1978-summer-olympic-games-2032-bid-process/page/17/#findComment-361430
Share on other sites

Here is a good run-through of these IOC changes to the selection process: :)

 

 

NEW APPROACH TO FUTURE HOST ELECTIONS

THE REVOLUTIONARY NEW APPROACH TO ELECTING HOSTS FOR OLYMPIC GAMES AND YOUTH OLYMPIC GAMES RESULTS IN SIGNIFICANT COST SAVINGS FOR POTENTIAL HOSTS, AS WELL AS MORE SUSTAINABLE PROJECTS AND MASTERPLANS. 

THE REFORMS ENSURE THE IOC REMAINS IN STEP WITH A RAPIDLY CHANGING WORLD TO DELIVER GAMES THAT ARE BETTER ALIGNED WITH FUTURE HOSTS’ LONG-TERM DEVELOPMENT PLANS WHILE MAINTAINING THE INHERENT MAGIC OF THE GAMES AND PROVIDING THE BEST POSSIBLE EXPERIENCE FOR ATHLETES.

Credit: International Olympic Committee

 

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has made significant improvements to its approach to future hosts since the election of Thomas Bach as IOC President in 2013.

 

The reforms began in earnest in 2014 with the unanimous approval by the full membership of the IOC,* collectively known as the IOC Session, of Olympic Agenda 2020, a strategic roadmap for the future of the Olympic Movement that, with a focus on increasing sustainability and legacies, led to a major review of all aspects of organising the Olympic Games and Youth Olympic Games.

 

One of the key areas addressed by Olympic Agenda 2020 was the candidature procedure, with a new philosophy introduced that invited potential hosts to present  projects that best fit their sporting, economic, social and environmental-planning needs rather than trying to fit the local context to the Games.

 

The goal was to create Olympic projects that are less expensive and that maximise operational efficiencies, while also unlocking greater value for future hosts, with a strong emphasis on legacy and sustainability.

 

Building on the success of these initiatives, 2018 saw the adoption of the New Norm, additional reforms that provided Olympic hosts with even more flexibility in designing the Games to meet their long-term development goals. The IOC also increased the assistance and expertise it and the wider Olympic Movement provided.

 

The impact of these reforms has been considerable. A one-year, non-committal dialogue stage introduced for the candidature phase of the Olympic Winter Games 2026, for example, resulted in significant cost reductions in both the candidature and operating budgets – approximately 80 and 20 per cent lower, respectively, than the average for 2018 and 2022.

 

As a reflection of the IOC’s flexibility with regard to the use of existing and temporary venues, 80 per cent of the proposed venues for 2026 were existing or temporary, a 33 per cent increase from the 2018/2022 average of 60 per cent.

 

So effective and appreciated was the increased partnership during the 2026 dialogue stage that the IOC set up a Working Group in early 2019 to consider ways to build upon these elements for the future.

 

*IOC Members represent the athletes, International Federations (IFs), National Olympic Committees (NOCs) and the International Paralympic Committee (IPC).

INCREASED FLEXIBILITY AND DIALOGUE

Following consultation with the IOC Executive Board (EB), the Working Group recommendations were presented to and approved by the IOC Session in June 2019. The Executive Board then agreed on an action plan for their implementation in October 2019, resulting in the creation of a new, streamlined approach to future host elections that allows for increased flexibility and cooperation on a bilateral level.

 

This approach is creating greater opportunities for dialogue between the IOC and Interested Parties (cities/regions/countries/National Olympic Committees), while allowing for more flexibility with regard to the timing of future elections. In addition, Interested Parties are not necessarily limited to a single city but can refer to multiple cities, a region or a country.

 

The door is open to any Interested Party to enter into non-committal continuous dialogue with the IOC through two permanent Future Host Commissions (see below for more information). It also allows the IOC to target a potential host if deemed beneficial to the Olympic Movement.

 

The initial dialogue does not have to be edition-specific, with discussions intended to determine whether a potential host is best suited to organise an Olympic Games or a Youth Olympic Games, and when. The strict timelines and deadlines of the past no longer exist.

 

The IOC will continue to offer hands-on support and expertise to help define and develop projects in partnership with the Interested Parties that will produce many long-lasting legacies for the local populations.

 

The new approach mirrors the rapidly changing world we live in: As the governing body of the Olympic Movement, the IOC has positioned itself at the vanguard of innovation and development to help deliver the best possible Olympic projects with the most benefits for Olympic stakeholders and future hosts alike.

 

“We must continue to keep up with the fast pace of change in our current world,” said President Bach. “Flexibility is a necessity to ensure good governance and to have sustainable Olympic Games in the future. We will do that while maintaining the magic of the Games, the fundamental principle of universality and our commitment to having athletes at the centre of everything we do.”   

WHAT ARE THE INNOVATIONS ?
  • The establishment of a permanent, non-committal and non-edition specific ongoing dialogue to explore and create interest among Interested Parties for the Olympic Games and Youth Olympic Games;

 

  • Once a potential host is identified, it does not mean the end of the line for other Interested Parties, as in the past. They can remain in Continuous Dialogue with the Future Host Commissions, to discuss hosting a future Olympic event.

 

  • The creation of two Future Host Commissions (Summer and Winter) to oversee interest in future Olympic Games and Youth Olympic Games and advise the Executive Board;

 

  • Giving the IOC Session more influence by having non-Executive Board members make up the Future Host Commissions.
FUTURE HOST COMMISSIONS

The two Future Host Commissions were appointed by IOC President Bach in October 2019. Both are gender-balanced and represent a full range of Olympic stakeholders, including athletes, International Federations (IFs), National Olympic Committees (NOCs) and the International Paralympic Committee (IPC).

 

The Commissions comprise IOC Members who are not on the Executive Board to ensure that the IOC Session has even more influence by being involved from the very beginning of the dialogue.

 

The full composition of the Commissions can be found here: Summer and Winter.

 

The Commissions will respect any confidentiality that may be requested by potential hosts as they work toward the development of the public and private dimensions of their project, as well as the content of any discussion of particular proposals.

 

The Terms of Reference of the Commissions and Rules of Conduct for the Commissions can be found here.

ROLE OF THE FUTURE HOST COMMISSIONS

The role of the Future Host Commissions is to continually explore, monitor and encourage interest in future Olympic Games, Olympic Winter Games and Youth Olympic Games.

 

The Commissions interact with potential hosts to determine the nature and extent of their possible interest and work with them to understand the various elements and opportunities of the Olympic Games and the Youth Olympic Games.

 

The Commissions will assist interested parties in formulating a strong vision for their Olympic project and designing sustainable proposals that align with their long-term development goals.

 

The role of the Commissions is also to study the long-term challenges related to hosting future Olympic Games, such as climate change.

 

The Commissions will report regularly to the Executive Board, providing advice and recommendations regarding possible hosts to enable the Executive Board to be in a position to react to various developments and opportunities deemed to be in the best interest of the Olympic Movement.

CONTINUOUS VS TARGETED DIALOGUE – WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENCES?
 
 
CONTINUOUS DIALOGUE

With this new approach, the Future Host Commissions remain open for dialogue in perpetuity.

 

Continuous dialogue is exploratory in nature and non-committal, held with Interested Parties for a future Olympic Games or Youth Olympic Games with the support of their respective National Olympic Committees (NOCs). These discussions are non-edition specific.

 

Throughout this dialogue, the Commissions constantly monitor and analyse the projects, providing feasibility assessments that will form the basis for recommendations and advice provided at frequent intervals to the IOC Executive Board (EB).

TARGETED DIALOGUE

At any time, the EB can make the strategic decision to instruct the Future Host Commissions to enter into targeted, edition-specific dialogue with an Interested Party or Parties, who will then be referred to as Preferred Host(s).

 

The EB will base such a decision on a positive feasibility assessment from a Future Host Commission and on other factors, such as potential opportunity in terms of current global context (including socio-economic, geopolitical and universality factors), alignment with Olympic Agenda 2020 and Olympic Agenda 2020+5, and strong public support.

 

At this time, the Preferred Host(s) will be asked to submit a streamlined set of documents, including guarantees, while the Future Host Commissions will make more detailed evaluations of the project(s) and, if required, visit the Preferred Host(s).

Based on the evaluation report of the Future Host Commission, the IOC Executive Board can put one or more Preferred Host(s) forward for a vote by the IOC Session if all requirements have been met.

 

Should the Preferred Host(s) fail to deliver key requirements, the EB can instruct the Future Host Commissions to return to Continuous Dialogue with other Interested Parties.

VOTE BY THE IOC SESSION

The Session’s prerogative to elect Games hosts has been preserved.

 

Once the Executive Board has put forward the Preferred Host(s) to the IOC Session, IOC Members will have the opportunity to hear presentations, ask questions and provide comments before voting for the future host.

 

IOC Members therefore continue to be at the centre of the decision-making process.

BENEFITS OF THE NEW APPROACH

With its strong commitment to flexibility, sustainability, legacies and the optimisation of all aspects of the Olympic Games, the IOC aims with the new approach to remain in step with a rapidly changing world to deliver Olympic events that are fully aligned with future hosts’ long-term development plans and Olympic Agenda 2020 and Olympic Agenda 2020+5 while maintaining the magic of the Games and providing thebest possible experience on and off the field of play for the athletes.

 

 

624D5B42-1E53-4615-9A4F-7CF13E333E45.jpeg

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1978-summer-olympic-games-2032-bid-process/page/17/#findComment-361433
Share on other sites

 

6 years in the making

The history of Brisbane/SEQ’s 2032 Bid

AOC - Australian Olympic Committee

IOC - International Olympic Committee

COMSEQ - Council of Mayors of South East Queensland 

PM - Australian Prime Minister

OCLG  Olympic Candidature Leadership Group (Brisbane/SEQ 2032)

QP - Queensland Premier

When

What

By

Nov 2014

Olympic Agenda 2020 announced 

“A strategic road map for the Olympic Movement”

IOC

2015

 

 

Pre-feasibility Study of a potential SEQ bid for 2028 Olympic Games commissioned in 2015 and released 2016

COMSEQ

Sep 2017

Paris and Los Angeles awarded 2024 and 2028 Games

IOC

April 2018 

2018 Gold Coast Commonwealth Games

 

GOLDOC

Jan 2019

 

SEQ People Mass Movement Study Released 

COMSEQ

Feb 2019

 

2032 SEQ Olympic / Paralympic Games Feasibility Study 

COMSEQ

May 2019

- ‘Sport Accord’ global sports conference Gold Coast visited by the IOC President

-  IOC President addresses AOC

IOC President

June 2019

New Norm Olympic bidding rule changes announced

IOC

June 2019

Australian Prime Minister meets with IOC President at G20 Summit

PM

 

July 2019

IOC Sends Funding Contribution Letter to Queensland Government

IOC

July 2019

Brisbane 2032 Value Proposition Assessment released

QP

Aug 2019

Inaugural Meeting of 2032 Olympic Candidature Leadership Group

OCLG

Sep 2019

Queensland Premier leads delegation in visit to IOC in Lausanne, Switzerland.

QP

Dec 2019

Queensland Premier announces Candidature for 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games

QP

Dec 2019

AOC welcomes Queensland 2032 Olympic Games Candidature

AOC

Mar 2020

Bid suspended due to COVID Pandemic

QP

Nov 2020

PM meets with IOC President and AOC President in Tokyo

PM, IOC + AOC

Dec 2020 

Brisbane/SEQ 2032 Bid continuous dialogue resumes

QP

Jan 2021

IOC Presentation to Brisbane Candidature representatives

IOC

Feb 2021 

Brisbane/SEQ 2032 Candidature presentation made to the IOC Future Host Commission

OCLG

Feb 2021

Feasibility Assessment Report into the Brisbane/SEQ 2032 Candidature presented to the IOC Executive Board

IOC Future Host Commission

Feb 24 2021

IOC Future Host Commission instructed to enter into “Targeted Dialogue” with the Brisbane/SEQ candidature

IOC Executive Board

Mar 2021

IOC Approves Agenda 2020+5

 - a strategic roadmap and the Olympic movement through to 2025.

 137th IOC Session

 

What Happens Now ?

 

 

 

 

 

Targeted Dialogue with Brisbane 2032 OCLG

IOC Future Host Commission + OCLG

 OCLG

 

Completion of IOC Questionnaire and other documents which iron out the finer details.

OCLG

 

Future Host Commission recommends preferred candidate to IOC Executive Board

IOC Future Host Commission

 

IOC Executive Board recommends preferred 2032 candidate to IOC Session

IOC Executive Board

138th IOC Session, 20-21 July, 2021 in Tokyo.

IOC Session Votes on Games’ 2032 host

IOC 

 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1978-summer-olympic-games-2032-bid-process/page/17/#findComment-361441
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • We don’t even have a broadcaster or streaming platform for the games ! IOC couldn’t get any deal for the Indian viewers and we can’t watch this games live ! 
    • 2028 Team Size Projection – Jan 2026 Update   Here’s an update to my 2028 Team Size Projection. While I touch upon major events changes may occur due to results in smaller events. Additionally, several sports released their qualification document so there may be cases where I have to update the projection. I will only include sports where there is an update.   Here is the link to the updated sheet.     Aquatics (Water Polo) The Men’s European Championships saw take gold. The victory moved Serbia up a few places between European nations. With that said, no one fell out of Olympic qualification with the likes of France and Romania still on the outside looking in. remains on the edge.   Athletics (Marathon) Both the Xiamen and Osaka marathons were held this month along with a few other smaller events. While there were a few changes in the rankings, in terms of Olympic projections gains an athlete in the men’s marathon at the expense of   Badminton Major tournaments include the Malaysia Open and India Open. New updates which affected projections include the women’s doubles where overtook . As Polina Buhrova is also scheduled to compete in the singles event, an additional spot has been open. Other changes in the women’s singles was loses one of their quotas. and benefit from those losses.   Indonesia’s loss on the women’s side is offset by gaining a second player in the men’s singles. This puts   on the outside.   Canoeing The qualification document for both Slalom and Sprint were released/updated. No significant changes were found in the Sprint update. Slalom had significant changes relative to 2024 where the initial quotas will be decided by rankings and kayak cross will now have significant quotas being allocated. After adjustment, the following nations lost a quota; Andorra, Chinese Taipei, Ireland, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Slovakia, and Sweden. The following nations gained a quota; Canada, China, France, Italy, South Africa, Spain, and Tunisia.   Cricket The Women’s T20 World Cup Qualifier was held. No changes to the projection.   Equestrian (Dressage & Jumping) Various World Cup events were held. No changes to the projections were made.   Fencing We had two Grand Prix this month, one for epee and the other for sabre. In men’s epee, overtakes . On the women’s side, the United States moved into the top 4 in the team ranking, pushing Estonia down to fifth. This pushed out of Olympic qualification while takes the Americas quota. This caused a downstream effect on the individual side as Ukraine takes an individual quota and Canada relinquishes their quota, additionally, gained a quota while lost one.   In men’s sabre, now takes the Asian team quota pushing down to just an individual quota. No changes were found in women’s sabre.   Handball Four men’s continental championships were held this month. finished top in Africa while a couple of upsets were saw in South America and Asia where and won over and respectively. Despite their wins, they currently haven’t leapfrogged into being projected to qualify. We’ll see how they perform at the World Championships.   Europe saw finish fourth. This was enough to push it into Olympic qualification projection. They pushed out.   Rowing The qualification document was released. There was a change in boat allocation relative to 2024 and the continental qualifier was slightly different than what I projected. Additionally, I assumed coastal rowing would allow 2 men and 2 women to compete in its three events, but the max is 1 man and 1 woman. This has caused significant changes to the projections.   Overall, the United States lost four quotas. Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Lithuania, New Zealand, Norway, and Spain lost two quotas and Algeria, Argentina, Croatia, Cuba, Egypt, Kazakhstan, Netherlands, Portugal, Tunisia lost one quota.   The following nations have gained two athletes; Japan, Morocco while the following nations gained one athlete; Angola, Austria, Belgium, Chile, Chinese Taipei, Cote d’Ivoire, Denmark, Estonia, Kuwait, Latvia, Mexico, Romania, Philippines, Paraguay, Puerto Rico, South Africa, South Korea, Switzerland, Togo, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu   Rugby Sevens Fixing a couple of mistakes. First on the men, actually has the Asian quota over and in the women as is essentially shutting down the program, I think it is only right to remove them until they decide to compete again. This means is also projected to qualify.   As for new updates, we saw the third tier SVNS compete, which brought no new updates and the Singapore SVNS. I also didn’t add the Dubai or Cape Town SVNS in my calculations. For both, while there was some shuffling no one ultimately fell out.   Shooting The Asian Shotgun Championships were held this month. A few top shooters were missing. The only change to the projection is is set to qualify in women’s trap, pushing out   Squash The Tournament of Champions was held this month. Additionally, the qualification document was released. There was some restriction as to how many nations can send two players and this sport will offer universality quotas.   The following nations lost an athlete quota; Colombia, France, Great Britain, Hong Kong, Malaysia, and New Zealand. The following nations gained an athlete quota; Canada, Pakistan, Spain (x2), Switzerland, Ukraine   Triathlon The qualification document was released. There are a few changes relative to 2024. Projection changes include: Losses to Hong Kong and Slovenia and gains for Austria and China.   Weightlifting The qualification document was released. One change to be made was the reallocation process for host nation quotas. Due to this, El Salvador Iraq, Palau, Sri Lanka, Tuvalu, and Vanuatu lost quotas while Australia, China, Dominican Republic, Iran, and Samoa (x2) gained quotas.   Wrestling The qualification document was released. There were some significant changes to the qualification process including using the world rankings and the final qualifier only consisting of non-qualified nations. The projection changes are as follows; losses to Belarus, Bulgaria, China, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Russia, South Korea, Sweden, and Turkey.   Belgium and Lithuania gained 2 quotas while American Samoa, Austria, Estonia, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Latvia, Madagascar, Spain, and Turkmenistan gained 1 quota.
    • Looks like we in the Philippines are in the same situation. No news yet on whether we’ll be able to watch the Games 
    • Cricket is any day in a better position than Baseball, Modern Pentathlon or Rowing 8s globally
    • http://i.imgur.com/gLJZbix.jpg   Honestly football is just on another level. For other sports, an expanded field or creating multiple host cities likely only works with baseball, cricket and maybe basketball, and only in very specific countries.
    • No streaming for the games in India. I contacted IOC they just sent me a list where the games will be shown live.    Last games we had the Olympic channel and YouTube showing the live coverage for regions with no media rights. This time sadly no such schedule.   So much about making the games accessible to all...
    • What revealed those files of Epstein !!!! thousands of scandals , horrible diguisting things mixing politic criminalities , robbery , scam , manipulation...etc    all those celebrities of shht that you love   
    • I wonder if instead of having flexibility around what sport to add there should be one or two team sports per game with an expanded field (of 16 or 32 or w/e) where the host gets to pick which which team sports (if any) has an expanded field.
    • Dunno if this is geoblocked, but this is from our weekly comedy show Saturday Night Live  
×
×
  • Create New...