website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Winter Olympic Games 2026 Bid Process


Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

No worries, deleting sports that have been on the Olympic program for basically as long as possible and aren't known for widespread corruption is always great, fuck history :whistle: 

 

Thank you for understanding :p

 

Though real talk, should it come to it and the IOC is basically begging a city to host, which sports could potentially be on the chopping block as a cost saving measure? Ski Jumping/Nordic Combined? Sliding Sports? Freestyle Skiing/Snowboarding?

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1976-winter-olympic-games-2026-bid-process/page/36/#findComment-180850
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JoshMartini007 said:

 

Thank you for understanding :p

 

Though real talk, should it come to it and the IOC is basically begging a city to host, which sports could potentially be on the chopping block as a cost saving measure? Ski Jumping/Nordic Combined? Sliding Sports? Freestyle Skiing/Snowboarding?

Slidings sports, absolutely. I mean, I'd be awfully sad and if the choice was entirely mine, freestyle skiing and freestyle snowboarding would be gone in 2,5 seconds, but not having to build a huge and expensive sliding centre is gonna save so much in costs as long as those scientists didn't figure out the plastic and modular sliding track yet.

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1976-winter-olympic-games-2026-bid-process/page/36/#findComment-180851
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, JoshMartini007 said:

 

Thank you for understanding :p

 

Though real talk, should it come to it and the IOC is basically begging a city to host, which sports could potentially be on the chopping block as a cost saving measure? Ski Jumping/Nordic Combined? Sliding Sports? Freestyle Skiing/Snowboarding?

 

7 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

Slidings sports, absolutely. I mean, I'd be awfully sad and if the choice was entirely mine, freestyle skiing and freestyle snowboarding would be gone in 2,5 seconds, but not having to build a huge and expensive sliding centre is gonna save so much in costs as long as those scientists didn't figure out the plastic and modular sliding track yet.

At least with luge they could eliminate artificial track and use natural track instead. Bobsled would be a screwed. I think that Nordic Combined would be next in line for being cut. The Freestyle events are to urban and youthful to be cut. Plus they cost less than most other events.

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1976-winter-olympic-games-2026-bid-process/page/36/#findComment-180854
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

Slidings sports, absolutely. I mean, I'd be awfully sad and if the choice was entirely mine, freestyle skiing and freestyle snowboarding would be gone in 2,5 seconds, but not having to build a huge and expensive sliding centre is gonna save so much in costs as long as those scientists didn't figure out the plastic and modular sliding track yet.

Realistically Freestyle Skiing and Snowboarding are basically the last two sports to get cut, even behind a bunch of the traditional sports. They are cheap to hold, they are popular and they both share the unique distinction in winter sports of having multiple nations from four continents win medals (America, Europe, Asia and Oceania all have at least two medal winning NOC in both Freestyle Skiing and Snowboarding). Freestyle Skiing is also the only winter discipline with gold medalists from four continents. With the possible exception of figure skating there are no more universal sports in the Winter Olympics.

Edited by NearPup
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1976-winter-olympic-games-2026-bid-process/page/36/#findComment-180858
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Olympian1010 said:

 

At least with luge they could eliminate artificial track and use natural track instead. Bobsled would be a screwed. I think that Nordic Combined would be next in line for being cut. The Freestyle events are to urban and youthful to be cut. Plus they cost less than most other events.

Nordic events needs no extra venue though, considering both ski jumping and cross-country skiing are already there anyway. In fact, it'd be basically the most stupid choice ever if one has to cut one sport :d 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1976-winter-olympic-games-2026-bid-process/page/36/#findComment-180859
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nate River said:

Realistically Freestyle Skiing and Snowboarding are basically the last two sports to get cut, even behind a bunch of the traditional sports. They are cheap to hold, they are popular and they both share the unique distinction in winter sports of having multiple nations from four continents win medals (America, Europe, Asia and Oceania all have at least two medal winning NOC in both Freestyle Skiing and Snowboarding). With the possible exception of figure skating there are no more universal sports in the Winter Olympics.

True if you look at the number of continents, for now. I know cutting sliding sports is way more realistic, cutting freestyle events would simply be my personal choice as I said :p 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1976-winter-olympic-games-2026-bid-process/page/36/#findComment-180860
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

Nordic events needs no extra venue though, considering both ski jumping and cross-country skiing are already there anyway. In fact, it'd be basically the most stupid choice ever if one has to cut one sport :d 

 

Yeah, Nordic Combined stays as long as Ski Jumping stays, they two pretty much go hand in hand.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1976-winter-olympic-games-2026-bid-process/page/36/#findComment-180864
Share on other sites

11 minut temu, Nate River napisał:

Realistically Freestyle Skiing and Snowboarding are basically the last two sports to get cut, even behind a bunch of the traditional sports. They are cheap to hold, they are popular and they both share the unique distinction in winter sports of having multiple nations from four continents win medals (America, Europe, Asia and Oceania all have at least two medal winning NOC in both Freestyle Skiing and Snowboarding). Freestyle Skiing is also the only winter discipline with gold medalists from four continents. With the possible exception of figure skating there are no more universal sports in the Winter Olympics.

I don't know about that cheap part. I honestly have no idea how costs of building venues for snowboarding and freestyle skiing looks like in compare with for example luge track, but I know that you have to build venues for: slopestyle, halfpipe, cross, big air, moguls, aerials and parallel slalom (well, maybe last thing can be the same venue as for slalom in alpine skiing, I don't know). Every single one of them is definetly cheaper than the hill for ski jumping but all together, I don't know.

 

By the way, it isn't so strange that so many countries are getting medals in this two events if they are practically six different events (slopestyle and halfpipe have a lot in common) ;) 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1976-winter-olympic-games-2026-bid-process/page/36/#findComment-180866
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Col_Frost said:

I don't know about that cheap part. I honestly have no idea how costs of building venues for snowboarding and freestyle skiing looks like in compare with for example luge track, but I know that you have to build venues for: slopestyle, halfpipe, cross, big air, moguls, aerials and parallel slalom (well, maybe last thing can be the same venue as for slalom in alpine skiing, I don't know). Every single one of them is definetly cheaper than the hill for ski jumping but all together, I don't know.

 

By the way, it isn't so strange that so many countries are getting medals in this two events if they are practically six different events (slopestyle and halfpipe have a lot in common) ;) 

Besides, snowboarding is definitely not the sport with the biggest potential for 5 continents to win a medal within 2 or 3 Winter Olympics :p 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1976-winter-olympic-games-2026-bid-process/page/36/#findComment-180876
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Col_Frost said:

By the way, it isn't so strange that so many countries are getting medals in this two events if they are practically six different events (slopestyle and halfpipe have a lot in common) ;) 

I mean...

Moguls has gold medalists from four continents.

Aerials has gold medalists from four continents.

Snowboard half-pipe has medalists from four continents and gold medalists from three continents (Ayumu got robbed :( )

Ski half-pipe has medalists from four continents even though it’s only been contested at two Olympics.

Snowboard Big Air has medalists from three continents after having been contested at one Olympics.

 

It’s not just a matter of the sport as a whole bringing geographical diversity. There are multiple events in freestyle skiing and snowboarding where every continent other than Africa has medal potential.

 

 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1976-winter-olympic-games-2026-bid-process/page/36/#findComment-180877
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • When it comes to power, confidence and match-winning ability, women's cricket has produced some truly fearless batsmen over the years. These players didn't just score runs - they changed games, calmed crowds and intimidated bowlers. Based on influence, consistency and ability to dominate attacks, here is my 2026 Forum list of the top 7 most dangerous women batsmen in cricket history.   At the top, Meg Lanning stands out for her quiet aggression and leadership. She could control an innings and then suddenly explode. Behind her is Harmanpreet Kaur, known for her raw power and clutch performances, especially in big tournaments.   Ellyse Perry deserves a special mention. Her technique, fitness and ability to increase pace make her lethal in all formats. Smriti Mandhana brings purpose with grandeur - once she gets going, bowlers struggle to find answers.   From a bygone era, Mithali Raj may not have looked aggressive, but her mental strength and ability to bat for long periods make her extremely dangerous. Suzy Bats has become a nightmare for bowlers in ODIs and T20s, as she mixes timing and smart shot selection. The list also includes Deandra Dottin, whose power-hitting can change a match in just a few overs.   What connects all these stars is their fearless mentality. Each has earned the tag of Dangerous Women's Batsman by performing consistently under pressure and against the best bowlers in the world. For fans who love in-depth cricket discussions, statistics and trending topics, Cricbites is becoming a popular platform to explore women's cricket in a fresh and engaging way.
    • Someone made this Statue Trump---Epstein     mysterious bronze statue called “Best Friends Forever” has popped up on the east end of the National Mall in Washington, DC,    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/24/us/politics/trump-epstein-statue-dc-national-mall.html    
    • Off to Milan for the 145th session of the International Olympic Committee. Although the agenda has not been published yet, there shouldn’t be any major items over these two days, apart from the election of a member of the IOC Executive Board. This will be the eighth time the session is held in Italy, the last one being during the Turin 2006 Olympic Games.
    • another wave of mega rain is coming in north Africa 
    • What is happening in Canada , people leave it  They say life is very expensive , you cant find an appartement , the salary is miserable    is it the multi tax of Trump? 
    • Weightlifting We now have six events per gender with a total of 10 athletes per event.   The Olympic Qualification Rankings will be based on the sum of the total results of five events (three from period 1 and two from period 2). The top 8 will qualify.   The 9th spot will also be based on the OQR, but it will go to the highest ranked athlete from an unrepresented continent.   The 10th spot will be split between the host and universality (3 each per gender). Should the United States qualify normally then their host quota will be reduced, first going to an athlete from an unrepresented continent then to the overall highest ranked athlete.   Additionally, a "Best Lifter" will be awarded which would give the nation the chance to qualify 4 athletes rather than the max of 3.
    • The probability of winning a medal in the men's 500m also seems a bit off   
    • 66% chance for a medal in moguls seems low though...   Men's relay being 5th in short track, and Clarke only having a 0.5% chance at a medal also seem off   Why is ski mountaineering there, we didn't even qualify anyone 
×
×
  • Create New...