Totallympics Suggestions and Problems Thread

[dcro 10,210]

Can we get back the "Love" reaction to posts? Quite often it's much more fitting than a simple like or haha...

 

Edited March 26, 2018 by dcro

[Sindo 1,504]

4 minutes ago, dcro said:

Can we get back the "Love" reaction to posts? Quite often it's much more fitting than a simple like or haha...

 

 

"Love" has never been a reaction, it was the previous name of what now is called "Like", and there is now the up arrow instead of the heart.

[heywoodu 15,141]

The f*ck is that nose-picking confused thing?  

[dcro 10,210]

15 minutes ago, Sindo said:

 

"Love" has never been a reaction, it was the previous name of what now is called "Like", and there is now the up arrow instead of the heart.

 

I seem to remember that there were both green arrow and blue heart when the update was installed, not sure though.

 

@heywoodu It's not nose picking, it's the mouse cursor. We had that confused reaction for like a day.

[Werloc 3,164]

1 hour ago, dcro said:

Can we get back the "Love" reaction to posts? Quite often it's much more fitting than a simple like or haha...

 

I am in desperate need of the confused reaction, I would abuse it to hell

[Bohemia 1,411]

Does that mean there's a confused reaction but not an angry one? Come on  

[Quasit 865]

I would like the "confused" reaction as well, there are most surely much more emotions than just happy and sad.

 

I'm not against "angry" either, there were moments where I would have used it but I can see why there is no "angry" reaction as it may confuse others if they share anger with the context of the post or if they are angry with the poster themselves, stirring up some bad mood in the forum.

[dcro 10,210]

According to this it's possible to add your own.

 

https://invisioncommunity.com/news/product-updates/new-reactions-r1016/

[Bohemia 1,411]

6 hours ago, Quasit said:

I'm not against "angry" either, there were moments where I would have used it but I can see why there is no "angry" reaction as it may confuse others if they share anger with the context of the post or if they are angry with the poster themselves, stirring up some bad mood in the forum.

 

Well, when you put it that way... you're not wrong! Maybe it's better to not have this one It's just that sometimes I wanted to have an angry reaction for some posts, not because I disagreed with them, but, as you said, because I was angry about the thing they talked about, like for example if they talk about football supporters who started fighting the players of their own team after they lost a match.

[dcro 10,210]

I think also having Wow/Surprised reaction would be much more handy than quoting the post just to put ""...