website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Doping Cases and Bans Thread (2016 & 2017)


Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, Dragon said:

Big story from France.

17 members of the Belarus canoeing team failed tests for Meldonium during a training camp in March and April.

When anti-doping agents raided them later they also found "heavier drugs".

 

http://www.lemonde.fr/jeux-olympiques-rio-2016/article/2016/05/26/les-gloires-du-canoe-bielorusse-coulees-par-les-agents-de-l-antidopage-francais_4926694_4910444.html

Those 17 are all members of the current team, including Olympic champions of 2008 (who are apparently still active)?

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/116-doping-cases-and-bans-thread-2016-2017/page/19/#findComment-17690
Share on other sites

Il y a 1 heure , Agger a déclaré:

 

Take 15 minutes and watch this. Then you would understand why the difference is this large!

 

 

it's very long i will not watch it untill the end , but he is wrong the prehistoric man was faster than Usain Bolt

 

the problem they officialize  the western tets only ( i mean the doping)

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/116-doping-cases-and-bans-thread-2016-2017/page/19/#findComment-17722
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Gianlu33 said:

For 5th times (:lol:) the Spanish Onya was positive in a control at Benjing 2008

You got to admite the commitment to cheating.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/116-doping-cases-and-bans-thread-2016-2017/page/19/#findComment-17729
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, bestmen said:

it's very long i will not watch it untill the end , but he is wrong the prehistoric man was faster than Usain Bolt

 

the problem they officialize  the western tets only ( i mean the doping)

 

How is he wrong?

He doesn't say anything about the prehistoric man being slower.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/116-doping-cases-and-bans-thread-2016-2017/page/19/#findComment-17818
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, bestmen said:

it's very long i will not watch it untill the end , but he is wrong the prehistoric man was faster than Usain Bolt

 

the problem they officialize  the western tets only ( i mean the doping)

Instead of saying "OMG it's a Western conspiracy!!" as people like Vitaly Mutko and Yelena Isinbayeva love to say, why not come with actual arguments? 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/116-doping-cases-and-bans-thread-2016-2017/page/19/#findComment-17820
Share on other sites

il y a 29 minutes, Agger a déclaré:

 

How is he wrong?

He doesn't say anything about the prehistoric man being slower.

he tried to explain why the man of the past was slower than now, right?

i said "he is wrong"  i give this example of the prehistoric man

anyway the naturalization is cheating the doping is cheating  also the technolgy that they use while training .......maybe the uniform too

 

 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/116-doping-cases-and-bans-thread-2016-2017/page/19/#findComment-17851
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, bestmen said:

he tried to explain why the man of the past was slower than now, right?

i said "he is wrong"  i give this example of the prehistoric man

anyway the naturalization is cheating the doping is cheating  also the technolgy that they use while training .......maybe the uniform too

 

 

 

It's a fact that the times nowadays are faster! He explains some of the factors, which especially is a matter of technology (the running surface, knowledge about the ideal body types for different events and changing swimming pool just to mention a few).

He even makes a great comparison with Jesse Owens, who with modern surface and starting blocks would be second at the Worlds in 2013. And that's even without our knowledge about the best training, body types and so on. Thereby he exactly states that the difference between now and then more or less is about what we know now that we didn't know back then!

Is that cheating? No. It's completely natural that we use our knowledge. Even the poorest countries know more about the ideal athletes than the richest countries back in the first half of the 20th century..

Therefore we of course can't just look at the records to talk about who is the best ever. We have to remember the context.

Please watch the video before you complain about it.

 

But I still don't understand why you mention the prehistoric man. That's completely irrelevant.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/116-doping-cases-and-bans-thread-2016-2017/page/19/#findComment-17855
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Those are the national junior championships, national championships are in Steinkjer, starting tomorrow: FIS | Steinkjer (NOR) - Event Details - Cross-Country
    • Nice for them, but also kind of too bad they pick the exact same two as last time. Would have been nice to see Regina Martinez for example (although I'm not sure that would have been logistically possible, depending on how they're going to do the flag bearer thing in the first place).
    • Tuesday January 13th, 2026   Preliminary Round Last Day Schedule   Group A Atlantic Standard Time (GMT -4)   Canada  vs  Sweden Period-by-Period: January 13th 2026 h. 17:00, Sport and Wellness Centre, Cape Breton   Hungary  vs  Switzerland Period-by-Period: January 13th 2026 h. 20:30, Sport and Wellness Centre, Cape Breton     Group B Atlantic Standard Time (GMT -4)   Czechia  vs  Slovakia Period-by-Period: January 13th 2026 h. 10:00, Sport and Wellness Centre, Cape Breton   United States  vs  Finland Period-by-Period: January 13th 2026 h. 13:30, Sport and Wellness Centre, Cape Breton
    • Monday January 12th, 2026   Preliminary Round Day 3 Results     Group A Atlantic Standard Time (GMT -4)   Sweden   3 - 0   Switzerland Period-by-Period: 2-0, 1-0, 0-0 January 12th 2026 h. 11:00, Sport and Wellness Centre, Cape Breton   Canada   14 - 0   Hungary Period-by-Period: 4-0, 7-0, 3-0 January 12th 2026 h. 18:00, Sport and Wellness Centre, Cape Breton   Group A Provisional Standing After Day 3   Nation P W(OTW) L(OTL) GF GA +/- Pt. Canada 2 2(0) 0(0) 23 0 +23 6 Sweden 2 2(0) 0(0) 7 1 +6 6 Switzerland 2 0(0) 2(0) 0 12 -12 0 Hungary 2 0(0) 2(0) 1 18 -17 0   Nations Qualified for the Quarterfinals   Canada Czech Republic Finland Hungary Slovakia Sweden Switzerland United States
    • One of my favorite songs from the early 2000s that I listened to on a cassette on my walkman      
    • For me 20 medals will be good. And if more there are? Super. However, I prefer not to get my hopes up too much, so as not to be disappointed later.
    • If you're still taking suggestions, I tought the following:   Team Madison format.   17 teams of 2 "riders", randomly drawn. Teams can be named for famous "endurance" track cyclists. 4 intermediate "sprints", one after a voting block, in which the top 8 teams will score according to this formula: (10, 8, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1). The order in which team score for a sprint are determined by the total number of "medals" won by both members of the team during the block. Ranking will be sorted according to the number of gold medals, then silver, then bronze. If there's two or more teams with same number of points, the medals of best individual performer of each team will be considered to break the tie. If the tie remains, then team's total points during the block will be used to break it. If the team fails to receive a single medal during each block, it will be considered to "lose lap" and 20 points will be substracted from their score. If the team fails to score at least 1 point during each block, it will be an automatic DNF for the team. If both members of the team get a medal from a single jury, it will be considered to "gain lap" and 20 points will be added to their score. A team can only win an additional lap per voting block. After the 4 intermediate, a "final" sprint will be recorded, in which points will be doubled (20, 16, 12, 10, 8, 6, 4 & 2). Ranking for the final sprint will take into account the total medals won during the event.   What do you think?
    • I don't medal pick, per se... I assign probabilities/expected-values and total them up. So I don't have a gold medal estimate... but if you want one, divide those numbers by three and you'll be pretty close!   I imagine Norway, Italy and Netherlands and maybe Canada will probably skew a bit higher on golds, and US, Germany, and Sweden will skew a little lower... so maybe: Norway - 14 US - 11 Germany - 11 Italy - 11 Canada - 10 Austria - 8 Netherlands - 8 Japan - 7 Sweden - 6 France.- 6   I was surprised seeing Italy come in that high, I was figuring 22-23, but I guess they've been do well on the World Cups. 
    • If you were to predict top- 10 for the number of gold medals, what would it look like?     For me, as an Italian, any result for Italy: +20 medals would be OK (if that will include 6-7 gold medals). The trauma of Turin 2006 is too great
    • Doesn't really help that two of the strongest countries in that particular sport are banned from the team event for well known reasons.
×
×
  • Create New...