website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Women's Rugby Sevens Qualification to Tokyo 2020 Summer Olympic Games


Recommended Posts

  • 5 months later...
  • 3 months later...

I'm the only one who finds this Qualification Process really unfair??

 

Right now :FRA:RUS:IRL:GBR:ESP are placed 5th to 9th in the 2018 World Series with means that at least 3 out of those teams would be out of the Games, instead worst teams like :MEX:BRA:FIJ and :CHN have almost secured a place in the Games.

 

OIf just they did continental qualification before World Series, Olympics would have better teams, something like (as right now)

 

:JPN as host :NZL:CAN:FRA:CHN:KEN:BRA from continental, :AUS:USA:RUS:IRL via world series and a battle between probably :GBR:FIJ and :ESP at the preolympic

 

Instead of: 

 

:JPN as host, :NZL:CAN:USA:AUS via world series, :FIJ:MEX:FRA:CHN:KEN:BRA from continental spots and have :RUS:IRL:GBR and :ESP battle at the last preolympic..................

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/946-womens-rugby-sevens-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/#findComment-184323
Share on other sites

il y a 11 minutes, Jur a déclaré:

I'm the only one who finds this Qualification Process really unfair??

 

Right now :FRA:RUS:IRL:GBR:ESP are placed 5th to 9th in the 2018 World Series with means that at least 3 out of those teams would be out of the Games, instead worst teams like :MEX:BRA:FIJ and :CHN have almost secured a place in the Games.

 

OIf just they did continental qualification before World Series, Olympics would have better teams, something like (as right now)

 

:JPN as host :NZL:CAN:FRA:CHN:KEN:BRA from continental, :AUS:USA:RUS:IRL via world series and a battle between probably :GBR:FIJ and :ESP at the preolympic

 

Instead of: 

 

:JPN as host, :NZL:CAN:USA:AUS via world series, :FIJ:MEX:FRA:CHN:KEN:BRA from continental spots and have :RUS:IRL:GBR and :ESP battle at the last preolympic..................

I've been thinking about it... The Olympic tournament will actually be much weaker than the world series ones 

The current ranking would be disastrous for European sides since I think that the barrages only include two teams from each continent! So we would have Ireland and Spain out before the last round with GB and Russia going against sides like Jamaica or Kazhakstan in an unofficial duel 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/946-womens-rugby-sevens-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/#findComment-184328
Share on other sites

31 minuti fa, Jur ha scritto:

I'm the only one who finds this Qualification Process really unfair??

 

Right now :FRA:RUS:IRL:GBR:ESP are placed 5th to 9th in the 2018 World Series with means that at least 3 out of those teams would be out of the Games, instead worst teams like :MEX:BRA:FIJ and :CHN have almost secured a place in the Games.

 

OIf just they did continental qualification before World Series, Olympics would have better teams, something like (as right now)

 

:JPN as host :NZL:CAN:FRA:CHN:KEN:BRA from continental, :AUS:USA:RUS:IRL via world series and a battle between probably :GBR:FIJ and :ESP at the preolympic

 

Instead of: 

 

:JPN as host, :NZL:CAN:USA:AUS via world series, :FIJ:MEX:FRA:CHN:KEN:BRA from continental spots and have :RUS:IRL:GBR and :ESP battle at the last preolympic..................

Rugby 7s is just a sport in which it is more evident than in other that Olympic tournaments should be made of 16 teams, rather than 12 or 8

Edited by AlFHg
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/946-womens-rugby-sevens-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/#findComment-184332
Share on other sites

If Canada and USA qualify as top 4, Mexico doesn't auto qualify. The North American spot is added to the reoechage.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/946-womens-rugby-sevens-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/#findComment-184347
Share on other sites

hace 4 horas, intoronto said:

If Canada and USA qualify as top 4, Mexico doesn't auto qualify. The North American spot is added to the reoechage.

Yes?

I think there's a qualification event for North Americans that Mexico would easily won against Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/946-womens-rugby-sevens-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/#findComment-184401
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Jur said:

Yes?

I think there's a qualification event for North Americans that Mexico would easily won against Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago

The NA qualification tournament will only be held if either or both Canada and the USA fail to qualify among the top 4.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/946-womens-rugby-sevens-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/#findComment-184402
Share on other sites

Oh, I never hear about that rule, with actually sounds pretty unfair too, by the way, but it would make for more decent teams at the Olympics...

 

if they held the South American Qualification Tournament were all teams are even worse than Mexico...

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/946-womens-rugby-sevens-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/#findComment-184406
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • The strength of the UK is that they are 100% focused on the track, while Italy has to navigate between the track and the road: the line-up is different for practically every event, etc. Paternoster should focus 100% on the track; she won't win anything big on the road anymore. As it is, she's weak both there and there. The situation is different with Balsamo, as she's also having significant success on the road and likely earns the most money there.
    • Discovery+ in the UK have also got their schedule up now.     I notice that only thing listed as being in UHD is the Opening Ceremony though....     
    • The problem over the last few years was that no-one was able to keep pace with the big Katie Archibald turns. Looks to be sorted now.  
    • The women's top 50 is so crammed with athletes from the same five nations that it is not inconceivable they are unable to fill the full quota from the top 50, in which case a third double spot would open up between USA/BEL/GBR
    • That women's pursuit team looks brutally fast. Batter you over the head into submission brutal, perhaps not seen since the early Trott-Rowsell days The 4 minute barrier could be on borrowed time.   The two British women sprinters Finucane and Caldwell also look pretty ominous, indeed the whole women's sprint team looks in some shape and with some depth to get that result without Finucane   Work to do for the British men's teams, but they won't be unhappy either, not to mention Joe Truman's unexpected Kilo win.
    • I prefer to do mine like this guy (https://app.podiumsport.it/) does his "Projected Medals" as probability based rather than straight medal picking... all things being equal, conversion rates should be about the same and the outliers come out in the wash. Unfortunately most people just like medal picking, and think any other approach is weird  
    • So probably: Men Oceania: Americas: Africa: Asia: One of  Europe: One of Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (probably not)  and whichever countries don’t qualify from Asian Games.  Universality: ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of the above in World Rankings    and one of  (most likely) or  seem safe with two quotas. The other will be favourites if a third team gets allocated two.    Women Oceania: Europe: One of Americas:  /  if US is ineligible due to their host quota, if the host quota gets reallocated then Canada will be in contention in the rankings Africa:   Asia: One of   Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (x1?)  (x1/2)  (x1/2), whichever doesn’t qualify out of  / ,  and  ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of above.  Universality: ?    is safe with two quotas between  it’ll be tough for whoever misses out of those three.   nevermind , 
    • The rankings look likely to give two spots each in the men's side to Egypt (2nd athlete at 3) and GB (second athlete at 9). the nearest contender after that is France and both Egypt and GB have plenty of contenders after their respective number 2 but before France's umber 2   Women's side looks a bit more of a battle, with Egypt again likely to provide 2, and then a fight between USA, GBR and BEL for the other lucky double spot. That said, so dominant are the Egyptians, Americans and Brits, that failing to find all the contenders in the top 50 is entirely plausible, possibly opening a third 'double' spot.
    • I'd done my final revisions on my prediction spreadsheets.. and I'm sticking with 26 for Canada.    Take it to the bank! (But don't sign anything)
    • Lacrosse: https://worldlacrosse.sport/lacrosse-qualification-set-for-olympic-games-los-angeles-2028/   Official doc: https://worldlacrosse.sport/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/LAC-LA28-Qualification-System.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...