website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Athletics Qualification to Tokyo 2020 Summer Olympic Games


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, OlympicIRL said:

Looks like this isn't the case for the men's 100m because in the official schedule there are 4 preliminary round heats, and then in Round 1 there will still be 7 heats (56 athletes). So the universality quotas in men's 100m won't affect those trying to qualify by ranking. This isn't the case for the women's 100m however which does not have a preliminary round and starts in Round 1 with 7 heats, same as men's round 1.

But then again, the Road to Tokyo page includes universality places into the total quota of 56.

https://www.worldathletics.org/stats-zone/road-to/7132391?eventId=10229630

 

Maybe they just copy-pasted stage schedule from Rio?

#banbestmen

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/922-athletics-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/126/#findComment-383390
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, dcro said:

But then again, the Road to Tokyo page includes universality places into the total quota of 56.

https://www.worldathletics.org/stats-zone/road-to/7132391?eventId=10229630

 

Maybe they just copy-pasted stage schedule from Rio?

No they didn't copy and paste because the women's 100m did have a preliminary round in Rio, but not this time in Tokyo. If there is a men's prelim round in the official schedule with 4 heats and a round 1 with 7 heats, the only real explanation I can see is that those universality quotas won't be counted in the 56 for men's 100m. I don't know for sure of course but it's the only logic I can see in having that prelim. And it makes sense because the men's 100m is the one that will receive the bulk of the universality quota requests.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/922-athletics-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/126/#findComment-383396
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dcro said:

But then again, the Road to Tokyo page includes universality places into the total quota of 56.

https://www.worldathletics.org/stats-zone/road-to/7132391?eventId=10229630

 

Maybe they just copy-pasted stage schedule from Rio?

I have the impression that a lot of countries will not have a wild card, or maybe they will distribute more in other events

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/922-athletics-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/126/#findComment-383400
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, OlympicIRL said:

No they didn't copy and paste because the women's 100m did have a preliminary round in Rio, but not this time in Tokyo. If there is a men's prelim round in the official schedule with 4 heats and a round 1 with 7 heats, the only real explanation I can see is that those universality quotas won't be counted in the 56 for men's 100m. I don't know for sure of course but it's the only logic I can see in having that prelim. And it makes sense because the men's 100m is the one that will receive the bulk of the universality quota requests.

But if Round 1 includes qualifiers from the prelim, and has 56 total athletes, it would mean some of the universality spots would technically count into the 56 total.

 

But I still suspect it must be a schedulling error. Road to Tokyo page looks pretty definitive.

#banbestmen

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/922-athletics-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/126/#findComment-383415
Share on other sites

Just now, dcro said:

But if Round 1 includes qualifiers from the prelim, and has 56 total athletes, it would mean some of the universality spots would technically count into the 56 total.

 

But I still suspect it must be a schedulling error. Road to Tokyo page looks pretty definitive.

 

Will be interesting to see how it will work. But going off the Olympic schedule in both the Olympic website and world athletics, there will be a preliminary round in the men's 100m. Really doubt they would make that error since every minute has to be planned for and if there is a prelim, then there will be more than 56 quotas in the men's 100m.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/922-athletics-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/126/#findComment-383422
Share on other sites

Men's 800m

:BEL Eliott Crestan - 1:45.19

https://www.worldathletics.org/athletes/belgium/eliott-crestan-14634371 

 

Men's 1500m

:BEL Ismael Debjani - 3:33.06

https://www.worldathletics.org/athletes/belgium/ismael-debjani-14423089 

 

Men's Triple Jump

:ALG Yasser Mohamed Triki - 17.31

https://www.worldathletics.org/athletes/algeria/yasser-mohamed-triki-14597364

 

Men's Shot Put

:ROU Andrei Rares Toader - 21.29

https://www.worldathletics.org/athletes/romania/andrei-rares-toader-14516137

 

Women's Long Jump

:VEN Yulimar Rojas - 6.88 (Already has the standard in Triple Jump)

https://www.worldathletics.org/athletes/venezuela/yulimar-rojas-14436431

 

Yulimar Rojas also jumped 7.27 with a wind of +2.7.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/922-athletics-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/126/#findComment-383766
Share on other sites

On 13/06/2021 at 19:38, dcro said:

But if Round 1 includes qualifiers from the prelim, and has 56 total athletes, it would mean some of the universality spots would technically count into the 56 total.

 

But I still suspect it must be a schedulling error. Road to Tokyo page looks pretty definitive.

So I just got an email from World Athletics in response to my question if unqualified athletes impact the 56 athlete quota in the men’s 100m and it’s as I suspected, they don’t impact the quota for that event:

 

Quote

Hi Daniel,

 

In the 100m the unqualified will not impact the 56 qualified by entry standard or world rankings.

 

Regards

 

World Athletics

 

Not sure what the case is for the other events. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/922-athletics-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/126/#findComment-384444
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • So qualification isn't done, and the last few spots are very close with essentially one more race to go.   On the 6th and 7th Canada entered 6 racers in the lower tier North American cup races in Lake Placid. On the 11th there was races again in Lake Placid, Canada only entered 2 (articles say withdrew 4, start list on the 10th says 2 registered, whatever).  If the total amount entered was above 20 then the ranking points for first start at 120 and go down incrementally, with only 2 Canadians entered there were 19 competitors so points for first only start at 90.    The USA only has a shot at qualifying 2 sleds at this point, and Uhlaender appears to have had a shot at catching up to 2nd best among the americans. She came 1st, those 30 points really cost her if that is how the USA nominates their team.   The best 17 countries get one sled, based on how their top competitor is ranked.  is in 13th with 498 points,  is in 14th with 480,  15th 475,  16th 468,  17th 457,  18th 456 and no one else has the ability to gain enough points.  could have received 27 more points,  19 more,  21 more. So a big deal for them, and not appearing in the stories.   The accusation is that Canada did it for their own gain, to protect Channell's chance of qualifying: the 6 countries with the highest ranked 2nd best slider get a 2nd quota.  Channell holds the last spot at 512,  Erlacher is next at 484. Both only race at the World Cup level. However, the next best after that is  Simmchen at 391, who did race in Lake Placid and misses out on 25 points. Both her and her teammate would have to pass both Channell and Erlacher in the rankings for them to achieve a 2nd quota. A miraculous outcome, but that is what Uhlaender is accusing the Canadians of being afraid of. Could be, I don't think so but who knows.  
    • I see, wasn't sure if they had internal trials like Canada had in the past. So Uhlaender will receive 84 points, more possibly if she races again, and Ro has one more race. So very understandable why she would be upset. 
    • The American selection criteria is IBSF ranking as of January 18th. Currently:   15  Kelly Curtis 710 16  Alessandra Fumagalli 704 17  Mystique Ro 694 18  Valentina Margaglio 668 19  Sujung Hong 662 20  Katie Uhlaender 660   So those 30 points could be important depending on next weekend.
    • Regarding  and  :   The FIL documents refer to Part C.2.2. of the Qualification rules regarding Athlete eligibility, it seems the Canadian women's double is missing the minimum of timed runs in Cortina (c.2.2.1), whereas the other are missing the requirement under C.2.2.2
    • I am so confused at the whole thing   Can someone give a short summary of what is the actual issue, and what would have happened (as in, who would have qualified) if those Canadians who withdrew did start?
    • Agree. That article is completely non-sensical. No one understands the qualification system apart from actually Cecchini. And the ones who technically could be upset (e.g. Austria) are not mentioned. :D   And the Israelis athlete is interestingly the woman who just drove down the halfpipe at the 2018 Olympics.   Plus, that race did get Johansen into the quota slot for 
    • Other than the Reuters article it is all pretty badly presented. What I find comical is, if true, the Israeli and Maltese federations were upset. LOL, so far out of contention but mad about five to ten points when they need hundreds.  and  are right on the edge and lose key points so I would understand them being upset, but Uhlaender? All three americans would have to overtake the 3rd best british slider, it would take divine intervention to accomplish. So she is upset, but it is not rational to blame the Canadian coach. It must be very frustrating to not be racing in the World Cup, climb into the top 20 in rankings, and it still not be enough. 
    • Slopestyle WC Snowmass    Women Gold-  Laurie Blouin (81.21) Silver-  Mari Fukada (77.26) Bronze-  Kokomo Murase (75.36)   Men Gold-  Jake Canter (85.16) Silver-  Su Yiming (84.18) Bronze-  Dane Menzies (83.68)    Full Results
×
×
  • Create New...