website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Tennis US Open 2020


thepharoah
 Share
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/4246-tennis-us-open-2020/

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Gianlu33 said:

And we go, another GS title contender is out today. After Kerber, Kvitova is eliminated too...

 

Kvitova contender at the US Open? Hardly.

 

She is as useless as it gets after that horrible attack. Wasting MP on serve -.-

 

Rogers into her second GS QF, and again she beat Petra in three en route :lol: 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/4246-tennis-us-open-2020/page/14/#findComment-317239
Share on other sites

Just now, Wanderer said:

 

Kvitova contender at the US Open? Hardly.

 

She is as useless as it gets after that horrible attack. Wasting MP on serve -.-

 

Rogers into her second GS QF, and again she beat Petra in three en route :lol: 

Honestly I had almost 7-8 names in my mind about a possible winner of women's single at US Open and Kvitova was one of this :p

 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/4246-tennis-us-open-2020/page/14/#findComment-317240
Share on other sites

Just wake up to learn this drama. I am against the decision of default. I know there is a rulebook and I appreciate it and referee still should consider the exact incident and the extend of the consequence. He definitely deserved a warning of his misbehavior but default is too much for me. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/4246-tennis-us-open-2020/page/14/#findComment-317243
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Vic Liu said:

Just wake up to learn this drama. I am against the decision of default. I know there is a rulebook and I appreciate it and referee still should consider the exact incident and the extend of the consequence. He definitely deserved a warning of his misbehavior but default is too much for me. 

Sorry but I disagree with your views. If you Novak broke his racquet a warning would be sufficient. If he hit the ball and it didn't hit anyone a warning maybe sufficient. But as it resulted in injuring a person the punishment was absolutely justified. Just imagine that being a ballboy, or it causing long term damage or even death. Everyone knows it was unintentional, but it could be serious for the person involved.

The rules which is in place is absolutely right one because it puts the health and safety of its stakeholders above a game. If it was the other way around it would be just disgusting.

To be honest Novak understood the decision, he was disappointed but he knew the decision was inevitable.

 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/4246-tennis-us-open-2020/page/14/#findComment-317291
Share on other sites

It's a shame that the dominance of the Big 3 (in terms of consecutive GS wins in the last 4 years) will end like this. No matter who wins now, it will be overshadowed by the fact that they didn't beat any of the Big 3. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/4246-tennis-us-open-2020/page/14/#findComment-317298
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/4246-tennis-us-open-2020/
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Only 63 goals in the second day.   TUESDAY 13 JANUARY   Men   Sweden-Netherlands 28-0 (16-0)   Finland-Hungary 19-0 (7-0)   Norway-USA 13-3 (7-2)
    • This suggestion has been implemented. If you open the forum's Badminton section, you will get a block with Badminton current and upcoming events: https://totallympics.com/forums/forum/21-badminton/   I will start implementing this also for other forums in the next days. Also this can be implented in the Qualification Tracker pages, with events of that single sport displaying in the respective sport's sections.   EDIT: testing with a Winter Sport event, which currently has some events in progress and some more starting in the next days: Alpine Skiing section
    • So qualification isn't done, and the last few spots are very close with essentially one more race to go.   On the 6th and 7th Canada entered 6 racers in the lower tier North American cup races in Lake Placid. On the 11th there was races again in Lake Placid, Canada only entered 2 (articles say withdrew 4, start list on the 10th says 2 registered, whatever).  If the total amount entered was above 20 then the ranking points for first start at 120 and go down incrementally, with only 2 Canadians entered there were 19 competitors so points for first only start at 90.    The USA only has a shot at qualifying 2 sleds at this point, and Uhlaender appears to have had a shot at catching up to 2nd best among the americans. She came 1st, those 30 points really cost her if that is how the USA nominates their team.   The best 17 countries get one sled, based on how their top competitor is ranked.  is in 13th with 498 points,  is in 14th with 480,  15th 475,  16th 468,  17th 457,  18th 456 and no one else has the ability to gain enough points.  could have received 27 more points,  19 more,  21 more. So a big deal for them, and not appearing in the stories.   The accusation is that Canada did it for their own gain, to protect Channell's chance of qualifying: the 6 countries with the highest ranked 2nd best slider get a 2nd quota.  Channell holds the last spot at 512,  Erlacher is next at 484. Both only race at the World Cup level. However, the next best after that is  Simmchen at 391, who did race in Lake Placid and misses out on 25 points. Both her and her teammate would have to pass both Channell and Erlacher in the rankings for them to achieve a 2nd quota. A miraculous outcome, but that is what Uhlaender is accusing the Canadians of being afraid of. Could be, I don't think so but who knows.  
    • I see, wasn't sure if they had internal trials like Canada had in the past. So Uhlaender will receive 84 points, more possibly if she races again, and Ro has one more race. So very understandable why she would be upset. 
    • The American selection criteria is IBSF ranking as of January 18th. Currently:   15  Kelly Curtis 710 16  Alessandra Fumagalli 704 17  Mystique Ro 694 18  Valentina Margaglio 668 19  Sujung Hong 662 20  Katie Uhlaender 660   So those 30 points could be important depending on next weekend.
    • Regarding  and  :   The FIL documents refer to Part C.2.2. of the Qualification rules regarding Athlete eligibility, it seems the Canadian women's double is missing the minimum of timed runs in Cortina (c.2.2.1), whereas the other are missing the requirement under C.2.2.2
    • I am so confused at the whole thing   Can someone give a short summary of what is the actual issue, and what would have happened (as in, who would have qualified) if those Canadians who withdrew did start?
    • Agree. That article is completely non-sensical. No one understands the qualification system apart from actually Cecchini. And the ones who technically could be upset (e.g. Austria) are not mentioned. :D   And the Israelis athlete is interestingly the woman who just drove down the halfpipe at the 2018 Olympics.   Plus, that race did get Johansen into the quota slot for 
×
×
  • Create New...