website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Biathlon 2016 - 2017 Discussion Thread


hckošice

Recommended Posts

4 godziny temu, Gianlu33 napisał:

Sadly I agree.. It seems a B division race :( 

Well, it can't be Division B race if in this competition we can see such athletes as M. Fourcade, Dorin Habert, Svendsen, Lesser, Preuss, Eder, Hauser, Smith and Crawford ;)

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/21/#findComment-61001
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, rybak said:

Well, it can't be Division B race if in this competition we can see such athletes as M. Fourcade, Dorin Habert, Svendsen, Lesser, Preuss, Eder, Hauser, Smith and Crawford ;)

When you have 2 mixed relay events, nations have to spread their athlets between them, meaning that either the mixed relay or the single mixed relay won't have the strongest possible field of competitors ;)

 

 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/21/#findComment-61016
Share on other sites

On 11/28/2016 at 21:34, heywoodu said:

When you have 2 mixed relay events, nations have to spread their athlets between them, meaning that either the mixed relay or the single mixed relay won't have the strongest possible field of competitors ;)

 

 

I wonder what they'd do for the World Championships. I would have one on the first day and one on the last day.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/21/#findComment-61075
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ahjfcshfghb said:

I wonder what they'd do for the World Championships. I would have one on the first day and one on the last day.

So far it's not even on the schedule :p

 

e37f2d1f6f.png

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/21/#findComment-61077
Share on other sites

Just now, ahjfcshfghb said:

Yeah it's not this year. But they've added it starting 2019.

Cool, I thought it would be this year :d 

 

But yeah now that you mention it, I remember they said 2019..

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/21/#findComment-61079
Share on other sites

@Werloc Didn't you say somewhere that Diana Rasimoviciute has divorced from Ilmars Bricis? She's on tomorrow's startlist as Diana Rasimoviciute-Brice :mumble:

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/21/#findComment-61144
Share on other sites

On 11/25/2016 at 23:00, heywoodu said:

 

IBU Qualifying Points = ((athlete’s time/winner’s time)-1) x Race Factor) + Race Penalty

 

Race Factor: for Sprint and Individual competitions 800

Race Penalty: the sum of the points of the three highest ranked athletes in the top 10 divided by 3.75

The race penalty for all WC, WCH and OWG competitions is zero (0).

 

Earlier in the year I made this table so when I'm at the competitions I can somewhat easily check the number of points without having to calculate stuff on my phone all the time :p (and so Bruna and the Brazilians have a better idea of what they'll need)

 

ca7a8daa34.png

 

The colour coding is just a little random, mostly because 150, 180 and 200 are/were "important" lines :p 

 

I've taken 40 as race penalty here. In most IBU Cups last season it was something between 30 and 40 (at least for the women), but as it depends on who ends up in the top-10, it's always a bit hard to predict exactly. That's why I used 40, so in most cases the actual number of points will be a little bit lower. 

 

Vertical is the winning time of the race (as you see it'll only work for sprints), horizontal is the time of athlete X behind the winner --> combine them to get the approximate number of points for athlete X :d 

 

By the way, concerning the World Championships, thinking about Tsakiri here- an athlete needs to 'have' under 180 points to be eligible to start. Does that mean all the points from the races are added up and averaged out?

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/21/#findComment-61153
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ahjfcshfghb said:

By the way, concerning the World Championships, thinking about Tsakiri here- an athlete needs to 'have' under 180 points to be eligible to start. Does that mean all the points from the races are added up and averaged out?

They take the average of the three best results in the past three trimesters. 

 

IBU has slightly changed the way they publish IBU Qualifying Points (I mean the format of the PDF is a little different), and my Excel sheet doesn't like it, so I'm waiting for my Excel magician to solve the problem so I can start adding results and keeping the list up to date :p 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/21/#findComment-61155
Share on other sites

By the way, one result of under 150 points is sufficient as well to be eligible (so: average of under 180 or at least one result of under 150), so with her 109 points last weekend she is already eligible :)

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/21/#findComment-61156
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • China Media Group (CMG) will broadcast all 116 gold medal events of the Milan Winter Olympics live on CCTV-1, CCTV-5, CCTV-5+ and CCTV-16. It will also use technologies such as 4K/8K ultra-high definition to enhance the viewing experience. Live broadcasts of all events will be carried out from 16:00 Beijing time to 06:00 the next day.
    • The strength of the UK is that they are 100% focused on the track, while Italy must to navigate between the track and the road: the line-up is different for practically every event, etc. Paternoster should focus 100% on the track; she won't win anything big on the road anymore. As it is, she's weak both there and there. The situation is different with Balsamo, as she's also having significant success on the road and likely earns the most money there.
    • Discovery+ in the UK have also got their schedule up now.     I notice that only thing listed as being in UHD is the Opening Ceremony though....     
    • The problem over the last few years was that no-one was able to keep pace with the big Katie Archibald turns. Looks to be sorted now.  
    • The women's top 50 is so crammed with athletes from the same five nations that it is not inconceivable they are unable to fill the full quota from the top 50, in which case a third double spot would open up between USA/BEL/GBR
    • That women's pursuit team looks brutally fast. Batter you over the head into submission brutal, perhaps not seen since the early Trott-Rowsell days The 4 minute barrier could be on borrowed time.   The two British women sprinters Finucane and Caldwell also look pretty ominous, indeed the whole women's sprint team looks in some shape and with some depth to get that result without Finucane   Work to do for the British men's teams, but they won't be unhappy either, not to mention Joe Truman's unexpected Kilo win.
    • I prefer to do mine like this guy (https://app.podiumsport.it/) does his "Projected Medals" as probability based rather than straight medal picking... all things being equal, conversion rates should be about the same and the outliers come out in the wash. Unfortunately most people just like medal picking, and think any other approach is weird  
    • So probably: Men Oceania: Americas: Africa: Asia: One of  Europe: One of Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (probably not)  and whichever countries don’t qualify from Asian Games.  Universality: ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of the above in World Rankings    and one of  (most likely) or  seem safe with two quotas. The other will be favourites if a third team gets allocated two.    Women Oceania: Europe: One of Americas:  /  if US is ineligible due to their host quota, if the host quota gets reallocated then Canada will be in contention in the rankings Africa:   Asia: One of   Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (x1?)  (x1/2)  (x1/2), whichever doesn’t qualify out of  / ,  and  ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of above.  Universality: ?    is safe with two quotas between  it’ll be tough for whoever misses out of those three.   nevermind , 
    • The rankings look likely to give two spots each in the men's side to Egypt (2nd athlete at 3) and GB (second athlete at 9). the nearest contender after that is France and both Egypt and GB have plenty of contenders after their respective number 2 but before France's umber 2   Women's side looks a bit more of a battle, with Egypt again likely to provide 2, and then a fight between USA, GBR and BEL for the other lucky double spot. That said, so dominant are the Egyptians, Americans and Brits, that failing to find all the contenders in the top 50 is entirely plausible, possibly opening a third 'double' spot.
    • I'd done my final revisions on my prediction spreadsheets.. and I'm sticking with 26 for Canada.    Take it to the bank! (But don't sign anything)
×
×
  • Create New...