prof87 3 Posted June 11, 2016 #41 Share Posted June 11, 2016 vor 11 Minuten schrieb dcro: Okay, so it will go to Nigeria then. ...or lets say to no one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcro 10,210 Posted June 11, 2016 #42 Share Posted June 11, 2016 (edited) 43 minutes ago, prof87 said: that means just the reallocation of the mens single quota place 11 minutes ago, prof87 said: ...or lets say to no one What? It doesn't matter how Australia qualified in women's singles. That quota still needs to be reallocated at the end. First it will go to New Zealand, and if they refuse to Nigeria. EDIT: Ah, yes, I realize now that Australia only needs to return continental quotas. Edited June 11, 2016 by dcro #banbestmen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prof87 3 Posted June 11, 2016 #43 Share Posted June 11, 2016 vor 3 Minuten schrieb dcro: What? It doesn't matter how Australia qualified in women's singles. That quota still needs to be reallocated at the end. First it will go to New Zealand, and if they refuse to Nigeria. It seems to me that it does matter, because of the following facts: 34 Single Places (including the 5 Continental Representation Places) + 1 x Host Country Place (HC) + 3 x Unused Athlet Quota Places from Doubles (UAQ) + 3 x Reallocation of Unused Tripartite Commission Invitation Places (RUT) Place 1-32 (including Continental Representation of Asia, Europe, America) (without following the Continental Representation)/with Continental Representation (33) UAQ - - Sabrina Jaquet (34) UAQ - - Chlor Magee (UAQ) UAQ - - Telma Santos (UAQ) AFR - - Kate Foo Kune (Continental Representation of Africa) (UAQ) RUT - - Kati Tolmoff (HC) HC - - Lohaynny Vicente (RUT) RUT - - Laura Sarosi (RUT) AUS - - Hsuan-Yu Wendy Chen (Continental Representation of Australia) (RUT) RUT - - Akvile Stapusaityte so no place open, correct me if I'm wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcro 10,210 Posted June 11, 2016 #44 Share Posted June 11, 2016 10 minutes ago, prof87 said: It seems to me that it does matter, because of the following facts: 34 Single Places (including the 5 Continental Representation Places) + 1 x Host Country Place (HC) + 3 x Unused Athlet Quota Places from Doubles (UAQ) + 3 x Reallocation of Unused Tripartite Commission Invitation Places (RUT) Place 1-32 (including Continental Representation of Asia, Europe, America) (without following the Continental Representation)/with Continental Representation (33) UAQ - - Sabrina Jaquet (34) UAQ - - Chlor Magee (UAQ) UAQ - - Telma Santos (UAQ) AFR - - Kate Foo Kune (Continental Representation of Africa) (UAQ) RUT - - Kati Tolmoff (HC) HC - - Lohaynny Vicente (RUT) RUT - - Laura Sarosi (RUT) AUS - - Hsuan-Yu Wendy Chen (Continental Representation of Australia) (RUT) RUT - - Akvile Stapusaityte so no place open, correct me if I'm wrong Yes, it should be like that. Meaning that Australia gets to keep women's singles quota. #banbestmen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griff88 1,952 Posted June 21, 2016 #45 Share Posted June 21, 2016 (edited) So... a bit of update in Men's singles Since Australia not taking their MS quota, New Zealand reject it and we still have one Oceanian country which satisfy the criteria: Metuisela Tanakai Vainikolo - ranked 574 Source: http://system.bwfbadminton.com/uploads/2016/06/21/Olympic qualifiers from WR 05-05-16 - 21 June phase 3 MS.pdf Edited June 21, 2016 by Griff88 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcro 10,210 Posted June 21, 2016 #46 Share Posted June 21, 2016 11 minutes ago, Griff88 said: So... a bit of update in Men's singles Since Australia not taking their MS quota, New Zealand reject it and we still have one Oceanian country which satisfy the criteria: Metuisela Tanakai Vainikolo - ranked 574 Source: http://system.bwfbadminton.com/uploads/2016/06/21/Olympic qualifiers from WR 05-05-16 - 21 June phase 3 MS.pdf Wow, what a surprise! Good for Tonga. #banbestmen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heywoodu 15,141 Posted June 21, 2016 #47 Share Posted June 21, 2016 13 minutes ago, Griff88 said: So... a bit of update in Men's singles Since Australia not taking their MS quota, New Zealand reject it and we still have one Oceanian country which satisfy the criteria: Metuisela Tanakai Vainikolo - ranked 574 Source: http://system.bwfbadminton.com/uploads/2016/06/21/Olympic qualifiers from WR 05-05-16 - 21 June phase 3 MS.pdf That's just awesome . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrv86 3,138 Posted June 21, 2016 #48 Share Posted June 21, 2016 5 hours ago, Griff88 said: So... a bit of update in Men's singles Since Australia not taking their MS quota, New Zealand reject it and we still have one Oceanian country which satisfy the criteria: Metuisela Tanakai Vainikolo - ranked 574 Source: http://system.bwfbadminton.com/uploads/2016/06/21/Olympic qualifiers from WR 05-05-16 - 21 June phase 3 MS.pdf Completely unfair as they modified the qualification criteria after they were published... originally players (including tripartite places) were supossed to compete in at least 3 tournaments to be able to play in Rio. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
intoronto 5,641 Posted June 21, 2016 #49 Share Posted June 21, 2016 13 minutes ago, mrv86 said: Completely unfair as they modified the qualification criteria after they were published... originally players (including tripartite places) were supossed to compete in at least 3 tournaments to be able to play in Rio. Yea, the BWF wrote not eligible beside his name (then updated it ). http://system.bwfbadminton.com/uploads/2016/06/21/Olympic qualifiers from WR 05-05-16 - 21 June phase 3 MS updated.pdf mrv86 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griff88 1,952 Posted June 21, 2016 #50 Share Posted June 21, 2016 3 minutes ago, intoronto said: Yea, the BWF wrote not eligible beside his name (then updated it ). http://system.bwfbadminton.com/uploads/2016/06/21/Olympic qualifiers from WR 05-05-16 - 21 June phase 3 MS updated.pdf Yeah.. It causes confusion. So Lino Munoz will get it instead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now