MantaRaymarc

@Benolympique Could you update the qualification schedule on Wikipedia instead? I can't edit purposefully as many users including Sportsfan already banned me from editing. Thank you!

Hey Sportsfan 1234, I want to ask you a question. If you cannot respond to my question, I have one wish for you. WHAT'S WRONG WITH RAYMARCBADZ'S EDITS? WHY DID YOU INTEND TO BAN THE USER? Please respond here, not on Wikipedia. Thank you!

For a long time, Heywoodu. This unproductive, grammar-sensitive user on Wikipedia continues to baffle me with my editing. Popcorn and reading? I'm busy with work outside wikipedia. Not kidding.

**** YOU SPORTSFAN 1234! I will continue to curse you because you wanted me to be OUT of the WIKIPEDIA. YOU'RE CREATING A MESS AND SCANDAL TO MY CONTRIBUTIONS IN WIKIPEDIA EVEN IF I HAVE A DIFFERENT ACCOUNT. GO AND CHECK ALL THE ARTICLES THAT I EDITED IN WIKIPEDIA WITH MY ORIGINAL ACCOUNT. I'm already peaceful but you continue to spot me as a SOCKPUPPET. I will tell you in my language. HAYOP KA, P***** I** MO, SPORTSFAN 1234!

An unexpected triumph for South Sudan. Three victories and a ticket to Paris 2024. History creates.

Best if you could help me contribute to the Olympics at fandom.com. This is much better than Wikipedia.

in what event?

Swimming at the 2023 World Aquatics Championships July 24, 2023 New Olympic Qualifying Time (OQT) Women’s 100 m backstroke – OQT (59.99) Wan Letian (59.52) Wang Xueer (59.93) Men’s 100 m backstroke – OQT (53.74) Xu Jiayu (52.87) Hubert Kós (53.12) Ksawery Masiuk (53.15) Oliver Morgan (53.52) Roman Mityukov (53.57) Hugo González (53.70) João Nogueira da Costa (53.71) Bradley Woodward (53.72) Women’s 100 m breaststroke – OQT (1:06.79) Tatjana Schoenmaker (1:05.56) Satomi Suzuki (1:06.20) Dominika Sztandera (1:06.42) Sophie Hansson (1:06.69) Macarena Ceballos (1:06.69) Men’s 200 m freestyle – OQT (1:46.26) Lee Ho-joon (1:46.21) Women's 1500 m freestyle – OQT (16:09.09) Li Bingjie (15:58.81)

Swimming at the 2023 World Aquatics Championships July 23, 2023 New Olympic Qualifying Time (OQT) Men’s 400 m individual medley – OQT (4:12.50) Lewis Clareburt (4:11.29) Women's 200 m individual medley – OQT (2:11.47) Ellen Walshe (2:10.92)

Swimming at the 2023 World Aquatics Championships July 23, 2023 New Olympic Qualifying Time (OQT) Men’s 400 m individual medley – OQT (4:12.50) Alberto Razzetti (4:11.57)

Thank you! Kindly update the list of swimmers in the article Swimming at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Qualification on Wikipedia. Make sure that swimmers from Brazil, Hungary, China, and the United States should leave their names empty until the selection trials occur.

Swimming at the 2023 World Aquatics Championships July 23, 2023 New Olympic Qualifying Time (OQT) Women’s 100 m butterfly – OQT (57.92) Zhang Yufei (56.89) Wang Yichun (57.72) Men’s 100 m breaststroke – OQT (59.49) Qin Haiyang (58.26) Nic Fink (59.38) Josh Matheny (59.43) Women’s 400 m freestyle – OQT (4:07.90) Erika Fairweather (4:03.07) Li Bingjie (4:04.98) Waka Kobori (4:07.48)

Swimming at the 2023 World Aquatics Championships July 23, 2023 New Olympic Qualifying Time (OQT) Women’s 200 m individual medley – OQT (2:11.47) Ye Shiwen (2:09.81) Yu Yiting (2:09.66) Rebecca Meder (2:10.95) Men’s 400 m freestyle – OQT (3:46.78) Guilherme Costa (3:44.17) Kim Woo-min (3:44.52) Antonio Djakovic (3:45.53) Kristof Rasovszky (3:46.56) Alfonso Mestre (3:46.61)

"completely conform to the Wikipedia style?" – What do you mean? I'm shifting to a different paradigm at this moment.

For those unaware of this user. I will reiterate my comment here. Who among you knows "Sportsfan 1234?" A user named Sportsfan 1234 wanted to be permanently "entitled" on the WikiProject Olympics, endlessly reverting the edits of others on Olympics, filing deletion discussions about the Olympic articles because of the GNG and NOLYMPICS guidelines, and moving the existing articles to drafts because they do not have sufficient sources. Lately, he posted a section on my username in the administrators' noticeboard for incidents, proposing a topic ban towards my end on Olympics. I strive to defend my case because I have done nothing wrong about my contributions. Because of his "entitlement", he convinced other editors and administrators to support a topic ban proposal against my will on Wikipedia; hence, I ranted and unleashed my personal attacks to stop this nonsensical issue. Consequently, I was blocked indefinitely on Wikipedia. I do not know how long this case would last? I could not get the opportunity to edit any Olympic-related articles. Who will clean up the "messes"? Who will monitor the qualification process for the Games? Thank you! Wikipedia username: Raymarcbadz

The IP address 82.120.136.18 and Sportsfan 1234 are operated by the same individual. He will provide any justifiable means to expel me from the Wikipedia community. I'm not posing threats but he's responsible for tampering with my personal information. So who started this issue? Him!

THIS IS SPORTSFAN 1234'S FAULT! HE SUDDENLY LEAKED MY OTHER ACCOUNT. HE ACCUSED ME AS A BANNED USER. HE INSISTED THE ADMINS BLOCK MY OTHER ACCOUNT AND PORTRAY ME AS A SOCKPUPPET. HONESTLY, HE WANTS ME NOT TO EDIT ANY ARTICLES ON WIKIPEDIA. I'M COMPLETELY UPSET AND DEVASTATED ALREADY. HE TRUSTED THE ADMINS. HE WANTS TO BE FOREVER ENTITLED. I WILL RAISE MY ANGER BECAUSE THIS IS TOO MUCH FOR HIM. I WILL POINT OUT MY ACCUSATIONS AGAINST THIS USER ON WIKIPEDIA. - HE LOVES TO PISS ME OFF. - HE DISREGARDS AND REVERTS MY EDITS. - HE DESCRIBES MY VOCABULARY AND GRAMMAR IN A PESSIMISTIC WAY. (e.g. bad rephrasing, weasel words, grammar) - HE WANTS TO REMOVE ALL REDIRECTS WITHOUT EVERYONE'S CONSENT. - HE ACCEPTS AND APPRECIATES OTHER USERS' EDITS. I WILL ADVISE HIM TO FIX THIS F*KING MESS! SORRY IF I SHOUT HERE BUT I CANNOT CONTROL MY EMOTIONS RIGHT NOW BECAUSE OF THE MESS THAT HE CREATED.

Wow. Sportsfan 1234's hatred towards me continues. Not only he successfully bans me from editing Olympic-related articles on Wikipedia, but he also continues to insult me with my English. How dare him? 😒🤬

You would feel the same sentiment when you edit past editions of the Pan American Games. A user named S with numbers (sorry if I explicitly state with an initial for safety reasons) will warn you about your editing privilege as he reverts yours with an unpleasant remark. Beware of him.

Now, I'm officially banned from Wikipedia by the community. Sportsfan 1234 does not want me to be part of or contribute to the Wikiproject Olympics (disagrees with my edits, putting negative remarks on the summary, and filing an administrative case for edit warring or incidents) and favors support from the admins for a nonsensical, prejudicial topic and community ban. Consequently, the Olympic-related articles will turn into a mess once again. Best of luck to the unbanned or unblocked users. They will face the burden to fix the mess. This will not be the same when I started editing and formatting the articles around a decade ago.

Exactly. I remembered accomplishing a gargantuan task to create stub articles about the Olympians competing in Athens 2004 and Beijing 2008 (some from London 2012) and edit NOC articles with the official table formatting for consistency after London 2012. Lugnuts managed to create and edit over ten thousand articles within a span of a decade because of time constraints, stemming from the earliest days of the modern Games. Look how incredible and fastidious he truly was.

Are these related to Olympics?

Exactly. This happens to the case of NOC articles for Paris 2024 on Wiki. Sportsfan 1234 insisted to reject the redirected articles and those far from the correct source standards. For instance, I created Eritrea at the 2024 Summer Olympics article with sources and he simply filed it for deletion because it does not merit the WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV guidelines. So confusing and harsh. Not kidding.

I recently found the Olympics wiki site at Fandom.com. This is less strict and more lenient than the current Wikipedia. Users can create and edit an article without getting troubled though they should be abided by rules and guidelines in the site that govern them.

This is truthfully marked by a sad reality for many of us editors whenever we contribute solely to the project. Admins and editors entrusted by them have abused their authority to override our edits and place our status on the degrees of probation and infraction.