website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Doping Cases and Bans 2021 Thread


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Monzanator said:

When Americans don't win gold medals they always have to blame outside influence, not themselves.

 

Sun Yang isn't here yet they don't blame Dean & Scott for taking away their medals at this distance?

 

Efimova isn't taking away medals so now it's Rylov who has to be on doping, right? How convenient :rolleyes:

 

Or maybe they should blame Hafnaoui who also had the nerve to take away one of the US gold medals in 400 free. He must be on doping, right?

 

America only loses when someone else is cheating. Ho-hum! Someone needs to tell Ryan Murphy he's not Ryan Lochte :p

Efimova has tested positive twice so she is well and truly proved to be a doper. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/6859-doping-cases-and-bans-2021-thread/page/7/#findComment-405114
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Orangehair43 said:

Efimova has tested positive twice so she is well and truly proved to be a doper. 

But the issue here is why Russia as a country should be banned from these Games not whether Efirmova should start. And Efimova is so irrelevant these days I presume even US swimmers don't mind she's here. After all, she is not taking away any medals from them :p

 

Since Justin Gatlin was allowed to take part in Rio Games as a repeated doping offender and only a hamstring injury prevented him from making Tokyo I feel like Ryan Murphy is barking at the wrong tree to begin with.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/6859-doping-cases-and-bans-2021-thread/page/7/#findComment-405120
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Monzanator said:

But the issue here is why Russia as a country should be banned from these Games not whether Efirmova should start. And Efimova is so irrelevant these days I presume even US swimmers don't mind she's here. After all, she is not taking away any medals from them :p

 

Since Justin Gatlin was allowed to take part in Rio Games as a repeated doping offender and only a hamstring injury prevented him from making Tokyo I feel like Ryan Murphy is barking at the wrong tree to begin with.

Lily King famously condemned Gatlin as well. 
 

And Russia should be banned because they committed state sponsored doping and every whistleblower and Anti doping organisation in the world recommend  a total ban - but the IOC and CAS disagree with that.
 

Efirmova appeared in the relay and while it is unlikely they will beat the Americans in that one things might explode if they do in any of the three finals. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/6859-doping-cases-and-bans-2021-thread/page/7/#findComment-405139
Share on other sites

Just now, Orangehair43 said:

Lily King famously condemned Gatlin as well. 
 

Efirmova appeared in the relay and while it is unlikely they will beat the Americans in that one things might explode if they do in any of the three finals. 

 

Lily King doesn't run the USTF. USA speaks high morals when accusing Russians of all the doping evil yet they allow Justin Gatlin to compete and enjoy Nike sponsorship like he's a perfect role model or something. This is a hypocrisy of the highest order. I will always point this out and indicate how two-faced Ryan Murphy's sound like now.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/6859-doping-cases-and-bans-2021-thread/page/7/#findComment-405141
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Monzanator said:

 

Lily King doesn't run the USTF. USA speaks high morals when accusing Russians of all the doping evil yet they allow Justin Gatlin to compete and enjoy Nike sponsorship like he's a perfect role model or something. This is a hypocrisy of the highest order. I will always point this out and indicate how two-faced Ryan Murphy's sound like now.

USTF couldn’t legally ban Gatlin even if they tried. He would simply sue and win - CAS has made it clear governing bodies cannot ban athletes if they doping bans have expired. Blame CAS and The IOC because the IOC are only people who could put in place a rule that sees a lifetime ban from competiting for all dopers and get CAS to agree to it. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/6859-doping-cases-and-bans-2021-thread/page/7/#findComment-405147
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Orangehair43 said:

USTF couldn’t legally ban Gatlin even if they tried. He would simply sue and win - CAS has made it clear governing bodies cannot ban athletes if they doping bans have expired. Blame CAS and The IOC because the IOC are only people who could put in place a rule that sees a lifetime ban from competiting for all dopers and get CAS to agree to it. 

 

USTF selected Gatlin to compete so they share the blame. The "it's all IOC fault" excuse doesnt hold ground. Somehow USTF didn't let Sha'Cari Richardson to compete in Tokyo (in the relay) so it shows they can shut someone down IF they only want to.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/6859-doping-cases-and-bans-2021-thread/page/7/#findComment-405148
Share on other sites

Just now, Monzanator said:

 

USTF selected Gatlin to compete so they share the blame. The "it's all IOC fault" excuse doesnt hold ground. Somehow USTF didn't let Sha'Cari Richardson to compete in Tokyo (in the relay) so it shows they can shut someone down IF they only want to.

They couldn’t select her for the relay without breaking their own rules that say the only those who run in the final can be selected. As her result was annulled she didn’t. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/6859-doping-cases-and-bans-2021-thread/page/7/#findComment-405149
Share on other sites

Just now, Orangehair43 said:

They couldn’t select her for the relay without breaking their own rules that say the only those who run in the final can be selected. As her result was annulled she didn’t. 

Who can stop USTF from changing their OWN rules? The IOC? :p This is a complete technicality some lawyers make money from but casual sport fans deserve better than that. Whenever there's a will, there's a way.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/6859-doping-cases-and-bans-2021-thread/page/7/#findComment-405151
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Monzanator said:

Who can stop USTF from changing their OWN rules? The IOC? :p This is a complete technicality some lawyers make money from but casual sport fans deserve better than that. Whenever there's a will, there's a way.

The American Courts. The Main reason  USTF has that trial format is because America is litigation mad and it would all end in frequent court battles. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/6859-doping-cases-and-bans-2021-thread/page/7/#findComment-405152
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Orangehair43 said:

The American Courts. The Main reason  USTF has that trial format is because America is litigation mad and it would all end in frequent court battles. 

 

Those trials would end in out of court settlements anyway especially if an athlete who sues USTF would be suspended during a course of such trial (which makes sense since USTF would be treated as employer - isn't that what Jess Varnish argued vs British Cycling in the UK trial?).

 

Plus Nike (or any other sponsor) would probably pay enough money under the table for those #5 & #6 relay hopefuls so they don't file a case and block Richardson's place in the relay. Most things in USA usually come down to money in the end.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/6859-doping-cases-and-bans-2021-thread/page/7/#findComment-405154
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • When it comes to power, confidence and match-winning ability, women's cricket has produced some truly fearless batsmen over the years. These players didn't just score runs - they changed games, calmed crowds and intimidated bowlers. Based on influence, consistency and ability to dominate attacks, here is my 2026 Forum list of the top 7 most dangerous women batsmen in cricket history.   At the top, Meg Lanning stands out for her quiet aggression and leadership. She could control an innings and then suddenly explode. Behind her is Harmanpreet Kaur, known for her raw power and clutch performances, especially in big tournaments.   Ellyse Perry deserves a special mention. Her technique, fitness and ability to increase pace make her lethal in all formats. Smriti Mandhana brings purpose with grandeur - once she gets going, bowlers struggle to find answers.   From a bygone era, Mithali Raj may not have looked aggressive, but her mental strength and ability to bat for long periods make her extremely dangerous. Suzy Bats has become a nightmare for bowlers in ODIs and T20s, as she mixes timing and smart shot selection. The list also includes Deandra Dottin, whose power-hitting can change a match in just a few overs.   What connects all these stars is their fearless mentality. Each has earned the tag of Dangerous Women's Batsman by performing consistently under pressure and against the best bowlers in the world. For fans who love in-depth cricket discussions, statistics and trending topics, Cricbites is becoming a popular platform to explore women's cricket in a fresh and engaging way.
    • Someone made this Statue Trump---Epstein     mysterious bronze statue called “Best Friends Forever” has popped up on the east end of the National Mall in Washington, DC,    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/24/us/politics/trump-epstein-statue-dc-national-mall.html    
    • Off to Milan for the 145th session of the International Olympic Committee. Although the agenda has not been published yet, there shouldn’t be any major items over these two days, apart from the election of a member of the IOC Executive Board. This will be the eighth time the session is held in Italy, the last one being during the Turin 2006 Olympic Games.
    • another wave of mega rain is coming in north Africa 
    • What is happening in Canada , people leave it  They say life is very expensive , you cant find an appartement , the salary is miserable    is it the multi tax of Trump? 
    • Weightlifting We now have six events per gender with a total of 10 athletes per event.   The Olympic Qualification Rankings will be based on the sum of the total results of five events (three from period 1 and two from period 2). The top 8 will qualify.   The 9th spot will also be based on the OQR, but it will go to the highest ranked athlete from an unrepresented continent.   The 10th spot will be split between the host and universality (3 each per gender). Should the United States qualify normally then their host quota will be reduced, first going to an athlete from an unrepresented continent then to the overall highest ranked athlete.   Additionally, a "Best Lifter" will be awarded which would give the nation the chance to qualify 4 athletes rather than the max of 3.
    • The probability of winning a medal in the men's 500m also seems a bit off   
    • 66% chance for a medal in moguls seems low though...   Men's relay being 5th in short track, and Clarke only having a 0.5% chance at a medal also seem off   Why is ski mountaineering there, we didn't even qualify anyone 
×
×
  • Create New...