website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Funding


intoronto
 Share
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28763-funding/

Recommended Posts

The Canadian sports system is in crisis. The government doesn't seem to care and invest in sport. 

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/halifax.citynews.ca/2025/02/05/scarcity-behind-the-medals-canadas-national-sport-organizations-running-deficits/amp/

 

 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28763-funding/
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Safe Dragonfly said:

Oh jeepers, the last increase in funding from the government was in 2005...

We have gone through both liberal and conservative governments. Clearly no one wants to fund. The solution is presented too, provide sport gambling revenue to funding amateur sport.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28763-funding/#findComment-681994
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

With the election and Sport Canada not finishing its "Future of Sport" study, national federations have had to cut back drastically in case of revving future reduced funding. For ex. All Wrestling Canada athletes are now self funded for tournaments.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28763-funding/#findComment-686130
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I did an analysis of Own the Podium funding for Summer sports from the Paris triennial versus the current funding level:

 

Some notes:

  • The 2024-2025 funding represents year 1 of 4 for the LA2028 cycle
  • Overall funding average has gone down from the average of the three Paris years :facepalm:
  • Why is breaking being funded? :facepalm:
  • Not surprising, Cycling and Rowing with the biggest drops in average. The biggest increases are to the Men's field hockey and Women's volleyball teams, which imo have no chance of medaling in LA :facepalm:
  • Badminton, Modern pentathlon, Sport climbing, Surfing and Table tennis are the core Olympic sports without any funding for this cycle

 

VFZWv3z.png

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28763-funding/#findComment-687032
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, intoronto said:

I did an analysis of Own the Podium funding for Summer sports from the Paris triennial versus the current funding level:

 

Some notes:

  • The 2024-2025 funding represents year 1 of 4 for the LA2028 cycle
  • Overall funding average has gone down from the average of the three Paris years :facepalm:
  • Why is breaking being funded? :facepalm:
  • Not surprising, Cycling and Rowing with the biggest drops in average. The biggest increases are to the Men's field hockey and Women's volleyball teams, which imo have no chance of medaling in LA :facepalm:
  • Badminton, Modern pentathlon, Sport climbing, Surfing and Table tennis are the core Olympic sports without any funding for this cycle

 

VFZWv3z.png

Thanks for the breakdown 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28763-funding/#findComment-687080
Share on other sites

It's too bad OTP never realligned their focus when it was continued after 2010. They have such a backward facing funding formula. It was one thing when when it started, cause it was only like 5 years out from Vancouver, at when looking to maximize medals over such a short term funding like that makes sense (to a point anyway, some of the decisions still seem to be highly political, but I digress)... but when it was continued after they should have became more forward facing and investing in sports with better potential ROI

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28763-funding/#findComment-687168
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

That's an interesting goal since no other nation does this. It'll also be quite difficult to achieve. Over the next summer and winter games we may get 55-60 combined medals. The United States and China easily surpasses that from summer alone. Great Britain despite being weak in the winter could also achieve this. Germany's strength in both games will likely have them ahead of Canada. After that nations like France, Italy, Japan and the Netherlands do well enough in the winter that they may hold onto their lead over Canada. Plus when Russia returns they are practically guaranteed to finish ahead of Canada in the combined medal table.

 

Here's what the combined medal total for 2022/2024 looks like

 

1. :USA - 151

2. :CHN - 106

3. :FRA - 78

4. :GBR - 67

5. :JPN - 63

6. :GER - 60

7. :AUS - 57

8. :ITA - 57

9. :CAN - 53

10. :NED - 51

 

France is a bit inflated since they hosted 2024. I forgot to mention Australia is in the same boat as Great Britain where if they have a good Summer games they could out earn us.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28763-funding/#findComment-690391
Share on other sites

 Share
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28763-funding/
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • I love that it is more straightforward in relation to the number of quotas and does not allow possible problems as it was in Tokyo and Paris.
    • I love the judo qualification system, for me is the best in all disciplines. It combines a strong circuit, and it allows 100 or so countries to participate in.   So, maybe, if UWW does its job properly, it will be a good thing.
    • China Media Group (CMG) will broadcast all 116 gold medal events of the Milan Winter Olympics live on CCTV-1, CCTV-5, CCTV-5+ and CCTV-16. It will also use technologies such as 4K/8K ultra-high definition to enhance the viewing experience. Live broadcasts of all events will be carried out from 16:00 Beijing time to 06:00 the next day.
    • The strength of the UK is that they are 100% focused on the track, while Italy must to navigate between the track and the road: the line-up is different for practically every event, etc. Paternoster should focus 100% on the track; she won't win anything big on the road anymore. As it is, she's weak both there and there. The situation is different with Balsamo, as she's also having significant success on the road and likely earns the most money there.
    • Discovery+ in the UK have also got their schedule up now.     I notice that only thing listed as being in UHD is the Opening Ceremony though....     
    • The problem over the last few years was that no-one was able to keep pace with the big Katie Archibald turns. Looks to be sorted now.  
    • The women's top 50 is so crammed with athletes from the same five nations that it is not inconceivable they are unable to fill the full quota from the top 50, in which case a third double spot would open up between USA/BEL/GBR
    • That women's pursuit team looks brutally fast. Batter you over the head into submission brutal, perhaps not seen since the early Trott-Rowsell days The 4 minute barrier could be on borrowed time.   The two British women sprinters Finucane and Caldwell also look pretty ominous, indeed the whole women's sprint team looks in some shape and with some depth to get that result without Finucane   Work to do for the British men's teams, but they won't be unhappy either, not to mention Joe Truman's unexpected Kilo win.
    • I prefer to do mine like this guy (https://app.podiumsport.it/) does his "Projected Medals" as probability based rather than straight medal picking... all things being equal, conversion rates should be about the same and the outliers come out in the wash. Unfortunately most people just like medal picking, and think any other approach is weird  
    • So probably: Men Oceania: Americas: Africa: Asia: One of  Europe: One of Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (probably not)  and whichever countries don’t qualify from Asian Games.  Universality: ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of the above in World Rankings    and one of  (most likely) or  seem safe with two quotas. The other will be favourites if a third team gets allocated two.    Women Oceania: Europe: One of Americas:  /  if US is ineligible due to their host quota, if the host quota gets reallocated then Canada will be in contention in the rankings Africa:   Asia: One of   Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (x1?)  (x1/2)  (x1/2), whichever doesn’t qualify out of  / ,  and  ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of above.  Universality: ?    is safe with two quotas between  it’ll be tough for whoever misses out of those three.   nevermind , 
×
×
  • Create New...