website statistics
Jump to content

Team GB Daily: Day 2


 Share

Recommended Posts

I think 14.666 will be enough

As now we come across the world
To share these Games of old
Let all the flags of every land
In brotherhood unfold

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cutoff in Tokyo was 14.56 - not directly comparable, obviously (4 Russian gymnast scored higher, so only 2 went through), but does suggest it'll be close. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realise that I might be answering some of these late, but I've just woken up (it's 3:30am for me :p)

 

Question of the Day

Archery: Can we beat Germany? No

Artistic Gymnastics: Who is the top Brit (All-around) after qualifying? Kinsella

Badminton: Can Lane and Vendy win at least one game today? No

Boxing: How many wins do our boxers get today? One

Canoe Slalom: Can Woods get a medal? No

Cycling Mountain Bike: Can we get a top 5 finish? Yes

Equestrian: Does our TEAM stay in a medal position at the end of the day? Yes

Hockey: Do the WOMEN win? Yes

Judo: Can Giles get a medal?

Rowing: Is it another clean sweep of advancements today? Yes

Rugby Sevens: How many wins do we get? Today, or overall? Today, zero, overall, one

Sailing: Do all four teams get through to at LEAST the quarterfinal (Windsurfing) and medal race (Skiff) Yes

Shooting: Do we get at least one medal today? No

Swimming: Does Peaty win gold? No

Table Tennis: Can Hursey get a win? No

Tennis: Do Evans and Murray go through? No

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The women's gymnasts have been sadly underperforming across the board this morning. Sole positive is Becky likely into the bars final. Eesh difficult start to the day with the archery being...well erratic might be kind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Olympicsnell said:

The archery team taken the unusual step of firing their arrows with a scatter gun 

In fairness to them, it's still a darn sight better than I could do.

 

I mean, I can run and swim 100m. Not quickly obviously, but I can do it.

 

I doubt I'd even be within 10 metres of the archery target. :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon said:

Women’s Pair last in their rowing heat. Will need to go through the repechage.

That's highly disappointing actually, oddsmakers had them going in as 4th favs! Admittedly I was never quite that high on hopes but thought a semi final berth was assured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Epic Failure said:

In fairness to them, it's still a darn sight better than I could do.

 

I mean, I can run and swim 100m. Not quickly obviously, but I can do it.

 

I doubt I'd even be within 10 metres of the archery target. :p

Archery, is one where you look at it and think “how hard can it be, stand in same place and fire arrow” and then you try it for yourself and realise the skill and talent the athletes have! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Gold & Silver for  in the Mixed 10m Air Rifle!
    • Italy will raise it to Jury.   Perini's cellphone was in the bag which was kept in the boat. It was not intentional as per him.
    • Giacomo Perini, who originally won bronze in men’s PR1 single sculls, were found to be using communication equipment during the final and has been excluded from the event (ranked dead last) 
    • And last but not least, American gold for the women.  
    • Incredible drama though, with a huge last 200m charge from ! 
    • Oksana Zubkovska just won her 5th consecutive gold in women's long jump at the age of 41. She's just fenomenal woman, who tried to convince doctors that she is healthy at her junior age. 
    • It might have some advantages, I get that, but it doesn't take away the fact that you simply can't make a remotely fair league standing when teams don't all play each other. There's no way you can compare team A and B on number of points gained when they didn't play the same teams (and/or each other)...
    • I'm as traditional and anti-Super League as anyone you can get, but i'm optimistic about the new format.   For one it's still totally opposite of what the Super League wants to be. We don't have a closed league with 30+ matches in a season and you also depend on the domestic leagues to qualify.    Also, as good as the old group stage format was, the last few years it became very double sided in my view. In the 2000s and early 2010s it was much more interesting, when the teams were more equal in strength and surprises happened. But in the past few years, with all the money involved the gap is widening between the elite 10 teams and the rest.    And we usually got 2-3 really strong groups, where some teams got screwed and then we had 5 rather easy groups, with the big teams there had a cruise to the knockout stage, where after 3 matches it was virtually known what the final standing will be.   Now in the new format, where the knockout bracket is fixed by the positions in the league, there will be intrigue till the end i reckon. Plus with only 1 match between teams, there is a higher chance for a smaller team to upset a bigger one. If you have Man City - Sparta in 2 matches, you definitely know City are winning at minimum 1 of them. But in only 1 round, if they miss to beat Sparta, then lose to team 2 and have another draw with a smaller team, then their position in the table is affected much more serious.   I also really like, that after the league phase, we don't get teams dropping to the lower competitions. I have enough of teams like Barcelona or Man Utd phoning and moaning, when they drop to the Europa League. If you don't make the knockouts you are out, done..   The one thing i definitely don't like about the switch is that they gave 2 of the extra spots again to the top Nations with this bogus "best country coef. in a year" spot. They should have given them to the Q nations. The top 5 leagues have enough teams already. 
×
×
  • Create New...