website statistics
Jump to content

How many medals do you expect from your Nation at the Summer Olympic Games Paris 2024?


 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Swewi said:

I expect 4 golds and 10 medals, which would be the best summer olympics for Sweden since Athens.

Good to hear you are optimistic. Really hope you are right. :clap:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dragon said:

https://www.si.com/olympics/medal-picks-predictions-paris-2024-olympics Here's the Sports Illustrated predictions for Paris.

You have an hour to spot the errors.:p

What in the gracenote have I just read 💀💀💀

They have :AUS winning men’s 4x100 swimming relay. No way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dragon said:

https://www.si.com/olympics/medal-picks-predictions-paris-2024-olympics Here's the Sports Illustrated predictions for Paris.

You have an hour to spot the errors.:p

:ITA 18 gold medals? :yikes:

 

where do I have to put my signature? :evil:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More than 40 medals doesn’t seem realistic for Germany, but maybe the German team will surprise me.

Attachment is the great fabricator of illusions; reality can be obtained only by someone who is detached.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/12/2024 at 8:06 PM, samterry said:

:ESP

 

Wish: Break the Barcelona 1992 record of 22 medals, and we definitely have the potential to get ≈25.

 

Prediction: 20. Second best but not enough to break the record. Less than our average of 17-18 would be a disappointment. 

 

I said this last month and stand by it :d, hope I'm proven to be too bearish by the end of the Games

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Dragon said:

https://www.si.com/olympics/medal-picks-predictions-paris-2024-olympics Here's the Sports Illustrated predictions for Paris.

You have an hour to spot the errors.:p

Well I see 7 medals for us, which I am okay with, except they give a silver in fencing for Despina Georgiadou who didn't even qualify for Paris :lol:

 

Of course I can't blame them, I mean she is ranked 3rd in the world so 99% of people would assume she is qualified for the Olympics in any sport but apparently not in fencing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Made an account just to share my thoughts for medal chances of 20% or higher for The Netherlands:NED in all events:d

 

All in all, I'd say based on the following percentages I'd come to around 30 medals, and factoring in Sifan Hassan and some unexpected medals (especially in Athletics, Tennis, Swimming and Judo), my fair estimate would be around 31-37 medals. 10+ gold should be realistic.

 

3X3 Basketball Men's team - 50% chance

 

Athletics 4x400M (W) - 80% chance
4x400M (Mixed) - 60% chance
Shot Put (W) - 30% chance
400M Hurdles (W) - 99% chance
Heptathlon (W) - 70% chance
1.500M (M) - 20% chance
Marathon (M) - 20% chance

 

Additionally, Sifan Hassan is a big X-factor. She hasn't yet announced what events she will perform in (1.500M, 5.000M, 10.000M, and/or marathon), but I expect at least 1 medal from her

 

Track Cycling 
Team Sprint (M) - 99% chance
Keirin (M) - 80% chance
Individual Sprint (M) - 99% chance
Madison (M) - 20% chance
Keirin (W) - 20% chance
Madison (W) - 20% chance

 

Beach volleyball 
Men - 30% chance
Women - 20% chance

 

BMX 
Racing (W) - 30% chance

 

Breakdancing 
Men - 30% chance
Women - 50% chance

 

Handball 
Women - 40% chance

 

Field Hockey 
Men - 70% chance
Women - 99% chance

 

Judo 
-81kg (M) - 20% chance
-63kg (W) - 50% chance
-70kg (W) - 20% chance
Mixed event - 20% chance

 

Mountainbike 

Women - 90% chance

 

Equestrian 
Jumping (Individual) - 30% chance
Jumping (Team) - 30% chance
Dressage (Individual) - 20% chance
Dressage (Team) - 20% chance

 

Rowing 
M1x - 80% chance
M2x - 80% chance
M4x - 90% chance
M4- - 20% chance
M8+ - 40% chance
W1x - 95% chance
W2x - 20% chance
W2- - 90% chance
W4x - 50% chance
W4- - 50% chance

 

Synchronised Swimming 
Duet (W) - 60% chance

 

Water Polo 
Women - 70% chance

 

Road cycling 
Men's race - 40% chance
Women's race - 70% chance
Women's time trial - 50% chance

 

Sailing 
49er (M) - 70% chance

ILCA 7 (M) - 20% chance
IQFoil (M) - 80% chance
49er FX (W) - 80% chance
ILCA 6 (W) - 40% chance
IQFoil (W) - 20% chance
Nacra17 (Mixed) - 50% chance

 

Swimming 

100m breaststroke (M) - 30% chance
200m breaststroke (M) - 30% chance
100m freestyle (W) - 20% chance
100m breaststroke (W) - 30% chance

200m breaststroke (W) - 40% chance
200m medley (W) - 20% chance
10km Open Water (W) - 60% chance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Gold & Silver for  in the Mixed 10m Air Rifle!
    • Italy will raise it to Jury.   Perini's cellphone was in the bag which was kept in the boat. It was not intentional as per him.
    • Giacomo Perini, who originally won bronze in men’s PR1 single sculls, were found to be using communication equipment during the final and has been excluded from the event (ranked dead last) 
    • And last but not least, American gold for the women.  
    • Incredible drama though, with a huge last 200m charge from ! 
    • Oksana Zubkovska just won her 5th consecutive gold in women's long jump at the age of 41. She's just fenomenal woman, who tried to convince doctors that she is healthy at her junior age. 
    • It might have some advantages, I get that, but it doesn't take away the fact that you simply can't make a remotely fair league standing when teams don't all play each other. There's no way you can compare team A and B on number of points gained when they didn't play the same teams (and/or each other)...
    • I'm as traditional and anti-Super League as anyone you can get, but i'm optimistic about the new format.   For one it's still totally opposite of what the Super League wants to be. We don't have a closed league with 30+ matches in a season and you also depend on the domestic leagues to qualify.    Also, as good as the old group stage format was, the last few years it became very double sided in my view. In the 2000s and early 2010s it was much more interesting, when the teams were more equal in strength and surprises happened. But in the past few years, with all the money involved the gap is widening between the elite 10 teams and the rest.    And we usually got 2-3 really strong groups, where some teams got screwed and then we had 5 rather easy groups, with the big teams there had a cruise to the knockout stage, where after 3 matches it was virtually known what the final standing will be.   Now in the new format, where the knockout bracket is fixed by the positions in the league, there will be intrigue till the end i reckon. Plus with only 1 match between teams, there is a higher chance for a smaller team to upset a bigger one. If you have Man City - Sparta in 2 matches, you definitely know City are winning at minimum 1 of them. But in only 1 round, if they miss to beat Sparta, then lose to team 2 and have another draw with a smaller team, then their position in the table is affected much more serious.   I also really like, that after the league phase, we don't get teams dropping to the lower competitions. I have enough of teams like Barcelona or Man Utd phoning and moaning, when they drop to the Europa League. If you don't make the knockouts you are out, done..   The one thing i definitely don't like about the switch is that they gave 2 of the extra spots again to the top Nations with this bogus "best country coef. in a year" spot. They should have given them to the Q nations. The top 5 leagues have enough teams already. 
×
×
  • Create New...