website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Santiago 2023


konig
 Share
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/24657-santiago-2023/

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, LDOG said:

No veo mas de un oro en vela. No hubo cambios que nos hayan favorecido.

En este caso disiento, normalmente en la vela Panamericana son pocas categorías, las olímpicas normalmente eran las lasers y windsurf y el resto "no-olímpicas" en donde rara vez hay un oro, en este caso son la mayoría de  las olímpicas (y las que no lo son como la 470, son de nuestras peores) y entre las no olímpicas tenemos alguna como  Lightning  en donde Argentina es candidato al oro, en mi caso espero 2 como mínimo: Nacra y Lightning.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/24657-santiago-2023/page/2/#findComment-591588
Share on other sites

De los deportes que terminaron, considero que cumplieron: tiro, natación aguas abiertas, ciclismo de ruta, tenes y esqui acuatico, el resto en mayor o menor medida, en deuda.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/24657-santiago-2023/page/2/#findComment-592683
Share on other sites

En general todo más o menos dentro de la lógica al final, con algo más de suerte capaz llegábamos al 20 en oros pero volviendo al 7° puesto normal en el medallero.

 

Pensando en París lo mismo de siempre: habrá que seguir confiando en los equipos, prenderle una vela al físico del Maligno Torres, que le sople buen viento al Nacra y después que esté inspirado algún tenista o que Fede Gil y Vernice tengan el torneo de su vida. El resto a lo clasificar y lo que se pueda.

Edited by NMQ
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/24657-santiago-2023/page/2/#findComment-594502
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, NMQ said:

En general todo más o menos dentro de la lógica al final, con algo más de suerte capaz llegábamos al 20 en oros pero volviendo al 7° puesto normal en el medallero.

 

Pensando en París lo mismo de siempre: habrá que seguir confiando en los equipos, prenderle una vela al físico del Maligno Torres, que le sople buen viento al Nacra y después que esté inspirado algún tenista o que Fede Gil y Vernice tengan el torneo de su vida. El resto a lo clasificar y lo que se pueda.

No tengo otra que coincidir, por eso la reacción, aun así considero que hubo un "derrumbe" respecto a Lima 2019.

Lo que decís de Paris es absolutamente así, entre 1 y 3 medallas como fue Tokyo, con pocas chances reales de "oro"

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/24657-santiago-2023/page/2/#findComment-594536
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LDOG said:

La verdad es que el "derrumbe" al final fue mas que nada en remo y natación, el resto hizo lo mismo de siempre.  

 

 

33 oros contra 17, literalmente la mitad.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/24657-santiago-2023/page/2/#findComment-594589
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, konig said:

33 oros contra 17, literalmente la mitad.

Lo que te digo se ve mas claro cuando comparás por medallas totales. De esas 25 menos, 14 se perdieron en esos dos deportes. Despues hubo solo caidas pequeñas en algunos otros. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/24657-santiago-2023/page/2/#findComment-594591
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, LDOG said:

Lo que te digo se ve mas claro cuando comparás por medallas totales. De esas 25 menos, 14 se perdieron en esos dos deportes. Despues hubo solo caidas pequeñas en algunos otros. 

Entiendo mejor tu punto, entonces podemos hablar mas de caída de oros en deportes puntuales mas que caídas en el total y en general.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/24657-santiago-2023/page/2/#findComment-594594
Share on other sites

Yo personalmente creo que no fue un mal panamericano, si lo tomamos desde el lado de las medallas ahí si se podría considerar que fue flojo solo mirando la comparación de oros, pero desde un punto de vista integral logramos las plazas olimpicas que eramos favoritos a conseguirlas y no hubo sorpresas, ademas que dentro de todo no se han conseguido una cantidad grande de oros pero los resultados fueron dentro de lo esperado y hasta un poco mejor, exceptuando algunos deportes muy puntuales.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/24657-santiago-2023/page/2/#findComment-594607
Share on other sites

 Share
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/24657-santiago-2023/
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • When it comes to power, confidence and match-winning ability, women's cricket has produced some truly fearless batsmen over the years. These players didn't just score runs - they changed games, calmed crowds and intimidated bowlers. Based on influence, consistency and ability to dominate attacks, here is my 2026 Forum list of the top 7 most dangerous women batsmen in cricket history.   At the top, Meg Lanning stands out for her quiet aggression and leadership. She could control an innings and then suddenly explode. Behind her is Harmanpreet Kaur, known for her raw power and clutch performances, especially in big tournaments.   Ellyse Perry deserves a special mention. Her technique, fitness and ability to increase pace make her lethal in all formats. Smriti Mandhana brings purpose with grandeur - once she gets going, bowlers struggle to find answers.   From a bygone era, Mithali Raj may not have looked aggressive, but her mental strength and ability to bat for long periods make her extremely dangerous. Suzy Bats has become a nightmare for bowlers in ODIs and T20s, as she mixes timing and smart shot selection. The list also includes Deandra Dottin, whose power-hitting can change a match in just a few overs.   What connects all these stars is their fearless mentality. Each has earned the tag of Dangerous Women's Batsman by performing consistently under pressure and against the best bowlers in the world. For fans who love in-depth cricket discussions, statistics and trending topics, Cricbites is becoming a popular platform to explore women's cricket in a fresh and engaging way.
    • Someone made this Statue Trump---Epstein     mysterious bronze statue called “Best Friends Forever” has popped up on the east end of the National Mall in Washington, DC,    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/24/us/politics/trump-epstein-statue-dc-national-mall.html    
    • Off to Milan for the 145th session of the International Olympic Committee. Although the agenda has not been published yet, there shouldn’t be any major items over these two days, apart from the election of a member of the IOC Executive Board. This will be the eighth time the session is held in Italy, the last one being during the Turin 2006 Olympic Games.
    • another wave of mega rain is coming in north Africa 
    • What is happening in Canada , people leave it  They say life is very expensive , you cant find an appartement , the salary is miserable    is it the multi tax of Trump? 
    • Weightlifting We now have six events per gender with a total of 10 athletes per event.   The Olympic Qualification Rankings will be based on the sum of the total results of five events (three from period 1 and two from period 2). The top 8 will qualify.   The 9th spot will also be based on the OQR, but it will go to the highest ranked athlete from an unrepresented continent.   The 10th spot will be split between the host and universality (3 each per gender). Should the United States qualify normally then their host quota will be reduced, first going to an athlete from an unrepresented continent then to the overall highest ranked athlete.   Additionally, a "Best Lifter" will be awarded which would give the nation the chance to qualify 4 athletes rather than the max of 3.
    • The probability of winning a medal in the men's 500m also seems a bit off   
    • 66% chance for a medal in moguls seems low though...   Men's relay being 5th in short track, and Clarke only having a 0.5% chance at a medal also seem off   Why is ski mountaineering there, we didn't even qualify anyone 
×
×
  • Create New...