website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Football 2020 Discussion Thread


Henry_Leon

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Olympian1010 said:

Some potentially big news here:

 

 

Nah, that's only a temporary thing. Not much of a big deal I guess, although I'd be in favour of keeping that possible new rules in place anyway. Then again, that just gives the richer teams even more chances :p 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2110-football-2020-discussion-thread/page/7/#findComment-293136
Share on other sites

I’m surprised that 5 subs are a thing in Euro. Once you’re at U10 level and above it’s 3 subs in all leagues in the US.

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2110-football-2020-discussion-thread/page/7/#findComment-293147
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Olympian1010 said:

I’m surprised that 5 subs are a thing in Euro. Once you’re at U10 level and above it’s 3 subs in all leagues in the US.

 

It's even 6 or 7 subs in the seventh or eight tier here in Poland. And clubs have put this idea forward themselves. You have to remember most of these players here in the lower tiers have full-time jobs along with playing soccer.

 

I believe in England they introduced rolling subs (like in ice hockey) below Tier 7 of non-league & U-17 competitions like 5 years ago already.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2110-football-2020-discussion-thread/page/7/#findComment-293149
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Monzanator said:

 

It's even 6 or 7 subs in the seventh or eight tier here in Poland. And clubs have put this idea forward themselves. You have to remember most of these players here in the lower tiers have full-time jobs along with playing soccer.

 

I believe in England they introduced rolling subs (like in ice hockey) below Tier 7 of non-league & U-17 competitions like 5 years ago already.

That sounds way too intelligent for the US.

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2110-football-2020-discussion-thread/page/7/#findComment-293150
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Monzanator said:

 

The status of soccer in USA is nowhere near what it is in Europe :p

There’s still millions of players, and thousands of leagues though. The structure is much worse, athlete development model is worse, management and coaching is worse, it costs more to play, and pay is worse for those who do make it far.

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2110-football-2020-discussion-thread/page/7/#findComment-293152
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Olympian1010 said:

I’m surprised that 5 subs are a thing in Euro. Once you’re at U10 level and above it’s 3 subs in all leagues in the US.

In Italy we have 9 tier, and every tier (expect Serie A and B) are divided into groups. 

For example, the last pro league (3rd tier) have 60 teams into 3 group, the 4th league have 173 teams into 9 group and is divided into interregional group.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2110-football-2020-discussion-thread/page/7/#findComment-293168
Share on other sites

On 24/04/2020 at 12:31, thepharoah said:

German federation wants to resume Bundesliga by May 10th but they're waiting for Government Confirmation 

I think it's May 9th ... ?

Apparently the plan is to test all the people who are going to be in the stadium before every game, which would mean that they need roughly 20k tests to finish the season.

Some people in Germany said that they couldn't do it, because other people need the tests more, but from what i can tell Germany currently can test 800k to 850k people a week and there are a lot of free capacities (not surprising when you only have 1000 - 2000 new infections every day), so they wouldn't take anything away from anyone. It has been said that the Bundesliga would lose around 700 million € if they would end the season now, so economically speaking it for sure would be great news if they could finish the season.

 

Aren't you a fan of Bayern Munich? If that's the case ... how do you feel about possible signings for the new season (Upamecano, Sane, Dest)?

Attachment is the great fabricator of illusions; reality can be obtained only by someone who is detached.
 

 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2110-football-2020-discussion-thread/page/7/#findComment-293270
Share on other sites

I think every professional league should be able to finish their season, with maybe the exception of Italy. France, Belgium, Netherlands jumped the gun.. Even if they start in june, there is enough time to finish by the beginning of august. Having football matches in empty stadiums isn't that much more dangerous like every other economic measure the countries are going to allow in the next few weeks. Like having restaurants, schools, malls, parks, tourism travel all open to the public. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2110-football-2020-discussion-thread/page/7/#findComment-293271
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • China Media Group (CMG) will broadcast all 116 gold medal events of the Milan Winter Olympics live on CCTV-1, CCTV-5, CCTV-5+ and CCTV-16. It will also use technologies such as 4K/8K ultra-high definition to enhance the viewing experience. Live broadcasts of all events will be carried out from 16:00 Beijing time to 06:00 the next day.
    • The strength of the UK is that they are 100% focused on the track, while Italy must to navigate between the track and the road: the line-up is different for practically every event, etc. Paternoster should focus 100% on the track; she won't win anything big on the road anymore. As it is, she's weak both there and there. The situation is different with Balsamo, as she's also having significant success on the road and likely earns the most money there.
    • Discovery+ in the UK have also got their schedule up now.     I notice that only thing listed as being in UHD is the Opening Ceremony though....     
    • The problem over the last few years was that no-one was able to keep pace with the big Katie Archibald turns. Looks to be sorted now.  
    • The women's top 50 is so crammed with athletes from the same five nations that it is not inconceivable they are unable to fill the full quota from the top 50, in which case a third double spot would open up between USA/BEL/GBR
    • That women's pursuit team looks brutally fast. Batter you over the head into submission brutal, perhaps not seen since the early Trott-Rowsell days The 4 minute barrier could be on borrowed time.   The two British women sprinters Finucane and Caldwell also look pretty ominous, indeed the whole women's sprint team looks in some shape and with some depth to get that result without Finucane   Work to do for the British men's teams, but they won't be unhappy either, not to mention Joe Truman's unexpected Kilo win.
    • I prefer to do mine like this guy (https://app.podiumsport.it/) does his "Projected Medals" as probability based rather than straight medal picking... all things being equal, conversion rates should be about the same and the outliers come out in the wash. Unfortunately most people just like medal picking, and think any other approach is weird  
    • So probably: Men Oceania: Americas: Africa: Asia: One of  Europe: One of Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (probably not)  and whichever countries don’t qualify from Asian Games.  Universality: ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of the above in World Rankings    and one of  (most likely) or  seem safe with two quotas. The other will be favourites if a third team gets allocated two.    Women Oceania: Europe: One of Americas:  /  if US is ineligible due to their host quota, if the host quota gets reallocated then Canada will be in contention in the rankings Africa:   Asia: One of   Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (x1?)  (x1/2)  (x1/2), whichever doesn’t qualify out of  / ,  and  ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of above.  Universality: ?    is safe with two quotas between  it’ll be tough for whoever misses out of those three.   nevermind , 
    • The rankings look likely to give two spots each in the men's side to Egypt (2nd athlete at 3) and GB (second athlete at 9). the nearest contender after that is France and both Egypt and GB have plenty of contenders after their respective number 2 but before France's umber 2   Women's side looks a bit more of a battle, with Egypt again likely to provide 2, and then a fight between USA, GBR and BEL for the other lucky double spot. That said, so dominant are the Egyptians, Americans and Brits, that failing to find all the contenders in the top 50 is entirely plausible, possibly opening a third 'double' spot.
    • I'd done my final revisions on my prediction spreadsheets.. and I'm sticking with 26 for Canada.    Take it to the bank! (But don't sign anything)
×
×
  • Create New...