Freestyle Skiing FIS World Cup 2024 - 2025

[Totallympics 63]

Freestyle Skiing FIS World Cup 2024 - 2025

 

Multi-Stage Event - 6 September 2024 - 30 March 2025

 

 

Official Website
Programme
Results System
Facebook Page
Discussion Thread

Edited September 5 by Sindo

[Grassmarket 3,355]

The Halfpipes from Cadrona are live on YT, both quals and finals.

 

FIS Freestyle Skiing - YouTube

[Josh 10,289]

 Gu is simply unstoppable 

[Josh 10,289]

According to FIS, DNI means did not improve… why can’t they just give them scores instead? 

 

Am I missing something? Don’t think I’ve ever seen this before. 

Edited September 8 by Josh

[Josh 10,289]

Halfpipe WC Cadrona, New Zealand

 

Women

Gold-  Eileen Gu (96.00)

Silver-  Kexin Zhang (89.25)

Bronze-  Rachael Karker (87.00)

 

Men

Gold-  Brendan MacKay (90.00)

Silver-  Alex Ferreira (89.50)

Bronze-  Andrew Longino (87.75)

 

Full Results

[heywoodu 14,883]

5 hours ago, Josh said:

According to FIS, DNI means did not improve… why can’t they just give them scores instead? 

 

Am I missing something? Don’t think I’ve ever seen this before. 

Yeah I don't remember seeing that neither, odd. It's not like the run is invalidated and so not scored (like for example a discus thrower who feels that a throw is not good enough and just steps on the line to avoid letting the officials measure the throw for no reason). The run is scored, so, you know....show the score.

 

What's even more odd, according to this:

https://www.interschools.com.au/news/2024-slopestyle-rules-and-competition-guide

 

Quote

Following are the specific rules regarding scoring:

 

If the score of the second run does not exceed that of the first run, no score will be assigned for the second run. The competitor will receive a "DNI" (Did not Improve) score for the second run.

If the score of the second run surpasses that of the first run, the second run will be scored. The first run will then receive a "DNI" (Did not Improve) score.

That's even weirder  I mean, technically a 'Did not improve' for the second run is annoying, but correct. A 'did not improve' for the first run however, just isn't correct, since the first run is done, you know, first  

[vovanA 156]

4 hours ago, heywoodu said:

Yeah I don't remember seeing that neither, odd. It's not like the run is invalidated and so not scored (like for example a discus thrower who feels that a throw is not good enough and just steps on the line to avoid letting the officials measure the throw for no reason). The run is scored, so, you know....show the score.

 

What's even more odd, according to this:

https://www.interschools.com.au/news/2024-slopestyle-rules-and-competition-guide

 

That's even weirder  I mean, technically a 'Did not improve' for the second run is annoying, but correct. A 'did not improve' for the first run however, just isn't correct, since the first run is done, you know, first  

maybe the would like to hide scores so that there was no excess discussion of judges' work... 

 

anyway, FIS actually didn't delete improved first runs and showed all the progress made by athletes

Edited September 9 by vovanA

[Olympionikes 27]

From what I understand it's only to lose less time. It was more logical during the slopestyle qualification as the condition were very bad than for the halfpipe even if wind and visibility were tricky too for the final

[heywoodu 14,883]

2 hours ago, Olympionikes said:

From what I understand it's only to lose less time. It was more logical during the slopestyle qualification as the condition were very bad than for the halfpipe even if wind and visibility were tricky too for the final

But how? Because to know whether run two was better, the scores need to be made anyway. It takes like 5 seconds extra to publish them.

[Olympionikes 27]

I think it's only when the run is incomplete that it is accurate otherwise it is a little bit weird as you already mentioned it. Run has to be scored so why don't show it....