website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Things You Would Change in Sports?


Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, intoronto said:

It would be embarrassing to include darts or billiards in the Winter Olympic program.

I can see a darts biathlon working though.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/27481-things-you-would-change-in-sports/page/5/#findComment-633085
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Cinnamon Bun said:

As a big fan of darts myself In genuinely think people won't be too bothered by it's inclusion. The whole origins of being a pub sport behind, it has much of a right to be considered for the Olympics as Archery and Shooting do. You don't exactly have to be athletic to do any of those sports. 

I think that is a big underestimation of especially the muscles needed for archery :p 

 

Right now there's already the eternal debate about darts being a sport or not, that would just get worse if included in the Olympics. Besides, I truly doubt any top level player has any serious interest in the Olympics, unlike for example athletes in some other sports that have actively been trying to get into the Olympics (sports climbing, for example). The Olympic tennis tournament is already something that doesn't feel like even 5% as important as a Grand Slam, with darts that would be way less I think.

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/27481-things-you-would-change-in-sports/page/5/#findComment-633088
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, orangeman said:

I think most people here would love a 3 week Olympic Games, but I'm not sure the general public has the attention for that. Most casual viewers I know say they're "done" by the end of the Olympics. It's sort of like Christmas; start too early and you take away the magic of it. 

It would also make the days calmer, which is useful, but also takes away a bit of that Olympic magic where everyone is filled to the brim with sports from early morning to late night :p 

 

Plus it'd be harder with getting time off from work :d 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/27481-things-you-would-change-in-sports/page/5/#findComment-633089
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, intoronto said:

It would be embarrassing to include darts or billiards in the Winter Olympic program.

It would be embarrassing to include any sport, which doesn't have a winter element to it. 

 

Playing sport "X" indoors makes it in no way a candidate for the Winter Olympics, so to just "puff" the program.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/27481-things-you-would-change-in-sports/page/5/#findComment-633090
Share on other sites

I mean, the following ideas have literally no chance of ever happening, but if we are wishing...

 

I'd have the Olympics be a true festival of sports. All other sport doesn't happen in that period. If that means that it takes 2-3 months, so be it. It's still only 2 months every 4 years.

 

You have representation from any country that wants it in any event so all sports are truly global. You have all sports that want to be involved in there.

 

It would be glorious insanity.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/27481-things-you-would-change-in-sports/page/5/#findComment-633093
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, orangeman said:

I think most people here would love a 3 week Olympic Games, but I'm not sure the general public has the attention for that. Most casual viewers I know say they're "done" by the end of the Olympics. It's sort of like Christmas; start too early and you take away the magic of it. 

 

 

We are already at 2 full weeks + 4 days. With smart and balanced scheduling it wouldn't be that noticeable.

 

You can have the Opening Ceremony on Tuesday and start 1/3 of the sports already on Wednesday & Thursday instead of Saturday. This way you can spread them out a bit and have more rest days for the team sports as well.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/27481-things-you-would-change-in-sports/page/5/#findComment-633094
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Federer91 said:

It would be embarrassing to include any sport, which doesn't have a winter element to it. 

 

Playing sport "X" indoors makes it in no way a candidate for the Winter Olympics, so to just "puff" the program.

Which means cyclocross for example would be fine. Purely in that sense, because obviously it's just nowhere near international enough :p 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/27481-things-you-would-change-in-sports/page/5/#findComment-633102
Share on other sites

Actually the problem with cyclocross, snow volley, ice sailing (but this one would be tough considering the climate changes) is that the IOC had a rule not to allow the sport federations to compete in BOTH Summer and Winter Olympics.... I would love to change that rule, at least for the sake of snow volley.

 

If we speak about minor wishes, I would like to balance quotas between some sports. Consider we have i.e. 16 quotas for taekwondo tournaments and 15 to 20 TEAM quotas in equestrian disciplines plus several individual ones. Would not that deserve a better balancing?

 

Also I would like to have more diverse disciplines in Winter Olympics. We have all kinds of erverything in summer sports - martial arts, precision sports, ball games, pure athletics.... I miss something like snow-wrestling or....idk, like a snowball fight :D Might be a team event ;) But as a simple wish as I sad before: snow volley would be a perfect addition to the winter programme.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/27481-things-you-would-change-in-sports/page/5/#findComment-633144
Share on other sites

Its not to change sports but i would love to see big mountains and snow in Brazil to have olympic games to suport every 2 years.

 

Unfortunatly im not God :lol:

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/27481-things-you-would-change-in-sports/page/5/#findComment-633161
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, heywoodu said:

I think that is a big underestimation of especially the muscles needed for archery :p 

 

Right now there's already the eternal debate about darts being a sport or not, that would just get worse if included in the Olympics. Besides, I truly doubt any top level player has any serious interest in the Olympics, unlike for example athletes in some other sports that have actively been trying to get into the Olympics (sports climbing, for example). The Olympic tennis tournament is already something that doesn't feel like even 5% as important as a Grand Slam, with darts that would be way less I think.

The debate about darts being a sport is massively flawed as there are multiple components that make it a sport such as skill, accuracy and the physical act of throwing. Also the top players have already said they'd be up for doing it, unlike tennis and golf there isn't a snobbery about only playing tournaments that are "big enough" as professional darts players will pretty much play anything even if it's somes shitty local darts tournament. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/27481-things-you-would-change-in-sports/page/5/#findComment-633168
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • China Media Group (CMG) will broadcast all 116 gold medal events of the Milan Winter Olympics live on CCTV-1, CCTV-5, CCTV-5+ and CCTV-16. It will also use technologies such as 4K/8K ultra-high definition to enhance the viewing experience. Live broadcasts of all events will be carried out from 16:00 Beijing time to 06:00 the next day.
    • The strength of the UK is that they are 100% focused on the track, while Italy must to navigate between the track and the road: the line-up is different for practically every event, etc. Paternoster should focus 100% on the track; she won't win anything big on the road anymore. As it is, she's weak both there and there. The situation is different with Balsamo, as she's also having significant success on the road and likely earns the most money there.
    • Discovery+ in the UK have also got their schedule up now.     I notice that only thing listed as being in UHD is the Opening Ceremony though....     
    • The problem over the last few years was that no-one was able to keep pace with the big Katie Archibald turns. Looks to be sorted now.  
    • The women's top 50 is so crammed with athletes from the same five nations that it is not inconceivable they are unable to fill the full quota from the top 50, in which case a third double spot would open up between USA/BEL/GBR
    • That women's pursuit team looks brutally fast. Batter you over the head into submission brutal, perhaps not seen since the early Trott-Rowsell days The 4 minute barrier could be on borrowed time.   The two British women sprinters Finucane and Caldwell also look pretty ominous, indeed the whole women's sprint team looks in some shape and with some depth to get that result without Finucane   Work to do for the British men's teams, but they won't be unhappy either, not to mention Joe Truman's unexpected Kilo win.
    • I prefer to do mine like this guy (https://app.podiumsport.it/) does his "Projected Medals" as probability based rather than straight medal picking... all things being equal, conversion rates should be about the same and the outliers come out in the wash. Unfortunately most people just like medal picking, and think any other approach is weird  
    • So probably: Men Oceania: Americas: Africa: Asia: One of  Europe: One of Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (probably not)  and whichever countries don’t qualify from Asian Games.  Universality: ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of the above in World Rankings    and one of  (most likely) or  seem safe with two quotas. The other will be favourites if a third team gets allocated two.    Women Oceania: Europe: One of Americas:  /  if US is ineligible due to their host quota, if the host quota gets reallocated then Canada will be in contention in the rankings Africa:   Asia: One of   Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (x1?)  (x1/2)  (x1/2), whichever doesn’t qualify out of  / ,  and  ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of above.  Universality: ?    is safe with two quotas between  it’ll be tough for whoever misses out of those three.   nevermind , 
    • The rankings look likely to give two spots each in the men's side to Egypt (2nd athlete at 3) and GB (second athlete at 9). the nearest contender after that is France and both Egypt and GB have plenty of contenders after their respective number 2 but before France's umber 2   Women's side looks a bit more of a battle, with Egypt again likely to provide 2, and then a fight between USA, GBR and BEL for the other lucky double spot. That said, so dominant are the Egyptians, Americans and Brits, that failing to find all the contenders in the top 50 is entirely plausible, possibly opening a third 'double' spot.
    • I'd done my final revisions on my prediction spreadsheets.. and I'm sticking with 26 for Canada.    Take it to the bank! (But don't sign anything)
×
×
  • Create New...