website statistics
Jump to content

Athletics at the Summer Olympic Games Paris 2024


Totallympics
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Nickyc707 said:

The Soviet Union was not Russia but a union of numerous countries. They were completely different entities. How can you simply add their numbers together when many of the USSR's medals were won by non-Russians.

OMG, people really need a history lesson, even though i have explained this a thousand times...

 

There were no other entities, there were no legal countries until the Independences in the 90s. Doesn't matter what your ethnicity was, you were under the rule of Russia, doesn't matter if the hat was "Soviet Union". It's not the same as the European Union. They weren't Independent countries.

 

If that isn't enough,  on 31 January 1992, the United Nations recognized, without objection, Russia as legal successor of the rights and obligations of the former Soviet Union. 

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20031123143520/http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf397.shtml

 

If Catalonia succeds in the future from Spain, would you say any medals from Catalonian athletes in the past shouldn't be counted for Spain? No, because at the time when they were won, they were part of Spain.

 

That's why in the history books Ukraine, Belarus, Armenia etc. and their results are counted after they gained Independence.

Edited by Federer91
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Federer91 said:

 

Germany doesn't include GDR, because the twice the athletes rule, but it has West Germany and Unified team included.

 

Ah, OK fair enough, thought it would be absurd if they were counting results that were :GDR :GER :GDR as three German medals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Grassmarket said:

Ah, OK fair enough, thought it would be absurd if they were counting results that were :GDR :GER :GDR as three German medals. 

 

Yes, East Germany isn't included in the historically accurate all time table, not only because of the double the athletes precedent, but because they were a runaway state. They formed their own Olympic Committee and were recognized as a separate country, while West Germany remained the legal successor of the previous unified Germany. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Federer91 said:

OMG, people really need a history lesson, even though i have explained this a thousand times...

 

There were no other entities, there were no legal countries until the Independences in the 90s. Doesn't matter what your ethnicity was, you were under the rule of Russia, doesn't matter if the hat was "Soviet Union". It's not the same as the European Union. They weren't Independent countries.

 

If that isn't enough,  on 31 January 1992, the United Nations recognized, without objection, Russia as legal successor of the rights and obligations of the former Soviet Union. 

 

Oh, sure in terms of international law but in sporting terms it just can't work like that.  In the early Olympics you had the Russian Empire [Three medals total].  In the 20s & 30s there were three Baltic Republics.  From 1952-1992 there was the USSR / Commonwealth of Independent States.  After 1992 Russia inherited the Tsar's medals, but otherwise started anew, along with the other 11 SSRs except the three Baltic Republics who already had Olympic records. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Federer91 said:

 

Yes, East Germany isn't included in the historically accurate all time table, not only because of the double the athletes precedent, but because they were a runaway state. They formed their own Olympic Committee and were recognized as a separate country, while West Germany remained the legal successor of the previous unified Germany. 

Actually, I forgot that both :GDR & :GER appeared as a Unified German Team 1956-1964 , so these medals must count. It was only in Grenoble 1968 that  :GDR appeared in its own name. 

Edited by Grassmarket
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Grassmarket said:

Oh, sure in terms of international law but in sporting terms it just can't work like that.  In the early Olympics you had the Russian Empire [Three medals total].  In the 20s & 30s there were three Baltic Republics.  From 1952-1992 there was the USSR / Commonwealth of Independent States.  After 1992 Russia inherited the Tsar's medals, but otherwise started anew, along with the other 11 SSRs except the three Baltic Republics who already had Olympic records. 

If the IOC wants to take the cowardly approach and not historically distribute medals, because of their agendas, it's their problem.

 

History can't be changed. There are enough historical documents, that show the legal successors of defunct states. 

 

The Baltic Republics keep their medals from the 20s and 30s, because they were independent countries back then. 

 

Afterwards they are occupied by Russia. They are no longer legal countries. Their athletes are willingly (or forcedly) competing for Russia, thus everything won is considered a Russian medal, until they again gain Independence as a separate country.

 

It's funny how people still pretend, that the names "Soviet Union" and "Russia" are completely unconnected and one country didn't exist for 40 years and magically appeared from the 90s..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Grassmarket said:

 

 

If you'd like to help our fellow Totallympics member Bruna Moura get to the 2026 Winter Olympics, after her car crash on the way to the 2022 Olympics, every tiny bit of help would be greatly appreciated! Full story and how to help can be found here!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • To be fair, that goes for lots of sports. Looking at the Paris Olympics, are there really more than a small handful of countries where the general public - outside of the Olympics - tunes in to rhythmic gymnastics, artistic swimming, dressage, shooting, modern pentathlon, rowing, canoeing, weightlifting, judo, wrestling, taekwondo, track cycling, diving and so on?   Not saying those other sports have a large and broad international appeal, because I doubt they do, but that goes for lots of currently Olympic sports in terms of how much the general public has any interest in it whatsoever  
    • GB doing bits in the transfer market, hope we make a trade for summer mcintosh next 
    • Yes it bothers me, because it violates the fundamental principals of what is classified as a Winter sport and thus eligible to be included in a Winter Olympics. The same way "snow and ice" is ludicrous for you...   If they wanted to include cc running at the Summer Games, where it belongs, then there would be no discussion. Because we all know, that Coe, IAAF just want another piece of the pie and a place at the table at the WOG for their own personal benefits. It makes no difference if your event is being held in December, January or February, when you can have it without an ounce on snow and in the bright sunny day with 25+ degrees. That is not a winter event.    And yes, i too detest ice hockey, curling being played in late May, June, August, even September. Real winter sports season should be from October to early-mid May. 
    • Lacrosse already had more than 40 nations competing at the last World Championship if you include the qualification round. Although taking a look at the results the difference between US/Canada and the other teams was huge.
    • Agree on the basis of this.    But let's take a look at the recently added sports.   For how many of them you could absolutely say they have gained interest and are trending positively. I can for only rugby and climbing. Of course rugby has been popular for decades, they only needed to figure out the perfect format for the OG. Sport climbing on the other hand is the only new sport, which has seen a rapid expansion in the past 10 years. No one was taking it seriously as a real sport a decade ago, but now it has grown in different parts of the World, the fan and media interesting is rising. And it gets more popular and popular.    I wouldn't say the same for skateboarding and surfing. I think their popularity isn't at all that high compared to the 90s and early 2000s. In that period they were much more popular in the American / Canadian zeitgeist from what i recall.    Many of the other sports are just host fodder and/or are basically a 3-5 country sports. Flag football, cricket, lacrosse, baseball, breaking have limited appeal. What is the justifiable reason for adding them, beside the host jerking for throwing a ton of money for organizing the Games.    And here lies the IOC's flow. Instead of firstly help growing and popularizing these sports before adding them, they first bring them on the OG in the hope that will automatically make these sports more trendy. It doesn't...   If you want to include lacrosse, then the IOC should work with the Governing body and all the National Associations in making a campaign to familiarize it around the World. Say you are including lacrosse, but in 3 Games time, so there is time to make an International footprint. After 8 years if you can make a Lacrosse World Championship with 24-32 teams, then including it at the OG makes it a much, much bigger factor.    Now they beat their drum "We are including new sports, look how modern and urban we are", when the truth is they are a joke event with 6 teams, which gives absolutely nothing for growing said sport and is just another statistic. 
    • A lot of young people start rowing while at university so they do provide many of the rowers we see on the international stage. However, there are lots of rowing clubs that are happy to take in members of all ages and backgrounds and most if not all make their equipment available to them. They don't expect you provide your own boat although I'm sure you can if you want. My local club are content whether you want to be a recreational or competitive rower, whether you're a junior or a veteran.    Most of the costs are associated with international rowing teams but that applies across many of the Olympic sports. You mention the issue of venues but presumably this also applies to sprint Canoeing which invariably use the same courses.
    • And ice hockey could be part of the Summer Olympics, considering that seems to never end during the year  
    • One of those 20 countries here: we'd love the theoretically free cyclo-cross medals, as long as an NOC can send 6-7 athletes per team, so we can send the entire world's top-6     That's us for the women, Belgium says the same for the men I think. Massively in favour!   Also, korfball please.
    • Sure, but she has been riding for Canyon/SRAM for years now, it's quite common in cycling to not be based in one's home country  
    • A quick search suggests that the price may indeed not be that high (unless at some point you need your own boat of course), but it does also seem like it's mostly student teams or things in some way related to an educational institution, which is a bit of an odd barrier to have to go through.   There might be things I'm missing though which would make it easier for someone who isn't a student to just join and start.
×
×
  • Create New...