website statistics
Jump to content

Men's American Football NFL 2020


Totallympics
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Gianlu33 said:

Apparently the natives say that they don't want change tha Washington logo and that NOBODY ask something to the native community.

 

Ahh, America. You will never change...

 

:d Now we have to figure out which tribes are entitled to speak on behalf being represented by the Redskins name? Of course the liberals won't care about it. I mean how many of these bozos have even heard of the ochre pigment that indirectly represents the name Redskins in first place? :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gianlu33 said:

Apparently the natives say that they don't want change tha Washington logo and that NOBODY ask something to the native community.

 

Ahh, America. You will never change...

Where did you read that?

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/07/2020 at 10:21, Monzanator said:

Another thread ruined by politics and "defund police" BS. I'll probably stop posting here until the season starts :(

 

On 16/07/2020 at 10:55, Monzanator said:

Everyone hates Dan Snyder and wants him gone. That's old news. Other than James Dolan at Knicks I don't know any other owner who gets a worse rap in the media. I smell some Jerry Sandusky-like crap but then again, it's America. I won't be surprised by anything :dunno:

 

The liberals will probably hate the Washington franchise out of sheer habit for years to come anyway :lol:

 

 

Money talks, bullshit walks.  Yea, this story has been out there for years, but as soon as a major sponsor basically said "we're pulling our support until you change your name," it was going to happen.

 

If you want to talk sports and not politics, ignore the thread during the offseason.  A prominent owner probably about to be pushed out is a pretty big story.  And I'm sure more than a few Redskins Washington NFL football club fans will be thrilled to see him go.  Maybe they'll actually manage to not suck so much with someone else in charge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Quaker2001 said:

 

 

Money talks, bullshit walks.  Yea, this story has been out there for years, but as soon as a major sponsor basically said "we're pulling our support until you change your name," it was going to happen.

 

If you want to talk sports and not politics, ignore the thread during the offseason.  A prominent owner probably about to be pushed out is a pretty big story.  And I'm sure more than a few Redskins Washington NFL football club fans will be thrilled to see him go.  Maybe they'll actually manage to not suck so much with someone else in charge

 

One guy with money will be replaced by another guy with money. One common thing about these billionaires is they don't give a damn what other people think. Their wealth allows them to rise above the political corectness. Look at the house cleaning Tepper did at Panthers. Every corner stone of the 2015 15-1 team is gone. Newton, Kuechly, T.Davis, Olsen and HC Rivera. All gone. Tepper wanted his own team and made sure everyone from the Richardson tenure hit the road. Kuechly retired but I wonder how much this had to do with the new ownership tbh.

 

Redskins have been irrelevant since the first Joe Gibbs era ended (or since the Heath Shuler draft bust, you name it). If the Browns or Jets are the NFL's 'loveable losers' then Redskins were the 'unloveable losers' for the last 25+ years :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Monzanator said:

 

:d Now we have to figure out which tribes are entitled to speak on behalf being represented by the Redskins name? Of course the liberals won't care about it. I mean how many of these bozos have even heard of the ochre pigment that indirectly represents the name Redskins in first place? :lol:

 

apparently it's the Blackfeet Nation the one with the closest ties to the name and logo of the Redskins...

 

https://eu.greatfallstribune.com/story/news/2020/07/13/washington-redskins-name-change-logo-nfl-montana-tribal-member-reactions/5427491002/

 

but of course the question involves also all the other tribes, so it's more controversial than ever...there's no common view even among the Native Nations...

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2020/07/03/redskins-name-change/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Monzanator said:

 

One guy with money will be replaced by another guy with money. One common thing about these billionaires is they don't give a damn what other people think. Their wealth allows them to rise above the political corectness. Look at the house cleaning Tepper did at Panthers. Every corner stone of the 2015 15-1 team is gone. Newton, Kuechly, T.Davis, Olsen and HC Rivera. All gone. Tepper wanted his own team and made sure everyone from the Richardson tenure hit the road. Kuechly retired but I wonder how much this had to do with the new ownership tbh.

 

Redskins have been irrelevant since the first Joe Gibbs era ended (or since the Heath Shuler draft bust, you name it). If the Browns or Jets are the NFL's 'loveable losers' then Redskins were the 'unloveable losers' for the last 25+ years :lol:

 

Not anymore it doesn't.  Look at the the debate over the name change which has been out there for years.  Look how quickly things changed when 1 big time sponsor made it about money.  The fact that Snyder is about to be Donald Sterling'ed out of the league is about something completely separate.  Yes, he'll be replaced with someone else, and again, maybe they'll no longer be one of the most poorly run franchises that has little excuse to be poorly run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Quaker2001 said:

 

Not anymore it doesn't.  Look at the the debate over the name change which has been out there for years.  Look how quickly things changed when 1 big time sponsor made it about money.  The fact that Snyder is about to be Donald Sterling'ed out of the league is about something completely separate.  Yes, he'll be replaced with someone else, and again, maybe they'll no longer be one of the most poorly run franchises that has little excuse to be poorly run.

 

Dan Snyder was one of the least popular owners in the league anyway. Big money sides with big money. Tepper kicked Cam Newton out and nobody spend 1% of the time to criticize that move compared to Colin Kaepernick's martyrdom after getting benched for Blaine Gabbert ;) Tepper is the wealthiest owner in NFL right now, he outbid some Hispanic guy Navarro IIRC for the Panthers ownership, all the talk about minority owners in NFL and it's all old white & Jewish money owning all the damn franchises. Blacks and Hispanics can basically do nothing about it. Even the Asians have more ownership in the major leagues, Seattle Mariners are still owned by the Japanese, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not quite sure where to to leave this since we don’t have a CFL thread, so I’ll just post it here.

 

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, so much for having the Inuit people have any say in this. Even if they oppose the name change, it doesn't matter.  It's all about money and political corectness at it's finest :lol:

 

https://edmontonsun.com/sports/football/cfl/edmonton-eskimos/reports-say-eskimos-ready-to-announce-name-change

 

This article says 78% of Western Artic Inuit opposes the change but who cares? :p

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Monzanator said:

Yeah, so much for having the Inuit people have any say in this. Even if they oppose the name change, it doesn't matter.  It's all about money and political corectness at it's finest :lol:

 

https://edmontonsun.com/sports/football/cfl/edmonton-eskimos/reports-say-eskimos-ready-to-announce-name-change

 

This article says 78% of Western Artic Inuit opposes the change but who cares? :p

 

Speech from an Inuit leader after the team won the Grey Cup in 2015: https://nunatsiaq.com/stories/article/65674natan_obed_why_the_name_edmonton_eskimos_harms_inuit/

 

 

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Selecting the best health insurance plans involves several key considerations. First, evaluate your medical needs, including any pre-existing conditions or specific healthcare requirements. Look for plans that offer comprehensive coverage, including hospitalization, critical illness, and preventive care. Compare premiums, deductibles, and co-payments to balance affordability and coverage. It's also important to check the insurer’s claim settlement ratio and the network of cashless hospitals. Consider waiting periods for pre-existing conditions and any exclusions in the policy. Additionally, look for extra benefits like wellness programs or annual health check-ups to maximize value from your health insurance plan.
    • Rather negative     Both towards Vollering and towards the coach, who has been making a mess of this for years now (like Tokyo). Vollering literally said "it was not good for me that Markus and Vos were still in the front towards the end"     One of the most well-known journalists (albeit a bit of a drama queen, but in this case, he's right): "Absurdly bad race by Vollering. Unbelievable."   An entire analysis titled "Vollering only thought of herself and threw away and almost certain Dutch medal": https://www.wielerflits.nl/nieuws/demi-vollering-dacht-alleen-aan-zichzelf-en-verspeelt-vrijwel-zekere-wk-medaille-voor-nederland/   Vollering: "They were all riding just to make me lose"   https://www.gelderlander.nl/video/productie/vollering-mij-laten-verliezen-wk-zurich-772648?referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F   The 100th time Vollering shows she should simply not be in a team like this. It is always trouble, every single time. We need a team with like 6 Marianne Vos clones, she has the experience, she can read a race like absolutely nobody else in the world can and she plays her role, whether that's the team captain or working for someone else, without complaining and to the fullest extent.   Vollering is the exact opposite of Vos. Vollering rides for Team Vollering, which consists of Demi Vollering. No matter what.
    • What did Dutch press make out of it? It was one of the worst "teamworks" I have ever seen in cycling.
    • There is a ton of evidence, even if you don't believe the Bible is real,  that israel is our ancestral land.  And we simply took what's ours.  And in fact there was never anyone named Palestinians there.   Simply a name given to the region by the Roman's.  But the actual people is just a collective of individuals from different Arab countries where they were kicked out from.  And we are expected to cater to them.   There are plenty of other countries that should take them.   Iran, qatar, Iraq, Kuwait, Yemen, Algeria,  libiya, Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco to name a few.   
    • Completely lost track of when the other final, but I just finished watching the pre-recorded version of it.   Team “Magic Mike” McEwen defeated Team Gushue 8-3 to win his third title (and in a row) of the season. 
    • Massive win indeed, a 80+ kilometer solo in the world championships, damn  (I mean, Sivakov jumped with him to try and help him of course, but couldn't do anything but sit in his wheel until he got dropped )
    • If even Erdogan calls you a psychopath, you're probably been....bad.    
    • Meanwhile:         https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maher_al-Assad
    • Sure, some things are simply historical events retold with a kind of fantasy layer over it, to make it more appealing to read and/or - most importantly - to put some lessons into it, which is fine (and which is the main way to read most religious texts, as 'lessons' and messages by the writers instead of actual historical facts). But let's not pretend that things like Moses splitting the sea or the entire exodus have a significant historical basis, based on actual evidence. Anyway, like I said: I'm well aware people who believe the religious book of their choosing is a historical book aren't going to ever believe otherwise, I grew up in a town full of similiarly minded people  
×
×
  • Create New...