website statistics
Jump to content

Swimming Qualification to Tokyo 2020 Summer Olympic Games


Recommended Posts

  On 6/22/2021 at 1:06 AM, Maxim Fastovsky said:

This is a very real tweet from the LA28 official page..... *Facepalm"

 

 

 

Expand  

Other than the biographical information literally the only part of this tweet that is correct is that he qualified for a second Olympics ?‍♂️

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/968-swimming-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/47/#findComment-386592
Share on other sites

  On 6/22/2021 at 1:11 AM, NearPup said:

Other than the biographical information literally the only part of this tweet that is correct is that he qualified for a second Olympics ?‍♂️

Expand  

it's hilarious because it's an original event dating back to 1908

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/968-swimming-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/47/#findComment-386593
Share on other sites

:CAN Canadian Olympic trials, day 4

 

Women's 200m breast

  • Sydney Pickrem (already nominated, did not race at trials)
  • Kelsey Wog (2:23.40)

 

Men's 200m breast

  • No one with standard

 

Women's 200m butterfly

  • No one with standard

 

Men's 200m butterfly

  • No one with standard

 

Women's 100m freestyle

  • Taylor Ruck (already nominated, finished fifth 54.58)
  • Penny Oleksiak (52.89, her best time since 2016 Olympic final, I believe)
  • Kayla Sanchez (53.77) + Maggie MacNeil (54.02) round out the top 4, likely our relay team 

 

Men's 100m freestyle

  • Josh Liendo (48.13)

 

Top 4: Ruslan Gaziev ( 48.81 ), Markus Thormeyer (49.24)

 

Top 2 ranked: Kisil + Hayden withdrew from finals due to injury. So the relay team is a guess atp.

 

     

    Link to comment
    https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/968-swimming-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/47/#findComment-386916
    Share on other sites

      On 6/22/2021 at 11:09 PM, Surlympics said:

    What was kisils time in the morning?

    Expand  

     48.43, which was better than the A standard. Swimming Canada should do the right thing and name him to the team in this event.

    Link to comment
    https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/968-swimming-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/47/#findComment-386929
    Share on other sites

      On 6/22/2021 at 11:22 PM, intoronto said:

     48.43, which was better than the A standard. Swimming Canada should do the right thing and name him to the team in this event.

    Expand  

    The Team announcement tomorrow is going to be fascinating. They've given themselves lots of flexibility in terms of who they select this time. I would expect them to name either Kisil or Hayden to the second spot in the 100m Free. I hope its Kisil. As much as I want to see Javi Acevedo names to the team it would be hard justify when they have Liendo, Gaslav, Thormeyer PLUS Hayden and Kisil hitting the A standard. 

    Link to comment
    https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/968-swimming-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/47/#findComment-386932
    Share on other sites

      On 6/22/2021 at 11:22 PM, intoronto said:

     48.43, which was better than the A standard. Swimming Canada should do the right thing and name him to the team in this event.

    Expand  

    According to the qualification document if there are less than two swimmers qualified in an event at trials Swimming Canada will nominate the next best ranked swimmer that has the A standard, and will nominate the best swimmer with the B standard and a FINA invitation in events where Canada doesn't have anyone qualified, as long as they pass a "review for competitive readiness", which is defined as them being reasonably able to match their qualifying time at the Olympics.

     

    The document very specifically says will, not may. From my reading of the document the only real discretion is if a swimmer is injured or otherwise no longer in good enough form to hit the standard.

    Link to comment
    https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/968-swimming-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/47/#findComment-386947
    Share on other sites

      On 6/23/2021 at 1:09 AM, NearPup said:

    According to the qualification document if there are less than two swimmers qualified in an event at trials Swimming Canada will nominate the next best ranked swimmer that has the A standard, and will nominate the best swimmer with the B standard and a FINA invitation in events where Canada doesn't have anyone qualified, as long as they pass a "review for competitive readiness", which is defined as them being reasonably able to match their qualifying time at the Olympics.

     

    The document very specifically says will, not may. From my reading of the document the only real discretion is if a swimmer is injured or otherwise no longer in good enough form to hit the standard.

    Expand  

    Interesting. I was under the inpression that they likely wouldn’t be taking some of the B standard athletes. I think with the priority listing in the qualification document they may not but didn’t notice the wording. 

    Link to comment
    https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/968-swimming-qualification-to-tokyo-2020-summer-olympic-games/page/47/#findComment-386948
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Latest Posts around Totallympics

      • The problem is XD is a fun event, but its essentially a social event, and lags far behind the others both at Grand Slams and Olympics - no quotas of its own, very limited prize money - as the indivisual Olympic tennis has got more and more important, the top players have limited thhier doubles participation to the main M and W D.   a team format, however, gets some fo that BJK/Davis cup magic, and because it'll b enovel, they can REALLY mess around with it - for example, a three set match could consists of MS first set, WS second and, if needed mixed doubles decider - light work load and quick competition. could play three matches a day if needed   Would not be incredibly shocked if BOTH golf and tennis adopted a quickfire 'Olympic' format - Singles, singles, doubles - (In golf it would be 9 hole matchplay with sets replaced with 9 hole matches, and the order men's indi, women's indi, mixed foursome   On Compound, nice to see it but odd too for GB - Ella Gibson is one of the outstanding shooters of her time, but GBR don't seem to have a male compound shooter worth a candle   On voluntary team sports (Flag football, cricket, lacrosse) I smell a rankings heavy approach with continental rep limited to 3 - though they may be real sneaky with cricket and go host (USA), Euro 1(GBR), Oceania 1(Aus), Asia (1)(India) Africa 1(South Africa) and Final Qualifier 1, heavily loaded with Asia and West Indies individual teams, perhaps Ireland and New Zealand for the appearance of balance.   The Iroquois question still unresolved. GBR would be a rankings pick in everything bar men's flag football   Wonder about the Team gymnastics - Super quick fire high peril format maybe of just one gymnast per apparatus, with the floor and vault reserved to the women so each sex provide only 4 scores - would make it feel different to the existing team events, and make USA a less guaranteed gold. Qualifiation by highest score in overall Q in each event - even if that score comes from same athlete in multiple events
      • i'm too  emotionally drained to really write all the pr's right now so safe to say there were a number of them.good night,happy i don't have to have heart attacks till sunday.
      • Eammanoul sousa wins flight 2 with 67.51 a huge 3 meter personal best and extension of his national record.
      • https://worldboxing.org/ioc-confirms-gender-parity-in-boxing-at-la28-with-seven-weight-classes-for-both-men-and-women/       Well I didn't see this coming but eh world boxing have gotten rid of men's flyweight!!!!! Non Olympics weights are now 50kg, 75kg and 85kg for the men and 48kg, 80kg and 80+kg for the women. I think it is good news that they haven't added womens heavyweight but men's flyweight being gone is a shocker especially for "smaller" nations. In Rio like we had both 49 and 52kg below 56kg but now flyweight is gone completely. I mean it is tricky to have 10 weightclasses and then have only 7 for the Olympics and for both the 10 and the 7 to be evenly spaced out but like im very surprised that its flyweight thats gone and not one of 55,60,65kg. To be honest selfishly from an Irish perspective at least for this cycle I don't hate it but flyweight was one of the most competitive divisions so it being gone will hurt the weaker (well i couldn't make the small joke twice) boxing countries.   Just for context the Paris weights were (M51, M57, M63.5, M71, M80, M92 and M92+ and then W50, W54, W57, W60, W66, W75)
      • results are being posted now dimitris pavlidis of greece 63.55
      • That's why they only offered 750 points to the winner as an initial compromise. If you were the 4th/5th best player in your nation and were not selected due to NOC limits and you cared about points you would be better off competing at a different event at the same time. With a depleted field you'd likely earn more points there anyway.   It was more because ATP/WTA tournaments held at the same time were losing out on players and thus attendance for the tournaments were low.
      • Thursday April 10th, 2025 - Round-Robin Day 2 Results (GMT +1)   13:00  Italy  2 - 0  Kazakhstan 16:30  Latvia  11 - 2  Slovenia 20:00  South Korea  OT3 - 2  Great Britain   Provisional Standing After Day 2:   1.    6 ------------------ 2.   6 3.   3 4.   2 5.   1 ------------------ 6.   0
      • Yeah,i'm pissed,power outrage ruined an already not great stream,don't know how the other two flights ended or if they even happened ,i would guess flight 3 atleast never got ot take place
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...