website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Winter Olympic Games Beijing 2022 Olympic Sports Programme


Recommended Posts

Fairly unhappy with the changes. The obsession with the mixed team events is getting a bit much.

 

Monobob: WTF. Never been runnat the senior level, even as a test event. Four women in 2026 would have been better.

 

Ski Big Air: a no brainer IMO. I know big air isn’t popular here, and I honestly don’t love it either, but if you’re going to have snowboard big air you should have ski big air, too. It doesn’t require a new venue (already exists for Snowboarding) and the athletes are already there for Slopestyle anyway.

 

Mixed Ski Jumping: would have been better to add a women’s large hill event IMO, along with a women’s team event for 2026.

 

Mixed Short Track: ...this event does not exist yet.

 

Mixed Aerials: was resigned to this because the Olympics are in China. It’s a really bad event IMO.

 

Mixed Snowboardcross: this makes no sense as a team event. Due to the nature of the event it should be a men’s and a women’s event. It doesn’t even have to increase the athlete quota.

Edited by NearPup
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/8/#findComment-151887
Share on other sites

My suggestion for quota reduction in skating:

Speed skating: Reduce quota by 18. Limit number of athletes per nation to 16 would save quotas...

Figure skating: Reduce Pairs to 18, Ice dance to 22. -8

Short track: This is impossible to reduce without compromising the number of ppl per heat.

Edited by intoronto
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/8/#findComment-151889
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nate River said:

Ski Big air: a no brainer IMO. I know big air isn’t popular here, and I honestly don’t love it either, but if you’re going to have snowboard big air you should have ski big air, too.

Agreed, which is why in my opinion the better option would have been just to get rid of the whole thing :d 

 

I don't know how the qualify of women's freestyle skiing big air is compared to the snowboarding version, but the level of the women's snowboarding big air in Pyeongchang was....awful. In 90% of the jumps just nothing happened apart from a small twist or something.

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/8/#findComment-151890
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, intoronto said:

My suggestion for quota reduction in skating:

Speed skating: Reduce quota by 18. Limit number of athletes per nation to 16 would save quotas...

Figure skating: Reduce Pairs to 18, Ice dance to 22. -8

Short track: This is impossible to reduce without compromising the number of ppl per heat.

Why reduce them that strongly in speed skating, but not in, say, alpine skiing or cross-country skiing?

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/8/#findComment-151891
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, heywoodu said:

Another option would be to remove ice hockey, that would save a true boatload of quotas.

And remove the most popular sport :p

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/8/#findComment-151894
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, heywoodu said:

Why reduce them that strongly in speed skating, but not in, say, alpine skiing or cross-country skiing?

Skiing got hit the hardest with -41 quotas.

Snowboarding hit the hardest. Drop of 44 total, while ski jump gained along with freestyle

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/8/#findComment-151895
Share on other sites

Just now, Nate River said:

And remove the most popular sport :p

Or bring it back to 23 per men's roster and 21 per women's.

 

Would save 44 quotas.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/8/#findComment-151896
Share on other sites

The IOC is fuking up the sports program to be polticially correct. What a joke. If you need more events for women, then add them but dont subtract from the men's side.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/8/#findComment-151899
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • China Media Group (CMG) will broadcast all 116 gold medal events of the Milan Winter Olympics live on CCTV-1, CCTV-5, CCTV-5+ and CCTV-16. It will also use technologies such as 4K/8K ultra-high definition to enhance the viewing experience. Live broadcasts of all events will be carried out from 16:00 Beijing time to 06:00 the next day.
    • The strength of the UK is that they are 100% focused on the track, while Italy must to navigate between the track and the road: the line-up is different for practically every event, etc. Paternoster should focus 100% on the track; she won't win anything big on the road anymore. As it is, she's weak both there and there. The situation is different with Balsamo, as she's also having significant success on the road and likely earns the most money there.
    • Discovery+ in the UK have also got their schedule up now.     I notice that only thing listed as being in UHD is the Opening Ceremony though....     
    • The problem over the last few years was that no-one was able to keep pace with the big Katie Archibald turns. Looks to be sorted now.  
    • The women's top 50 is so crammed with athletes from the same five nations that it is not inconceivable they are unable to fill the full quota from the top 50, in which case a third double spot would open up between USA/BEL/GBR
    • That women's pursuit team looks brutally fast. Batter you over the head into submission brutal, perhaps not seen since the early Trott-Rowsell days The 4 minute barrier could be on borrowed time.   The two British women sprinters Finucane and Caldwell also look pretty ominous, indeed the whole women's sprint team looks in some shape and with some depth to get that result without Finucane   Work to do for the British men's teams, but they won't be unhappy either, not to mention Joe Truman's unexpected Kilo win.
    • I prefer to do mine like this guy (https://app.podiumsport.it/) does his "Projected Medals" as probability based rather than straight medal picking... all things being equal, conversion rates should be about the same and the outliers come out in the wash. Unfortunately most people just like medal picking, and think any other approach is weird  
    • So probably: Men Oceania: Americas: Africa: Asia: One of  Europe: One of Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (probably not)  and whichever countries don’t qualify from Asian Games.  Universality: ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of the above in World Rankings    and one of  (most likely) or  seem safe with two quotas. The other will be favourites if a third team gets allocated two.    Women Oceania: Europe: One of Americas:  /  if US is ineligible due to their host quota, if the host quota gets reallocated then Canada will be in contention in the rankings Africa:   Asia: One of   Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (x1?)  (x1/2)  (x1/2), whichever doesn’t qualify out of  / ,  and  ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of above.  Universality: ?    is safe with two quotas between  it’ll be tough for whoever misses out of those three.   nevermind , 
    • The rankings look likely to give two spots each in the men's side to Egypt (2nd athlete at 3) and GB (second athlete at 9). the nearest contender after that is France and both Egypt and GB have plenty of contenders after their respective number 2 but before France's umber 2   Women's side looks a bit more of a battle, with Egypt again likely to provide 2, and then a fight between USA, GBR and BEL for the other lucky double spot. That said, so dominant are the Egyptians, Americans and Brits, that failing to find all the contenders in the top 50 is entirely plausible, possibly opening a third 'double' spot.
    • I'd done my final revisions on my prediction spreadsheets.. and I'm sticking with 26 for Canada.    Take it to the bank! (But don't sign anything)
×
×
  • Create New...