website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

This is just so tragically American.

https://www.latimes.com/sports/olympics/story/2025-08-14/la-2028-olympics-will-be-first-to-offer-venue-naming-rights?

 

We'll get, what, the Walmart Aquatics Stadium and the Coca-Cola Canoe Slalom Track or something?

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/29084-summer-olympic-games-los-angeles-2028-venues/#findComment-695420
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

This is just so tragically American.

https://www.latimes.com/sports/olympics/story/2025-08-14/la-2028-olympics-will-be-first-to-offer-venue-naming-rights?

 

We'll get, what, the Walmart Aquatics Stadium and the Coca-Cola Canoe Slalom Track or something?

Honestly it’s not a bad thing the naming of a place is not that important and if a company wants to throw money on the “brand’s name” aquatic stadium for the 2 weeks it will be existing, I don’t mind, it a great financial gain for the Olympics and for the hosting city, and don’t forget the Olympics had trouble for a while attract cities for financial reasons, and it can be a way to attract more bids from cities in the future

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/29084-summer-olympic-games-los-angeles-2028-venues/#findComment-695424
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, heywoodu said:

This is just so tragically American.

https://www.latimes.com/sports/olympics/story/2025-08-14/la-2028-olympics-will-be-first-to-offer-venue-naming-rights?

 

We'll get, what, the Walmart Aquatics Stadium and the Coca-Cola Canoe Slalom Track or something?

If it's only about remaining the current naming rights of the major professionnal venues and not getting corporate names for everything and anything, I'm OK with that.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/29084-summer-olympic-games-los-angeles-2028-venues/#findComment-695425
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Dnl said:

Honestly it’s not a bad thing the naming of a place is not that important and if a company wants to throw money on the “brand’s name” aquatic stadium for the 2 weeks it will be existing, I don’t mind, it a great financial gain for the Olympics and for the hosting city, and don’t forget the Olympics had trouble for a while attract cities for financial reasons, and it can be a way to attract more bids from cities in the future

Luckily most sports will have their own Dutch commentator here, who generally don't mention the full names all the time, but I can certainly imagine those generic English commentators constantly talking about the DQS Solutions & Staffing Mountain Bike Track Powered by Precision Vehicle Logistics every time they mention the track, and so on, that makes for such an annoying viewing experience :p

 

But sure, as long as the names aren't really mentioned anyway....yeah, not so bad I guess. Still tragically American though, and it kinda feels like the next step towards also the Olympics simply being one of those events where the entire venue, background and every single piece of equipment is absolutely plastered over with sponsor names instead of what you usually see nowadays (large things basically just showing "CITY - YEAR" or something).

Edited by heywoodu

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/29084-summer-olympic-games-los-angeles-2028-venues/#findComment-695428
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, heywoodu said:

Luckily most sports will have their own Dutch commentator here, who generally don't mention the full names all the time, but I can certainly imagine those generic English commentators constantly talking about the DQS Solutions & Staffing Mountain Bike Track Powered by Precision Vehicle Logistics every time they mention the track, and so on, that makes for such an annoying viewing experience :p

 

But sure, as long as the names aren't really mentioned anyway....yeah, not so bad I guess. Still tragically American though, and it kinda feels like the next step towards also the Olympics simply being one of those events where the entire venue, background and every single piece of equipment is absolutely plastered over with sponsor names instead of what you usually see nowadays (large things basically just showing "CITY - YEAR" or something).

I agree, and again as long as it’s in those small non relevant things and as long as it’s not visible I’m fine with it but if we going to have uniform covered in sponsors we’ll have a trouble or even the LA-KFC 2028 games or something along those lines 

Edited by Dnl
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/29084-summer-olympic-games-los-angeles-2028-venues/#findComment-695438
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, heywoodu said:

This is just so tragically American.

https://www.latimes.com/sports/olympics/story/2025-08-14/la-2028-olympics-will-be-first-to-offer-venue-naming-rights?

 

We'll get, what, the Walmart Aquatics Stadium and the Coca-Cola Canoe Slalom Track or something?

Very american yes, im not personally bothered though. Not the worst thing that could happen 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/29084-summer-olympic-games-los-angeles-2028-venues/#findComment-695440
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chargundam said:

Very american yes, im not personally bothered though. Not the worst thing that could happen 

Personally, I think getting private companies to pay millions to keep the naming rights to venues they've already paid millions to get naming rights for, despite the fact that, if they didn't pay these exrta naming rights, most locals would still call the stadium by the naming rights name (e.g. the O2 during 2012, the SoFi in 2028) is absolute genius. The idea that Olympic will be sullied by visible commercialism - when the entire damn enterprise is a vastly commercial, vastly capitalist org and has been for decades - simply shows some people buy the Kool AId that the Olympic movement sells from its unbranded but fully sponsored Kool-Aid Kiosk

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/29084-summer-olympic-games-los-angeles-2028-venues/#findComment-695445
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Dnl said:

Honestly it’s not a bad thing the naming of a place is not that important and if a company wants to throw money on the “brand’s name” aquatic stadium for the 2 weeks it will be existing, I don’t mind, it a great financial gain for the Olympics and for the hosting city, and don’t forget the Olympics had trouble for a while attract cities for financial reasons, and it can be a way to attract more bids from cities in the future

That's pretty much how I feel.  They also made it clear there won't sell names for the Coliseum, Rose Bowl and Dodger Stadium.

 

As an aside, I remember in 1984, the torch relay was funded/organized through corporate sponsorships and that didn't sit well with the Greeks.  Also, anyone could run 1 KM leg on the relay if they donated $3000 to certain designated charities.  

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/29084-summer-olympic-games-los-angeles-2028-venues/#findComment-695455
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Triplecast said:

That's pretty much how I feel.  They also made it clear there won't sell names for the Coliseum, Rose Bowl and Dodger Stadium.

 

As an aside, I remember in 1984, the torch relay was funded/organized through corporate sponsorships and that didn't sit well with the Greeks.  Also, anyone could run 1 KM leg on the relay if they donated $3000 to certain designated charities.  

The Peacock theater, in downtown LA, home of weightlifting and boxing's early rounds, is named after NBC's Peacock streaming service.  Presumably because of NBC's massive investment in the games, IOC was already letting this venue keep its corporate name.  So it is not a big leap to allow other corporate naming.   The temporary cricket site will be known as the Tata Cricket Ground.  You read it here first.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/29084-summer-olympic-games-los-angeles-2028-venues/#findComment-695484
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • I have a time slot 16th of April, but my girlfriend doesn't . So you're not the only one ... Hopefully there are some tickets left when I enter the ticketshop.
    • Because of the continued uncertainty in the Gulf, the Doha Diamond League has been reorganised to the 19th June, in between Oslo and Paris.  Shanghai on 16 May will therefore be the first DL meet of the season.     WDL meeting in Doha postponed until June - Wanda Diamond League
    • Update after Matchdays 8 and 9.   Group A:  is almost a lock with 21p, and 7 games 7 wins. Almost impossible for them to not qualify. The battle is in the second place between  (16p) and  (13p).  with 8p is almost out.  and  eliminated.   Group B:  won both of the 2 games so is almost secured with 19p.  is second with 14p, with  (1 more game played) and  with 11p.  is eliminated and  practically too (6p)   Group C:  went 2 out of 2 so they are still first with 16p and one game less than the rest. The battle for second place will be between  14p,  11p and  9p.  eliminated and  (with one game less and 4p) probably too.   Group D: Only 3 for 2 places.  first with 19p has the advantage, but coming close is  with 16p. They played each other in the Matchday 11 of 12. Coming in third behind is  with 11p. ,  and  eliminated.   Group E: Both  and  won both matches so its still the same, Poland first with 24p and Italy second with 21p, which is the best runner-up and also qualifying directly, so is very likely that both teams end up qualifying no matter who finish first and second. , ,  and  eliminated.   Group F: A tie between  18p and  18p. Germany has the goal advantage (+21 to +20), and has to play the three weaker teams, so its more likely to qualify. Coming behind are  with 10p and  with 9p, which are practically eliminated with  and   Group G:  takes the advantage with 12p and one game less.  and  both have 7p, and coming behind are  5p (but one game less) and  with 5p.   Group H:  with the win against  moved to first place with 13p (and one game less), and Turkey stays in second with 11p.  is coming in third with 8p, while  is eliminated and  have 3p and one game less.   Group I: A triple tie between ,  and  with 10p. Belgium have the advantage because they have the best head to head points and one game less. Austria is second in the H2H difference and Denmark is third but with also one game less.  have 6p and  is eliminated.   The next 3 and last matchdays will define the 10 qualified teams and the 8 that will go to the playoffs. Matchdays will be 24-26 September, 28Sep-1Oct and 5-6 October, 2026.
    • Still no qualification system    ATHLETICS   BOXING   CRICKET   FOOTBALL   WATER POLO
    • That's how the organizing committee did it, stupid that its so early, before the world cup even but what can we do
    • I got my window starting on Sunday.  Need to see what is still available that might not be outrageously priced
    • Australian Open, best of Day #3   men's 50m Breast:  Sam Williamson, 27.14 women's 200m Fly:  Elizabeth Dekkers, 2.05.39 men's 100m Fly:  Matthew Temple, 51.70 women's 50m Back:  Alexandria Perkins, 27.79 men's 400m IM:  Lewis Clareburt, 4.10.10;  William Petric, 4.10.20 women's 200m Free:  Mollie O'Callaghan, 1.53.69;  Lani Pallister, 1.55.66;  Erika Fairweather, 1.55.72 men's 50m Free:  Jamie Jack, 21.71 women's 200m IM:  Kaylee McKeown, 2.09.22;  Ella Ramsay, 2.09.94 women's 50m Breast:  Sienna Toohey, 30.39;  Mia O'Leary, 30.75 men's 200m Back: Stuart Swinburn, 1.58.25  women's 1500m Free:  Lani Pallister, 15.44.07 men's 1500m Free: comin'up later
×
×
  • Create New...