lunatik 2 Posted August 15, 2016 #171 Share Posted August 15, 2016 I hope Yeleussinov (KAZ, 69kg) will get the compensation in his final for this one, I have a bet on him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcro 10,210 Posted August 15, 2016 #172 Share Posted August 15, 2016 For anyone interested in public opinion, just read the last 5-6 pages in this thread and you'll see what people think about Olympic boxing. #banbestmen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FC Mezhgorye 135 Posted August 15, 2016 #173 Share Posted August 15, 2016 6 минут назад, dcro сказал: For anyone interested in public opinion, just read the last 5-6 pages in this thread and you'll see what people think about Olympic boxing. We need to remove boxing and add a chess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gianlu33 4,552 Posted August 16, 2016 #174 Share Posted August 16, 2016 It's a shame but we know it. They must change the rules.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Federer91 2,793 Posted August 16, 2016 #175 Share Posted August 16, 2016 Like i've said countless times about boxing, AIBA wants to reward all of their important parties. They distribute the titles / medals equally between everyone. It doesn't matter if one boxer is doing great, if his country already has an advantage in other categories he will lose, so that other countries can get his categorie. You especially see this in the 1/4 before the medals, where countries who need medals usually beat ones that already have ones from other categories. Russia is getting presumably 1-3 wins and Tishchenko was a clear favourite in this categorie, so other russians needed to lose early like Egorov or Chebotaev. But shit comes in when the clear favourite Tishchenko is outplayed, then AIBA has a big problem, because they have already cut other russians and they would need to compensate them in categories that shouldn't be their, which would make a domino effect. The same goes for the other "powerhouses" Kazakh, Uzbek, Azer, Cuba, France. Everyone of them will get their categorie. Kazakh should get 81 categorie, i think 69 is for the Uzbek. Sad, but that is the present, and i get less and less angry when our boxers get screwed all the time. Dolby 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bestmen 2,817 Posted August 16, 2016 #176 Share Posted August 16, 2016 not only you we have 3 boxers lost the 1/4 , so no medal for us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quasit 865 Posted August 16, 2016 #177 Share Posted August 16, 2016 21 minutes ago, Federer91 said: Like i've said countless times about boxing, AIBA wants to reward all of their important parties. They distribute the titles / medals equally between everyone. It doesn't matter if one boxer is doing great, if his country already has an advantage in other categories he will lose, so that other countries can get his categorie. You especially see this in the 1/4 before the medals, where countries who need medals usually beat ones that already have ones from other categories. Russia is getting presumably 1-3 wins and Tishchenko was a clear favourite in this categorie, so other russians needed to lose early like Egorov or Chebotaev. But shit comes in when the clear favourite Tishchenko is outplayed, then AIBA has a big problem, because they have already cut other russians and they would need to compensate them in categories that shouldn't be their, which would make a domino effect. The same goes for the other "powerhouses" Kazakh, Uzbek, Azer, Cuba, France. Everyone of them will get their categorie. Kazakh should get 81 categorie, i think 69 is for the Uzbek. Sad, but that is the present, and i get less and less angry when our boxers get screwed all the time. So the Ukraine is not a "powerhouse" anymore? They used to dominate boxing before London 2012. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcro 10,210 Posted August 16, 2016 #178 Share Posted August 16, 2016 5 minutes ago, Quasit said: So the Ukraine is not a "powerhouse" anymore? They used to dominate boxing before London 2012. Perhaps their relations with Russia changed things. It's all about politics here. #banbestmen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Federer91 2,793 Posted August 16, 2016 #179 Share Posted August 16, 2016 6 minutes ago, Quasit said: So the Ukraine is not a "powerhouse" anymore? They used to dominate boxing before London 2012. Not in the present, they have won only 3 bronzes in the last two Worlds. Maybe they are having a new generation after London and still couldn't find credible boxers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcro 10,210 Posted August 16, 2016 #180 Share Posted August 16, 2016 Quote Here's a canvas of opinion... Shane McGuigan (world champion coach): "Boxers spend 4 years training for these championships, to get robbed after 9 mins. I've seen 20+ wrong decisions." BJ Flores (world title challenger): "No question. Levit won all THREE rounds. Impossible to give Tischenko two rounds. Impossible!" Kal Yafai (unbeaten flyweight): "One of the worst decisions I've ever seen. Disgusting." Gamal Yafai (Commonwealth super-bantamweight champion): "Wow. The Russian didn't even win a round for me." Tommy McCarthy (unbeaten cruiserweight): "Levit on fire. I smell a rat! Levit literally punched him all over the ring." Gary Lockett (trainer): "Absolutely disgraceful decision - Levit p***** that. Never seen anything like that. I don't even know the guy and I'm angry for him. Absolutely devastating for him." Tom Farrell (unbeaten super-lightweight): "Terrible decision, that. The Kazakh has been robbed of a gold medal there." #banbestmen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now