Summer Olympic Games 2020 Qualification Systems

[JoshMartini007 2,767]

18 minutes ago, OlympicsFan said:

I hate the new IAAF system, it basically discriminates younger athletes, for them it will be much more difficult to gain a good world ranking. Also very unfair for athletes who are injured for 1-2 years prior to the olympics and therefore cant gain a good ranking. I never thought that i would say this, but IAAF should take FINA as an example.

 

They can still qualify by reaching the entry standard.

[De_Gambassi 1,267]

il y a 16 minutes, JoshMartini007 a déclaré:

 

That's only for one out of the eight quotas. Still a dumb rule, 8 teams is too small for to try and pull for universality (or even continental quotas).

 

There is no host country quota here. That makes it okish for me.

[dcro 10,210]

3 minutes ago, De_Gambassi said:

 

There is no host country quota here. That makes it okish for me.

 

There is actually, but only for one gender.

[ATHENS 1896 15]

The main criteria for qualifying  (directly or indirectly via Tournaments) on 3 X 3 is the sum of ranking points of top 100 nationals.  This is a depth / volume criteria rather than a top quality one; which contradicts with the TOP Athletes concept for the Summer Games. I am surprised that IOC approved - this would be more suitable for  the concept of the Youth Games.   

[Dunadan 1,103]

^ As an example of this, Andorra is 3rd in the women's ranking...in the last 4 years their record in World/Europe Cups is 3 wins and 25 losses.

 

Edited July 31, 2018 by Dunadan

[JoshMartini007 2,767]

10 minutes ago, ATHENS 1896 said:

The main criteria for qualifying  (directly or indirectly via Tournaments) on 3 X 3 is the sum of ranking points of top 100 nationals.  This is a depth / volume criteria rather than a top quality one; which contradicts with the TOP Athletes concept for the Summer Games. I am surprised that IOC approved - this would be more suitable for  the concept of the Youth Games.   

 

It would have made more sense to construct a rankings with say your best 4 players. 100 is a bit ridiculous. It reminds me of weightlifting where they reward average nations rather than top athletes.

[Gianlu33 5,284]

28 minuti fa, ATHENS 1896 ha scritto:

The main criteria for qualifying  (directly or indirectly via Tournaments) on 3 X 3 is the sum of ranking points of top 100 nationals.  This is a depth / volume criteria rather than a top quality one; which contradicts with the TOP Athletes concept for the Summer Games. I am surprised that IOC approved - this would be more suitable for  the concept of the Youth Games.   

IOC approve everyting  

[dcro 10,210]

FIBA got this on a fake excuse of bringing new nations. So yeah, I'm all for Andorra and Mongolia trolling their way in.

[NearPup 3,505]

7 hours ago, dcro said:

Yay, they cut quotas from small nations. Looks like they can no longer enter 1+1 athletes per default, but rather only 1 athlete. Thank God, Olympics will surely be saved with such measures!

 

Goodbye development of women's athletics in such countries. IOC's "gender equality" is such a scam.

I read the rule as saying that a nation is allowed one entry per gender. Especially due to point b.

[NearPup 3,505]

45 minutes ago, ATHENS 1896 said:

The main criteria for qualifying  (directly or indirectly via Tournaments) on 3 X 3 is the sum of ranking points of top 100 nationals.  This is a depth / volume criteria rather than a top quality one; which contradicts with the TOP Athletes concept for the Summer Games. I am surprised that IOC approved - this would be more suitable for  the concept of the Youth Games.   

3x3 might legitimately have the worst qualification system in the history of the Olympics...