website statistics
Jump to content

Winter Youth Olympic Games 2024


Totallympics
 Share

Recommended Posts

PROVISIONAL MEDAL STANDING AFTER DAY 11

 

Tuesday 30.01.2024

Total Medal Events: 71/81

 

1. :ITA ITA        11 - 3 - 3

2. :GER GER       8 - 5 - 5

3. :FRA FRA       7 - 4 - 6

4. :CHN CHN      5 - 8 - 3

5. :AUT AUT      5 - 6 - 5

6. :KOR KOR       5 - 6 - 4

7. :USA USA       4 - 9 - 3

8. :SWE SWE      3 - 4 - 3

9. :CAN CAN      3 - 2 - 0

10. :GBR GBR      3 - 1 - 1

-. :NED NED         3 - 1 - 1

12. :LAT LAT      2 - 3 - 1

13. :JPN JPN      2 - 2 - 7

14. :SLO SLO      2 - 2 - 1

15. :FIN FIN       2 - 0 - 3

16. :DEN DEN      1 - 2 - 0

17. :SUI SUI        1 - 1 - 4

18. :CZE CZE     1 - 0 - 2

-. :KAZ KAZ       1 - 0 - 2

-. :POL POL        1 - 0 - 2

21. :HUN HUN    1 - 0 - 1

22. :NOR NOR   0 - 4 - 3

23. :AUS AUS   0 - 2 - 1

24. :NZL NZL    0 - 1 - 4

25. :SVK SVK    0 - 1 - 2

26. :UKR UKR    0 - 1 - 1

27. :THA THA    0 - 1 - 0

-. :TUN TUN      0 - 1 - 0

-. :TUR TUR      0 - 1 - 0

30. :BRA BRA  0 - 0 - 1

-. :ROU ROU     0 - 0 - 1

-. :ESP ESP      0 - 0 - 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MIXED DOUBLES CURLING TOURNAMENT

 

Day 5 Results

 

PRELIMINARY ROUND

 

GROUP A

 

:GBR Great Britain  8 - 4  Hungary :HUN

:KOR South Korea  17 - 1  Nigeria :NGR

:CAN Canada  4 - 6  Czechia :CZE

 

Group A Provisional Standing After Day 5:

 

1. :CAN 3/1

-. :CZE 3/1

----------

-. :GBR 3/1

4. :KOR 2/2

5. :HUN 2/3

6. :NGR 0/5

 

GROUP B

 

:UKR Ukraine  1 - 9  United States :USA

:QAT Qatar  1 - 13  Sweden :SWE

:SLO Slovenia  4 - 14  Norway :NOR

 

Group B Provisional Standing After Day 5:

 

1. :USA 4/0

2. :SWE 4/1

----------

3. :NOR 3/2

4. :SLO 2/2

5. :QAT 0/4

-. :UKR 0/4

 

GROUP C

 

:JPN Japan  11 - 2  New Zealand :NZL

:LAT Latvia  6  - 3  Brazil :BRA

:CHN China  13 - 4  Turkiye :TUR

 

Group C Provisional Standing After Day 5:

 

1. :CHN 4/0

2. :JPN 3/1

----------

-. :LAT 3/1

4. :NZL 1/3

-. :TUR 1/3

6. :BRA 0/4

 

GROUP D

 

:SUI Switzerland  9 - 3  Austria :AUT

:DEN Denmark  9 - 4  Germany :GER

:KAZ Kazakhstan  10 - 2  Italy :ITA

 

Group D Provisional Standing After Day 5:

 

1. :GER 4/1

-. :SUI 4/1

----------

3. :DEN 3/1

4. :AUT 2/3

5. :KAZ 1/3

6. :ITA 0/5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, hckošice said:

Event 68/81

 

CCS.png

 

CROSS-COUNTRY SKIING

 

Women's 7.5km Classical
Final Results
 
:FIN Nelli-Lotta KARPPELIN
22:19.6
 
:FRA Agathe MARGREITHER
22:30.1
 
:FRA Anette COUPAT
22:32.3

Full Final Result HERE

There were 21(!) jury decisions in this event. I don't remember ever seeing that many for one event: https://olympics.com/gangwon-2024/static/yog24d-/pdf/YOG24D-/CCS/YOG24D-_CCS_C73A_CCSW7.5KMIS-----------FNL-000100--.pdf

 

There were so many they had to put out a correction after confusing a few cases: https://olympics.com/gangwon-2024/static/yog24d-/pdf/YOG24D-/CCS/YOG24D-_CCS_C67_CCSW7.5KMIS-----------------------1.pdf

 

Have you ever seen something like this @heywoodu?

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Olympian1010 said:

There were 21(!) jury decisions in this event. I don't remember ever seeing that many for one event: https://olympics.com/gangwon-2024/static/yog24d-/pdf/YOG24D-/CCS/YOG24D-_CCS_C73A_CCSW7.5KMIS-----------FNL-000100--.pdf

 

There were so many they had to put out a correction after confusing a few cases: https://olympics.com/gangwon-2024/static/yog24d-/pdf/YOG24D-/CCS/YOG24D-_CCS_C67_CCSW7.5KMIS-----------------------1.pdf

 

Have you ever seen something like this @heywoodu?

 

No, neither me nor Bruna have ever seen this, but I think the explanation in general is pretty simple: there's a 'classic technique zone', where you have to use the 'real' classic technique instead of double-poling. I'd bet money on "Using a banned technique on marked sections of the course" basically all coming from athletes double-poling on that part.

 

The 'Using skating technique' ones are probably largely down to inexperience, and not following the marked course can simply mean having gone way wide in a corner to avoid a crash or something like that. I've asked Bruna to contact Mariana and Julia and ask if they heard anything about this by any chance, and maybe whoever is there are their 'team captain' (if it's the guy I think it is, English might have been a real issue here in relaying these things to the athletes, but that is of course only one country).

 

Anyhow, you know what would have made this question easier to answer for everyone? It starts with a 'c' and rhymes with the word 'ameras' :p 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

there's a 'classic technique zone', where you have to use the 'real' classic technique instead of double-poling. I'd bet money on "Using a banned technique on marked sections of the course" basically all coming from athletes double-poling on that part.

I didn't even know there was such a thing in cross country skiing :yikes:

 

I assumed double-poling was totally fine anywhere on the course.

Edited by Olympian1010

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't followed the curling mixed doubles competition, but below is an overview of qualification scenarios. Hopefully, I haven't made any mistakes.

 

Group A

This is the only group with no-mathematically-qualified teams yet and the only group with four teams still in contention. Remaining matches are Czechia-South Korea, which will be played first and Canada-Great Britain. If you don't want to get confused with text, jump directly to the tables.

 

If Czechia wins, then they qualify and they will be joined by the winner of the other match. If it's Great Britain, then GB wins the group and Czechia finishes second. If it's Canada, then Czechia wins the group and Canada ends up second.

 

To summarise, if Czechia wins. 

Winner of :CAN-:GBR 

/ Group Standings

1 2
:CAN :CZE :CAN
:GBR :GBR

:CZE

 

If South Korea wins, then the winner of Great Britain-Canada certainly wins the group.

 

If Great Britain loses that match, a three way tie between Czechia, Great Britain and South Korea will be created. In this case, South Korea will win the tie with a 2-0 win-loss record in the tie-breaker. 

 

If Canada loses that match, a three way tie between Canada, Czechia and South Korea will be created. Win-loss record for all tied teams will be 1-1. In that case qualification will be decided based on draw shot challenge. At the moment, it's South Korea (43.46) ahead of Czechia (48.09) ahead of Canada (59.66). 

 

To summarise, if South Korea wins.

Winner of :CAN-:GBR

/ Group Standings

1 2
:CAN :CAN :KOR
:GBR :GBR DSC (:CAN,:CZE,:KOR)

 

Group B

USA and Sweden have both secured their spots in the quarterfinals. US team is undefeated and still has one match to play. They are certainly first as they have won against Sweden, who completed the group with a 4-1 win-loss record.

 

Group C

China is the group winner as they are undefeated with one match to play and they have won against Japan and Latvia, both of them having a 3-1 win-loss record. These two teams are facing each other tomorrow, therefore whoever wins gets the second spot.

 

Group D

Both teams in the current top two, Germany and Switzerland, have completed their matches and they both have a 4-1 win-loss record. However, as I'll explain thoroughly, only Germany is mathematically qualified. Denmark is in third place with a 3-1 win-loss record and will face Kazakhstan tomorrow.

 

Obviously, if Denmark loses, then Germany and Switzerland are through to the quarterfinals, with the former winning the group, having won the direct match up.

 

If Denmark wins, then a three way tie at a 4-1 win-loss record will be created. In this case, the tie-breaker win-loss record will be 1-1 for all three teams and qualification will come down to draw shot challenge. But as I mentioned above, Germany and Switzerland have completed their matches, which means their current DSC is their final one. Since Germany (31.04) is better than Switzerland (79.90), Germany will definitely finish ahead of Switzerland in this tie. Given that Denmark's current DSC is 37.31, at the moment they also have the upper hand against Switzerland in this scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, hckošice said:

MIXED DOUBLES CURLING TOURNAMENT

 

Day 5 Results

 

PRELIMINARY ROUND

 

GROUP A

 

:GBR Great Britain  8 - 4  Hungary :HUN

:KOR South Korea  17 - 1  Nigeria :NGR

:CAN Canada  4 - 6  Czechia :CZE

 

Isn't it first point for Nigeria during this event?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Anyone wants to add their vote? Deadline is Dec 1st
    • day 9 events   60. SPEED SKATING - W 500m 61. FREESTYLE SKIING - M Dual Moguls 62. SNOWBOARD - Mixed Team Snowboard Cross 63. ALPINE SKIING - W Giant Slalom 64. SKELETON - Mixed Team 65. BIATHLON - M 12.5km Pursuit 66. BIATHLON - W 10km Pursuit 67. SKI JUMPING - W Large Hill Individual 68. CROSS-COUNTRY SKIING - M 4x7.5km Relay
    • day 8   8-9-7---24 8-6-4---18 6-4-6---15 5-4-2---11 5-3-3---11 4-10-8---22 4-5-5---14 4-4-1---9 3-2-11---16 3-1-3---7 2-4-1---7 2-1-1---4 2-1-0---3 1-1-1---3 1-1-1---3 1-0-0---1 0-1-2---3 0-1-1---2 0-1-1---2 0-0-1---1
    • day 8 events   52. SPEED SKATING - M 500m   1. Jordan Stolz USA 2. Laurent Dubreuil CAN 3. Tatsuya Shinhama JPN   53. SHORT TRACK - M 1500m   1. William Dandjinou CAN 2. Park Ji-won KOR 3. Pietro Sighel ITA   54. FREESTYLE SKIING - W Dual Moguls   1. Jakara Anthony AUS 2. Jaelin Kauf USA 3. Olivia Giaccio USA   55. ALPINE SKIING - M Giant Slalom   1. Henrik Kristoffersen NOR 2. Marco Odermatt SUI 3. Atle Lie McGrath NOR   56. SKELETON - W Skeleton   1. Kimberly Bos NED 2. Tina Hermann GER 3. Valentina Margaglio ITA   57. BIATHLON - W 7.5km Sprint   1. Elvira Oeberg SWE 2. Justine Braisaz-Buchet FRA 3. Lisa Vittozzi ITA   58. SKI JUMPING - M Large Hill Individual   1. Stefan Kraft AUT 2. Timi Zajc SLO 3. Daniel Tschofenig AUT   59. CROSS-COUNTRY SKIING - W 4x7.5km Relay   1. Sweden 2. Norway 3. United States
    • As a Montreal Canadien fan, I am in agreement. However, he is struggling recently and is demoted to the 4th line this week. Hoping he can turn it around. 
    • I read now that Valentina Rodini will be in the new team of Tizzano + Galtarossa and Martini. I was probably in such an information bubble on Instagram that I thought that only Abbagnale was running a campaign and had a team of people around him. That's why I was surprised by his defeat + the fact that, for example, Rodini supports his rival. But as I wrote, for me the change in the general coach position is a plus. We need a new opening and a new impulse: Cattaneo had his best results in Tokyo and then he only explained that his rowers were running away abroad to the USA to study and that's why he had worse results. Ok, except that it's the same in Romania and Greece but they results are comparable or better. It's obvious that no one here will make the UK or the Netherlands, because we don't have such resources and money but I think we can repeat the Romanian results (2 gold - 3 silver in Paris) and that will be a much better result than the 2 silver in this year.
    • Abbagnale boasted that he had 80 per cent a few days before the vote (I still have the screen) and ran again as a result of a power deal. Not a great loss.   I have doubts about the new technical director though, you can't announce him during the congress, brandishing the scalp of the Abbagnale era technical staff (who then, were Crispi's men). Let's hope there are no rifts between the new staff and the athletes, it had to be handled better.
    • I was surprised by Abbagnale's defeat. I thought he was a sure of victory, since he decided to run - I read some source that he didn't know if he would start before Paris 2024. What do you think about it?
    • Rugby Sevens WR SVNS 2024 - 2025   Multi-Stage Event - 30 November 2024 - 4 May 2025     Official Website Programme Results System Facebook Page Discussion Thread
    • Cattaneo was good but his peak was in Tokyo 2021. Then there was such stabilization - stagnation. In Paris the result was in line with expectations but without the wow effect. They threw everything that was best into the quadruple sculls and it was enough for a only silver. Now without the lightweight sculls in LA I think that radical changes are needed to remain competitive. Previously there was a 3-year Olympic cycle due to Covid, so big changes weren`t good but now I think the time is right. Although of course more funds are needed for this sport in Italy, because even the best coach will not overcome this vel our men`s alpine skiing sector
×
×
  • Create New...