JoshMartini007 2,536 Posted June 20 #161 Share Posted June 20 1 hour ago, Fer GUA said: Is it true that received an Universality Quota? Centro Caribe Sports announced Oscar Ticas as qualified to the games. There's nothing official from World Archery, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was awarded the quota. He's the best tripartite eligible archer whose nation is not yet qualified. In other news, it looks like declined their quota. Fer GUA and mrv86 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrv86 3,138 Posted June 20 #162 Share Posted June 20 33 minutes ago, JoshMartini007 said: There's nothing official from World Archery, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was awarded the quota. He's the best tripartite eligible archer whose nation is not yet qualified. In other news, it looks like declined their quota. Sad, but good news for @dcro dcro 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MHSN 3,619 Posted June 20 #163 Share Posted June 20 1 minute ago, mrv86 said: Sad, but good news for @dcro I assume they didn't decline the quota but failed to reach the MQS. same goes to the other Oceania archers but in this case what they are going to do with the quota ? awarding it to the next archer in FIQT (which will be our 16 yo kid ) or giving it to the ranking ? the rules say if reallocation happen before the FIQT that quota will go to the FIQT, and if it happens after the FIQT, the quota goes to the ranking. the Oceania qualification happened long time ago, before the FIQT but they are doing the process now, after the FIQT. so to me it can go both ways, depends on how they read their own rules. did I miss something ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshMartini007 2,536 Posted June 20 #164 Share Posted June 20 7 minutes ago, MHSN said: I assume they didn't decline the quota but failed to reach the MQS. same goes to the other Oceania archers but in this case what they are going to do with the quota ? awarding it to the next archer in FIQT (which will be our 16 yo kid ) or giving it to the ranking ? the rules say if reallocation happen before the FIQT that quota will go to the FIQT, and if it happens after the FIQT, the quota goes to the ranking. the Oceania qualification happened long time ago, before the FIQT but they are doing the process now, after the FIQT. so to me it can go both ways, depends on how they read their own rules. did I miss something ? Interestingly enough Fiji still has their women's quota despite also being nowhere near the MQS. Whether it goes to the FIQT or World Rankings likely depends on when the quota was declined. Iran should ask to see when the email/official rejection was sent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prso1000 662 Posted June 20 #165 Share Posted June 20 35 minutes ago, JoshMartini007 said: Interestingly enough Fiji still has their women's quota despite also being nowhere near the MQS. Whether it goes to the FIQT or World Rankings likely depends on when the quota was declined. Iran should ask to see when the email/official rejection was sent. @MHSNiran has enough quotas this one is ours 😂 MHSN 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MHSN 3,619 Posted June 20 #166 Share Posted June 20 4 hours ago, JoshMartini007 said: Interestingly enough Fiji still has their women's quota despite also being nowhere near the MQS. Whether it goes to the FIQT or World Rankings likely depends on when the quota was declined. Iran should ask to see when the email/official rejection was sent. that's too much to ask from our Archery federation they are terrible in administrative duties yesterday during the qualification men's recurve, our #1 and #2 (both in top 100 WR with slim chance to do something here) made a mistake and shot the first series of 6 shots in place of each other, both received zero for the first 6 arrows and therefore finished in last positions mrv86 and Prakash_k 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrv86 3,138 Posted June 21 #167 Share Posted June 21 (edited) & obtain the final spots by reallocation via individual world ranking. Heartbreak for as they fell short by 0.5 points of getting that last spot, a win at today’s 1/8 finals by Pintaric would have made it. Also heartbreak for as their archer can’t no longer qualify by world ranking, being passed by due to Pit Klein’s today performance. In men’s the reallocated spots by ranking go to & either / who are tied with 107 points each. There’s no clear rule for breaking a tied rank, so World Archery will need to confirm this situation. Finally, the spot left by should be filled by if the rejection came before final WQT, otherwise it goes to / Edited June 21 by mrv86 Dnl, Roamingrover86, MHSN and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinnamon Bun 896 Posted June 21 #168 Share Posted June 21 21 minutes ago, mrv86 said: & obtain the final spots by reallocation via individual world ranking. Heartbreak for as they fell short by 0.5 points of getting that last spot, a win at today’s 1/8 finals by Pintaric would have made it. Also heartbreak for as their archer can’t no longer qualify by world ranking, being passed by due to Pit Klein’s today performance. In men’s the reallocated spots by ranking go to & either / who are tied with 107 points each. There’s no clear rule for breaking a tied rank, so World Archery will need to confirm this situation. Finally, the spot left by should be filled by if the rejection came before final WQT, otherwise it goes to / Given the tie between and I reckon the final spot will go to them and they'll just make out that the quota was rejected after the WQT (which is fairly easy to do). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrv86 3,138 Posted June 24 #169 Share Posted June 24 Well, it seems that the last individual qualifier gave world ranking points, and this made Luxembourg sum 108 against Finland’s 107. So, last quota is between and Josh 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now