website statistics
Jump to content

Women's Basketball FIBA Olympic Qualification Tournaments 2024


Totallympics
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Vektor said:

So basically :HUN or :ESP will qualify to Paris before they play their match.

 

If :CAN wins against :JPN, :HUN will also qualify.

If :JPN wins against :CAN, :ESP will also qualify.

 

Bad news for :JPN and :CAN, because this means that :ESP or :HUN will play an unimportant match for them while the other will fight for quota in the final match. 

Which country do you think would miss the games?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Vektor said:

So basically :HUN or :ESP will qualify to Paris before they play their match.

 

If :CAN wins against :JPN, :HUN will also qualify.

If :JPN wins against :CAN, :ESP will also qualify.

 

Bad news for :JPN and :CAN, because this means that :ESP or :HUN will play an unimportant match for them while the other will fight for quota in the final match. 

I hate this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Vektor said:

So basically :HUN or :ESP will qualify to Paris before they play their match.

 

If :CAN wins against :JPN, :HUN will also qualify.

If :JPN wins against :CAN, :ESP will also qualify.

 

Bad news for :JPN and :CAN, because this means that :ESP or :HUN will play an unimportant match for them while the other will fight for quota in the final match. 

Why is this so? They're all 1-1 now. If Canada and Hungary both lose they'd both be 1-2. Isn't the first tie-breaker head-to-head, which Canada holds? Canada also still has the best point differential. 

The same with Japan/Spain. If they both lose, Japan should hold the tie-breaker against Spain and qualify. 

Edited by orangeman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Josh said:

 @EselTheDonkey just went over all of the scenarios again, it seems as if I was wrong. Only winning would qualify you for Paris, otherwise you’ll have to wait until Sunday. 

Are you sure?

 

Let's assume Australia beats Germany and Brazil beats Serbia. This means :AUS would have won two games, :BRA and :GER each one and :SRB none. Australia would be qualified, of course. 

 

Then there are two options for :BRA vs :GER on Sunday. Either Germany wins and is qualified, or Brazil wins and has two victories as well (one against Germany and one against Serbia). Meaning Germany would have one win and Serbia at most one as well, while Germany would have won the game against Serbia.

 

What is the scenario in which Germany wouldn't already be qualified, if Brazil beats Serbia?

Edited by EselTheDonkey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, orangeman said:

Why is this so? They're all 1-1 now. If Canada and Hungary both lose they'd both be 1-2. Isn't the first tie-breaker head-to-head, which Canada holds? Canada also still has the best point differential. 

The same with Japan/Spain. If they both lose, Japan should hold the tie-breaker against Spain and qualify. 

Yes, that's true.

 

But the European teams have the advantage of knowing how the other match went. Which means that Hungary or Spain might not fight that hard because they will already have the quota, which can help the other European team to qualify.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Vektor said:

Yes, that's true.

 

But the European teams have the advantage of knowing how the other match went. Which means that Hungary or Spain might not fight that hard because they will already have the quota, which can help the other European team to qualify.

I misread your original post, I did not see the "or", and thought you meant "and". Sorry! 

 

But if Canada loses to Japan then they don't really belong at the Olympics anyway, injuries or not. Of course if Spain loses to Hungary (and Japan) then they don't really deserve it either, but they did enough.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, orangeman said:

I misread your original post, I did not see the "or", and thought you meant "and". Sorry! 

 

But if Canada loses to Japan then they don't really belong at the Olympics anyway, injuries or not. Of course if Spain loses to Hungary (and Japan) then they don't really deserve it either, but they did enough.  

Japan isn’t as bad of a team as you’re making them out to be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Anyone wants to add their vote? Deadline is Dec 1st
    • day 9 events   60. SPEED SKATING - W 500m 61. FREESTYLE SKIING - M Dual Moguls 62. SNOWBOARD - Mixed Team Snowboard Cross 63. ALPINE SKIING - W Giant Slalom 64. SKELETON - Mixed Team 65. BIATHLON - M 12.5km Pursuit 66. BIATHLON - W 10km Pursuit 67. SKI JUMPING - W Large Hill Individual 68. CROSS-COUNTRY SKIING - M 4x7.5km Relay
    • day 8   8-9-7---24 8-6-4---18 6-4-6---15 5-4-2---11 5-3-3---11 4-10-8---22 4-5-5---14 4-4-1---9 3-2-11---16 3-1-3---7 2-4-1---7 2-1-1---4 2-1-0---3 1-1-1---3 1-1-1---3 1-0-0---1 0-1-2---3 0-1-1---2 0-1-1---2 0-0-1---1
    • day 8 events   52. SPEED SKATING - M 500m   1. Jordan Stolz USA 2. Laurent Dubreuil CAN 3. Tatsuya Shinhama JPN   53. SHORT TRACK - M 1500m   1. William Dandjinou CAN 2. Park Ji-won KOR 3. Pietro Sighel ITA   54. FREESTYLE SKIING - W Dual Moguls   1. Jakara Anthony AUS 2. Jaelin Kauf USA 3. Olivia Giaccio USA   55. ALPINE SKIING - M Giant Slalom   1. Henrik Kristoffersen NOR 2. Marco Odermatt SUI 3. Atle Lie McGrath NOR   56. SKELETON - W Skeleton   1. Kimberly Bos NED 2. Tina Hermann GER 3. Valentina Margaglio ITA   57. BIATHLON - W 7.5km Sprint   1. Elvira Oeberg SWE 2. Justine Braisaz-Buchet FRA 3. Lisa Vittozzi ITA   58. SKI JUMPING - M Large Hill Individual   1. Stefan Kraft AUT 2. Timi Zajc SLO 3. Daniel Tschofenig AUT   59. CROSS-COUNTRY SKIING - W 4x7.5km Relay   1. Sweden 2. Norway 3. United States
    • As a Montreal Canadien fan, I am in agreement. However, he is struggling recently and is demoted to the 4th line this week. Hoping he can turn it around. 
    • I read now that Valentina Rodini will be in the new team of Tizzano + Galtarossa and Martini. I was probably in such an information bubble on Instagram that I thought that only Abbagnale was running a campaign and had a team of people around him. That's why I was surprised by his defeat + the fact that, for example, Rodini supports his rival. But as I wrote, for me the change in the general coach position is a plus. We need a new opening and a new impulse: Cattaneo had his best results in Tokyo and then he only explained that his rowers were running away abroad to the USA to study and that's why he had worse results. Ok, except that it's the same in Romania and Greece but they results are comparable or better. It's obvious that no one here will make the UK or the Netherlands, because we don't have such resources and money but I think we can repeat the Romanian results (2 gold - 3 silver in Paris) and that will be a much better result than the 2 silver in this year.
    • Abbagnale boasted that he had 80 per cent a few days before the vote (I still have the screen) and ran again as a result of a power deal. Not a great loss.   I have doubts about the new technical director though, you can't announce him during the congress, brandishing the scalp of the Abbagnale era technical staff (who then, were Crispi's men). Let's hope there are no rifts between the new staff and the athletes, it had to be handled better.
    • I was surprised by Abbagnale's defeat. I thought he was a sure of victory, since he decided to run - I read some source that he didn't know if he would start before Paris 2024. What do you think about it?
    • Rugby Sevens WR SVNS 2024 - 2025   Multi-Stage Event - 30 November 2024 - 4 May 2025     Official Website Programme Results System Facebook Page Discussion Thread
×
×
  • Create New...