Pasolini 248 Posted August 8, 2023 #31 Share Posted August 8, 2023 8 hours ago, Rafa Maciel said: Tentative quotas for in the women's event We have to remember that Australia will have a quota - probably in 2022 but one never know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jan Linha 590 Posted August 8, 2023 #32 Share Posted August 8, 2023 So the person who updates the quotas on wiki just put it there like this. How could get a quota when and are ahead of Kim Lea Muller of who finished 10th?? 😳😳😳 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafa Maciel 1,592 Posted August 8, 2023 #33 Share Posted August 8, 2023 6 hours ago, Jan Linha said: Hannah Roberts has already qualified last year. I think this time it will be ... Which leave Iveta Miculyčová again as first below the line. 😭 Technically Roberts hasn't qualified as an individual yet - the quotas from '22 and '23 WC are awarded to the nation rather than the individual so at the moment the quota list would be 2x , 1x , , But I take your point that the quotas from the WCs will end up being reallocated after the OQS next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafa Maciel 1,592 Posted August 8, 2023 #34 Share Posted August 8, 2023 5 hours ago, Mateus Nagime said: We have to remember that Australia will have a quota - probably in 2022 but one never know. Yes, there will need to be an Oceanian qualifier and that will come from the '22 WC results ( Sarah Nicki finished in 22nd) but not sure which of or would miss out. (Working assumption would Ducarroz) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jan Linha 590 Posted August 8, 2023 #35 Share Posted August 8, 2023 28 minutes ago, Rafa Maciel said: Technically Roberts hasn't qualified as an individual yet - the quotas from '22 and '23 WC are awarded to the nation rather than the individual so at the moment the quota list would be 2x , 1x , , But I take your point that the quotas from the WCs will end up being reallocated after the OQS next year. In this scenario, should have qualified 2 athletes and the quota should have gone to the medalists..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafa Maciel 1,592 Posted August 8, 2023 #36 Share Posted August 8, 2023 6 minutes ago, Jan Linha said: In this scenario, should have qualified 2 athletes and the quota should have gone to the medalists..... No - each NOC can only qualify 1 athlete at each event. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafa Maciel 1,592 Posted August 8, 2023 #37 Share Posted August 8, 2023 Looking at the available results from competitions over the last 18 months, my current expectations for qualification in women's freestyle looks like this: Host Quota (Laury Perez) Olympic Qualifier Series (Hannah Roberts) (Iveta Miculycova) (Kim Lee Muller) (Charlotte Worthington) 2022 World Champ Quotas 2023 World Champ Quotas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nickyc707 382 Posted August 8, 2023 #38 Share Posted August 8, 2023 (edited) Okay, after all that discussion caused by a messy qualification process I'd say the only one of the three men's quotas from this WC that is really at risk is the US's and they already have one quota and will likely get the second in the qualifying series. That presupposes that S Africa takes up a quota which is far from certain. Edited August 8, 2023 by Nickyc707 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpjmcevoy 362 Posted August 8, 2023 #39 Share Posted August 8, 2023 16 hours ago, Jan Linha said: So the person who updates the quotas on wiki just put it there like this. How could get a quota when and are ahead of Kim Lea Muller of who finished 10th?? 😳😳😳 I think that was a typo, inserting {{GER}} instead of {{GBR}}. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nickyc707 382 Posted August 9, 2023 #40 Share Posted August 9, 2023 6 hours ago, mpjmcevoy said: I think that was a typo, inserting {{GER}} instead of {{GBR}}. They also inserted Germany in the men's qualification section but that has been corrected by another editor. I have questioned the person responsible for the entry in the the women's section and am still awaiting a reply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now