website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Artistic Swimming at the Aquatics WA World Championships 2023


Recommended Posts

12th, 8th and 9th from the preliminary round make up the podium?

This sport has turned from set in stone to unpredictable.

 

Usually, China doesn't drop like that in judged sports but I don't follow artistic swimming.

Edited by Quasit
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/20971-artistic-swimming-at-the-aquatics-wa-world-championships-2023/page/2/#findComment-560944
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Quasit said:

12th, 8th and 9th from the preliminary round make up the podium?

This sport has turned from set in stone to unpredictable.

 

Usually, China doesn't drop like that in judged sports but I don't follow artistic swimming.

I think event he judges still are trying to figure out how the scoring works.

 

Before the score was only a disguise to the preference given to each team, disregarding any actual difference from one performance to other.

 

Now I’m not buying that a team that barely qualified for the final suddenly improved so much as to actually medal, while the other competitors dropped significantly.

 

It’s good that the system has changed, but way far from a fair shot to all.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/20971-artistic-swimming-at-the-aquatics-wa-world-championships-2023/page/2/#findComment-560995
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mrv86 said:

I think event he judges still are trying to figure out how the scoring works.

 

Before the score was only a disguise to the preference given to each team, disregarding any actual difference from one performance to other.

 

Now I’m not buying that a team that barely qualified for the final suddenly improved so much as to actually medal, while the other competitors dropped significantly.

 

It’s good that the system has changed, but way far from a fair shot to all.

From what the commentators have been saying, the actual changes make a lot of sense - routines made up of set number of elements, each element has a degree of difficulty score and if they fluff the element, they aren't awarded the degree of difficulty which results in reduced score.

 

Teams that qualified for the finals in 10-12 will have had multiple base marks applied - the minimum score for an element - rather than the full degree of difficulty. This means that they can lose 7 or 8 points from their DD so whilst the difference may look dramatic, it may just represent a tidier routine.

 

The problem at the moment is that there is no way for the spectators to make sense of what is going on as it is just presented as a score with no visibility of which elements have been penalised. I'd like to see on screen graphics which show which elements have been fully awarded, which are under investigation and which have been failed - similar to what they now show for figure skating. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/20971-artistic-swimming-at-the-aquatics-wa-world-championships-2023/page/2/#findComment-560998
Share on other sites

The azzurre were very imprecise, I had higher expectations. 3 inaccuracies, unfortunately several basemarks will arrive :(

Edited by Gianlu33
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/20971-artistic-swimming-at-the-aquatics-wa-world-championships-2023/page/2/#findComment-561277
Share on other sites

I know there's no quotas on offer at this champs, but the acrobatic scores don't count for olympic qualification right - just technical and free?

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/20971-artistic-swimming-at-the-aquatics-wa-world-championships-2023/page/2/#findComment-561284
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rafa Maciel said:

I know there's no quotas on offer at this champs, but the acrobatic scores don't count for olympic qualification right - just technical and free?

Acro will be part of the Olympic routines in Paris, for the 1st time. So, they will count in the combined score for the OQ

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/20971-artistic-swimming-at-the-aquatics-wa-world-championships-2023/page/2/#findComment-561287
Share on other sites

Good routine for Japan, a bit worse than the qualifications. Let's see if one of the big teams ahead (United States, Ukraine and China) will do some mistakes...

 

Honestly I have 0 confidence in the American team

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/20971-artistic-swimming-at-the-aquatics-wa-world-championships-2023/page/2/#findComment-561290
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • It's somewhat surprising that figure skating isn't more popular here.
    • I'm not against team events or even mixed team events, but I think they need to be more than the sum of individual performances. So relays are fine (including team event in luge), team pursuit too, team event in skeleton is ok cause you have this different type of start though I would prefer the luge system (with a chip instead of this board you definitely can't touch in skeleton ?). Rest needs to be rethought at least. And rules need to be coherent between the sports regarding how many teams you can enter, why is it 4 duos in alpine combined event and only 1 in CC team sprint ? 2 would be my limit for dual events, even in sports where they usually don't enter more than one team in WC events.    Alpine skiing (10)   No changes.   Biathlon (11 -> 9)   - Mixed relay + Single mixed relay. Agree with De_Gambassi, different format from the gender relays, increased chances for weaker nations to compete even if we would have two teams for some countries. - Both pursuits. I've seen several people complain about how tired the athletes were by the end of the Games during the mass-starts. Thing is these are the same people that are adamant on keeping the pursuit in the program. Either ditch them or treat the sprint as a qualification round. You would then have one individual races, one MS and one "exciting" double-event.   Bobsleigh (4)   No changes. Max 2 teams per country.   Cross-country skiing (12 -> 11)   - Both team sprints. + Mixed team sprint.  Same idea as in biathlon. Like some I'm all for a real sprint and not the dull attrition races we witnessed in Val di Fiemme. Freestyle is mandatory, can be uphill/downhill but not longer than 1'30.  - 50km W + 30km W   Curling (3)     No changes.     Figure skating (5 -> 3)   - Team event.  Awful ranking system. - Ice dance.  "Dance", enough said.   Freestyle skiing (15)   - Team aerials. + Ski-cross mixed event. Ideally luge-like with immediate start after your teammate crossed the finish line. Alternate M-W order between the rounds. In snowboard cross men were almost useless all day long.   Ice hockey (2)   No changes.   Luge (6)   No changes.   Nordic combined (3 -> 4)   + Gundersen NH W - Gundersen NH M + Mass-start LH M - Team event + Mixed team event   Short-track speed skating (9)   No changes.   Skeleton (3)    No changes.   Ski jumping (6 -> 5)   - Super team M   Ski mountaineering (3)   - Both sprints + Both individuals   Snowboarding (11)   No changes.   Speed skating (14)   - Mass-start in the current format is shite + (Re)introduce an allround competition inspired by track cycling's omnium (first version). So a couple of individual races (500 and 3000 ?), an elimination race, a points races to end it.  (-) This would be endurance based so maybe ditch 3000/5000. 
    • Worth noting that these Olympics, there were separate qualification and event threads where as in the past, they were merged together in one thread so that makes the increase in replies even more impressive.
    • The best part of last nights closing ceremony was the highlight montage Eurosport made.   Anyone who didn't see it NEEDS to see it. Amazing.   Probably my second favourite montage of an OG after the London one in 2012.    
    • After our first ever Olympic medal, it's time for our first Paralympic medal.  The chances are good, but I'm traumatized by the Chinese after 2022.    I'm also concerned about the atmosphere of these games. 
    • no, there was a world cup stage also the following year, then the track was dismissed and the hall reverted back to its usual tasks (not sport related)
    • That wasn't cheating, cheating is doing something against the rules for your advantage. I read the rulebook, and not only was it not clear enough on the matter for it to be a burned rock even though it should've been, there's no advantage to what he did. 
    • Tuesday February 24th, 2026 - Round-Robin Day 2 Schedule (GMT +1)   12:30   Turkiye vs Romania 16:00   Thailand vs Serbia 19:30   Croatia vs Bulgaria
    • Monday February 23rd, 2026 - Round-Robin Day 1 Results (GMT +1)   12:30   Serbia  2 - 4  Turkiye 16:00   Bulgaria  1 - 5  Romania 19:30   Thailand  2 - 1  Croatia   Provisional Standing After Day 1:   1.    3 ----------------- 2.   3 3.   3 4.   0 5.   0 ----------------- 6.   0
×
×
  • Create New...