website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Winter Youth Olympic Games 2020


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Fly_like_a_don said:

OK so @Olympian1010 is wrong. The qualifications for these aren't easy. IOC at complete fault. 

Oh come on :lol: 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1503-winter-youth-olympic-games-2020/page/24/#findComment-262743
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Fly_like_a_don said:

OK so @Olympian1010 is wrong. The qualifications for these aren't easy. IOC at complete fault. 

No, the qualifications are easy. India requested quotas, but failed to register a single eligible skier. Essentially no skiers from India competed at FIS events, so they didn’t qualify. There’s a difference between quotas requested, and quota eligibility. Realistically an Indian skier basically need to complete a Slalom without falling on their ass, or face, and without crashing. However, no Indians entered an FIS event, so the blame lies with no one really. India just didn’t try to qualify.

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1503-winter-youth-olympic-games-2020/page/24/#findComment-262745
Share on other sites

By my calculations the FIS still has the potential to reallocate 15 quotas. However, I’m not sure about how the process works at this point, or if they plan to reallocate those quotas. What happened is that each discipline was given a maximum amount of quotas, but some of the disciplines couldn’t meet that maximum even after allocation (example: Ski Jumping should have had 40M/40W, but instead ended up with 38M/35W after all reallocation). The FIS seems to have given some of these “lost” quotas to other disciplines, though there doesn’t seem to be a real method to it (they’re just giving them off wherever pretty much). We are now left with 15 quotas and countries who still seem to want a few, but I don’t know if the FIS intends to reallocate them, or if there will just be less athletes than allocated for in Lausanne?

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1503-winter-youth-olympic-games-2020/page/24/#findComment-262879
Share on other sites

Speed Skating Reallocations:

 

Rejected 1 Male: :AUT:BEL

 

Rejected 1 Female: :AUT:CAN:IRL:SUI

 

Gained 1 Male: :CZE:FIN

 

Gained 1 Female: :BEL:HUN:ROU:FIN

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1503-winter-youth-olympic-games-2020/page/24/#findComment-262886
Share on other sites

On 14/12/2019 at 14:42, Olympian1010 said:

No, the qualifications are easy. India requested quotas, but failed to register a single eligible skier. Essentially no skiers from India competed at FIS events, so they didn’t qualify. There’s a difference between quotas requested, and quota eligibility. Realistically an Indian skier basically need to complete a Slalom without falling on their ass, or face, and without crashing. However, no Indians entered an FIS event, so the blame lies with no one really. India just didn’t try to qualify.

Forget India. 

:NGR :PAK:SAM:TGA All these what do you have to say? 

 

It's not that qualifications should be easy. Infact all unqualified nations MUST be allowed to send 1 athlete in either speed skating, short track speed skating ,alpine or cross country skiing. Otherwise these games won't improve. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1503-winter-youth-olympic-games-2020/page/24/#findComment-263110
Share on other sites

Just now, Fly_like_a_don said:

Forget India. 

:NGR :PAK:SAM:TGA All these what do you have to say? 

 

They don't have anyone good enough to qualify according to the really not very harsh standards. When you watch the competitions, you'll see there are some athletes who are really, really, really far behind (like a half minute behind in a run of less than a minute). If a few athletes who had the potential to stay upright and finish in a sort of normal way had tried, those countries would have qualified someone.

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1503-winter-youth-olympic-games-2020/page/24/#findComment-263112
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

 

They don't have anyone good enough to qualify according to the really not very harsh standards. When you watch the competitions, you'll see there are some athletes who are really, really, really far behind (like a half minute behind in a run of less than a minute). If a few athletes who had the potential to stay upright and finish in a sort of normal way had tried, those countries would have qualified someone.

What matters is global representation

I'm ok even if they take 5 minutes, because you have to start some time now or later. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1503-winter-youth-olympic-games-2020/page/24/#findComment-263116
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Fly_like_a_don said:

What matters is global representation

I'm ok even if they take 5 minutes, because you have to start some time now or later. 

 

Yes, and when they're good enough to at least be a little respectable, they can then start in events like this. There has to be some sort of base line, some basic capability one should have to be able to compete.

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1503-winter-youth-olympic-games-2020/page/24/#findComment-263124
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, heywoodu said:

 

Yes, and when they're good enough to at least be a little respectable, they can then start in events like this. There has to be some sort of base line, some basic capability one should have to be able to compete.

For that they should be allowed to participate in winter Olympics. Other wise no one would really care. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1503-winter-youth-olympic-games-2020/page/24/#findComment-263159
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Fly_like_a_don said:

For that they should be allowed to participate in winter Olympics. Other wise no one would really care. 

They can when they have a basic ability to qualify :)

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1503-winter-youth-olympic-games-2020/page/24/#findComment-263194
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • China Media Group (CMG) will broadcast all 116 gold medal events of the Milan Winter Olympics live on CCTV-1, CCTV-5, CCTV-5+ and CCTV-16. It will also use technologies such as 4K/8K ultra-high definition to enhance the viewing experience. Live broadcasts of all events will be carried out from 16:00 Beijing time to 06:00 the next day.
    • The strength of the UK is that they are 100% focused on the track, while Italy must to navigate between the track and the road: the line-up is different for practically every event, etc. Paternoster should focus 100% on the track; she won't win anything big on the road anymore. As it is, she's weak both there and there. The situation is different with Balsamo, as she's also having significant success on the road and likely earns the most money there.
    • Discovery+ in the UK have also got their schedule up now.     I notice that only thing listed as being in UHD is the Opening Ceremony though....     
    • The problem over the last few years was that no-one was able to keep pace with the big Katie Archibald turns. Looks to be sorted now.  
    • The women's top 50 is so crammed with athletes from the same five nations that it is not inconceivable they are unable to fill the full quota from the top 50, in which case a third double spot would open up between USA/BEL/GBR
    • That women's pursuit team looks brutally fast. Batter you over the head into submission brutal, perhaps not seen since the early Trott-Rowsell days The 4 minute barrier could be on borrowed time.   The two British women sprinters Finucane and Caldwell also look pretty ominous, indeed the whole women's sprint team looks in some shape and with some depth to get that result without Finucane   Work to do for the British men's teams, but they won't be unhappy either, not to mention Joe Truman's unexpected Kilo win.
    • I prefer to do mine like this guy (https://app.podiumsport.it/) does his "Projected Medals" as probability based rather than straight medal picking... all things being equal, conversion rates should be about the same and the outliers come out in the wash. Unfortunately most people just like medal picking, and think any other approach is weird  
    • So probably: Men Oceania: Americas: Africa: Asia: One of  Europe: One of Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (probably not)  and whichever countries don’t qualify from Asian Games.  Universality: ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of the above in World Rankings    and one of  (most likely) or  seem safe with two quotas. The other will be favourites if a third team gets allocated two.    Women Oceania: Europe: One of Americas:  /  if US is ineligible due to their host quota, if the host quota gets reallocated then Canada will be in contention in the rankings Africa:   Asia: One of   Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (x1?)  (x1/2)  (x1/2), whichever doesn’t qualify out of  / ,  and  ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of above.  Universality: ?    is safe with two quotas between  it’ll be tough for whoever misses out of those three.   nevermind , 
    • The rankings look likely to give two spots each in the men's side to Egypt (2nd athlete at 3) and GB (second athlete at 9). the nearest contender after that is France and both Egypt and GB have plenty of contenders after their respective number 2 but before France's umber 2   Women's side looks a bit more of a battle, with Egypt again likely to provide 2, and then a fight between USA, GBR and BEL for the other lucky double spot. That said, so dominant are the Egyptians, Americans and Brits, that failing to find all the contenders in the top 50 is entirely plausible, possibly opening a third 'double' spot.
    • I'd done my final revisions on my prediction spreadsheets.. and I'm sticking with 26 for Canada.    Take it to the bank! (But don't sign anything)
×
×
  • Create New...