website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Athletics 2019 Discussion Thread


OlympicIRL

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Olympian1010 said:

 

With the changing gender standards it’s bound to happen at one point or another.

 

Gender standards? :rolleyes: Gimme a break... that's political bullshit. You've invented a new DNA code? Recounted the chromosomes and came up with a new magic number?

 

Transgender athletes will never change the standards of global professional sport because they won't be allowed to. They're in a huge minority anyway so it won't make it pass the first post. Hell, Semenya getting pushed back under the rock only proves that. And nobody will even consider any changes for third-string athletes because they're irrelevant anyway.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1375-athletics-2019-discussion-thread/page/20/#findComment-205800
Share on other sites

Just now, ChandlerMne said:

IAAF only emphasised 400-1500 m. Dont know why. It should extend to all track and field events.

So, yes, i agree with you.

 

Because it's where endurance-speed ratio matters the most. It doesn't matter as much in longer races i.e. marathon where trained women can easily beat the time of several men. Last year's Chicago women's marathon winner finished 24th on the road. Good luck with Semenya finishing Top 25 among male 800m speciallists even once!

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1375-athletics-2019-discussion-thread/page/20/#findComment-205802
Share on other sites

Just now, Monzanator said:

 

Because it's where endurance-speed ratio matters the most. It doesn't matter as much in longer races i.e. marathon where trained women can easily beat the time of several men. Last year's Chicago women's marathon winner finished 24th on the road. Good luck with Semenya finishing Top 25 among male 800m speciallists even once!

You got that right. 

Marathon is exception, testosterone isnt that important there. Same as in race walking.

On the other hand, all throwing,jumping except high jump and pole vault, highly depends on testosterone. So, IAAF should broaden its criteria. 

 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1375-athletics-2019-discussion-thread/page/20/#findComment-205804
Share on other sites

Just now, ChandlerMne said:

You got that right. 

Marathon is exception, testosterone isnt that important there. Same as in race walking.

On the other hand, all throwing,jumping except high jump and pole vault, highly depends on testosterone. So, IAAF should broaden its criteria. 

 

 

The IAAF needs to have scientific proof, right now it only has enough to claim 400-1500m

 

And before saying it's obvious, remember the IAAF tried to have the ban across all events before being forced to backtrack.

Edited by JoshMartini007
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1375-athletics-2019-discussion-thread/page/20/#findComment-205805
Share on other sites

Just now, JoshMartini007 said:

 

The IAAF needs to have scientific proof, right now it only has enough to claim 400-1500m

 

True, scientific based conclusion is only one valid. 

It shouldnt be that hard to relate distance in shot put with testosterone.

We had many girls in the 80ies who were throwing 21+. Almost every one of them was using steroids or testosterone. Now, when testing is more often and more precise, every 20.00 m + result is sufficient for gold. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1375-athletics-2019-discussion-thread/page/20/#findComment-205806
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JoshMartini007 said:

 

The IAAF needs to have scientific proof, right now it only has enough to claim 400-1500m

 

And before saying it's obvious, remember the IAAF tried to have the ban across all events before being forced to backtrack.

The problem for the IAAF is that there are so few athletes in the same position as Semenya so they only have evidence in the events in which that athletes have the greatest advantage.

Let's face it, if the race you're best at is the 800m then you run the 800m even if yoy enjoy the 100m more.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1375-athletics-2019-discussion-thread/page/20/#findComment-205810
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ChandlerMne said:

Yes, i am from Montenegro.

I would feel exactly the same. Principle is same, nation is of no importance here. 

A little (a lot) off topic here, but are you attending the games this month?

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1375-athletics-2019-discussion-thread/page/20/#findComment-205818
Share on other sites

I will say, while the athletics world tears itself apart at this decision...Semenya has been very classy and reasonable in her response. It makes me rethink my reaction a little bit. I can be upset about it, but in all honesty none of our opinions will do anything about it now.

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1375-athletics-2019-discussion-thread/page/20/#findComment-205823
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Olympian1010 said:

A little (a lot) off topic here, but are you attending the games this month?

Selected events, yes. My working hours doesnt allow full comittment but i hope that i will watch as many events as possible.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1375-athletics-2019-discussion-thread/page/20/#findComment-205836
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Some of the small nations have competed in the past but usually lost 30-0 to the Aussies
    • Officials persons (include Head) of RLF are still in ban. For example, Vaelbe has spoken even more terrible words but, however, CAS obliged to gave them AIN status. And it's the same situation here - FIL must to implement CAS's decision. But it's not clearly FIL's criterias for AIN status and that too strange
    • For Modern Pentathlon, it's interesting that Africa only gets one continental championship spot, considering how well Egypt does in the event.  (But then again, it's max 2 athletes per NOC per gender.)  Presuming that an Egyptian wins the African CCh, I suppose their performance in the other major competitions will allow the second competitor to come through.
    • Statement from the president of the russian Luge federation (yesterday): "Our team is in Kazakhstan and is preparing to apply for U.S. visas. We are setting an example for our entire country, especially for the younger generation. They see that a difficult path is not a reason to give up. It teaches perseverance. In this perseverance lies our shared strength, our mission to millions of young people for whom sports are a guiding point and a shining star. I believe in our country, in our strong-spirited guys. I sincerely love and respect our president, Vladimir Putin. He is the best president in the world. May God grant him strength and good health."   Do they deserve neutral status?
    • I did not think it would happen again but... I created similar post for Paris - 2024 https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/27489-ain-athletes-qualification-for-paris-2024-olympic-games-and-reallocation-of-quotas-post1-updated-1507/#comments  I was not sure if that reallocations would really happen but the reality was even more serious than the expectations. According to this research 43% of the neutral statuses issued by the IFs were fake AIN  - https://razom22.com/neutrality-research/  And the figures are based on the IOC decisions - not on the evaluations by Ukrainian NOC or sport ministry. Right now the situation is absolutely unclear. As usually )) Some notes: 1. Russians will not reject quotas for 2026 as they did for 2024 in judo and wrestling. 2. AINERP may be more loyal to russians due to the new member - Watanabe. His federation issued AIN status to Melnikova who took part in the primaries of the russian ruling party, had phots with Z and e .t.c. 3. I do not expect a lot of reallocations becaues of the total small number of the rus/blr athletes in qualification events right now. 4. BUT, even with these small numbers we see that FIS allowed to compete several incompliant persons.        Short notes from the IOC statement before Paris - 2024:   1. IOC`s decisions to reject quotas are final. 2. IOC`s decisions to approve quotas are not final - new facts may lead to the rejection of invitation. 3. IOC`s decisions cannot be appealed - NOCs were not invited to the Games, so it is a good will to invite individual athletes... or not   russians Sports Athlete(s) Discipline Possible Reallocation NOC IOC Decision + IF reallocation if happened Figure skating Adeliia PETROSIAN Women's singles Stefania Yakovleva Confirmed by IOC Figure skating Petr GUMENNIK Men's singles Davide Lewton Brain Confirmed by IOC belorussians     Sports Athlete(s) Discipline Possible Reallocation NOC IOC Decision + IF reallocation if happened Figure skating Viktoriya SAFONOVA Women's singles Stefania Yakovleva Confirmed by IOC  
    • I would say they will not be eligible. But it realy abotut the wording every federation has in its papers. World Aquatics changes their policies several times (especially after Mazepin "solved the issues" persoanlly - as witnessed one russian Olympic champion)   Inoirtnat notes on FIS decisions:   FIS points are frozen for ruissns and belorussians - so the situation is not so complicated for a lot of them. The list of the AIN`s is not final as the list from ISU was. It means that persons mau be not only removed from the list but added as well. I expect russians to try some freestyle applications before the stage in China, for example. FIS has not problems with the deny of visa or entris by the host countries. So they kept the possibility to close the doors for the russians for all the countries as ICF did. No sanctions for this, no removing events from the Olympic qualification list, no host changes,   * * * * * Here is the the relevant extract from FIS papers for Aerials tram event. What do you think?
    • Not only Korostelev but all 3 russian entries. I will bring the detail 
    • And will bet that the IBU is a lot richer than the FIS because their wealth is based on German TV contracts.  
    • Russians filed an appeal to CAS against IBU. But I do not believe they will get any result in time to grab quotas. I suppose IBU will not agree to have "fast" hearings as FIS did. And i suppose IBU will fight in CAS without intention to lose as FIS did.
×
×
  • Create New...