Dragon 1,844 Posted May 1, 2019 #171 Share Posted May 1, 2019 (edited) 39 minutes ago, Vojthas said: I read something about Strasbourg Court - can't it cancel CAS as it's based in Switzerland? Edit - I asked a lawyer friend and he said the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg can overrule a Swiss decision like the one CAS made. Edited May 1, 2019 by Dragon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshMartini007 2,536 Posted May 1, 2019 #172 Share Posted May 1, 2019 1 hour ago, Olympian1010 said: I mean the obvious solution to me is to introduce a third gender category for every event, the open category. It would be more inclusive, but I doubt the IOC will do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon 1,844 Posted May 1, 2019 #173 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Just now, JoshMartini007 said: It would be more inclusive, but I doubt the IOC will do it. Define who would compete in the "open" category Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshMartini007 2,536 Posted May 1, 2019 #174 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Just now, Dragon said: Define who would compete in the "open" category Everyone of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon 1,844 Posted May 1, 2019 #175 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Just now, JoshMartini007 said: Everyone of course So men would have two categories they could win and women only one? Not really fair, is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChandlerMne 1,037 Posted May 1, 2019 #176 Share Posted May 1, 2019 So,for some of you its normal to have her competing with testosterone level around 10,15 or even higher with other girls with testosterone level of 2,3 or 5? And knowing what testosterone is, how it works and knowing that its also a doping? Wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xander 53 Posted May 1, 2019 #177 Share Posted May 1, 2019 (edited) 25 минут назад, Dragon сказал: So men would have two categories they could win and women only one? Not really fair, is it? There's always a "brilliant" statement: "such discrimination is a necessary, reasonable and proportionate means of achieving the IAAF's aim". Edited May 1, 2019 by Xander Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Federer91 2,793 Posted May 1, 2019 #178 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Just now, ChandlerMne said: So,for some of you its normal to have her competing with testosterone level around 10,15 or even higher with other girls with testosterone level of 2,3 or 5? And knowing what testosterone is, how it works and knowing that its also a doping? Wow. That is why, there are only 3 logical options: 1) Compete with the men 2) Allow performance enhancing in sport 3) Choose another career Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshMartini007 2,536 Posted May 1, 2019 #179 Share Posted May 1, 2019 We could follow the Paralympics lead and create a class system for different levels of testosterone (ignoring that there's more than testosterone levels that dictates advantage in sports) vinipereira 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xander 53 Posted May 1, 2019 #180 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Black athletes should be next according to such logic. The ex-Soviet camp (especially Russia and its satellites) talks all the time that black athletes have physical advantage over white athletes No black marathoners, no black sprinters. Yeah, it's discriminative, but... we won't win otherwise. "We aren't racists... we just want to ban all blacks". It's not a sarcasm, this is real attitude even among certain coaches & athletes. The laboratory can issue "the right" decision and the case is closed. They would have done it already if not USA. Btw, one of our current F800m runners wrote "Those blacks!" in her FB after she lost and then deleted it. She also liked a racist comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts