website statistics
Jump to content

Doping Cases and Bans Thread (2016 & 2017)


heywoodu
 Share

Recommended Posts

They can give it to us then Zygimantas Stanulis would be happy :d

2 minutes ago, DaniSRB said:

Looks like our NOC doesn't want to accept reallocations.....they must be crazy :facepalm:

 

Edited by irmants
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, DaniSRB said:

Russia is banned

 

these are reallocations

Women ALB, GEO, MDA
Men BEL, CRO, ESA, MGL, SRB

 

@dcro

I don't understand how IWF decided these reallocations. I understand, they not wanting to do the whole recalculations like they did for Bulgaria but they should have given these spots to highest ranked nation in World List not qualified. Norway finished higher than Albania and Georgia in both European Qualifiers and World Qualifiers and still they don't have a quota. Did Norway refuse the quota? Also, I am assuming it is not given to highest ranked individual as in that case, IWF would have declared the names of lifters receiving the quota. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dolby said:

I don't understand how IWF decided these reallocations. I understand, they not wanting to do the whole recalculations like they did for Bulgaria but they should have given these spots to highest ranked nation in World List not qualified. Norway finished higher than Albania and Georgia in both European Qualifiers and World Qualifiers and still they don't have a quota. Did Norway refuse the quota? Also, I am assuming it is not given to highest ranked individual as in that case, IWF would have declared the names of lifters receiving the quota. 

i don't know sorry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Dolby said:

I don't understand how IWF decided these reallocations. I understand, they not wanting to do the whole recalculations like they did for Bulgaria but they should have given these spots to highest ranked nation in World List not qualified. Norway finished higher than Albania and Georgia in both European Qualifiers and World Qualifiers and still they don't have a quota. Did Norway refuse the quota? Also, I am assuming it is not given to highest ranked individual as in that case, IWF would have declared the names of lifters receiving the quota. 

 

I think they looked at individual rankings now (we thought they would do that during the first round of reallocations). Anyway, all of these quotas went to nations that don't have strong teams overall, but only some individuals (and that's why we can assume that individual rankings were used).

#banbestmen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, DaniSRB said:


Men BEL,

 

http://www.nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20160729_02404396

 

Tom Goegebuer has been staying on his strict diet in the past weeks, is what this brand new news article says...being the Belgians neighbours, I'll be cheering for him in Rio :clap:

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here are they summary what happened inweightlifting for the past two month, if they add sth new , i will update this post

IWF statement on the reanalyzes 06.06.2016

The IWF has been notified by the IOC regarding presumed Adverse Analytical Findings and Adverse Analytical Findings that resulted from the retesting of the 2008 Beijing and 2012 London Olympic Games samples that also involves medal winners.The IWF closely cooperated with the IOC in the overall retesting procedure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE1 15.06.2016

The IWF reports that as a consequence of the IOC’s reanalyses of samples from the 2012 London Olympic Games, the samples of the following Athletes have returned Adverse Analytical Findings:

  • AUKHADOV, Apti (RUS) – Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone, Drostanolone (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • KOSTOVA, Boyanka (AZE) – Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone, Stanozolol (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • PODOBEDOVA, Svetlana (KAZ) – Stanozolol (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • SAZANAVETS, Dzina (BLR) – Drostanolone, Stanozolol (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • SHKERMANKOVA, Maryna (BLR) – Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone, Stanozolol (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • KALINA, Yuliya (UKR) – Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • ZHARNASEK, Yauheni (BLR) – Dehydrochlormethytestosterone, Stanozolol, Oxandrolone (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • MANEZA, Maiya (KAZ) – Stanozolol (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • ILYIN, Ilya (KAZ) – Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone, Stanozolol (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • CHINSHANLO, Zulfiya (KAZ) – Oxandrolone, Stanozolol (S1.1 Anabolic agents)

In line with the relevant rules and regulations, the IWF imposed mandatory provisional suspensions upon the Athletes, who remain provisionally suspended in view of potential anti-doping rule violations until their cases are closed. Following the IOC’s decisions, the IWF will be in a position to take over the results management of these cases.

The IWF will report the current standing of the Beijing reanalytical cases as soon as possible. Should it be determined in any of the cases that no anti-doping violation was committed, the relevant decision shall also be published.

 

The IWF will not make any further comments on the cases until they are closed.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PUBLIC DISCLOSURES2 18.06.2016

The IWF reports that as a consequence of the IOC’s reanalyses of samples from the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games, the samples of the following Athletes have returned Adverse Analytical Findings:

  • KHURSHUDYAN, Hripsime (ARM) – Stanozolol (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • DUDOGLO, Alexandru (MDA) – Stanozolol (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • EVSTYUKHINA, Nadezda (RUS) – dehydrochlormethyltestosterone metabolites (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • TAYLAN, Nurcan (TUR) – Stanozolol (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • SHAINOVA, Marina (RUS) – Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone metabolites and stanozolol metabolites (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • ZAIROV, Intigam (AZE) – Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (S1.1 Anabolic agents) – Remains suspended due to previous IWF sanction until 21.12.2023
  • ILYIN, Ilya (KAZ) – Stanozolol (S1.1 Anabolic agents) – Remains provisionally suspended

In line with the relevant rules and regulations, the IWF imposed mandatory provisional suspensions upon the Athletes, who remain provisionally suspended in view of potential anti-doping rule violations until their cases are closed. Following the IOC’s decisions, the IWF will be in a position to take over the results management of these cases. Should it be determined in any of the cases that no anti-doping violation was committed, the relevant decision shall also be published.

 

The IWF will not make any further comments on the cases until they are closed.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Anti-Doping issues to be discussed by the IWF Executive Board 20.06.2016

Recognizing the serious consequences with regard to the reanalysis of the London 2012 and Beijing 2008 Olympic Games samples, the IWF Executive Board dedicates a full day to discuss these and other Anti-Doping related matters at its meeting in Tbilisi, GEO on 22-23 June.

Following the decisions from 2015 that already showed the strictest approach towards zero tolerance, the IWF EB aims to continue its commitment and work for a clean sport.

As a reminder, the following decisions were made by the IWF Executive Board in 2015:

  • Bulgaria was banned to participate in weightlifting at the Rio 2016 Olympic Games / relevant decision confirmed by CAS
  • 1 quota was withdrawn from Romania due to the multiple positive cases in the qualification period
  • 1 quota was withdrawn from Uzbekistan due to the multiple positive cases in the qualification period

Following the Executive Board meeting in Tbilisi, the summary of the relevant decisions will also be published.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Strong statement by the IWF Executive Board 22.06.2016

Recognizing the importance of the fight against doping at all times and with special regard to the serious consequences of the 2015 IWF World Championships Houston, USA results and the reanalyzes of the Beijing 2008 and London 2012 samples, the IWF Executive Board made the following decisions today:

  1. The IWF Executive Board strictly and immediately applied its Special Anti-Doping rules for Rio 2016 on Quota withdrawal to countries having produced multiple positive cases in the Qualification period.

The IWF Executive Board unanimously voted the withdrawal of 11 quotas to the additional 2 that were already withdrawn from Romania and Uzbekistan.

Two (2) quotas were withdrawn from Azerbaijan (1Man – 1Woman) due to the multiple positive cases in the qualification period

One (1) quota was withdrawn from Belorussia (1Man) due to the multiple positive cases in the qualification period

Two (2) quotas were withdrawn from Kazakhstan (1Man – 1Woman) due to the multiple positive cases in the qualification period

Two (2) quotas were withdrawn from Moldova (2Men) due to the multiple positive cases in the qualification period

Two (2) quotas were withdrawn from Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (1Man – 1Woman) due to the multiple positive cases in the qualification period

Two (2) quotas were withdrawn from Russia (1Man – 1Woman) due to the multiple positive cases in the qualification period

One (1) quota was withdrawn from Romania (1Man) due to the multiple positive cases in the qualification period (19.11.2015)

One (1) quota was withdrawn from Uzbekistan (1Woman) due to the multiple positive cases in the qualification period (19.11.2015)

  1. The IWF is setting up an Independent Investigation Commission to investigate into countries with multiple Anti-Doping Rule violations (3 or more per year) including those that have produced 3 or more Adverse Analytical Findings or Presumptive Adverse Analytical Findings in the reanalysis procedures of the 2008 and 2012 Olympic Games.
  2. The IWF Executive Board is modifying its Anti-Doping Policy to enable it to apply extra sanctions beyond the existing articles, including suspension of Federations which produce the most significant number of Anti-Doping Rule Violations in an Olympic period.
  3. The IWF will take appropriate measures to make sure that the athletes potentially implicated in the reanalysis process of the 2008 and 2012 Olympic Games – once disqualified by the IOC – shall not participate in the Rio 2016 Olympic Games.
  4. The IWF Executive Board has decided that National Federations confirmed to have produced 3 or more Anti-Doping Rule Violations in the combined re-analysis process of the 2008 and 2012 Olympic Games shall be suspended for 1 year. Countries thus subject to suspension are: KAZ, RUS, BLR.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Second day of the IWF Executive Board meeting in Tbilisi 23.06.2016

The IWF Executive Board voted in principle about the reallocation of 8 Men 11 Women Quota places available (subject to the approval of the IOC).

In order be fair and keep the balance between continents; considering ranking, universality and countries’ representation, (according to the current standing – subject to changes) the redistribution is as follows:

Africa: KEN (M) / MAR (W) MRI (W)
Asia: QAT (M) SRI (M) / IRQ (W) UAE (W)
Europe: GRE (M) ISR (M) / FIN (W) LAT (W) SWE (W)
Oceania: NRU (M) / SOL (W)
Pan-America: CHI (M) GUA (M) / ARG (W) PER (W) URU (W)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PUBLIC DISCLOSURES3 07.07.2016

The IWF reports that as a consequence of the IOC’s reanalyses, three further samples from the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games have returned Adverse Analytical Findings:

  • MARTIROSYAN, Tigran (ARM) / M69kg – Stanozolol, Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (S 1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • HASANOV, Sardar (AZE) – Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (S 1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • OZKAN, Sibel (TUR) – Stanozolol (S 1.1 Anabolic agents)

In line with the relevant rules and regulations, the IWF imposed mandatory provisional suspensions upon the Athletes, who remain provisionally suspended in view of potential anti-doping rule violations until their cases are closed. Following the IOC’s decisions, the IWF will be in a position to take over the results management of these cases. Should it be determined in any of the cases that no anti-doping violation was committed, the relevant decision shall also be published.

 

The IWF will not make any further comments on the cases until they are closed.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IWF Statement: McLaren Investigation Report 19.07.2016

The International Weightlifting Federation (IWF) has received the McLaren Report on the WADA Investigation of Sochi Allegations and noted with regret that the sport of Weightlifting is implicated.

The IWF contacts WADA in order to receive evidence regarding the McLaren report and ready to carefully evaluate the outcomes and fully cooperate with the respective Anti-Doping Organisations.

In the past four years (2013-2016) the IWF organised the following Events in Russia:

2013 IWF GP – 3rd President’s Cup – Moscow;
2014 IWF Junior World Championships – Kazan; IWF GP – 4th President’s Cup – Noyabrsk
2015 IWF GP – 5th President’s Cup – Grozny
2016 IWF GP – 6th President’s Cup – Kazan

It is important to emphasize that none of the samples taken in these Events were analysed in the Moscow Laboratory.

Furthermore the IWF runs an extensive out of competition (OOC) testing program in Russia and within the aforementioned period none of the OOC samples were analysed in the Moscow Laboratory.

 

The IWF showed multiple time its zero tolerance towards doping and acted as a pioneer by banning Bulgarian lifters from participating at the 2016 Rio Olympic Games. The IWF also withdrew numerous quota places from countries having produced multiple positive cases in the Qualification period. The IWF Executive Board further decided that National Federations confirmed to have produced 3 or more Anti-Doping Rule Violations in the combined re-analysis process of the 2008 and 2012 Olympic Games shall be suspended for 1 year.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IWF on the decision of the IOC Executive Board 25.07.2016

Following the decision of the International Olympic Committee Executive Board concerning the participation of Russian athletes in the Olympic Games in Rio 2016, the IWF states that:

 

The IWF acknowledges that the IOC will not accept any entry of any Russian athlete in the Olympic Games Rio 2016 unless such athlete can meet the conditions they set. The IWF acknowledges the request and criteria set by the IOC and await the evidence to be provided by the Russian athletes entered in the Rio 2016 Olympic Games. The IWF will evaluate the evidence provided once received. The IWF acknowledges that ROC is not allowed to enter any athlete for the Olympic Games Rio 2016 who has ever been sanctioned for doping, even if he or she has served the sanction.

 

In order to establish the pool of eligible Russian athletes, the IWF contacted the IOC, WADA for further clarification on the implementation of the decision that in some points might lead to confusion. The IWF is among those IFs where the Entry List is subject to changes following the eligibility check. As soon the IWF receives the relevant answers, information and clarification, the IWF Executive Board will issue the final decision on the eligibility of the Russian weightlifters.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PUBLIC DISCLOSURES4 27.07.2016

The IWF reports that as a consequence of the IOC’s reanalyses of samples from the 2012 London Olympic Games (IOC – wave 2), the samples of the following Athletes have returned Adverse Analytical Findings:

  • ZAIROV, Intigam (AZE) – Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • ZABOLOTNAYA, Nataliya (RUS) – Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • TSIREKIDZE, Rauli (GEO) – Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone, Stanozolol (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • UTESHOV, Almas (KAZ) – Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone, Stanozolol (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • TZARUKAEVA, Svetlana (RUS) – Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • SIMSEK, Sibel (TUR) – Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone, Stanozolol (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • KULESHA, Iryna (BLR) – Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone, Stanozolol (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • KHURSHUDYAN, Hripsime (ARM) – Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone, Stanozolol (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • IVANOV, Alexandr (RUS) – Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (S1.1 Anabolic agents), Tamoxifen (S4. Hormone and metabolic modulators)
  • IOVU, Cristina (MDA) – Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (S1.1 Anabolic agents)
  • DEMANOV, Andrey (RUS) – Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (S1.1 Anabolic agents)

In line with the relevant rules and regulations, the IWF imposed mandatory provisional suspensions upon the Athletes, who remain provisionally suspended in view of potential anti-doping rule violations until their cases are closed. Following the IOC’s decisions, the IWF will be in a position to take over the results management of these cases. Should it be determined in any of the cases that no anti-doping violation was committed, the relevant decision shall also be published.

 

The IWF will not make any further comments on the cases until they are closed.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IWF EB decision on Russian participation at the Rio 2016 OG 29.07.2016

he IWF Executive Board decided today to ban the Russian Weightlifting Federation from recommending/entering/participating with athletes and Technical Official at Rio Olympic Games 2016.

The decision is effective as of today.

The IWF Executive Board carefully studied question of the participation of Russian weightlifters in the Olympic Games Rio. The study included the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)’s Independent Person (IP) Report by Prof. Richard McLaren,

  • IOC decision concerning the participation of Russian athletes in the Olympic Games in Rio 2016,
  • Statistics (Re-analytical cases from the Beijing and London Olympic Games), Anti-Doping statistics concerning the Russian athletes,
  • IWF Anti-Doping Policy,
  • WADA Code,
  • Olympic Charter,
  • IOC, WADA communications
  •  

According to the IOC decision concerning the participation of Russian athletes in the Olympic Games in Rio 2016, which set the eligibility criteria for the Russian athletes to participate at the Games the IWF Executive Board evaluated the nominated athletes’ eligibility. 8 (Eight) athletes were nominated by the Russian Olympic Committee (ROC) to compete in the Rio Olympic Games weightlifting events. Ms. Tatiana Kashirina’s and Ms. Anastasiia Romanova’s nominations were withdrawn by the ROC due to prior anti-doping rule violations. Four (4) additional athletes were listed in the McLaren Report as beneficiaries of the Disappearing Positive Methodology System.

 

According to the IOC decision “the IFs to examine the information contained in the IP Report and for such purpose seek from WADA the names of athletes and National Federations (NFs) implicated. Nobody implicated, be it an athlete, an official, or an NF, may be accepted for entry or accreditation for the Olympic Games.” The implication of athletes in the IP Report has been made ineligibility criteria by the IOC; no further action or decision is required from the IWF in this regard.

 

Furthermore, according to the latest IOC decision:

“Under these exceptional circumstances, Russian athletes in any of the 28 Olympic summer sports have to assume the consequences of what amounts to a collective responsibility in order to protect the credibility of the Olympic competitions, and the “presumption of innocence” cannot be applied to them. On the other hand, according to the rules of natural justice, individual justice, to which every human being is entitled, has to be applied. This means that each affected athlete must be given the opportunity to rebut the applicability of collective responsibility in his or her individual case.”

 

Further to the above, we would like to highlight the extremely shocking and disappointing statistics regarding the Russian weightlifters:

As of today there are 7 confirmed AAFs for Russian weightlifters from the combined reanalysis process of London and Beijing, while the second wave of Beijing reanalyses is not yet in a stage when the names and countries involved can be publicly disclosed. The IOC asked the International Federations to “apply their respective rules in relation to the sanctioning of entire NFs.“ According to Article 12.4 of the IWF Anti-Doping Policy,„If any Member Federation or members or officials thereof, by reason of conduct connected with or associated with doping or anti-doping rule violations, brings the sport of weightlifting into disrepute, the IWF Executive Board may, in its discretion, take such action as it deems fit to protect the reputation and integrity of the sport.“The IWF Executive Board confirmed that the Russian Weightlifting Federation and Russian weightlifters brought the weightlifting sport into disrepute.In the light of the above, the Executive Board decided to withdraw the appointment of the Russian Technical Official from the Rio2016 Olympic Games.

 

The integrity of the weightlifting sport has been seriously damaged on multiple times and levels by the Russians, therefore an appropriate sanction was applied in order to preserve the status of the sport.

According to the Reallocation Policy, the Executive Board decided to offer the available Quota place to athletes from the following NOCs:

Women ALB, GEO, MDA
Men BEL, CRO, ESA, MGL, SRB

All athletes beneficiating from this last minute Reallocation were tested in the Qualification Period and are subject to further testing before participation.

 

 

 

Edited by amiry2j
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • When? I remember this is a joke about this great job 
    • The same thing happened after Turin 2006. That hall later was never used for skating competitions again, only the Indoor ECH in athletics was organized there once in 2009 and that was it. After that it was only used for commercial fairs etc. It will be the same with Milan. Regarding the indoor arena in Collalbo, it was a great idea to make it an Italian center of skating sports for many years: good location, high altitude, tourist town. Well, but according to the organizers, it`s not worth doing it, but why? Why is`t not worth doing anything here but Germany has a similar track in Inzell and it is possible there? They should hire a good manager who will develop a plan for them to make it worth doing. The same is with the bobsleigh track in Cortina. It was also not worth renovating it and if Salvini's and other big politics and determination hadn`t come into it, the competition would probably have been in Austria or St. Moritz.   The cooperation with the Netherlands is probably only supposed to concern short track. Besides, this cooperation will not do anything if we don`t have at least one indoor track for training in the summer and early autumn. The Dutch Federation isn`t a charity and will not build us infrastructure for free so that we can train on it. There are no miracles. It`s probably more about taking advantage of the opportunity to train with someone like Fontana, who is a legend in short track. After 2026 this cooperation will end, when she leaves.
    • For Ghiotto to win 2 golds at the Olympics, he would have to be the second van der Poel or Sablikova in they pick of form. You have to be a genius to beat this whole coalition of Norwegians, Dutchmen etc. However, I don't see that much talent in him. I'd like to be wrong, but I'm afraid that he'll end up with some silver-bronze in the 10 km and that's it. If he starts losing to Eitrem now, who is 22 years old, it won't bode well for the future, and there's also Roest + maybe another Dutchman will jump out. Generally, our team is poorly prepared for this season and it's not like Ghiotto is on individual training on the moon and has just come down to earth and will now win everything while the rest of the team are in terrible form. Of course, the lack of form of Bosa or Trentini means e.g. 20th place, not 10th, but for Ghiotto it could mean 4/5 place, instead of 1st. It's the same with the team. For today, the only positive performance for us is Lollobrigida's 2nd place in the b category of the women's 1500 meters and Fontana's solid performance in the same event. The rest is terrible.
    • Costantini & Mosaner will back to play together for the frist time since Beijing 2022 Our NOC and Federation do an amazing work.
    • Right now I’m watching Scotland-Switzerland at the European Curling Championships, even though Germany-Norway would probably be a more interesting game… (can’t find any streaming options for it)   At 4:00am Scotland-Italy in the women’s bronze medal match, and at 9:00am TBD-TBD in the men’s bronze medal match   We’ll see if I’ll have enough time for the Davis Cup, Women’s/Men’s Slalom WC Gurgul, Skeleton WC Yanqing, BPT Challenge Chennai, BWF China Masters, WTT Finals Fukuoka, GSOC Kioti National, Freestyle Skiing WC Beijing, Alpine Skiing WC Killington, Moguls WC Ruka   Also will be following along with the Canadian Curling Olympic Mixed Doubles Qualifier, UCI Champions League Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Open Water WC Neom, Luge WC Lillehammer/Cross Country WC Ruka, Ski Jumping WC Ruka   Friday (November 22) 4:30 PM: NBA - Warriors v. Pelicans 8:00 PM: ISU Speed Skating World Cup Nagano - Day 2 10:00 PM: European Curling Championships - Women’s Gold Medal Match   Saturday (November 23) 5:00 AM: European Curling Championships - Men’s Gold Medal Match 4:00 PM: NHL - Canucks v. Senators 8:00 PM: ISU Speed Skating World Cup Nagano - Day 3   Sunday (November 24)   Monday (November 25) 7:00 PM: NBA - Warriors v. Nets   Tuesday (November 26) 4:00 PM: NHL - Canucks v. Bruins   Wednesday (November 27) 4:30 PM: NHL - Canucks v. Penguins 7:00 PM: NBA - Warriors v. Thunder   Thursday (November 28)   Friday (November 29) 1:00 AM: ISU Speed Skating WC Beijing - Day 1 10:00 AM: UCI Track Cycling Nations League Apeldoorn - Day 1 12:00 PM: NHL - Canucks v. Sabres
    • As far as I am concerned, there are two very simple problems: infrastructure and the lack of cooperation between sports federations. Let me explain. The MiCo2026 Olympics will provide virtually no legacy in ice sports, there is still a lack of an indoor hall, there is no federal centre that has been promised for so many years. It could have been an opportunity to make a nice roof in Baselga di Pinè, but instead they preferred to make temporary facilities in Rho.   The second problem is the total lack of cooperation between roller skating and speed skating, we have a huge pool and we are not exploiting it. Fortunately we are doing a few small collegiate events, the technical collaboration with the Netherlands absolutely must be exploited.   I am not so negative however about the current situation, Ghiotto practically on the 10k seems to be off the scale (watch out for the Czech and Norwegian) and he can medal in the 5k and drag the pursuit team. In the mass start you have more cards in both the men's and women's, let's see what Fontana does. And a Fontana-Peveri-Lollobrigida pursuit team can also play for a third place
    • Canada Team Size Prediction for Winter Olympic Games 2026 Milano Cortina   Ski Sports   Alpine Skiing  (13) - That's been the team size the last couple of Olympics so it's a safe bet again. Cross Country Skiing  (10) - Not too familiar with the qualification system. Probably around 6 men and 4 women. Ski Jumping  (5) - Loutitt, Strate and Maurer for sure on the women's side. Possibly a 4th will qualify. On the men's side, if Bowd-Clowes returns, then he should also qualify. Nordic Combined  (0) - Been a nonexistent sport for a while. No athletes competing in the World Cup or Continental Cup. Freestyle Skiing  (32) - Should qualify a team in mixed aerials which means a maximum team size of 32 athletes. Which athletes in which disciplines to be determined. Snowboarding  (24) - Full teams in slopestyle and big air. Then somewhere between 1-4 athletes in the other disciplines. Biathlon  (6) - Based on the Nations Cup last year, the men finished outside the top 20 and wouldn't qualify a relay team (and that's without Russia and Belarus). With Christian Gow's retirement, that makes things even more difficult. Women's relay should still qualify though. Ski Mountaineering  (1) - Gonna be optimistic here and say that one athlete will qualify either through the World Rankings or continental quota.     Skating Sports   Speed Skating  (16) - 7 to 8 men, 8 to 9 women. For now, I'll say 8 of each gender. Short Track Speed Skating  (10) - Full team size. With the current skill level of the team, anything else would be a tragedy. Figure Skating  (12) - Most likely 1 man (I hope) and 1 woman, then 2-3 pairs and 2-3 ice dance couples. For now, let's say 2 in pairs and 3 in ice dance.     Sleigh Sports   Luge  (7) - 2 women + 1 entry in each of the other disciplines Skeleton  (4) - 1 or 2 men + 2 or 3 women Bobsleigh  (14) - 2 men's crews (in both events) and 3 women's crews (in both events)     Team Sports   Curling  (12) - Full team or else you might as well burn the federation to the ground. Ice Hockey  (48) - Both men's and women's teams already qualified       Total Optimistic Prediction  -  (229) Total Pessimistic Prediction  - (184)   Total Realistic Prediction  -  (214)
    • Besides, I think Eitrem will be better than Ghiotto. You can see it after 1500 meters. He is younger. The whole Norwegian team is also in great shape. You just have to look at the team Norway has, how many new and young skaters there are and in our group A there is one Trentini, who takes last place. In every winter sport we invest too little money to be counted.   If Eitrem has the same form over long distances as he does over 1500 metres, he will dominate this season, not Ghiotto or Roest.
    • Looking at last season's 1st World Cup, it's worse for now and it should be the other way around. Bosa out of shape, Trentini weak. Both will drop to a lower group. It's similar to skeleton, i.e. regression instead of progress. I hope this doesn't mean Ghiotto is also in weaker form, because it could end up with 0 podiums this weekend.
×
×
  • Create New...